|
English
15 Syllabus
Summer,
2006
Instructor: Matt Weiss
Section: 204
Office:
58 North Burrowes Building
Classroom:
Sackett 203
Office
Phone:
814-865-6440
Office
hours: M 11-12, T+W 3-4
Email:
mjw321@psu.edu
Mailbox:
112 Burrowes (Above the name)
Course
Description
The
purpose
of this class is to improve your writing and to introduce you to
various types
and methods of argument. While some
(indeed, many) of these arguments may take the form of traditional
essays, the
course is designed to allow you some freedom in both what you write and
how you
write it. You will choose your own
topics for each paper, although you will be given guidelines about
certain
formal requirements of each assignment.
Aside from those, though, how you argue your point is up to you.
We will discuss in class which methods are
most effective in which situations, and how best to define the scope of
your
position. Because it is compressed into
the space of six weeks this class is intensive, and I will often assign
you
both reading and a writing assignments for homework.
Texts
Eberly,
Rosa. Elements of Reasoning. 2nd ed. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon, 2000.
Course
Packet, TBA.
Other
readings will be photocopied by the instructor, or put online for you
to print
out.
General
Course Requirements
and Papers
To
pass this course you must do the following three things:
1.
Complete all four papers, as well as all other
writing
assignments.
2.
Complete (and demonstrate knowledge of) all reading
assignments.
3. Actively
participate as both reader and writer in
draft
workshops, argument workshops, in-class exercises, and classroom
discussions.
You
will be turning in your papers for this course online. We will be
using a Wiki, an editable online environment,
for submission of all proposals, rough drafts, and final drafts.
Depending on your response to the wiki, we
might move the weekly writing and journal assignments there as
well.
We will discuss how to use the wiki (both
what is technically possible and what is appropriate) in class.
The
overall purpose of the wiki, however, is
to promote your independent interaction with the issues we discuss in
class.
Papers
must be submitted on time: Late papers will
normally be docked one
letter grade per day, unless you get my approval for an extension before
the due date. Note well: This also holds for drafts that are due for
peer review: not only must you submit a draft on the day it is
due, but
the draft must be a complete draft that is ready to share.
Format:
Choosing a format is a rhetorical decision,
but normally your papers should be double-spaced with one-inch margins
on all
sides. Separate title pages are usually
inappropriate in this course. Place your
name, the date, and the instructor's name in the upper right hand
corner of the
first page. Place any title above the
text on page one, and double space beneath it.
Page one need not be numbered, but all subsequent pages should be
numbered in the upper right hand corner.
If you want to experiment with alternate formats you are welcome to,
but
be prepared to justify your reasons for doing so.
Weekly
Writing
In
addition to your formal papers, you will
be writing a number of shorter assignments. Although
they are short, they should not be taken
lightly. Taken cumulatively, these
assignments make up
15% of your grade.
The
Weekly Writing is very
straightforward. Each week I will describe
a short (1-2 pages) assignment that will usually be due on the same day
as your
proposal for the next paper. Although
these assignments are looser in their criteria for success, you should
still
take them seriously as an opportunity to practice your writing.
Assessment
Paper
#1: Definition
Argument
10%
Paper
#2: Causal
Argument
15%
Paper
#3: Evaluation
Argument
20%
Paper
#4: Proposal Argument
20%
Weekly
Writing
Assignments
15%
Participation
20%
Conferences
Individual
conferences with me are an essential part of this class. You will
each be writing your papers on
topics of your choice, and therefore it will be hard for me to give you
specific advice in the class setting.
You are required
to
meet with me at least once during the first
three weeks of the class, and I would encourage you to meet with me
more often
if possible. Think of my office as an
extension of the classroom and use my office hours to discuss not only
paper
topics, but any aspect of your reading or writing: problems, questions,
ideas
you wish to develop, strategies you'd like to try, and so on. I’m
going to try something new this session,
as another way to make myself available to you when you need my
help.
At certain times during the week, which I
will announce in class, I will be on AOL Instant Messenger, under the
screen name
ENGLteach2006. During those hours, you
can IM me with questions, send me pieces of your paper to look at,
etc.
An important note for both online and
in-person conferences: I will not
read any portion of your papers blind, without a conversation with you
about
what you think needs work and what issues you want to discuss.
Attendance
&
Participation
Regular
attendance is required. Please come to
every class. The course depends upon
your active participation. As this is a
compressed time period (during which we try to fit 14 weeks of material
into 6
weeks of class time) it is especially important that you make every
effort to
be in class. Excused absences are
appropriate, but beyond that, let me repeat University policy (Policies and
Rules,
42-27): A student whose
absences are excessive “may run the risk of receiving a lower grade or
a
failing grade,” whether or not some of those absences are
“excused.”
If you miss a class, then it is your
responsibility to get assignments, complete work, and submit
papers.
What that means: if for any reason you are
not in class, it is YOUR responsibility to contact a classmate and get
notes
for the class you missed, as well as any additional homework that may
have been
assigned in-class.
Attendance
counts as a portion of your participation grade (20% of your overall
grade). It is only a portion, however: this class requires your
active participation in class discussions. I will try my utmost
to make our classroom a
safe space, a place in which we can take risks, try out ideas, and not
be
afraid of giving the wrong answer. In
return, I ask that you do your best to speak up when you have something
to
contribute, allow (and even encourage) the participation of your
classmates,
and come to class prepared with some ideas of things you want to
say.
As long as you are trying to contribute to
the progress of the class, and have done the work necessary to have an
informed
opinion, you will have fulfilled your participation obligation in my
eyes.
Academic
Integrity
Penn State
defines academic integrity as the pursuit of
scholarly activity in an open, honest and responsible manner. All
students should act with personal integrity, respect other students’
dignity,
rights and property, and help create and maintain an environment in
which all
can succeed through the fruits of their efforts (Faculty Senate Policy
49-20).
Dishonesty
of any kind will
not be tolerated in this course. Dishonesty includes, but is not
limited
to, cheating, plagiarizing, fabricating information or citations,
facilitating
acts of academic dishonesty by others, having unauthorized possession
of
examinations, submitting work of another person or work previously used
without
informing the instructor, or tampering with the academic work of other
students. If you are caught engaging in academic dishonesty, you
risk
failing the assignment and even the course. You
may also be referred to the College Committee on
Academic Integrity,
which may recommend academic probation, suspension, or expulsion for
academic
dishonesty.
Reminder
The
Pennsylvania State University
encourages qualified people with disabilities to
participate in its programs and activities and is committed to the
policy that
all people shall have equal access to programs, facilities, and
admissions
without regard to personal characteristics not related to ability,
performance,
or qualifications as determined by University policy or by state or
federal
authorities. If you anticipate needing any type of accommodation
in this
course or have questions about physical access, then please tell the
instructor
as soon as possible.
Schedule
of Events
Abbreviations:
ER
= Elements of
Reasoning, W = Weekly Writing, TBA = To be announced.
Paper
Specific Abbreviations:
P = Assignment
Proposal, RD = Rough Draft, FD = Final Draft.
Unless
otherwise noted, essays to be read will be in a
Course Packet available sometime after July 4th
from Cop-ease on
Allen st. This
syllabus may change as circumstances require, including (but not
limited to)
additional reading or writing assignments for any given day.
Date
Day
Reading
Due
Writing
Due___________
Introduction
to Argument and Rhetorical Analysis
6/28 W
First Day: Introduction/Orientation
6/29
TH ER:
1-20
Writing
Sample
6/30
F ER: 21-48
Start Journal:
Narrative
7/3
M ER:
49-68
7/4
T
***************Independence Day, No
Class***************
7/5
W ER: 69-82, Handout:
“Creating a
Criminal” (W) Rhetorical Analysis
7/6
TH 3 Essays on “Cleanliness”
7/7
F “Bitch,” “Being
a
Man”
(P) Definition
Paper
7/10
M “A Patriotic
Left,”
(W)
“A
Nation Worth
Defending”
Journal
Entry
7/11
T “Invisible
Technology”
7/12
W In-Class Draft Review
: Read
Drafts.
(RD)
Definition Paper
7/13
TH “Logical Fallacies”
story,
“Cheerleader! An American Icon”
7/14
F
(FD)
Definition Paper
7/17
M
7/18
T ER: 83-94, “Gun
Control is
Constitutional,”
“The
False Promise of Gun Control”
7/19
W “It Takes A Tribe,” “Things
You Only (P) Causal Paper
Do
In College,” “This Is How We
Live”
(W)
TBA
7/20
TH “What Makes a Serial Killer,”
“Against
Nature”
7/21
F Special
Circumstances: (RD) Causal
Paper due Saturday 10am
7/24
M ER: 95-110, “The
Moral Clone”
7/25
T
(FD)
Causal Paper
(P)
Evaluation Paper
7/26
W “A Hanging,” “Death and
Justice”
7/27
TH “A Negative Vote On Affirmative
Action” (RD) Evaluation
Paper
“The
Future of Affirmative Action”
7/28
F
7/31
M
(FD)
Evaluation Paper
8/1
T ER: 111-120,
“Of (Headless) Mice and
Men”
8/2
W “A War for the Surgeon
General…”
(P)
Proposal Paper
Letters
By William Bennet
(W)
TBA
and
Milton
Friedman
8/3
TH “Devastating Beauty,”
8/4
F
(RD)
Proposal Paper
8/7
M
Conferences
8/8
T Conferences
8/9
W
(FD)
Proposal Paper
|
|