What is instructional technology? Whenever I introduced myself as an instructional
systems major to someone I just met, they always asked me what this major was
about. If I used the term "instructional technology" to explain what
the instructional systems is, they seemed to come to an understanding of what
I study for my major. They immediately related the instructional technology
to the web-based instruction, educational CD-ROMs, and computers. We need to
understand that the use of the machine is only one aspect of the technology.
Solomon (2000) pointed out that "alternative perspectives in our field
assume a broader interpretation of technology as the systematic application
of all sources of organized knowledge." Based on this viewpoint, technology
consists the products, the artifacts such as machines and tools, as well as
the processes, the ways of doing things such as strategies and techniques.
It is from this view of a broader interpretation that Seels and Richey (1994)
defined the field of instructional technology, i.e. "the theory and practice
of design, development, utilization, management and evaluation of processes
and resources for learning." Their definition reflects the evolution of
instructional technology from a movement to a field and a profession and the
contributions this field has made to theory and practice.
Different terms have been used to represent the field. Schrock (1995) used
the term instructional development as a broader context for her description
of the history of the field; Reiser (2001) used the term instructional design
and technology to define the field. To Shrock (1995), instructional development
is "a self-correcting, systems approach that seeks to apply scientifically
derived principles to the planning, design, creation, implementation, and evaluation
of effective and efficient instruction"; To Reiser (2001), "the field
of instructional design and technology encompasses the analysis of learning
and performance problems, and the design, development, implementation, evaluation
and management of instructional and non-instructional processes and resources
intended to improve learning and performance in a variety of settings, particularly
educational institutions and the workplace." Both terms encompass the same
broader scope of the field as the term instructional technology.
The following descriptions of the historical development of the field of instructional
technology incorporated Reiser's and Shrock's thoughts.
| Before 1920's |
Instruction
was interpreted in the metaphor of exercise, in which the mind was thought
to consist of faculties in need of exercise
The
advent of scientific investigation into human and animal learning
Edward
Thorndike's influence of laws of learning, his advocacy of social engineering,
his advocacy of educational measurements. It led to establish education
as a science
|
| 1920's |
Bobbitt:
the goals for schooling could be derived from an objective analysis
of those skills necessary for successful living·
The
design of instruction was the connection between the desirable outcomes
and the planning of the instructional experience that could facilitate
their acquisition.
The
emergence of the concepts of objectives, individualized instruction
and mastery learning
|
| 1930's |
Tyler's
Eight Year Study: refining the procedures for writing instructional
objectives; recognizing the cyclical nature of evaluation within the
process of creating instruction designed to produced specific outcomes,
i.e. the recognition of the formative evaluation process
|
| 1940's |
World
War II: the creation and distribution of the mediated learning materials
A
large number of psychologists and educators were called on to conduct
research and develop training materials for the military services. Development
of training materials were based on their work on instructional principles
derived from research and theory on instruction, learning and human
behavior.
- Robert Gagne
- Leslie Briggs
- John Flanagen
Psychologists
used their knowledge of evaluation and testing to help assess the skills
of trainees and select the individuals who were most likely to benefit
from particular training programs à examining general intellectual,
psychomotor and perceptual skills
Research
and development effort directed toward education.
Emergence
of the role of the instructional technologist; formation of the basic
instructional development team: designer, SME and producer calling for
professional development of a new field
|
| 1950's |
Skinner's
research into operant conditioning
Skinner's
programmed instruction: behavioral objectives, small frames of instruction,
self-pacing, active learner response to inserted question, immediate
feedback.
Shifting
education's focus to the outcome behavior of the learner instead of
the process of the behavior of the teacher.
Reaffirming
the feasibility of a self-pacing and mastery learning· Task analysis
was first used by Air Force personnel in the early 1950s.
Bloom's
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956)
|
| 1960's |
Articulation
of the components of instructional systems and the recognition of their
systems properties
Robert Gagné's
The conditions of Learning (1965): a milestone that elaborated the analysis
of learning objectives and the relationship between different classes
of learning objectives and appropriate instructional designs
- 1965: Robert Gagné's The conditions of learning: five domains
of learning outcomes: verbal information, intellectual skills, psychomotor
skills, attitudes, and cognitive strategies - each of which required
a different set of conditions to promote learning
- Gagne's nine events of instruction: "Gagne's working the area
of learning hierarchies and hierarchical analysis also has had a significant
impact on the instructional design field
Gagne indicted that
skills within the intellectual skills domain have a hierarchical relationship
to each other, so that in order to readily learn to perform a superordinate
skill, one would first have to master the skill subordinate to it.
This concept leads to the important notion that instruction should
be designed so as to ensure that learners acquire subordinate skills
before they attempt to acquire superordinate ones." (Reiser,
2001). A learning task analysis or instructional task analysis for
identifying subordinate skills becomes a key feature in many instructional
design models.
The
essential features of systems, i.e. evaluation and feedback resulted
in the refinement of evaluation procedures, developing criterion-referenced
measures
Federal
support of the instructional development: in 1957, after the launching
of Sptunik by the Soviet Union, the USA government poured millions of
dollars into improving math and science education. The instructional
materials developed with these funds were usually written by the subject
matter experts and produced without tryouts with learners.
In
the mid-1960, Michael Scriven (1967) pointed to the need to try out
drafts of instructional materials with learners prior to the time and
the materials were in their final form. Scriven indicated that this
process would enable educators to evaluate the effectiveness of materials
while they were still in their formative stages and, if necessary, revise
them before they were produced in their final form. Scriven named this
tryout and revision process "formative evaluation", and contrasted
it with what he labeled "summative evaluation", the testing
of instructional materials after they are in their final form.
The
broadening of the field of audiovisual instruction to embrace the larger
concept of instructional development and technology.
|
| 1970's |
A
decade of consolidation: Proliferation of ID models
Addition
of needs assessment to the collection of steps that defined the ID process
The
field reached out to the literature of consulting and change agents
for information to assist with its growing complexity· Graduate
education programs focusing on instructional systems design grew
Existing
associations of professionals were redefined: DAVI became AECT; publication
of Journal of instructional development
|
| 1980's |
The instructional application s of microcomputers have come to dominate
Performance technology
movement, with its emphasis on front-end analysis, on-the-job performance,
business results, and non-instructional solutions to performance problems,
was beginning to have an effect on instructional design practice (Rosenberg,
1988, 1990; Rossett, 1990)
The
growth in the utilization of instructional development by business and
other non-school agencies
Merrill,
Li and Jones (1990) discussed the need to develop new models of instructional
design to accommodate the interactive capabilities of this technology
à computers began to be used as tools to automate dome instructional
design tasks
|
| 1990's |
The
influence of the performance technology movement: broadening the scope
of the instructional design field to include analysis of the causes
of performance problems and non-instructional solution
Growing
interest in constructivism. The instructional principles includes:
- Solve complex and realist problems
- Examine the problems from multiple perspectives
- Take ownership of the learning process
- Become aware of their own role in the knowledge construction process
(Driscoll, 2000)
- How consideration of constructivist principles can enhance instructional
design practices (Coleman, Perry and Schwen, 1997; Dick, 1996; Lebow,
1993; Lin et al., 1996).
Use
and development of electronic performance support systems (computer-based
systems designed to provide workers with the help they need to perform
certain job tasks, at the time they need that help, and in a form that
will be most helpful)
- Information base
- Intelligent coaching and expert advisement systems
- Customized performance support tools that automate and greatly simplify
many job tasks
Rapid
prototyping: this design technique has been advocated as a means of
producing quality instructional materials in less time than is required
when more conventional instructional design techniques are employed
- The rapid prototyping process involves quickly developing a prototype
product in the very early stages of an instructional design project
- Then going through a series of rapid tryout and revision cycles
until an acceptable version of the product is produced (Gustafson
& Branch, 1997a; Jones and Richey, 2000)
Use
of the Internet for distance learning
- The programs cannot be online replicas of the instruction delivered
in classrooms; instead such programs must be carefully designed in
light of the instructional features that can, and cannot, be incorporated
into Internet-based courses
Knowledge
Management§ Rossett (1999): knowledge management involves identifying,
documenting, and disseminating explicit and tactic knowledge within
an organization in order to improve the performance of that organization.
- Current-day technologies such as database programs, groupware, and
intranets allow organizations to "manage" (i.e. collect,
filter, and disseminate) such knowledge and expertise in ways that
were not previously possible.
- Rosenberg (2001): designing training programs vs. creating knowledge
management systems
- Rossett and Donello (1999): instructional designers and other training
professionals not only will be responsible for improving human performance,
but also will be responsible for locating and improving access to
useful organizational knowledge.
- Reiser (2001) the growing interest in knowledge management is likely
to change and perhaps expand the types of tasks instructional designers
are expected to undertake.
|
References:
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part
II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and
Development, 49 (2), 57-67.
Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The
definition and domains of the field. Washington, D. C.: Association of Education
Communications and Technology.
Shrock, S. A. (1995). A brief history of instructional development. In G. J.
Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past present and future (Second
ed., pp. 11-18). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
Solomon, D. (2000). Toward a post-modern agenda in instruction technology.
Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48 (4), 5-20.