Visual Research Methods
Beittel, K. (1973). Alternatives for art education research: Inquiries into the making of art. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Cochran, L. M., Younghouse, P. C., Sorflaten, J. W., & Molek, R. A. (1980). Exploring approaches to researching visual literacy. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28, 243-266.
Collier, J. Jr., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
de Lauretis, T. (1984). Alice doesn't: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana Univeristy Press.
Denizen, N. (1991). Images of postmodern society: Social theory and contemporary cinema. London, Newbury Park, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Edwards, E. (Ed.). (1992). Anthropology and photography 1860-1920. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Emme, M. (1991). Feminist film theory and art education. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 11, 68-85.
Feld, S. & Williams, C. (1975). Toward a researchable film language. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 2.(1), 25-32.
Finke, R. A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 236-259.
Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. London, Sydney and Wellington: Unwin Hyman.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York: Harper & Row. (Reprinted, 1986, Boston: Northeastern University Press)
Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion, a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Heider, K. G. (1976). Ethnographic Film. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Hochberg, J. E. (1982). Visual interest in picture-text combination: Final report for the period February 1, 1980 - January 31, 1982. New York: Columbia University.
Hockings, P. (1975). Principles of visual anthropology. The Hague: Mouton.
Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univeristy Press.
Howze, W. C. (1988). The influence of western painting and genre painting on the films of John Ford. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, A48/10, 2475.
Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
Keifer-Boyd, K. (1993). An exploratory study of nonverbal digital video interactive analytic techniques. In M. Zurmuehlen, (Ed.), Working Papers in Art Education, Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Langer, S. (1982). Meaning and visual metaphor. Studies in Art Education, 23, 2.
Mead, M., & Bateson, G. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis (Special Publications, II). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. (Reissued, 1962)
Miller, P. W. (1988). Nonverbal comunication: What research says to the teacher (3rd ed.). Washington D. C.: National Education Association.
Nichols, B. (1991). Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Rollins, M. (1989). Mental imagery: On the limits of cognitive science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shepard, R. N. (1975). Form, formation, and transformation of internal representations. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sorenson, E. R. (1975). Visual records, human knowledge, and the future. In P. Hockings (Ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (pp. 463-476). Chicago: Mouton Publishers.
Thomas, T. (1991). Interart analogy: Practice and theory in comparing the arts. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 25(2), 17-36.
Worth, S. & Adair, J. (1975). Through Navajo eyes: An exploration in film communication and anthropology, (3rd printing). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Zavarzadeh, M. (1992). "Pun(k) deconstruction and the postmodern imagination," Cultural Critique (Fall): 5-44.