Marxists On Way To Controlling Us Helped By Duplicitous USCCB – Palin BLASTS Pelosi Bill - Common Sense From A Judicial Giant On Growing Tyranny - The Cold-Hearted Insincere Tone Of Obama Re The Terroristic Ft. Hood Shootings By A Jihadist - Obama's Ties To Islam
November 8, 2009
To read the article, click here:
November 8, 2009
Pelosi ObamaCare passage: Marxists on way to controlling all of us
By Sher Zieve
With Saturday night's passage of the US House of Representatives' ObamaCare package (220-215),
The Marxists now holding power and sway over the
Long ago career Congressional members discarded the notion that they are beholden to doing the people's business or even listening to them. We-the-People are expected to work for them, in order to keep them in the lifestyles to which they have become accustomed. Besides, when Marxists and any other type of totalitarian regime is in power votes are no longer necessary. The rulers will take care to instill the necessary intimidation, force and vote-counters to ensure their staying in power and seizing control over every aspect of the lives of their (former) constituents.
Remember, ObamaCare is NOT about healthcare but, it is about control...total control. With this greatest theft of power and its perks in
Note: Gutting of Medicare=termination of large numbers of Seniors. Simple solution for reducing the population. If the ObamaCare measure passes the Senate, the
On 15 April 2009, TEA (Taxed Enough Already) parties were held nationwide. Congress, Obama and Obama's state-run media ignored or marginalized the efforts of hundreds of thousands of us. On 12 September approximately 1.7 millions of We-the-People arrived in
So, here are a few facts. Once "universal healthcare" enters a society, said society is — forevermore — ruled from the Left; even if some conservatives are finally elected. The tentacles of this giant entitlement program will spread wide and deep and — if one can still follow history — will not be able to be removed. Despite all of our best efforts, the Marxist rulers (no longer those who actually govern) in
Obama continues to say that if we decide to keep private insurance, nothing will change. He lies and continues to do so in the very best fashion of all totalitarian leaders. ObamaCare not only destroys American healthcare but, is designed to also destroy small business — once the lifeblood of the
While he destroys our country, Obama maintains a broad smile on his face. He has created the — yes created — the greatest job loss in the
Landmark health bill passes House on close vote:
Pelosi has protesters arrested:
© Sher Zieve
Proof Positive That 'Race Trumps All' For Mindless Drones Even If You're A Disciple Of The devil, As Congressional Black Caucus Cozy Up To Dictator To ‘Help’ Obama
THIS IS THE FAMOUS 'GREAT AND FREE HEALTHCARE'
THAT REGULAR CUBANS RECEIVE
One of the greatest fallacies about the so called 'Cuban Revolution' has to do with healthcare.
Foreigners who visit
Argentinean soccer star Maradona, for example, has traveled several times to
In addition, most of these facilities are filthy and patients have to bring their own towels, bed sheets, pillows, or they would have to lay down on dirty bare mattresses stained with blood and other body fluids.
An e-mail and a photo from
a reader who just returned from his first visit to Castroland:
"My God, I have just returned from my first visit to
Letter from a slave doctor in Angola
A relative of a Cuban slave doctor, who was sent by the Castro regime to work in
The name of the doctor has been omitted for obvious reasons. Here is a translation of what he said:
"Let me explain how the contract works. The Angolan government pays
Note - According to the relatives,
the 30% that is paid in
Based on this breakdown,
And the difference, approximately US$3,400, goes to the pocket of Castro & Castro Slave Traders Unlimited.
Some exiled doctors that I've talked to believe that the figure that the Cuban government pays for the "housing and transportation" seems high and is probably what the government told the doctor.
If that's the case, the difference that goes to the Castro brothers pockets could be even higher.
Multiply that by the thousands of Cuban doctors who are currently working in foreign countries and you can understand why Forbes lists Fidel Castro as one of the world's richest dictators.
Next time you hear one of those foreign ignorants talking about the "generosity" of
An American reporter writes about the medical
she witnessed in
Those of you who saw Michael Moore's documentary "Sicko," would remember the scene where Moore and his guests walked into a Cuban pharmacy and asked for an asthma medication, Salbutemol, and immediately the clerk opens a drawer and gives it to one of the guests, a woman from New York, who then begins to cry when she learns that in Cuba that medicine costs only a fraction of what it costs in New York. According to
But the scene at the Cuban pharmacy, as the whole portion of Sicko filmed in
In an article titled "Catching a cold in
Here is part of what she wrote: "It wasn't much of a cold; just the kind that would get better by itself in a week. In the meantime it was a nuisance with a cough and stuffy nose. A little over-the-counter remedy would help.....There were no over-the-counter remedies to be had. I asked the guide what Cubans did if they had a cold. The guide said that a Cuban would go to the doctor — a visit free of charge — who would write a prescription for aspirin. However, there would be no way to fill the prescription. We visited a pharmacy later in the trip. Behind the counter five well-dressed Cuban women waited to serve, but the shelves were empty. The only items in sight were the monthly ration of sanitary napkins, 10 permitted per Cuban woman per month.
It was like being in a dream where two different things can happen at the same time. We were in a two-tier system: one for the privileged (tourists, for example) and the other for those who lived and worked in socialist
It was depressing to see attractive and intelligent people restricted and denied opportunity in such an appealing land only 90 miles away from our country. The accident of birth has put me in a free country and I have never been so grateful."
In regard to the story below, let's keep in mind that there seems to be no problem killing babies because of rape, incest, or the health of the mother! Why should an innocent be killed for another's crime? Why should the life of a baby be subordinate to the life of the mother when both are equal in the eyes of God calling for every attempt to be made to save both the life of the mother AND the baby? I see nothing to prevent such killing which evidently doesn't matter to those making claims that abortion otherwise is well on the way to being eradicated in the Stupak amendment. Such claims are premature in the extreme in light of what is reported here, given the pathological liars in the Obama Administration and the rogue Congress that supports its diabolical Communist agenda!
The truth of the matter is that Pelosi used Stupak as a ruse to keep her death care bill alive for Obama with the aid of the USCCB who once again served Obama well in being his useful idiot! - Gary L. Morella
Sun 11/08/09 2:54 PM
Pro-Life Amendment Seen as Historic Victory Overshadowed by Dangers of Health Bill Passage
Warnings that Democrats plan to scrap pro-life Stupak amendment language in Senate
By Kathleen Gilbert
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 8, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Celebration over the dramatic victory of a pro-life amendment in the House health care bill late Saturday night was quickly dimmed by the passage of the bill, which not only presents a plethora of other dangers, but also could lose even the hard-won pro-life language in later proceedings.
At approximately 10:20 p.m. EST Saturday night, the U.S. House voted 240-194 to approve an amendment to H.R. 3962 that maintains long-standing federal policy on abortion by banning government-appropriated funds from covering elective abortions. Then, just before 11 p.m., House lawmakers voted 220-215 to pass the massive health care overhaul. One Republican voted for the bill.
Family Research Council president Tony Perkins called the passage of the pro-life amendment "a huge pro-life victory" and congratulated the bipartisan effort against the bill's abortion coverage. "We applaud this House vote which prohibits the abortion industry from further profiting from taxpayers by using government funds to pay for the gruesome act of abortion," he said.
"Unfortunately, H.R. 3962 is a seriously flawed piece of legislation," said Perkins, who pointed out the bill's massive governmental power grab and open door to health care rationing, among other issues. National Right to Life's Douglas Johnson agreed that the victory was not total. "Today's bipartisan House vote is a sharp blow to the White House's pro-abortion smuggling operation," he said.
"But we know that the White House and pro-abortion congressional Democratic leaders will keep trying to enact government funding of abortion, and will keep trying to conceal their true intentions, so there is a long battle ahead."
Pro-abort leaders across America flew into a rage as the pro-life Stupak amendment, unexpectedly approved for consideration Friday night, went on to gain an easy victory Saturday. Many pointed fingers at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), whose input several lawmakers relied on to discern solidly pro-life amendments for the bill.
"It is extremely unfortunate that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and anti-choice opponents were able to hijack the health care reform bill in their dedicated attempt to ban all legal abortion In the United States," said Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards in a statement late Saturday. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/planned-parenthood-condemns-passage-stupak-pitts-amendment-30821.htm
Yet various sources confirm that Pelosi's last-minute turnaround was not a true abandonment of her abortion allies, but a temporary concession to keep the struggling bill alive - with hopes that a subsequent bicameral version would scrap the pro-life language. There is a larger pro-abortion majority in the Senate, making it unlikely a similar pro-life scenario would play out on the Senate floor.
Some Democrat lawmakers have already vowed to pursue such a reversal.
"I feel certain [the Stupak amendment] will come out of the bill before it comes back from committee," pro-abortion
Ultimately pro-life leaders appeared to agree that the amendment, though important in its own right, put hardly a dent in an otherwise massively dangerous bill.
Noted FRC's Perkins: "The Speaker's bill still allows rationing of health care for seniors, raises health costs for families, mandates that families purchase under threat of fines and penalties, encourages counseling for assisted suicide in some states, does not offer broad conscience protections for health care workers and seeks to insert the federal government into all aspects of citizen's lives."
American Life League president Judie Brown had harsh words for the USCCB's cooperative attitude toward the legislation. While aggressively promoting the long-standing ban on federal abortion funding, the Conference has largely not questioned other dangerous aspects of President Obama's overhaul - a position Brown says risks making the bishops "political pawns in advancing a culture of death that treats human life as disposable."
"[The health bill's] instrumentalist approach to abortion will serve to enshrine in law grave injustices condemned unequivocally by the Catholic Church," she said. "Among these are rationed health care, In vitro fertilization, embryonic stem cell research, human experimentation, euthanasia and birth control. "Faithful Catholics have a responsibility to vigorously oppose abortion in healthcare, not negotiate the status quo."
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee
Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today
View Story on LifeSiteNews.com
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
Yesterday at 10:34pm
We’ve got to hold on to hope, and we’ve got
to fight hard because Congressional action tonight just put America on a
path toward an unrecognizable country.
The same government leaders that got us into the mortgage business and the car business are now getting us into the health care business.
Despite Americans’ decisive message last Tuesday that they reject the troubling path this country has been taking, Speaker Pelosi has broken her own promises of transparency to ram a health “care” bill through the House of Representatives just before midnight. Why did she push the 2,000 page bill this weekend? Was she perhaps afraid to give her peers and the constituents for whom she works the chance to actually read this monstrous bill carefully, if at all? Was she concerned that Americans might really digest the details of a bill that the Wall Street Journal has called “the worst piece of post-New Deal legislation ever introduced”?
This out-of-control bureaucratic mess will be disastrous for our economy, our small businesses, and our personal liberty. It will slam businesses at a time when we are at double-digit unemployment rates – the highest we’ve seen in a quarter of a century. This massive new bureaucracy will cost us and our children money we don’t have. It will rob Americans of more of our freedom and further hamper the free market.
Make no mistake: we’re on course to have government commandeer one-sixth of our economy. The people who gave us Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now want to run our health care. Think about that.
All of us who value the sanctity of life are grateful for the success of the pro-life majority in the House this evening in its battle against federal funding of abortion in this bill, but it’s ironic because we were promised that abortion wasn’t covered in the bill to begin with. Our healthy distrust of these government leaders made us look deeper into the bill because unfortunately we knew better than to trust what they were saying. The victory tonight to amend the bill and eliminate that federal funding for abortion was great – because abortion is not health care. Now we can only hope that Rep. Stupak’s amendment will hold in the final bill, though the Democratic leadership has already refused to promise that it won’t be scrapped later.
We had been told there were no “death panels” in the bill either. But look closely at the provision mandating bureaucratic panels that will be calling the shots regarding who will receive government health care.
Look closely at provisions addressing illegal aliens’ health care coverage too.
Those of us who love freedom and believe in open and transparent government can only be dismayed by midnight action on a Saturday. Speaker Pelosi’s promise that Americans would have 72 hours to read the final bill before the vote was just another one of the D.C. establishment’s too-common political ploys. It’s broken promises like this that turn people off to politics and leave them disillusioned about the future of their country.
But despite this late-night maneuvering, many of us were paying close attention tonight. We’ll keep paying close attention. We need to let our legislators in
- Sarah Palin
For the record, Gov. Palin is right on the money with her comments here, and, as far as I'm concerned, is the only true conservative out there in a sea of RINOS that the big tent types like Steele and Gingrich go out of their way to promote, as Steele shamelessly did to Geraldo Rivera on FOX News last night in basically de facto guaranteeing to Rivera that RINOS are welcome in the GOP with true conservatism being too extreme for his taste!
This is why the likes of Steele get no money from me whatsoever.
I'm a Catholic, read conservative, before I'm anything else because liberalism is a sin,
Liberalism is a Sin
i.e., it is oxymoronic to speak of a 'liberal Catholic!'
Also for the record, it comes as no surprise that the most worthless organization calling itself Catholic in the country, the USCCB, was duped into thinking that the Stupak amendment would be honored when push comes to shove in final reconciliation, as rightfully observed by Gov. Palin in her commentary above, and Minority Leader Boehner in his commentary below.
Governor Palin's and Congressman Boehner's concerns are warranted given that we're dealing with a resident in the White House whose Administration and rogue Congress led by Pelosi and Reid are pathological liars who will say anything to stay in power, moreover, to get power over every aspect of our lives, thereby making us slaves to a Godless state, which is Comrade Obama's primary goal that matters not to a USCCB wearing blinders when it comes to the Democrats!
- November 07, 2009
House Minority Leader John Boehner accused Speaker Nancy Pelosi of secretly promising Democratic supporters of abortion rights that the restrictions that would strengthen a ban on federal funding to end pregnancies would not make it into the final version of the health care bill.
Leader John Boehner, who has vowed to do all he can to derail President Obama's
health care overhaul, sought on Saturday to cast suspicion on an abortion
agreement that helped secure the support of several moderate Democrats.
The agreement, reached late Friday, allowed Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and other abortion opponents to insert tougher abortion restrictions into the legislation during debate on the House floor.
But Boehner accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of secretly promising Democratic supporters of abortion rights that the restrictions that would strengthen a ban on federal funding to end pregnancies would not make it into the final version of the health care bill.
Boehner made the move in part to give pause to Democratic opponents of abortion whose votes are needed to pass the legislation.
Boehner asked Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., whether he could guarantee the restrictions would remain in the bill.
Waxman said he could not make that guarantee because it would be up to the Senate and House negotiators if the legislation advanced that far.
"I have my doubts this language if it passes has any chance of being in the final version of this bill," Boehner said.
The House is expected to vote on the Stupak amendment Saturday night.
The USCCB's duplicity in such matters comes as no surprise to those who are Catholic in more than name only because the the vast majority of USCCB members, especially the leadership, are Democrats before they're Catholics, never mind that the Democratic Party has gone to hell in a handbag! See the following link,
A Prime Example Of Why The USCCB Is A Mill Stone Around The Necks Of Catholics In More Than Name Only
in particular, the enclosed link within!
Judas USCCB Supports Comrade Obama's Destruction Of
The USCCB, and the apostates that it spawns like Doug Kmiec, are nothing more than 'useful idiots' to the unholy trinity of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, and their minions!
Did it ever occur to the worthless USCCB that this litany of monstrous diabolic legislation of Obama, which is straight from the Communistic bowels of hell, will encourage abortion by raising unemployment to such levels that abortion will be freely seen as another means of contraception more than ever before due to the radical left's well known gospel, as preached by Planned Parenthood, and the population controllers who are now Obama's czars, that babies are a burden on families instead of the gifts from God that they've always been, are, and will be until the end of time?
What other conclusion could there be when the contraceptive mentality of the age is pedal to the metal, as evinced by the unkempt left lunatic fringe's illogical shrieking arguments against the Stupak amendment on the House floor last night, as seen on CSPAN, a fringe that will ultimately get what it wants in the end as wicked Pelosi & Co. take care of their own with the help of our purported Catholic bishops, not a few whom were not only 'not conned' by Pelosi, but rather intentionally 'party to the con,' as evinced by their failure to rein in the dissenters in their dioceses, like the aforementioned Kmiec (see the following links),
DEMOCRACY AND DEMAGOGUES – We Are Not Obliged To Go To Hell With Apostate Douglas Kmiec & Co. Who Arrogantly Flout Church Moral Teaching
Douglas Kmiec Has No Credibility Whatsoever Because He Gives No Indication Of Being Capable Of Rational Thought
ZERO For The Catholic Campaign For Human Development Which Is The ACORN Of An Apostate USCCB Counterfeit Church That Saw No Problems Giving Millions To Corrupt ACORN Directly - Calling Out Apostate Kmiec
from invariant traditional Catholic teaching on faith and morals, read dogma, dissenters who are freely allowed to destroy the Church from within in the same manner that Obama is destroying the country from within!
To summarize in regard to Obama, why was there only basically silence from the USCCB PRIOR to Obama's election?
Moreover, there were members of the USCCB who directly promoted Obama's candidacy, if memory serves me right!
Obama's anti-Catholic modus operandi was very well known, given his shameless public support without apology for the ENTIRETY of a culture-of-ETERNAL-death to include baby killing not only inside but also outside of the womb as evinced by his well known non-support of Born Alive Infant Protection Acts!
The USCCB was complicit in the election of an antichrist, given that it was purported Catholics to include the likes of apostate Doug Kmiec, who were basically given a green light to shill for the most anti-Catholic candidate ever to run for the presidency without any public reprimand from the USCCB as a whole, which was needed!
Why has no Catholic bishop held Pelosi to account to her public apostasy? This woman deserves formal excommunication many times over for her very public sins in promoting the ENTIRETY of a culture-of-ETERNAL-death! Her monstrosity of a death care masquerading as a health care bill has problems that go far beyond baby killing that should get the attention of the USCCB but hasn't.
But we're talking about an organization that praised the infamous Cap & Tax bill designed solely to give Obama more power over all of us which has been his goal from the get-go.
All of this legislation coming from the Obamunists has nothing to do with their feigned social concerns but rather are tools for the Communist takeover of our country, which matters not to the USCCB.
The dirty little secret is that the vast majority of the USCCB are Democrats before they're Catholic with little care to the fact that the Democratic leadership is straight from the bowels of hell when it comes to the moral order!
We're not just talking abortion here, bishops. FYI, we're talking the entirety of a culture-of-ETERNAL-death spawned by the contraceptive mentality of the age which you SELDOM preach against. We're talking about the promotion of sexual promiscuity leading to abortion, and the advocacy of the sexual perversion of homosexuality as a civil right in an affirmative action sense, which you NEVER preach against, along with euthanasia which is a logical consequence of abortion, embryonic stem cell research, the list is endless!
To somehow imply that an imprimatur should be given to apostate Pelosi's death care bill if abortion is completely removed from same completely IGNORES the fact that there are many other problems with this bill that are anti-Catholic in the extreme, thereby rendering any support for it from Catholics to be patently absurd!
Why don't you bishops for once realize that formal excommunication is necessary for those apostates like Pelosi who, to date, have been given free reign to destroy the souls of those under your charge, not the least of which are there own? Don't you care about the heart and soul of your country that is being willfully destroyed by disciples of the devil? Don't you care about an
Given that the likes of Pelosi are allowed to masquerade as Catholic, the answer to that question is clearly no! - Gary L. Morella
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009
Subject: [LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH] Common Sense from a Judicial Giant on Growing Tyranny
Posted By Mary Ann Kreitzer to LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH at 11/08/2009 12:13:00 PM
Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting which bears repeating. Look at the cold-hearted tone of Obama here!
The more that I see this video, I also saw this report live, and couldn't believe what I was seeing and hearing, the more angry that I get at what is clearly a fraud masquerading as president. It's not just Obama's cold-hearted emotionless tone but rather his body language in that he's just mouthing what his handlers consider a necessary response to make him look better, i.e., it's all about Obama just like his recent charade with all the camera's present when one of our bravest came home fighting for a freedom that is now fleeting in our country thanks to the totalitarian policies of Obama.
There is not one scintilla of genuine sincerity evident on the part of Obama for the tragedy that just occurred. There is only the robotic droll of someone who is just going through the motions in the face of the greatest tragedy to our military stateside in my memory!
Here we have Veteran's Day coming up on November 11, and we have a purported commander-in-chief, at least a man who likes to tout that any time that he can to let us know he rules, acting like anything but to our military and their families who, I assure you, will never forget this!
In case anyone has been living in an alternative universe since Obama's inauguration, which I personally believe will go down in infamy in American history, our national security is at grave risk because we have resident, not a president, in the White House who couldn't care less about our military! If he did, he wouldn't put one of his most experienced and respected generals on hold in regard to an urgent request for a need for troops to fight and win a war on a foreign battlefield for shameless reasons of political expediency!
But what else could be expected from Comrade Barack Hussein Obama, a man who tells us that there is no war against terrorism in the face of one of the most heinous terrorist acts by a jihadist against our military on its own base!
Here is a question that begs asking. Why didn't Obama and his rogue Congress cancel the rest of their plans this weekend at the very least out of respect for our fallen at
That, ladies and gentlemen, speaks volumes as to the priority of Obama and his minions! - Gary L. Morella,
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 01:35:31 -0800
Subject: [DrFrank c] Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting
From: Nedd Kareiva
If you have not already done so, please view this 6 minute You Tube video about Obama's response to the Fort Hood shootings. About 4 1/2 hours ago, there were 65,000+ views. As of this writing, there are more than double that (135,000). View it and and please forward. It's already becoming viral as it has been up for only a little over 24 hours.
After you do, please view this 3 minute video from Texas Gov. Perry. We can clearly see who is presidential and who isn't.
Finally, please visit this page, read the piece and add your comments. You'll need to register but once you do, you'll be able to post immediately without confirming your e-mail address.
As of this moment, there are nearly 1200 posts in roughly 14 hours and 97% of them are very much against Obama. This is
Again, please put your 2 cents in and spread the word like wildfire.
I don't want to give anyone false hope but my gut instincts say that Obama's response to the shootings is going to have a more severely negative effect on him and his so-called popularity will even further plummet. This may be a turning point like nothing else thus far. Again, please share this with others. Thank you!
November 7, 2009
By Alan Keyes
There are times when even Obama's critics
seem to have difficulty putting into words their reaction to his strange
behavior. I think that's because they refuse to consider the simple premise
that makes sense of it all: He feels no love for the
The occupant of the office he lays claim to is supposed to represent the body politic. People expect that his reactions will reflect its joys and pains i.e., the joys and pains of the American people as a whole. They expected him to react to the shocking events at
It was obvious to all that Obama's gut wasn't writhing. He spoke like a spectator taking notice of a scuffle on the sidelines. 'We shouldn't react until we know all the facts,' he says, as if the gut waits for a doctor's report rather than twisting with pain as a part of the body falls away.
With due regard to Bill Clinton, the simple fact is this. Obama doesn't feel our pain. To be sure, once it becomes clear that appearing to do so will serve his agenda of power, he will study the part and summon the right appearance when the script calls for it. But only fools will forget that this aspect of the role doesn't come naturally for him. His instinct isn't to feel for the country. It is to protect our assailants from any overreaction by Americans. He apparently assumes that we are prone to spiteful nastiness.
Nothing about this nation's reaction after the gut wrenching events of 9-11 justifies his fearful and insulting instincts. In many other countries (including the Islamic nations whose praises he sings so readily) there would have been violent street riots that claimed the lives of scores of innocent people, victimized because they professed the same religion as the terrorist assailants. In
Obama's reaction did not represent the American people. It came from years of associating with, studying, and even worshiping with people who hate us and everything we stand for in the world. In his heart of hearts I wager he even despises the decent motivation of many who voted for him. Many did so precisely because they naively believed that their action would lay to rest once and for all the stigma of institutionalized bigotry and hatred that mars all too many pages of our history as a nation. But there is a kind of relentless hating that sees in repentance only the admission of guilt. Though such people thought Obama's victory would stand for hope, every day it becomes more apparent that he brings only judgment.
What manner of man is this who now claims to preside over the affairs of the nation?
"The sojourner who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. He shall lend to you, and you shall not lend to him. He shall be the head, and you shall be the tail." (Deuteronomy 28:31, cf. Lamentations 5:8, Ezekiel 11:9)
Better they had sought for hope following God's example and looking "for a man among them who should build up the wall and stand in the breach before me for the land, that I should not destroy it..." (Ezekiel 22:30).
tragedy would not have happened but for the political correctness that has
infested the country to include our military! We're talking about a
global war that wants to make us all live in a state of terror throughout
November 6, 2009
Muslim-executed massacre in the
By Sher Zieve
First of all, let's get something out in the open and into the light of day. As Obama's state-run media now refuses to tell the truth about virtually anything and will always protect the 'politically correct' (that's PC according to the Left) groups despite said groups committing extreme and extraordinarily brutal atrocities, they continue to support them. Note: Terrorism is the business arm of the Left.
We should all simply ignore those that try to bamboozle us with articles that say the perpetrators of the wholesale slaughter of humans, in order to perpetuate a dim and anti-life ideology, are "troubled people" and involved in "high stress" situations.
The truth is that on 5 November 2009 Muslim and US Army Officer Nidal Malik Hasan massacred at least 13 people (as of this writing) and wounded at least 31 more in
And this monster was still allowed to remain in the Army — and had recently been promoted to the rank of Major? This is abject insanity.
Hasan had never been in any combat situation, yet leftist commentators are now implying that he was suffering from post (or is it pre?)-traumatic stress disorder. Huh? What trauma? He was scheduled to be sent to
This is not the first time that Muslims have committed heinous crimes against US citizens. The most notable is the 9/11 massacre in 2001 in which thousands of people were murdered by Islamist butchers. Muslims disgruntled with the
When Muslim populations reach a certain population percentage in their hosts' societies, Muslims — spurred on by their religious clerics — become even more violent as they begin to take over their host countries. Are we already beginning to see the trend in the
US Army major behind Fort Hood murders expressed sympathy for Islamic terrorists:
Islamic Plan to Take Over Host Countries:
© Sher Zieve
The Incredible Arrogance Of An Obamunist Masquerading As A Rep Of The Chamber Of Commerce - Democrats Dying To Kill Us With Obamacare - ACORN Watch: Fight The Thugs – Muslim Dem Rep Ignores Teachings Of Quran – Obama Officials Love Mass Murderer Mao - Cap And Trade For Babies: One Child Policy Coming To USA?
Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN) who was first elected to Congress in 2006, recently gave the keynote speech at a forum in Washington, D.C. The forum, "Engaging The Muslim World – Challenges and Opportunities" was sponsored by the U.S. Institute Of Peace (USIP).
Ellison claims that the Jihadists are engaging in worldwide terrorism because they're angry about Western colonialism in the past. This is wrong. Ellison clearly hasn't studied the violent history of Islam.
Ellison is portraying a false view of why the Jihadists hate Western Civilization. The Jihadists are killing "infidels" (all non-Muslims) because the Quran (supposedly the revelation of Allah to Muhammad) demands that faithful Muslims kill or enslave anyone who refuses to acknowledge Allah or submit to Islam.
The Jihadists are killing "infidels" (all non-Muslims) because the Quran (supposedly the revelation of Allah to Muhammad) demands that faithful Muslims kill or enslave anyone who refuses to acknowledge Allah or submit to Islam.
The Jihadists have waged relentless warfare against the West since the 7th Century when Muhammad sent his armies to conquer, kill and enslave. They have never needed "colonialism" as an excuse to kill infidels.
They kill because they're told to kill as part of their religious duty. Killing non-believers in Islamic theology is a sacrament – like taking communion or being baptized in the Christian faith.
In the past centuries, there were two great waves of Islamic imperialism. The first wave of Islamic invasions began in 622 with Muhammad leading his armies to slaughter infidels. The second wave began in 1071 and lasted until 1683 when an Islamic army was destroyed at the Battle of Vienna (Austria) by a coalition of Polish, Prussian and Austrian forces. The Christian victory at the Battle of Vienna saved Europe from Islamic slaughter and enslavement.
The Quran tells faithful Muslims that they must kill non-Muslims or enslave them. In addition, Islamic Shariah law is to be imposed on the whole world. Thus, Islam has always been an aggressive, merciless political system that seeks to dominate the world through the sword.
According to Ellison, "… the United States has more Muslims than many countries that are considered Muslim countries … the United States is part of the Muslim world." What does this mean? In Islamic theology, the entire world is to be forcibly brought under the domination Islam so the world will be at "peace." Is this Ellison's hope for the future?
Last year, Ellison took a Hajj to Mecca. His trip was paid for by the Muslim American Society, which is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. The Muslim Brotherhood is a group that has declared war on the United States and Western Civilization. In fact, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamed Akram, wrote a memo describing how his group was determined to destroy the West.
According to Akram, Muslims in America "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack."
Is Rep. Ellison aware of this memo by Mohamed Akram? If so, does he care? Is he helping to sabotage the West as a Member of Congress? Is he loyal to the U.S. Constitution or loyal to Shariah law, which demands absolute submission to the demands of the Quran?
The Quran he used was Thomas Jefferson's copy. According to Ellison: "The very foundation of our nation, the authors of our Constitution impressed, is religious freedom, and the use of Jefferson's Quran shows that the founders not only knew of the Quran but also used it."
Wrong. Jefferson read the Quran to understand the kind of merciless Muslims the new United States was going to be dealing with in the future. He and John Adams were dealing with the Muslim Barbary pirates who were seizing ships and enslaving the ship crews in the Strait of Gibraltar. Jefferson was studying his enemy's war manual.
A good first step in separating "good" non-violent Muslims from the terrorist variety would be for people like Mr. Ellison to step forward and condemn the violent ones by name. If a Congressman is too frightened or too corrupted by Saudi money to do this -- how can we expect mere citizens to stand up to the Jihadists?
Islam doesn't contracept and abort its children into oblivion. It understands that it will prevail by sheer weight of numbers in a relatively short amount of time! For proof see the Demographic links below. This should give us all pause to think about the suicide that the West is committing. We're talking about a religion that teaches it followers to kill, not love, its enemies with enemies defined as all who disagree with the prophet Mohammed! See the Quran for proof. - Gary L. Morella
Demographic Winter Exposing The Lies Of The Population Control Gore/Global Warming Crowd Is A Crisis That We Can’t Ignore
New Documentary Exposes Direct Link Between Failing Global Economy And Demographic Winter - Obama Promotes Euthanasia In Healthcare Plan
Slippery Tactics: Obama Declares War On Oil With Huge Tax Increases In The Offing For All Of Us Which Is Par For The Course For Comrade Obama Who Hates America - Obamacare Puts Transparency And Accountability On Death Bed - The Most Immediate Threat To Economic Freedom At The G-20 In Pittsburgh Is The Concerted Push Toward Global Governance - The Demographic Bomb - There Is A Reason That Social Security Is Bankrupt - There Are Consequences For Violating The Natural Law Of God - Judge In Case Of Arrested Notre Dame Pro-Lifers Is Married To Pro-Abortion ND Professor
Friday , November 06, 2009
Pfc. Aaron Thomas Nemelka
Pfc. Michael Pearson
Spc. Jason Dean Hunt
Sgt. Amy Krueger
Friday , November 06, 2009
By Michelle Malkin • November 6, 2009 12:01 AM
Scroll for updates…7:39am Eastern press conference…Ft. Hood officials disclose that the murder victims included 12 soldiers and 1 civilian…first responder heroine who shot Hasan is in stable condition…witnesses still being interviewed “all through the night”…they confirm that Hasan was wearing his uniform…
I was traveling to
Allahpundit at Hot Air has a massive, blow-by-blow post on all the latest developments. The Christian Science Monitor profiles Nidal Malik Hasan, the Muslim soldier identified by the military as the shooter:
Terry Lee, a retired Army colonel who knew Hasan, told Fox News about a story he heard secondhand. He
said a fellow colleague had told him that Hasan had
made “outlandish comments” about the wars in
“[He] made comments about how we shouldn’t be over there – you need to lock it up, Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor,” Lee added.
But the suspect’s cousin, Nader Hasan, gave Fox News a different picture. He said his cousin had never deployed but was affected by the war and had been concerned about his impending deployment.
“He would tell us how he would hear things, horrific things, things from war probably affecting him psychologically,” Nader Hasan said.
His name appears on radical Internet
postings. A fellow officer says he fought his deployment to
There are many unknowns about Nidal Malik Hasan, the man authorities say is responsible for the worst mass killing on a
“Troubling.” And familiar.
At least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades.
Here’s the Scribd comment of Nidal Hasan:
There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers,
feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee
jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved
them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a
noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier
committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more
appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble
cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers
whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing
enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they
were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their
intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in
Those of you with long memories will remember all those who came before Hasan. Here is my column from March 2003 on Muslim soldiers with attitude:
Sgt. Asan Akbar, a Muslim American soldier with the 326th Engineer Battalion, had an “attitude problem.”
According to his superiors and acquaintances, Akbar’s attitude was bitterly anti-American and staunchly pro-Muslim. So how did this devout follower of the so-called Religion of Peace work out his attitudinal problems last weekend?
By lobbing hand grenades and aiming his M-4 automatic rifle into three tents filled with sleeping commanding officers at the 101st Airborne Division’s 1st Brigade operations center in
Akbar is the lone suspect being detained in the despicable attack, which left more than a dozen wounded and one dead. Surviving soldiers say Akbar, found cowering in a bunker with shrapnel injuries, was overheard ranting after the assault: “You guys are coming into our countries, and you’re going to rape our women and kill our children.”
“Our”? At least there’s no doubt about where this Religion of Peace practitioner’s true loyalties lie.
Naturally, apologists for Islam-gone-awry are hard at work dismissing this traitorous act of murder as an “isolated, individual act and not an expression of faith.” But such sentiments are willfully blind and recklessly p.c.
Sgt. Akbar is not the only MSWA — Muslim soldier with attitude — suspected of infiltrating our military, endangering our troops and undermining national security:
– Ali A. Mohamed. Mohamed, a major in the Egyptian army, immigrated to the
A former classmate, Jason T. Fogg, recalled that Mohamed was openly critical of the American military. “To be in the
Soon after he was honorably discharged from the Army in 1989, Mohamed hooked up with Osama bin Laden as an escort, trainer, bagman and messenger. Mohamed used his
Ain’t multiculturalism grand?
– Semi Osman. An ethnic Lebanese born in
Osman was arrested last May as part of a federal investigation into the establishment of a terrorist training camp in
Ain’t open borders grand?
– John Muhammad. The accused Beltway sniper and Muslim convert was a member of the Army’s 84th Engineering Company. In an eerie parallel to the Akbar case, Muhammad is suspected of throwing a thermite grenade into a tent housing 16 of his fellow soldiers as they slept before the ground-attack phase of Gulf War I in 1991. Muhammad’s superior, Sgt. Kip Berentson, told both Newsweek and The Seattle Times that he immediately suspected Muhammad, who was “trouble from day one.”
Curiously, Muhammad was admitted to the Army despite being earlier court-martialed for willfully disobeying orders, striking another noncommissioned officer, wrongfully taking property, and being absent without leave while serving in the Louisiana National Guard.
Although Muhammad was led away in handcuffs and transferred to another company pending charges for the grenade attack, an indictment never materialized. Muhammad was honorably discharged from the Army in 1994. Eight years later, he was arrested in the 21-day Beltway shooting spree that left 10 dead and three wounded.
Ain’t tolerance grand?
– Jeffrey Leon Battle. A former Army reservist,
Ain’t diversity grand?
“It’s bad enough we have to worry about enemy forces, but now we have to worry about our own guys,” Spc. Autumn Simmer told the Los Angeles Times this week after the assault on the 101st Airborne. The Islamist infiltration of our troops is scandalous. Not one more American, soldier or civilian, must be sacrificed at the altar of multiculturalism, diversity, open borders, and tolerance of the murderous “attitude” of Jihad.
FYI: Convicted Beltway sniper John Muhammad is scheduled to be executed next week. No doubt the families of the Muslim sniper victims are re-living the horror tonight.
FYI: Muslim US soldier Hasan Abujihaad was convicted last year on espionage and material terrorism support charges after serving aboard the USS Benfold and sharing classified info with al Qaeda financiers, including movements of US ships just six months after al Qaeda operatives had killed 17 Americans aboard the USS Cole in the port of Yemen.
On Twitter, follow #fthood for news updates.
More Twitter-related news here.
Clarice Feldman notes President Obama’s “odd” — to say the least — reaction to the attack on
On Thursday, 11 soldiers and civilian police
However, his expression of grief was very odd. He spent the first two minutes of the four-and-a-half minute address in a light-hearted discussion of his earlier “Tribal Nations Conference” on Native American rights, including a “shout out” recognition of a conference attendee.
When he finally got around to the purpose for his public appearance, he gave an uninspired and rambling dissertation on the tragedy. Even then, he could not keep the topic focused on sympathy for the pain of others:
I want all of you to know that as Commander in Chief, that there’s no greater honor, but no greater responsibility for me (emphasis his) than to make sure that the extraordinary men and women in uniform are properly cared for…
Poor soul, it’s so saddening to know how this tragedy affects him. Listening to this address provides some insight into Obama’s character and how he ranks his priorities.
I’ve said it many times over the years and it bears repeating again as cable TV talking heads ask in bewilderment how all the red flags Hasan raised could have been ignored: Political correctness is the handmaiden of terror.
U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul,
a Republican from
“He took a lot of extra classes in weapons training, which seems a little odd for a psychiatrist,” McCaul said.
McCaul said Hasan had received poor grades for his work at Walter Reed and was not happy about his situation in
“He’s disgruntled because he had a poor performance evaluation, he doesn’t believe in the mission, he’s looking at getting transferred to
McCaul added that officials planned to interview Hasan to try to determine for sure that he was not working with foreign agents.
“From an intelligence standpoint, that’s key, finding out if he talked to anyone overseas,” McCaul said.
Bruce Bawer has a brilliant essay on the MSM whitewashing of jihad:
CNN (ditto the New York Times website) was considerably less useful than the tidbits I picked up online by following links on various blogs and in Facebook postings. They led me to (among other things) an AP story, a Daily Mail article, and a Fox News interview that provided telling details:
Hasan had apparently been
a devout Muslim; Arabic words, reportedly a Muslim prayer, had been posted on
his apartment door in
…after [the Anderson Cooper show] was over, we got a “special edition” of Larry King Live hosted by Wolf Blitzer. This one really took the cake. By way of “illuminating” Hasan’s actions, Blitzer interviewed a panel of — no, not experts on Islamic jihad, but psychiatrists. Blitzer endlessly repeated the mantra that Hasan had been “taunted” for being Muslim, had feared going to a war zone, and had ultimately gone “berserk,” and the docs echoed this line. “He did not reach for help when he should have,” lamented one panelist. Another opined: “It sounded like it got to be too much for him.” Yet another told us: “All kind of people need help who aren’t getting help. … He was feeling picked on by his colleagues. … He was strained. He was scared.”
Could there be a more bitter contrast? At
And now: Reports that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” during the attack.
Nothing to see here. Move along…
Truly must see video on Obama's ties to Islam