Reaction to Vannevar Bush's "As we may think" (1st week)
This article was first published in July 1945, when
the World War II was coming to an end. The author of this article, Vannevar
Bush, was heavily involved in national defense research during the World War II
[1]. He wrote this article from the perspective of a science administrator,
trying to find new directions for post-war scientific research. The article
also reflected his academic background in electrical engineering, with various
appearances of electrical engineering terms and technologies.
In this
article, the author called for a shift in the focus of scientific work after
the war. He suggested focusing on facilitating access to human knowledge,
including the creation, storage, manipulation, selection and consultation of
records.
The famous theoretical hypertext-based
computer system “Memex” was proposed as “a device in which an individual stores
all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it
may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility”. The “Memex” has great
impacts on the development of hypertext and intellect augmenting computer
systems [2].
In addition,
many new technologies, as well as technical trends, associated with the “Memex”
were also successfully predicted, such as speech recognition, mass-produced computers,
hypertext, and new forms of encyclopedias.
This article is very important for Information
Sciences and Technology (IST), although the word “record” was used much more frequently
than the word “information” by the author (I would guess it was partially because
the idea of “information” has not been mature or well recognized at the time of
the article). This article provided seminal work and laid groundwork for a great
number of current IST topics. This article was primarily concerned with I and T
of the Information-Technology-People (I-T-P) triangle. As for I, “Memex” was
proposed to provide personalized information service, which is similar to
library service. As for T, it talked about technologies that can help people to
better create, organize, store, manipulate and utilize information. Nevertheless,
the author also considered user interface design for effective access to
knowledge, which is about “People”.
Every coin has two sides. There are also limitations
in Bush’s article.
First, from the perspective of “Technology”, he missed
some important technologies, although it seems too harsh to expect him to
predict all important technologies. For example, as an electrical engineer, he
missed digitalization, maybe because he was so successful in analog computing. Most
of the technologies he proposed in this article were based on analog devices and
technologies. By contrast, digital technologies have dominated IST nowadays. Another
example was considering computer systems such as “Memex” as standalone discrete
units, although the idea of hypertext was fundamental to the emergence of
Internet, which connects computer to form a network.
Second, from the perspective of “People”, Bush’s
vision was limited to scientists and scientific research. He did not pay much
attention to the civil use and the social contexts of new technologies, while
they are crucial for the success of new technologies. For example, the “Memex”
system was primarily designed for academic purpose. However, modern computers owe
a great deal of their success to ordinary people, who use computers for
business, entertainment and everyday life.
Third, from the perspective of “Information”, the
article did not distinguish “record”, “information” and “knowledge”, although
the three ideas are different from each other.
Even though technology has changed tremendously during
the past 63 years and some predictions in this article may now seem odd or
out-dated, I was still impressed by the author’s vision. It took not only
knowledge in one’s own discipline, but also a clear overview and a deep
understanding of human being’s scientific research, to come up with so many great
insights. I thus consider this article as a giant leap, not only for IST, but
also for science as a whole.
Reference:
[1] Wikipedia. Vannevar Bush.
2008 [cited Jan 14, 2008]; Available from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vannevar_Bush.
[2] Wikipedia. Memex. 2008 [cited Jan 14, 2008]; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memex.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Reaction to Vannevar Bush's "As we may think" (1st week).
TrackBack URL for this entry: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/4573
Leave a comment