This week has certainly allowed our leaders in Washington to grandstand over the AIG bonus fiasco. They gave quite a grilling to the new CEO of AIG, when in fact the bonus contracts were written before he came on board. In fact Mr. Liddy is currently working for $1/year to fix AIG and could probably be considered a civil servant. Should he be the focus of the outrage? Rather isn't this more indicative (perhaps damning) of the whole Wall Street culture of questionable compensation? Isn't this more indicative of the type of greed which evolved over the last 30 years which got us into this mess?
The "solution" they say is to tax bonuses at TARP supported companies a rate of 90%. They aren't specifically targeting AIG, "just any TARP-supported company." What bothers me about the legislative "solution" is that it sets a dangerous precedent. I'm no Constitutional lawyer (Can you say bill of attainder?), but this tax probably won't "claw back" the AIG bonuses. It may instead create a situation where we punish outrages with targeted taxes. Maybe we start taxing people at 90% who voted against us. Maybe we start taxing people at 90% who work for tobacco companies or the entertainment industry.
Let's resolve to take a stand rather than a grandstand and fix the problems which allowed this situation to occur. $165 million in "retention" bonuses is outrageous, but the real problem is about 10,000 times bigger.
The "solution" they say is to tax bonuses at TARP supported companies a rate of 90%. They aren't specifically targeting AIG, "just any TARP-supported company." What bothers me about the legislative "solution" is that it sets a dangerous precedent. I'm no Constitutional lawyer (Can you say bill of attainder?), but this tax probably won't "claw back" the AIG bonuses. It may instead create a situation where we punish outrages with targeted taxes. Maybe we start taxing people at 90% who voted against us. Maybe we start taxing people at 90% who work for tobacco companies or the entertainment industry.
Let's resolve to take a stand rather than a grandstand and fix the problems which allowed this situation to occur. $165 million in "retention" bonuses is outrageous, but the real problem is about 10,000 times bigger.
