A matter of perspective.

| 6 Comments | No TrackBacks

There are times in your life when you want so very desperately for something to happen, that you get caught up in the emotion of the moment. This is one of those times. I've been quiet on the social media front the second half of this week and I'm sure that it raises a few eyebrows--after all, I'm not what you would call the quiet type. But I've been processing the results of the last several interviews for the social media position for which I've been competing. As much as we all wanted it to happen, in the end they don't believe I'm the right fit for the job.

RiP - A Remix Manifesto

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks


It pretty much speaks for itself, making points Lessig has made before. But every time I see something like this, it begs the greater question: Why do we create, why do we share, if we don't really want anyone to see it, think about it, be moved by it? Like social media, it becomes a matter of letting go of our supposed need to control and, instead embracing the engagement. You cannot have the good without the bad, the conversation without a voice.

It always makes me think. 

http://www.dontpaniconline.com/magazine/rip-a-remix-manifesto



(via Stuff)

Squeeee!

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks
2ndround.jpg

Squeeee! Happy Friday, indeed!

Why do I tweet?

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks
Jeff Swain, my colleague here at ETS, is doing his doctoral research in informal learning spaces and how they influence identity. He's recorded a short video explaining his thoughts, and then he asks for viewers to create--and post--a short reply. It took me over a dozen tries, and while I've given up on short, sweet, and erudite, I've finally captured something in the way of intelligence and posted my thoughts on why I use twitter. Perhaps they are coherent. More likely not. But hey, sometimes that's just how I roll.


And now I ask you -- why do you tweet?


Push and pull.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Robin2Note: This is a blogpost I wrote--and then sat on--after watching the destruction that was danah boyd's keynote speech at Web 2.0 Expo on Nov 17, 2009. I was horrified to watch this happen to such an amazing speaker, because I truly felt it was devastatingly undeserved. I'm publishing it now because 1) enough time has passed that it is no longer has the kind of sting it did initially; 2) perhaps now that the brouhaha has died down, it can be heard and have some relevance; and 3) it actually feeds into a panel discussion I will be a part of at this year's Web 2010 Conference, which I hope you attend. Not because I'm really that excited to be dancing in front of a big audience, but with the explosion of social media, I strongly feel we need to address the broader picture of the backchannel's contribution to conferences and events. I will also tell you that until an hour ago, I had not read danah's own analysis of what went wrong because I did not want it to color my own thoughts and observations. Having said that, I've now read her post, and I'm even more convinced that we need to understand how the crowd in the cloud and the sage on the stage can coexist to create an environment of engagement, respect, and conversation. It's about the openness of the dialogue, folks, and we need to do it better than we do it now. 

I welcome your thoughts. 

You haven't seem much of me online today. I've been taking care of business on my end. Of course, you say, but there's always time to drop a tweet or two. True enough. And here I am, whispering in your ear before I go to the next order of business. Because there's a special event this afternoon I'm just dying to tell you about. Remember that job I was applying for involving social media?

I've got an interview for it this afternoon.

Rock star badges.

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks
This year's Symposium is only five weeks away, and I'm starting to feel the excitement. Being on the inside of the event is, in some ways, a real eye opener, if only to see just how finely tuned this production is. The attention to details is amazing, and I'm really starting to get a sense of just why it takes so many people to make this event the milestone it is each year.

nameBadge.jpgOne of the pieces I've been a part of is the creation of the new name badges. Not your typical conference badges, these are sleek black badges with the Penn State shield in silver, and my name as I want it to appear. Nice, huh? These are permanent badges that can then be used at any Penn State events we attend. But what I really love about them is this: one side shows my Penn State professional side with the shield and my name, while the other side reflects my social side--the event hashtag (#psutlt) and my Twitter ID, @robin2go. No worries if an attendee doesn't have a Twitter ID, but I like the fact that I can add it if I have one, because then people can see my online ID and connect with me that way. What's more, the social side has space for our event moo stickers, which have become a tradition at the symposium for several years. Once we check into the registration desk, we'll have the opportunity to choose the stickers that reflect our participation in our community. Podcasting? There's a sticker for that. Openness, collaboration? There's stickers for those, too. Or perhaps you're a fan of a particular Teaching and Learning with Technology event. There will be stickers for those as well. 

Clearly, I'm excited about these badges. You can be too--just head on over to the Customize Your Badge page and fill out three questions. That's all there is to it. And when we get to the Symposium, we'll all be looking like rock stars.

(via TLT Symposium News)

Faceplant.

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks
I have just responded to two blog posts today about different aspects of Facebook. I think it is time I talk about it here. I don't normally address Facebook for a very simple reason.

I hate Facebook. Really.

Facebook, to me, is high school all over again. I was not popular and didn't get to hang with the incrowds. In fact, I was worse than a nerd. I was smart, I moved around a lot, I was always the new kid, and teachers LOVED me. You can't put a bigger "loser" target on someone in high school. So I was basically a loner, always on the outside, and not really interested in looking in.

Thank god I got to graduate and move on.
The Geospatial Revolution Project

http://geospatialrevolution.psu.edu/index.html

georev.jpg

This is the first time I've seen this promotional video on an upcoming public media series from Penn State Public Broadcasting. When I was completing my IST degree I had a focus on GIS, and as a result, had both Dave DiBiase and Richard Alley as instructors. I believe this is eye opening research for many in the public sector, and perhaps one of the most appealing things to me is that this project is a web-based serial release of video episodes, which will then be woven together into a 60 minute documentary. Educational public media distributed online, combined with an outreach initiative in collaboration with educational partners.

How much more collaborative and open can educational teaching and learning with technology get?


(via Stuff)

Authentic Robin2go.

| 17 Comments | 2 TrackBacks
I'm applying for a job this week. It's one I would be good at. Heck, let's be real: it's one I'd kill for. It's about cultivating communities using social networks here at Penn State, and the position is shared across three entities: the College of Liberal Arts, the Rock Ethics Institute, and Education Technology Services, where I currently work part time. I'm up against stiff competition: two very smart, very capable candidates who are also two very close friends. Not an enviable position, let me assure you. They both have strengths that are specific to their backgrounds, have a lot of experience presenting at conferences, and can probably spell pedagogy and use it correctly in a sentence. At first glance, you might well ask, why even try? 

Why indeed.