PENN STATE
TEACHER EDUCATION – PORTFOLIO RUBRIC
|
Indicator |
Exemplary 20 Points Maximum |
Acceptable 16 Points Maximum |
Unacceptable 13 Points Maximum |
CompletenessPoints: ________ |
Clearly organized around
Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. Table of contents clearly
identifies all entries. The identified
artifacts thoroughly support organization categories. Introductory information is provided. |
The four domains in
Danielson’s Framework for Teaching are evident. Table of contents
identifies the portfolio’s entries.
The identified artifacts generally support organization
categories. |
Organization does not
follow Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. Table of contents is
briefly presented and gives an overview of the entries. Shows limited relationship between
artifacts and organization categories. |
PresentationPoints:
________ |
Presented with professional appearance and a logical sequence Accurate table of contents Tab dividers to delineate sections Creative, attracts reviewer’s attention Concisely
presented |
Organized in a logical
sequential presentation of the required elements Generally attractive Some variety in displayed artifacts Contains limited extraneous material |
Lacks logical/sequential
organization of required elements Relies heavily on narrative exhibits Show little creativity or imagination Duplicate and/or extraneous
material
is included |
ConstructionMechanics Usage Points: ________ |
Final-form written products
are professionally polished and refined to communicate with some degree of
sophistication in style and content |
Final-form products
effectively communicate to the reviewer |
Final-form written products
contain enough surface errors (in mechanics, organization, word-choice,
grammar, and so on) to inhibit effective communication to the reviewer. |
|
Appropriate variety
of candidate’s academic work Points: ________ |
Exceeds minimum variety of
candidate’s work: four core subject areas and additional subject areas
(elementary) or major discipline specific content areas (secondary) are
represented by one or more pieces of evidence linked to planning and
preparation, classroom environment, and instructional delivery. |
Contains minimum variety of
candidate’s work: four core subject areas (elementary) or several major
discipline specific content areas (secondary) are represented by at least one
piece of evidence linked to planning and preparation, classroom environment,
and instructional delivery. |
Contains less than the
minimum variety of candidate’s work:
fewer than four core subject areas (elementary) or a few major
discipline specific content areas (secondary) are represented, or there is
limited evident linkage to planning and preparation, classroom environment,
and instructional delivery. |
|
Reflection sheets
are complete and connect the evidence to one or more categories Points: ________ |
Reflection sheets are
thoroughly developed and connect artifacts to organizational
category(s). Clearly connects
student’s performance to instruction, and otherwise defines the importance of
the artifacts. |
Reflection
sheets generally connect artifacts to organizational category(s), and
provides some evidence of why
the associated artifacts are included. |
Missing or incomplete
reflective sheets and/or limited or no connection of artifacts to
organizational category(s). Little or
no discussion of the importance of rationale for including artifacts. |
Organization Categories:
Planning and Preparation Classroom
Environment Instructional
Delivery Professionalism
Candidate’s Name Date Score/Grade