re-Visiting COPs
For my final synthesis of the three themes in CI 597, I want
to revisit my first thoughts of Communities of Practice. This final synthesis is broken into three posts,
entitled "re-Visiting COPs," "a COPs Identity," and "designing a COP." All posts are related to Communities of
Practice (COPs).
This post starts with an analysis of a previous post from
Participation and reification contribute to the
discontinuity of a boundary or help to create a boundary. The boundary allows for negotiation of
meaning through community interconnectedness with other COPs. In the Web 2.0 world, you can easily
negotiate meaning with users anywhere in the world through boundaries. More on this can be found on a previous post
from
Constellations of Practice are the combination of many
different Communities of Practice. Every
time we join a new COP, we are adding an addition to our Constellation. We ARE drawing our own constellations (of
practice) throughout our lives.
What does this all mean in context with Web 2.0
technology? The answer is simple. We can create COPs using Web 2.0 technologies as reification
objects or as boundary objects. However, in order
to create these COPs, we must know and understand the identity of the
participants. Thus, my next posting will
be "a COPs Identity."
All links used in this post:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mdm392/blogs/ci597/2008/02/creating-communities-of-practi.html
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mdm392/blogs/ci597/2008/02/community-of-practice-revisite.html
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mdm392/blogs/ci597/2008/02/whatcha-gonna-do-when-they-com.html
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mdm392/blogs/ci597/2008/02/wengers-constellations.html
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: re-Visiting COPs.
TrackBack URL for this entry: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/8514

Leave a comment