Tyranny As Obama
Seeks To Take Away Religious Rights Of Doctors And Health Care Providers Who
Refuse To Perform Abortions
----- Original Message -----
From: AFA Action Alert
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:30 AM
Subject: Obama seeks
to take away religious rights of doctors and health care providers who refuse
to perform abortions
Donald E. Wildmon
Please help us get this information
into the hands of as many people as possible by forwarding it to your
entire e-mail list of family and friends.
Obama seeks to take away religious rights of doctors and health
care providers who refuse to perform abortions
Urgent: send your e-mail to the
White House today!
March 3, 2009
According to several news
agencies, President Barack Obama
will rescind the "conscience rule" that protects health workers who
refuse to participate in abortions or other medical procedures that go
against their moral and religious beliefs. If the rule is rescinded, doctors,
nurses and other health care workers could lose their jobs or be punished
professionally for adhering to their sincerely held religious convictions. Obama's proposal would take away their religious
The current rule empowers federal health officials to cut off federal
funding for any state or local government, hospital, clinic, health plan,
doctor's office or other entity if it does not accommodate employees who
exercise their right of conscience. It applies to more than 584,000 health
The Obama administration is doing the bidding of
pro-abortion advocacy groups who seek to penalize health care providers who
refuse to participate in abortions.
According to The Washington Post, Obama
administration officials stressed that the proposal will be subject to 30
days of public comment. That is why it is so very important for you to
let the White House hear from you today.
Donald E. Wildmon,
Founder and Chairman
American Family Association
the letter that I sent. - Gary L. Morella
March 3, 2009
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20500
Re: Without life, there ARE NO OTHER ISSUES!
Dear President Obama:
It is morally wrong for the federal government to force a
doctor, nurse or other health care professional to participate in abortion -
which stops a heartbeat and kills an innocent human life. I urge you not to
rescind the "conscience rule."
Without life there are no other issues, PERIOD! No citizen of
this country should be compelled to go against faith enabled right reason in
terms of issues involving the moral order. To do so is a violation of
Constitutionally protected rights that all Americans are entitled to from
conception to natural death, as referred to in the Declaration of
Independence. That Declaration, may I remind you, was not Independence
from God Almighty Whose blessing the Founding Fathers recognized as necessary
to survive the assaults from without and within! In order to deserve that
must obey the Natural Law of God for the sake of the common good. There can
be no common good served when Americans at their most vulnerable stage of
life, being innocents in their mothers' wombs, are denied an inalienable
right to life that was deemed paramount at America's founding.
It is a known fact that life begins at conception. Therefore
to deny the right of the aforementioned innocents to life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness, is a grave sin against God's moral order that can only
result in God's chastisement for America.
Abortion is a sin that cries out to Heaven for vengeance. It
is baby killing pure and simple. To force believers to be accomplices to
abortion is an unconscionable action on the part of a tyrannical state whose
unjust laws do not require obedience for the sake of a Kingdom not of this
Gary L. Morella
Obama as Hitler
This week in a bold move the President broke a barrier that his supporters
should be quite concerned about. For in doing so he has broken a barrier that
should always be seen as sacred. However, this will likely be marginalized by
the leftist media that offers it’s blind support
regardless of any mastery of facts.
Case and point... Rachel Maddow.
She is MSNBC's less funny and perhaps more butch version of Keith Olbermann. And on this past Friday night she did an
entire "bit" on anyone who would compare Obama's
policies to socialism as "not very serious people." Of course
people seeing the “bit” were a good deal uncertain
of Maddow as she herself kept interchanging the
terms socialist and communist. But liberals often are confused by facts and
frequently either do not understand what they are discussing, or discuss it
purposefully with deception. Whatever the case Maddow
thought herself witty.
We're supposed to believe her because... ...well... ...she said it. It does
not matter to Maddow if President Obama’s policies are in substance moving us towards
centralized control where the Government becomes the caretaker/nanny and the
individual is lulled into mind-numbing moronic infancy suckling off the
government's “all-sufficient” teet.
But if she got that worked up over a few people calling Obama’s
socialist policies by name, imagine what she will say about the title of this
And yet simply because Maddow, and others who
defend their loyalty to Obama in irrational ways,
still contend that he produces nothing but rainbows, ponies, and butterflies,
doesn't mean we shouldn't compare what Obama is
doing with others in history who have already tried those policies.
Which brings us to this point: This week President Obama exercised for the first time a policy decision that
shares a trait held in common with Adolf Hitler.
The headline was leaked late in the Friday afternoon news cycle so that as
few people as possible would pay attention, but here's the crux of a very
real problem: President Obama is moving policy on
public health into the direction of doctors being forced to act against their
conscience. (For liberals educated in public schools, a conscience is that
little voice inside you that used to inform you as to what was right or
President Obama wants them
performing abortions, whether they believe it to be an immoral thing or not.
And while the comparisons to Hitler are made either on eugenist
or racist grounds--but you cannot escape the impact.
In the 1930's and 40's as Hitler wished to use his captive “lesser-humans”
for "experiments" in his final solution. He too forced doctors to
do things they did not wish to do. Everything from injecting living humans
with horrible chemicals to see the effect, to trying differing grades of
poisonous gases in what eventually became death chambers. These doctors, who
were purveyors of those things that helped save lives, were suddenly forced
to use the medical knowledge they had of death--to end them.
In today’s scenario Obama wants doctors to
exterminate “lesser humans” for the purpose of immediate solutions to his
social experiment. And he wishes them to do so regardless of whether or not
they are compelled by the higher call of morality on an individual basis.
Put another way Obama's policy shift would be the
equivalent of forcing those who believed slavery to be immoral and never even
owned slaves, to begin purchasing them, beating them, raping them, and
This policy shift that Obama has attempted to slide
under the radar screen is grossly immoral, and doctors should disobey it and
run a medical mutiny against the administration if it becomes law.
The President did this, as he has done most things since coming to power as a
pure, pragmatic, political move to pay off the campaign favors of those
special interest groups he railed against during his campaign. In this case
the abortion industry which is increasingly under attack from the next
generation who understand the taking of innocent life to be horrific.
As to all the comparisons that the left made in 8 years of the previous
administration, they never once had such a clear comparison that so vividly
laid out the exact parallel between the dictator who thought it moral to gas
people in chambers, and now a President who believes that live babies should
be left to starve in soiled utility closets of hospitals, even if it violates
the voice of God telling the doctor to do otherwise.
This stroke of the policy pen, moves the
administration into its first conflict with the first amendment right of
religious belief and expression, and he should be penalized for it quickly.
Friday, Ms. Maddow, President Obama
took a demonstrable step in the shoes, actions, and example of Adolf Hitler.
What have you to say about that?
Pro-Life Leaders Respond to Obama's Plan to Revoke Conscience Regulations
By Kathleen Gilbert
WASHINGTON, D.C., March 2, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) -
President Obama is facing heavy criticism from
pro-life politicians and activists for setting to work dismantling the
Bush era federal regulations that uphold doctors' conscience rights.
The Health and Human Services (HHS) Department Friday
confirmed that the president has begun the process of repealing the
regulations that had been passed by the Bush administration and that went
into effect Jan. 20. The regulations enforce pre-existing federal law
that protects healthcare workers' right to conscientiously refuse
implementation of or involvement in abortions, including dispensation of the abortifacient morning-after pill.
Representative Thaddeus McCotter
(R-MI), Chairman of Republican House Policy Committee, issued a statement
Sunday, saying, "The administration's attack on pro-life Americans'
right of conscience endangers every Americans' right of conscience."
Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ), co-chairman of the House
Pro-life Caucus, denounced Obama's plans Friday.
"The nation is under siege by pro-abortion radicals who
are attacking the fundamental right of conscience, and are attempting to
impose their will through the Obama
administration," said Smith. "It is ironic that they like to
be called pro-choice, instead of pro-abortion, but that their preference for
'choice' refers only to people who support the killing of unborn
"Women deserve to have the option to choose doctors who
reflect their views on the sanctity of human life," Smith observed.
"They will lose that freedom if pro-life health care professionals are
driven from the medical field."
"Without long-standing 'conscience protection' the
extremist abortion lobby will eventually turn every ob-gyn into an abortionist."
Smith cited the "Ethics Opinion" of the American College of Obsetricians
and Gynecologists as an example of such extremism. The "Opinion"
called on all ob-gyns to be required to make
abortion referrals, and relocate near an abortionist if they do not
themselves provide abortions.
"Any pretense of 'moderation' on life issues was long ago
dispensed with," said Fr. Tom Euteneuer,
president of Human Life International, about the Obama
administration. "With the rescinding of the Mexico City Policy,
the appointment of dozens of radical anti-life cabinet members and staff, the
enormous increase in funding for contraception and irresponsible sex
advocacy, and now these grave insults to human life and dignity ... one
shudders to think what could be next.
"It's as if the president and Congress are trying to
outdo each other for the dishonor of who can forward the most extreme
Catholic League president Bill Donohue lamented the attack
against regulations protecting doctors' conscience rights, in particular
Catholic doctors, who have a moral obligation to oppose abortion.
"No one in the health care field should ever be compelled
by law to perform or assist in a procedure that violates his or her
conscience," said Donohue. "This should be an elementary
right, yet there are those who want to trespass on it.
"This would be another step in the wrong direction for an
administration which is promoting abortion by overturning the Mexico City
Policy, promising to support the United Nations Population Fund and
considering the nomination of radical abortion rights supporter Kansas Gov.
Kathleen Sebelius to be the Secretary of HHS. This
action would be the most offensive since it compromises the rights of
Catholics to act according to their conscience.
"It is imperative that President Obama
not rescind this morally critical regulation," said Donohue.
HHS CHOICE SEBELIUS MATCHES OTHER OBAMA
Sebelius “Says One Thing,
March 2, 2009 - Washington, DC -- The Traditional Values Coalition
criticized the nomination of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius
as Secretary of Health and Human Services as another Obama
appointee “who says one thing and does another and has contempt for the rule
TVC charged that Sebelius
publicly professed her “personal opposition” to abortion but privately worked
closely with the abortion industry and helped launder abortion industry
contributions to candidates.
“In an administration in which Joseph Biden, George
Mitchell, Bill Richardson and Tom Daschle were supposed to be agents of
change,” said TVC Executive Director Andrea Lafferty, “
this is just more of the same old stale politics as usual.
“This crew probably spent more than 100 years
cumulatively working in the Congress. The only time they thought about
change was when they stood in front of a Capitol Hill vending machine.”
The Coalition’s statement follows:
The President’s announcement today of the
appointment of Kathleen Sebelius as his nominee to
head Health and Human Services, once again, places a person, whose rhetoric
is dramatically different from her actions, in a position of power.
Like the Treasury Secretary who avoids paying taxes
and others President Obama has sought to appoint,
Governor Sebelius says she is “personally opposed”
to abortion but manages to overcome her principles and accept large
contributions from the abortion industry and also launders abortion industry
contributions for other candidates.
Governor Sebelius has
demonstrated contempt for the rule of law as she has worked closely with the
abortion industry to thwart the intent of campaign laws to ensure
transparency and full-disclosure.
In 2006, the notorious Kansas
abortionist George Tiller, one of the few abortionists in America who
continues to perform ghastly partial birth abortions, donated $120,000 to the
Democratic Governors Association (Sebelius was the
incoming president). The DGA turned around and donated $200,000 to
Bluestem Fund Political Action Committee which is Gov. Sebelius’
PAC. Presto – Tiller money goes to
Sibelius with none of his bloody fingerprints on it.
Anyone who dismisses this as a ploy used by many
unscrupulous politicians should remember that this is supposed to pass the
“change you can believe in” standard established repeatedly in numerous
long-winded Obama campaign speeches.
Gov. Sebelius says one
thing and does another, and she has contempt for the rule of law. The
Governor has looked the other way while this notorious abortionist performed illegal partial-birth abortions and covered up the
statutory rape of girls in her state.
Ultimately, President Obama
is responsible, and we will have to wait and see how close his soaring
rhetoric is matched by performance. He is off to a very bad
is a pro-life Pastor with courage to speak out on the abortion
holocaust, being furthered by Obama's overturning of
the "Mexico City
Fr. Richard L. Perozich, Pastor
St. Mary Catholic Church http://www.stmaryescondido.com/
Escondido, CA 92025
January 31, 2009
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Obama,
Please reinstate the Mexico City Policy, and do all in your power to end the
torture of killing infants in the womb and destroying the bodies and spirits
of mothers who undergo these barbaric procedures called abortion described
for you below.
* Menstrual extraction A very early suction abortion,
often done before the
pregnancy test is positive.
* Suction The abortionist first paralyzes the cervix (womb opening). He then
inserts a hollow plastic tube with a knifelike tip into the uterus. The tube
is connected to a powerful pump with a suction force 29 times more powerful
than a home vacuum cleaner. The procedure tears the baby's body into pieces
and the hose frequently jerks as pieces of the baby become lodged. The
placenta is then cut from the inner wall of the uterus and the scraps are
sucked out into a bottle.
* Dilatation & Curettage (D&C) Uncommon today and used during the first
weeks of pregnancy. This is similar to the suction procedure except that the
abortionist inserts a curette, a loopshaped steel knife
up into the uterus.
He then cuts the placenta and baby into pieces and scrapes them out into a
basin. Bleeding is usually profuse.
* Dilatation & Evacuation (D&E) Performed during the second trimester
months) of pregnancy. This method has largely replaced saline and chemical
abortions, which too frequently resulted in live births, a complication from
the abortionist's perspective! A pliers-like instrument is needed because
the baby's bones are calcified, as is the skull. There is no anesthetic for
the baby. The abortionist inserts the instrument into the uterus, seizes a
leg or other part of the body and, with a twisting motion, tears
it from the
baby's body. This is repeated again and again. The spine must be snapped,
and the skull crushed to remove them. The nurse's job is to reassemble the
body parts to be sure that all are removed.
* D & X (Partial Birth) Also used for advanced pregnancies. The cervix is
dilated to allow passage of a ring forceps. A foot or lower leg is located
and pulled into the vagina. The baby is extracted in breech fashion until
the head is just inside the cervix. The baby's legs hang outside the woman's
body. With the baby face-down, scissors are plunged into the baby's head at
the nape of the neck and spread open to enlarge the wound A suction tip is
inserted and the baby's brain is removed. The skull collapses and the baby
is delivered. Sharp and suction curettage is continued until the walls of
the womb are clean.
* Hysterotomy This method is usually used late in
pregnancy and is likened
to an "early" Caesarian section. The mother's abdomen and uterus are
surgically opened and the baby is lifted out. Unfortunately, many of these
babies are very much alive when removed. To kill the babies, some
abortionists have been known to plunge them into buckets of water or smother
them with the placentas. Still others cut the cord while the baby is still
inside the uterus depriving the baby of oxygen.
* Salt Poisoning a.k.a. "Candy Apple
Babies:" Most often used after the
first trimester (first three months). The abortionist injects a strong salt
solution directly into the amniotic sac (fluid surrounding the baby). The
baby breathes and swallows it, is poisoned, struggles, and sometimes
convulses. It takes over an hour to kill the baby. The mother delivers the
dead baby in a day or two (sometimes alive!). Why "candy apple"
corrosive effect of the salt solution often burns and strips away the outer
layer of the baby's skin. This exposes the raw, red, glazed-looking
subcutaneous layer of tissue. The baby's head sometimes looks like a candy
apple. Some have also likened this method to the effect of napalm on
innocent war victims. This technique was originally developed in the
concentration camps in Nazi Germany.
* Prostaglandin Abortions Three forms, two are injected and one is a vaginal
suppository. Its first approved use was for "the induction of mid
abortion." The hormone produces a violent labor and delivery of whatever
size baby the mother carries. If the baby is old enough to survive the
trauma of labor, it may be born alive, but is usually too small to survive.
In one article, among the complications listed was "live birth!"
* RU-486 A drug that produces an abortion taken after
the mother misses her
period. Its effect is to block the use of an essential hormonal nutrient by
the newly-implanted baby, who then dies, and drops off. Note that RU-486 is
not a contraceptive because it does not prevent fertilization or
implantation. It is used only after the mother has missed her period and the
baby is at least two to three weeks old, with a beating heart (the fetal
heart begins to beat when the woman is four days late for her period). It is
no longer effective after six or eight weeks. Methotrexate
- one of the
drugs contained in RU486 - can cause liver damage, kidney destruction, heart
muscle compromise, pulmonary failure, gastrointestinal pathology, and bone
marrow suppression. It has also been reported to cause loss of speech
function, strokes, and convulsions.
May the Holy Spirit of God be with you to lead all to truth and life.
Sincerely in Christ,
Fr. Richard L. Perozich
In regard to the story below, what is UNDERLINED is THE
problem. We have a lot of bishops and archbishops who are all talk and no
action! Little wonder the Church is in the mess that it is!
For the love of God, apostates like Sebelius, Pelosi,
Kennedy, Kerry, & Co. deserve FORMAL EXCOMMUNICATION
MANY TIMES OVER for the public scandal that they've caused the faith. And
what do we see but their bishops and archbishops going out of their way to NOT
BE CATHOLIC by refusing to use tough medicine for their souls, and the souls of
all those that these same bishops and archbishops are leading astray by DOING
NOTHING, repeat, NOTHING, to correct the grave public errors of the aforementioned
We know who you are, bishops and archbishops. You're
not fooling anyone! Catholics in more than name only ARE NOT THAT EASILY
CONNED! You may get a lot of ink in a desperate Catholic press yearning
for any good news in this sea of wickedness in which
we leave, however remote. But that is little consolation to a
Church burning while you fiddle with your meaningless, toothless drivel in the
face of the devil who is laughing at you!
To expect apostates to correct themselves after they've been
allowed to publicly bastardize Church moral teaching with impunity is akin to
expecting Comrade Obama to freely turn in his
"how to be the dictator-in-chief-handbook" without a needed exorcism!
- Gary L. Morella
archbishop stopped short, however, of stating that if Sebelius
approached a priest, deacon, or extraordinary lay Eucharistic minister for
Communion, she would be denied. Pity! Sebelius
ignored him in the same way she has been ignoring archbishops for years.
VI: REBELLIOUS SEBELIUS
Posted: Tuesday March 3, 2009 at 9:33 am EST by Judie Brown
Kathleen Sebelius, current governor
and alleged Catholic, has distinguished herself in many ways. Most disturbing
among them is her long-held support for the act of abortion. It is this
single attribute that perhaps makes her attractive to President Obama as he sets his sights on her as his nominee for the
post of Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
By the way, those words, "health" and "human services"
have a whole lot to do with the defining characteristics of the Sebelius era in Kansas.
For example, out of a sincerely held, very deep belief in the jaundiced view
that abortion is nothing more than an aspect of reproductive health services,
she has gone out of her way to embrace the culture of death. Her opinion, based
on her statements and actions, is that every mother should have the right to
choose to end the life of her own preborn child.
Sebelius has explained that though she is
"personally opposed to abortion," she is "obligated
to uphold state and federal laws and court decisions related to abortion."
When Sebelius vetoed the Comprehensive
Abortion Reform Act last year, she explained in her veto message,
I am concerned about a number of provisions in SB 389. The
United States Supreme Court decisions make clear that any law regulating
abortion must contain exceptions for pregnancies which endanger the woman's
life or health. However, SB 389 allows a variety of individuals to seek a
court order preventing a woman from obtaining an abortion, even where it may
be necessary to save her life. I am concerned that the bill is likely
unconstitutional or even worse, endangers the lives of women. …
As Governor, nothing is more important to me than the safety, health and
privacy rights of our citizens. I am vetoing SB 389 because it endangers the
health of women and is likely to be found in violation the United States
Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Kansas.
The governor issued this statement with a straight face, though the message
she received from her archbishop should have given her reason to pause since Sebelius is a Catholic who supports abortion and has
supported abortion for more than twenty years.
Joseph Naumann reacted immediately upon
receiving word of the Sebelius veto and issued a
stinging rebuke in which he said:
What makes the governor's actions and advocacy for legalized abortion,
throughout her public career, even more painful for me is that she is
Catholic. Sadly, Governor Sebelius is not unique in
being a Catholic politician supporting legalized abortion.
Since becoming archbishop, I have met with Governor Sebelius
several times over many months to discuss with her the grave spiritual and
moral consequences of her public actions by which she has cooperated in the
procurement of abortions performed in Kansas.
My concern has been, as a pastor, both for the spiritual well-being of the
governor but also for those who have been misled (scandalized) by her very
for legalized abortion….
Having made every effort to inform and to persuade Governor Sebelius and after consultation with Bishop Ron Gilmore
(Dodge City), Bishop Paul Coakley (Salina) and
Bishop Michael Jackels (Wichita), I wrote the
governor last August requesting that she refrain from presenting herself for
reception of the Eucharist until she had acknowledged the error of her past
positions, made a worthy sacramental confession and taken the necessary steps
for amendment of her life which would include a public repudiation of her
previous efforts and actions in support of laws and policies sanctioning
archbishop stopped short, however, of stating
that if Sebelius approached a priest, deacon, or
extraordinary lay Eucharistic minister for Communion, she would be denied.
Pity! Sebelius ignored him in the same way she has
been ignoring archbishops for years.
Since the archbishop's initial reprimand things have clearly gotten worse.
During the presidential election campaign, then Senator Barack
Obama had Governor Sebelius
on his team
of advisors regarding Catholic matters, and the archbishop explained in
"What I found out after I took the pastoral action with Governor Sebelius is that Senator Obama
had her on his advisory committee for Catholics. …
"I wasn't aware of that [beforehand] but I hope that it alerted Senator Obama that this is not probably somebody that can really
counsel you in terms of the mind and the heart of the Church on this very
critical and important area.
"So I think it would be a bad judgment on Senator Obama's
part to select someone who was in conflict with the Church."
By now we all realize that now President Obama had
no concern whatsoever for authentic Catholic doctrine, nor was he about to
take advice from a Catholic who follows what the Church teaches. Quite the
contrary, he surrounded himself both then and now with dissenters … Catholics
who defied Church teaching and got away with it … still get away with it!
To this very moment, no firm order has been given that the governor should be
denied the sacrament should she approach for the reception of Holy Communion.
The sad fact is that Sebelius will be making her
way through the various government interviews used to ascertain whether or
not she could be confirmed as the new HHS secretary under Obama.
And while doing these interviews, she will probably be held to a higher
standard by her political peers than she has been by the Catholic archbishops
who have dealt with her. Sebelius has been at the
forefront of the abortion rights debate in Kansas for more than 20 years and has yet
to be clearly and resoundingly rebuked.
Bill O'Reilly has claimed that Sebelius is "not
fit to serve" ; he based this comment on her public alliances with
infamous abortionist George Tiller. But, sadly, the Catholic bishops have not
suggested that she is not fit to call herself Catholic.
Robert Novak labeled Sebelius "the
national pro-choice poster girl" in May of last year. However,
Catholic bishops have not taken definitive action to make sure she knows she
is not authentically Catholic and must cease her public claims to the
I will give but one example of her long history of carrying the water for the
pro-aborts. In 1989, Sebelius was a state representative. Shortly after
Scott Peterson had been found guilty of killing his wife and their preborn child, a law was proposed in Kansas to define preborn
babies killed in such ways as persons. But Sebelius
opposed it stating: "I think for me and a lot of other people there are
certain inalienable rights established for a person, but those are not
applied in utero." …
In other words, in 1989 Sebelius refused to
acknowledge the fact that a baby exists in his mother's womb prior to birth.
That was twenty years ago … the archbishop took no corrective action.
The sad fact is that over these many years no Catholic bishop has taken steps
to correct Sebelius in a meaningful way. She has
repeatedly ignored the public statements of her bishops. Over time, Sebelius has become recalcitrant in her support for
abortion, which she clearly believes is but another aspect of health care. Sebelius represents all that is despicable about the
movement that strives to protect abortion rights at all costs as though
abortion itself were a sacrament.
So now, we come to the present moment and the prospect of having this woman
preside over a department concerned with public "health" and the
provision of "human services." What an oxymoron that is!
What kind of health care
is it that provides murder for an innocent preborn
child as a solution to a perceived problem? And what kind of human service is it to discard, on
the garbage piles of America,
the bodies, bones and blood of little babies who never had a chance to live?
Macabre, is it not, that we are facing the prospect of having an advocate of
human butchery in one of the most pivotal positions in our nation's
It is disturbing, as well, that a so-called Catholic may assume this role
with nary a word of genuine repudiation from Catholic shepherds.
Recently, there was a picture in the local Pravda US, The Centre Daily Times of State College Pennsylvania, that
showed a group of smiling Marines at Comrade Obama's
address regarding the Iraq
War at Camp Lejeune!
I'm sure this pic made the morning rounds in the
aforementioned mainstream media that has been in the tank for Obama from the get-go.
For the record, per my sources, this is pure propaganda in the
tradition of Joseph Goebbels, as Obama is the most
disliked president by the military in recent history due to
his previous disparaging comments about the military that received
wide dissemination, implying that that our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines
were going out of their way to kill civilians. We're talking about a man
who effectively wants to unilaterally disarm in the face of an enemy that wants
to destroy us from without via his proposed drastic cuts in the military budget
to pay for his radical Marxist Socialist social engineering problems that
foment class warfare, which is right out of communist
handbooks, to ensure that he stay in power as the nation's savior.
Such a man is the greatest threat that America
has ever had because of the support that he has in the aforementioned Pravda US
press to destroy America
The truth of the matter is that Obama's
spending can never be paid for at the rate that it's being initiated because
money has to be invented to do so, which will de facto render our money
worthless via the coming hyper inflation that is inevitable. Those who
believe in the lie that only the wealthy will be taxed are living a pipe dream
as very soon they will see their paychecks halved due to the insanity of Obama and his Dem minions whose only care is power and
control of anything and everything about our lives, i.e., to make us completely
dependent upon a welfare state that will demand that we kowtow to its Godless
decrees! Obama couldn't care less about
the need for the wealthy to hire the poor, thereby giving the poor a chance to
better themselves. No, Obama, wants everyone to
be poor via laws that are so insane as to be laughable if their consequences
weren't so tragic, e.g., Gore's global warming lies which will destroy American
industry, in particular, the American energy industry, which will increase
taxes on everyone by an order-of-magnitude as Obama's
excess corporate taxes are passed on to the customers. Wow, that's really
going to encourage investing and create jobs! But Obama is not about investing in America and creating jobs. Obama is about just the opposite to reinvent America in Obama's warped class warfare image to further Obama - to heck with the rest of us!
Attention megalomaniac Obama: The world
already has a Savior spelled with a capital "S" and it isn't
you! His Kingdom is of another world, not your lie of an
earthly socialist utopia which is straight from the father-of-lies!
Anyone who is conned by that aforementioned picture of happy
Marines is drinking Obama's kool-aid
which is as deadly as Jim Jones' was in terms of the future of our country for
our children and grandchildren - a future that will be nonexistent if Obama is not opposed at every level where his communist
policies rear their ugly heads on the local, state and federal levels!
With the help of God, Whom we need now
more than ever, Obama can be defeated. But we must get close to God to do this, and the only way
that will happen is by obeying God's Natural Law which is a participation in
His Eternal Law for the sake of the common good leading ultimately to a
Era Navy Veteran!