Criteria
|
Flexibility
Adaptive Instructional Designs
|
|
Primary
Contributors
|
Daniel L Schwartz, Xiaodong Lin, Sean Brophy,
John D. Bransford
|
|
Reference
|
(Schwartz, Lin, Brophy, & Bransford, 1999)
|
|
Goals
|
To teach a deep understanding of disciplines;
to foster the skills of problem solving, collaboration &
communication
|
|
General
Characteristics
|
·
constructivist type approach
·
stakeholder participation in systemic learning
·
more customized and holistic than other cognitive
approaches
·
10 steps
- Look
ahead & reflect back - holistic look at what is to be
learned
- Initial
challenge – motivating challenge to develop a group mental
model
- Generate
ideas – make thoughts explicit so the teacher and learners can
assess current knowledge level
- Multiple
perspectives – learn about solving the problem from experts
- Research
& revise – exposing learners to other resources and
information
- Test
your mettle – formative assessment provides a barometer for
knowledge level and motivation for further research &
revision of problem solution
- Go
public – learners present their solutions and leave a legacy
- Progressive
deepening – provides cycles of challenges that build on
previous knowledge, problem-based to project based
- General
reflection & decisions about legacies – learners look at
where they started and how much they have learned
·
Assessment - summative
assessment of goals and objectives
|
|
What
is Knowledge?
|
|
|
Type
of Learning
|
all domains can be involved
higher-order thinking
inquiry
|
|
Control
of Learning
|
learner-centered
facilitated by instructor
stakeholder group involved in the design of
curriculum
|
|
Focus
of Learning
|
problem/project based learning
|
|
Grouping
for Learning
|
usually project groups or whole class depending
on the availability of resources (computers)
|
|
Interactions
for Learning
|
Problem-based learning à
open-ended project-based learning
teacher facilitates, outside research,
collaborative reflection and discussion
|
|
Support
for Learning
|
multiple perspectives, in-class and outside
resources, self-reflection, formative assessments
|
|
Relevant
use to K-12 Education
|
This theory would be perfect for the K-12
environment if there were more hours in the school day and less
mandated content to be covered. It would provide students with
the chance to become life long learners by developing the skills
necessary such as self-inquiry, seeking multiple perspectives,
working collaboratively, creating a mental models and goal setting.
|
|
Relevant
research
|
|