Unity Connection 7.x

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Connection has entered the enterprise messaging arena, oddly enough, competing with its sister product, Cisco Unity.

Like Penn State, a number of other large Cisco VoIP installations have deployed Unity to meet the enterprise needs but don't use or want the Exchange-based unified messaging.

Some notes I got from commentary at CIPTUG today...

  • 10,000 users per server (7,500 if IMAP enabled)
  • Linux platform - same OS and voice layer as appliance-model Communications Manager
  • Active/active failover instead of active/passive
  • IMAP integration puts a mail folder appearance on your IMAP e-mail linked directly to Unity Connection. Same effect as Unity unified messaging. Hey, ASET offers IMAP now, free. Hmm.

Until now, Connection was not a contender for enterprise-level voicemail because it didn't scale to our size. Now I think it's worth a fresh look.

Data sheet

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/26668

Leave a comment

August 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Contact Me


AIM: TNS BillS

View William Simon's profile on LinkedIn

Donate

Make a gift
Like this blog? Support education and research at Penn State by donating any amount to an area of your choice.

Subscribe

Blogroll

Disclaimer

We are Penn State, but I am not. Opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not represent the opinions of The Pennsylvania State University or any division therein, including but not limited to the author's workgroup, department, administrative unit, or campus. Technologies and ideas discussed on this blog do not describe a production service unless noted.