August 2008 Archives
Dr. Samuel Prescott (19 Aug 1751 - ?) was the 1st cousin to my 5th great-grandmother Ann Prescott Heywood. (For any Putnams reading this, you read it correctly; he is most closely related through the Heywood side of the family not the Prescott side of the family.) My grandmother had a much fuller speech on this ride that she delivered to her DAR chapter. But I don't know where that got to.
After I first posted this, Uncle Bob sent me the following addition via e-mail. - Your Dr. Sam Prescott story reminded me that I'd never shared with you the same incident as related in Allen French's book "The Day of Lexington & Concord". pp 91ff:
"In the meantime, (William) Dawes [another relative of ours, via the same branch by which Cal Coolidge enters, as I recall, but Nancy can confirm] having arrived (at the Clarke house in Lexington) Revere had set out again with him to alarm Concord. They were overtaken by a young Doctor Samuel Prescott (a Concord man who had been calling on his sweetheart in Lexington) whom they found to be a "high son of Liberty". As they rode Revere told his companions of his experience with the two officers, and his belief that still others were on the road before them. Nevertheless, they went on, arranging to alarm every house, Prescott willingly helping them, and useful because he knew the people. As Revere expected, he came upon more officers; it was when he was again alone, the others having stayed to alarm a house. Seeing before him two officers, as he thought, he called to his friends to come up: "there were two, & we would have them." In an instant he was surrounded by four, and! when young Prescott came up, the officers, with drawn pistols and emphatic oaths and threats, forced them to go through a pair of bars, which had been let down, into a pasture. [this spot is now marked by a tablet]
"When we had got in, Mr. Prescott said "put on,"" and taking to the left, while Revere took to the right, jumped his horse over allow stone wall, and escaped. Revere had no such luck. Observing a small wood, he spurred for that, intending to leap from his horse and escape on foot; but when he reached it, out started six officers, who seized his bridle, and at the muzzle of their pistols made him dismount.
Some of his captors abused him much; later, he said, they insulted him, calling him rebel, which we do not consider as much of an insult as did he. But one of his captors was a gentleman, questioned him courteously, recognized his name, and played a game of bluff with Revere, at which the Yankee had the better. "He said...they were only waiting for some deserters they expected down the road: I told them I knew better, I knew what they were after; that I had alarmed the country all the way up, that their Boats were catch'd aground, and I should have 500 men there soon."
Surprised, these officers called their leader from the road, Major Mitchel of the 5th Regiment. His questions getting no better answer from Revere, he ordered his whole party to the road, and with them Revere and four other prisoners who now appeared from the bushes. These were Solomon Brown, Hancock's messenger to Concord, and two other Lexington men; having fallen into the officer's ambush, they had waited here some two hours. The fourth man was a harmless peddler......at the sound of guns from Lexington) the major... consulted with his subordinates.
....But with Prescott escaped toward Concord, and Dawes vanished back toward Lexington, with Revere's story in their minds, and now this volley of alarm guns in their ears, they well have felt that their mission had come to a fruitless end.
.....Dawes had escaped from the two officers who pursued him by a trick characteristic of the man. Riding at full speed into the next barnyard, he shouted as if to call the inmates of the house to his aid. His horse stopped so quickly that he fell and lost his watch; but though the house was empty, his pursuers departed more quickly still, and he got safely away. The watch was later returned to him. But little more is known of his doings later that night; Dawes is out of the story."
This was apparently the answer given by my 5th great-grandfather no matter who was asking the question. When my son was studying the Revolutionary War in 6th grade, I showed him a list of all the ancestors he had who fought in the War. (You can be sure that one of these days, I'll get around to putting that list in a blog post.) Anyway, as he looked at the list, he asked if all of them were Patriots or had some of them been Tories. After I proclaimed them all Patriots, I found this record just a few short weeks later in the book "The Robertses of New England," by Thomas A. Jacobsen.
Eliphalet Roberts (15 Apr 1750 - 27 Sept 1843) was one of the first settlers of Strafford, Vermont, having a 100 acre farm there as early as 1774. He was also the father of at least 16 children. Yes, I said at least 16. The above-mentioned book suggests may he had 22 children in all, but I have names for only 16.[1] Anyway, Eliphalet enlisted in the Revolutionary cause in early 1777 and served at Ticonderoga.[2] The following petition signed by fourteen citizens of Strafford tells what happened next:
"Strafford April ye29, 1778So... Patriot --> Loyalist --> Patriot again and with apologies this time. It sounds to me like Grandpa Roberts was on the side of whomever he judged to be the most advantageous to himself and his family. Can't say that I really blame him.
These may certify Any Gentlemen to whom it may concern that Eliphalet Roberts is an inhabitant of this town and that he did in July last desert his Countreys Cause and fled to the Enemy and their remaind til the Surrender of General Burgoin and Quick after that he returned to this town and Appeared to be very sorry for his Conduct made all the Recantations that could be thought proper He promises to be friendly for the future and to be subject to our laws since he came home appears to be Agreable to his Confession and promises He has a large family of small children and if he should be stript of what little improvements he has theirs some danger of his famelyes being some charge to the State Therefore if the Honorable Counsil in their wisdom should see fit sofar to Restore him as to allow him the use of his land upon his good behavour for the future it would be lokt upon as an act of generosity and be well accepted by the town in general."[3]
[1} By the way, the children listed in the book are incorrect. The author lists 17 of the supposed 22 chidlren, but one of the 17 is actually his granddaughter, not his daughter.
[2] Miles, pp. 77-8; Holbrook, Jay Mack. Vermont's First Settlers. Oxford, Mass.: Holbrook Research Institute, 1982, p. 71.
[3] Document at the Vermont Historical Society.
"Bedford State Police Clamp Down on Two-in-one Liquor Joint and Bawdy House." Stringtown "sporting house" ends year's existence as quartet are brought to justice.
A raid upon one of Bedford County's "sporting houses" which netted the county jail four lodgers for a good many nights to come occurred the night of Thursday, April 6, at a lonely house on a dirt road in Stringtown, about six miles south of Hyndman.
The house was not lonely in one sense. A great quantity of liquor and four residents, Lester C. English, 26, Ruby English, 19, his wife, Carl Nissen, 26, and Ella Wilhelm, 33, were all taken from the house. The liquor was destroyed. Wilhelm and Nissen were arraigned before Squire H. A. Clark, on charge of operating a bawdy house and violating liquor laws. Lester English was charged with violating the liquor laws, and his wife, Ruby, for being an inmate of a bawdy house. All were held for court on $800 for each charge, in default of bail. They are now in the county jail.
The raid followed the receipt at the Bedford State Police Headquarters of a large number of complaints against the place. It was reported that a large number of youths in the vicinity of Hyndman and elsewhere had contracted venereal diseases there. The raid of last Thursday followed a preliminary plain clothes investigation of the premises Monday night. Enough evidence was secured on this visit to warrant the raid.
Accordingly, two state police
appeared at the house earlier in the evening of the raid, Privates DeWitt and
Hanmore. In plain clothes they were in such a position to aid their fellow
police if resistance were made by those inside. The police who made the raid,
shortly before
Ella Wilhelm is a former resident
of Hyndman and had operated the place at Stringtown for about a year. Carl
Nissen who rents the house from a Frostburg man, tried to take the entire
responsibility for the raid, but this chivalry was rebuffed by the police's
certain knowledge that the woman had been in charge on previous occasions. [
The house of the raid is a frame one-story bungalow which sits back from Stringtown's one and only street some 150 yards, along a narrow dirt road. It contains four rooms.
The living room is oblong,
containing in the center an oilcloth covered table. About this and on the
lounges which lined two sides of the room, sat many a night those who drank the
beer and liquor served up from the kitchen. Behind the bar on the night of the raid police
found enough liquor to equip a sailor's hotel. There were 56 quart and 38 pint
bottles of home brew and 5 ½ pints of moonshine whisky. In the wood shed just
out back of the kitchen 80 more pints of beer were dug out from their hiding
place. Also in the kitchen they found a 20 gallon crock of home brew, together
with bottling apparatus, all ready to be bottled. No equipment was found for
the distillation of whiskey and the supposition is they bought it. [End of newspaper story]
Bedford Co., has produced two Mrs. Ella Wilhelms.
Ella Mason Wilhelm, daughter of Jesse D. & Laura
(Devore) Mason of Hyndman,
Ella Robina Welsh, daughter of Henry & Cora Welsh, was born
Court records from the 1933 arrest of Ella Wilhelm list no
witnesses. Ella plead guilty to the liquor law violations and the count of
running a bawdy house was dropped. Nor did anyone bail her out. She sat in jail from the time of the arrest
to the court plea. Ella & Karl Nissen
were charged on four counts: (1) manufacture of liquor, (2) possession
of liquor, (3) sale of liquor & (4)
maintaining a bawdy house. [Note: all
misdemeanors]. Both plead guilty to the first three counts only. The fourth was dropped. L.C. English was only
charged with the three liquor violations, it seems he was the bartender for the
establishment. He plead guilty. Ruby English was charged only with
prostitution, she did not plead guilty but she did not contest (nollo
contesto). All four were sentenced to 18 months in the county jail to be
paroled after 27 days. The arrest was on
April 6 (when they went into jail since they couldn't make bail) and they were
released on
So those are the facts and they tell quite a tale already. But naturally a story like this leads me to speculate why she would do such a thing. I think that Ella had thrown over a seemingly stable home for a "boy toy" in 1923. Times were good in the '20's, why not? It seems though that Frank then tossed her aside some time before 1932 (since he's clearly nowhere to be found in '32) and by then it was the depression and she had no means of support. She was already branded a fallen woman in the town with a scandalous divorce. I think times got tough and she did the best she could to support herself. And since her own father Henry Welsh had died of syphilis in 1924, I'm sure she knew just how easily men were willing to spend money on that sort of thing.
Several things seem odd about Ella's first marriage to
In tender memory of the summer day...
Of sterner lives and gloomier faith,
A woman lived, tradition saith,
Who wrought her neighbors foul annoy,
And witched and plagues the county side
Till at the hangman's hand she died.
...
[Part III: The Witch's Daughter]
But still the sweetest voice was mute
That river-valley ever heard
From lips of maid or throat of bird ;
For Mabel Martin sat at,
And let the hay-mow's shadow fall
Upon the loveliest face of all.
She sat at, as one forbid,
Who knew that none would condescend
To own the Witch-wife's child a friend.
The seasons scarce had gone their round,
Since curious thousands thronged to see
Her mother at the gallows-tree ;
And mocked the prison-palsied limbs
That faltered on the fatal stairs,
And wan lip trembling with its prayers !
Few questioned of the sorrowing child,
Or, when they saw the mother die,
Dreamed of the daughter's agony.
They went up to their homes that day,
As men and Christians justified:
God willed it, and the wretch had died !
Dear God and Father of us all,
Forgive our faith in cruel lies,-
Forgive the blindness that denies !
She was born in England in 1625 and came to America as a child. At age 21, she married George Martin in Massachusetts. Thanks to New England's prodigious record-keeping I have lots of information on her. In 1647 (age 22) she was fined for an unnamed offense. I can only assume it was the equivalent of a parking ticket. In 1667 her husband complained publicly that her assigned seat at the meetinghouse was beneath her station. So perhaps, I can begin to infer that she was a bit uppity.
Beginning in 1669, I can see that she perhaps rubbed more than one neighbor the wrong way. In 1669 she was first accused of witchcraft by William Sargent who said she "was a witch and he would call her a witch", she was then aged 44 and still had young children at home. Her husband sued the accuser for slander the same day. Sargent also accused Susannah of having a child while still single and strangling it and that her second son George Martin, Jr. was not fathered by George Martin Sr. The court found Sargent guilty of slander, but in what appears to be an insult the magistrates awarded George, Sr. the eighth part of a penny in damages. This was an appallingly small sum in damages even for the times. So, perhaps this means that rumors had always abounded that Susannah was a bit loose.
The trial transcripts from 1692 really begin to give me a sense of who she was -- Outspoken and Intelligent.
For background see my Salem Witch Trials pages. Her testimony was especially insightful. Here's a brief excerpt:
I think she shows remarkable good sense in recognizing that if she spoke in this setting her words would be twisted.
What ails this people?
Susanna: I do not know.
But what do you think?
Susanna: I do not desire to spend my judgment upon it.
Do not you think they are Bewitched?
Susanna: No I do not think they are.
Tell me your thoughts about them?
Susanna: Why? my thoughts are my own, when they are in, but when they are out they are anothers.
In the deposition given by John Pressy against Susannah Martin at her trial, his story briefly put was that she had cursed him specifically saying that "he should never prosper and never have but two cows." Since in the past 20 years he had not prospered nor ever was able to obtain more than two cows, she must surely be a witch. My take on it. Grandma Susannah called 'em as she saw 'em. She knew a deadbeat when she saw one basically told him he'd never amount to anything. Well, he didn't. But I guess he had the last laugh, since they convicted and hung her for witchcraft.
