‘Catholic support for Comrade Obama’
is an Oxymoron
by Gary L. Morella
The enclosed
article was forwarded to me from a Byzantine
Catholic friend. That a disciple of the devil like the political joke
who is Comrade Obama can get "Catholic" support
boggles the mind! Such support cannot be Catholic. Rather, it is of
the devil! See the sorry history of the devil's support below from
Catholic frauds, which is due mainly to the lack of orthodox Catholic Catholic catechesis coming from their pulpits
because their bishops couldn't care less, i.e., their bishops are not
Catholic!
Catholic
moral theology has always clearly taught that you can NEVER do an evil for a
greater good. What could be a greater evil than voting for someone who
officially promotes the killing of innocents in the womb to the diabolical
extremes of Comrade Obama, who is so evil that
he cannot support 'born alive infants acts,' regardless of whatever
other positions are held by this individual, practically all of which
would render America to being a Communist totalitarian state quicker than
you can say 'the audacity of hope.' Take a quick look at the definition
of 'audacity' in Webster's. In Comrade Obama's
case we're talking about the 'arrogant disregard of normal restraints,'
read the destruction of the moral order, PERIOD, leaving us with the chaos of
the devil! But of course, this bothers the 'mericiful
lord, the messiah,' Comrade Obama, not, as he's
too busy practicing his illusory ascent into the heavens which
demands that
Without
life there are NO OTHER ISSUES, PERIOD, because natural life is the only means
to ETERNAL life for man in obedience to the Law of God. For the love of
God, we're talking about a man who is an antichrist figure if there
ever was one, given his meteoric rise from the relative obscurity of the
political sewage racist, Marxist Socialist, sinkhole from whence he came, a man
who supports the entirety of a culture-of-ETERNAL-death to extremes
unheard of by even the shameless Clintons who seem like benign residents of Mr.
Rogers' neighborhood in comparison!
The
Catholic Church does NOT permit voting for those who are pro-baby killing under
ANY circumstances. How could it and call itself Catholic in the
aforementioned realization that man is procreating to populate Heaven in accord
with the intent of the Creator? Moreover, the Catholic Church does NOT
permit supporting those who are counter to the teaching Magisterium
on faith and morals to include especially pro-sexual promiscuity via contraception,
abortion, pro-sodomy, and euthanasia. There is a moral order here that
takes precedence; else, the chaos of the devil reigns supreme! Eternity
hangs in the balance! The Catholic position is to educate the faithful so that
those running for office will see the truths of the faith in a natural law
context as a participation in the eternal law leading ultimately to a final salvific end intended by the Sacrifice of our Savior for
man's redemption. In particular, this means that Catholics, especially Catholic politicians, cannot
check their faith at the door and remain Catholic, unlike the lie of John
Kennedy forced upon him to gain power at the risk of his immortal soul.
The
"lesser of two evils" argument has never been Catholic. What is
Catholic is to educate the world that "evil deserves no vote." And
that can only happen when Catholics are taught that they are to
uncompromisingly witness to the world for the sake of its conversion to the
faith, which is what Jesus taught in the Gospel of Matthew, the last part of
which was crystal clear on this issue.
The
"lesser of two evils" is still evil. Catholics are not called to
promote evil via any proportional situational ethics argument, regardless of
who is making them. Certainly, Jesus Christ, the Founder of the Church upon the
Rock that is Peter did NOT.
I would
not want to explain to Jesus Christ, coming as Just Judge, upon drawing my last
breath, why I voted for an antichrist for President of the
No
Catholic Can
Support the Twin Antichrists: Obama and Clinton |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m275.htm
Who
Do the USCCB Bishops Think That They Are Kidding? |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m255.htm
John
Kerry, the Apostate Altar Boy |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m204.htm
A
Catholic's Choice in this Election |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m202.htm
Let’s Get
One Thing Straight – John Kerry is NO Catholic, PERIOD! |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m197.htm
The
Biggest Scandal is the Bishops Doing NOTHING to Correct Pseudo-Catholic Kerry |
http://www.personal.psu.edu/glm7/m188.htm
BY FR JOACHIM OMOLO
OUKO, AJ
NAIROBI-KENYA
JULY 2, 2008
The Tablet Newsletter of June 28, 2008 has published quite interesting article
about Barack Obama and the
catholic votes. Although in the last presidential election the Catholic vote
was decisive in giving George W. Bush a second term in the White House, the
fact that there are signs that Catholics may be deserting the Republicans and
the Democrat candidate is making great efforts to woo them leaves a lot to be
desired.
Although in the Pennsylvania primary, Obama lost to
Hillary Clinton trailing badly among Catholic voters, the fact that since last
year’s election, the number of Democrats in Pennsylvania had increased by more
than 161,000, it is obvious that Obama has to make a
strong outreach to Catholics in that area.
The defectors that include Catholics like Chris Molitoris,
22, who was a registered Republican but switched his party registration so he
can vote in the Democratic primary for Obama is
another boost. Molitoris is from Plains near
Scranton and is the student president at the University of Scranton, a Catholic
Jesuit university. Other
When George W. Bush out-polled John Kerry (a Catholic) among Catholic voters in
2004, it was not about race, but purely on religion. Kerry was a democrat
catholic presidential candidate, while Bush was a Protestant Republican.
Historically the Catholics have been voting republican because they are anti-abortion
unlike the Democrats. To some extent even the
This was exactly what happened to Kerry in 2004 presidential election when then
Cardinal Ratzinger wrote a letter US bishops in
August 2004 that they must refuse Holy Communion to pro-abortionists and those
obstinate sin.
Apart from an individuals’s judgement
about his worthiness to present himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, Ratzinger said the minister of Holy Communion may find
himself in the situation where he must refuse to distribute Holy Communion to
someone, such as in cases of a declared excommunication, a declared interdict,
or an obstinate persistence in manifest grave sin (cf. can. 915).
Regarding the grave sin of abortion or euthanasia, Ratzinger
said in the letter that when a person’s formal cooperation becomes manifest
(understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently
campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws), his Pastor
should meet with him, instructing him about the Church’s teaching, informing
him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion until he brings to an
end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be
denied the Eucharist.
When “these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they
were not possible,” and the person in question, with obstinate persistence,
still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, “the minister of Holy
Communion must refuse to distribute it” (cf. Pontifical Council for Legislative
Texts Declaration “Holy Communion and Divorced, Civilly Remarried Catholics”
[2002], nos. 3-4).
Apart from adult Catholic voters, the good news for Obams
is that young Catholics, along with other members of their generation, have
been energised by Obama’s
campaign. His opposition to the war in
Another fact that Catholic Democrats outnumber Catholic Republicans in the
United States, both are outnumbered by the 41 percent of U.S. Catholic voters
who are not affiliated with either party, according to new data from the Center
for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University sounds good
news to Obama’s road to victory.
In a report titled “Election ‘08 Forecast,” released June 20, CARA compared
data on party identification and the social, political and moral views of the
estimated 47 million potential Catholic voters in the November election.
The fact that American catholic bishops have also become more assertive in
urging their congregations to vote in accord with Catholic teachings on those
issues - and in moving to chastise Catholic officials who disagree, in a few
cases by threatening to deny them Communion, acting with the support and
encouragement of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now the
new pope, who at the time headed the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, one is to wait whose voice will be heard during November elections.
People for Peace in
00800, Westlands