Beware Of The Ulterior Motives Of UN Agenda 21 Proponents Regarding Farmers Markets - The UN Agenda 21 Plan Of The Eco-Fascists To Herd Those Of Us, Whom They Deem Fit To Live, Into Cities So That We Might Be Better Controlled - Burn Down The Suburbs - A New And Intrusive Ecclesiastical Communism As Agenda 21 Enabling A Godless New World Order - Fighting The Pathological Lying Gore Green Goblins For The Sake Of A Country Fit To Live In - Corporate Welfare Costs Taxpayers Almost $100 Billion In FY2012 - White House Pressure Got Solyndra DOE Loan - Melting Our Money Away Via Delusional Solar Power Dreams - Obama’s Green Jobs Scam - Biofuels Boondoggle Ripping Off Military As Air Force Pays $59 A Gallon To Help Obama Donors - Obama Waging All-Out War On Coal Industry As Unreasonable Clean Air Standards Imposed On Plants With The Loss Of Jobs Of No Concern - Obama’s Amerika Is Now A Country Where Being An American Is A Crime As Oregon Rain Man Found Out - Insanity As Beetle To Delay Keystone Pipeline - Get Ready For More Solyndra-Style Waste As Obama’s 2nd Term Will Feature A “Green Bank” - Obama’s Draconian Car Regs Based On Green Goblin Lies Will Make Cars Unaffordable - The Assault On Coal And American Consumers - Skeptics Put The Freeze On NASA “Hot Air” About Greenland Ice - Debunking The Great Carbon Tax Hype -  Let’s Drill For Oil - Solyndra Figures Attend Swank Obama Fundraiser - Leaked Emails Snag Global-Warming Alarmists - Obama’s Imaginary Efficient Green Energy - EPA’s “Border Environmental” Agreement Ignores Damage Done By Illegal Aliens - Lifting Drilling Restrictions Could Increase U.S. Reserves By 30 Percent - Alaska Massive Petroleum Reserves Put Off Limits By Obama Who Has A Death Wish For Efficient American Energy - Obama Wants To Nationalize All Industries And Regulate Your Paycheck As Plan Would Let Government Determine “Value” Of Private Market Jobs - EPA Foolishly Seeks To Destroy Nation’s Coal Industry - Ethanol Mandate Ignores The Free Market  - The Bogus Hype From Climate Alarmists Like Michael Mann That July Heat Record Shows Rise In Global Temp - Higher Gas Prices Add To Economic Slump - The Obama Politburo’s Double Standard When It Comes To Concern About Carbon Footprints

on Farmers Markets 'Evolving' Into 'Community Hubs,' Says USDA Architect 

There is an ulterior motive here as anyone aware of UN Agenda 21 knows upon looking at the rants of the disciples of sustainability, i.e., the idea is to herd us all into the cities so that we may be better controlled! I see this in my local paper in Central PA on a monthly basis where the local lunatic community organizer hysterically gives doomsday scenarios if her gospel isn't accepted, lock, stock, and barrel. I vividly recall making a comment along these lines after one of her columns where I asked, basically, what was her final solution for all those who don't want to be herded. My comment was summarily censored by that paper which is a card carrying member of PRAVDA USA.
There is nothing wrong with Farmers Markets, for sure. There is everything wrong with using Farmers Markets as an enticement for the work of community organizers, read communists, to be the cattle prods for the aforementioned herding.

Farmers Markets 'Evolving' Into 'Community Hubs,' Says USDA Architect 





Agenda 21: ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’
Judi McLeod  Full Story

Agenda 21 has no teeth, it only has fangs

Agenda 21: ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’



- Judi McLeod  

Maurice Strong, United Nations, Agenda 21

Some day when historians are sifting through the ashes of what was once the Free West trying to determine what happened,  they will discover that freedom was lost through ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’.

‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’  is the main strategy being used to push through the very real and dangerous Agenda 21 through villages, towns and cities. The inhabitants of some 1,200 cities—600 of them American—do not even know they’ve been hijacked by the UN’s Agenda 21.

Interesting how Agenda 21 was originated by the first ‘Man Who Wasn’t Really There’,  U.N. Poster Boy, Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong.  Obama, incidentally is only the second ‘Man Who Wasn’t Really There’.

The reason Obama stands out while Maurice Strong doesn’t, is that arrogant Obama likes to boast openly about his obsession to Fundamentally Transform America, while Maurice Strong has always played in the dark of the background.

Obama came out of the nowhere of the streets of Chicago, undocumented, and with zero experience or skills other than those owned by hundreds of thousands of community organizers/activists who get by, courtesy of a capacious government teat. 

Maurice Strong came out of nowhere with only a Grade 11 education to spend a lifetime making it rich as the Father of the Environment through the government-funded U.N.  Strong breezed into the Big Apple at age 18, arriving at Turtle Bay to take up a ready made job as assistant pass officer in the Identification Unit of the Security Section.  He lived with Noah Monod, then treasurer of the U.N.  It was when he first met David Rockefeller and learned that all U.N. funds were handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank. 

Long lost over time is that the U.N. physical headquarters got its start in life from the Rockefellers who bought land that had formerly housed an abattoir.  Those folk old enough can still remember the frightened squeals of animals being led to slaughter.

Today it is the freedom of the human race being led to slaughter with most folk not even aware of how and where they are being led.

More than a lifetime has passed, but Rockefeller, at age 97 and Strong, now 83 are still here.

The era when Strong was in training was the same one when global governance emerged.  The idea of allowing the U.N. to become a supranational agency was advanced by the Rockefellers and the Rockefeller-funded Council on Foreign Relations.

It was difficult for the masses to catch on to the game-plan with the U.N. masquerading as ‘Grand Peace Central’.

It was the late great Henry Lamb (1938-2012) who first began documenting and writing the history of the real United Nations.  Lamb, who attended U.N. meetings at his own expense, became the ‘Bible of all things U.N.’

At the tender age of 18, Strong, with no real education,  just happened to be looking for opportunities in all the right places.  As an indication how far he was to go, he was 67 years old when he was appointed Senior Advisor to incoming U.N. Secretary General, Kofi Annan in 1997. Strong’s well-paid mission was “to assist planning and executing a far-reaching reform of the world body”.  Annan didn’t have to go too far to find his senior advisor, who was in those days already an active member of the Commission on Global Governance.

Why doesn’t the name Maurice Strong blink on like one of Mr. Edison’s light bulbs when Agenda 21 is being discussed?

“Strong prefers to operate in the background.  He, perhaps more than any other single person, is responsible for the development of a global agenda now being implemented throughout the world.” (Henry Lamb).

Though word leader lemmings and the U.N. have turned citizen suspicion of the all-encompassing Agenda 21 into conspiracy theory, ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’ is the world’s most clear and present danger.

The toxic tentacles of Agenda 21

The toxic tentacles of Agenda 21 go all the way to China and back; to Obama’s personal friend Bill Ayers and down through the Black Panthers.

Some 178 countries are now pushing Agenda 21 but these are only the countries we know about.

Strong operates these days from the Peoples Republic of China.  As Lamb pointed out, “Strong’s cousin, Anna Louise Strong, was a Marxist, and a member of the Comintern, who spent two years with Mao and Chou En-lai.  Her burial in China in 1970 was organized personally by Chou En-lai.  Maurice is well received in China, partly because of his cousin’s connections.”

Unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist co-founder Bill Ayers, a fundraiser, close friend and confidante of Barack Obama states in Fugitive Days, that Anna Louise Strong provided a printing press for the Black Panthers upon the Weather Underground’s request. (Ciff Kincaid,

In any case, it wouldn’t matter where Maurice Strong lived.  Strong, like all U.N. operatives, is fully covered by Diplomatic Immunity.  There are some fish who are never caught.

Just like its architects who bob in and out of everyday life and who never have to worry about Justice catching up with them, Agenda 21 is hard to nail down. It suits to a ‘t’ the old saying: “It would be like trying to nail jelly to a wall”.

Prominent among the claims that it doesn’t exist is the one defining Agenda 21 as “a non-binding resolution not a treaty, which carries no legal authority from which any nation is bound to act.  It has no teeth.” (Tom DeWeese).

Agenda 21 has no teeth, it only has fangs

Of course Agenda 21 has no teeth, it only has fangs.

A huge part of the problem in trying to fight off ownership by Agenda 21 are the multiple names and descriptions for it and the tons of U.N. paper produced to keep it recycled through the countless bureaucrats in villages, towns and cities.

A veritable moving target that never goes away, Agenda 21 has more pages and as many clauses as the unread Health Bill known as ObamaCare.

As patriots try to define it, the U.N. continues to change it—at least in description and words.

The best definition of Agenda 21 comes right from the U.N. itself.  In 1993, the U.N. published ‘Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet’: “Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”

And if you think they are kidding in this Science Fiction-type definition of ‘The Agenda That Really Wasn’t There’, ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability) proves otherwise.

After the Maurice Strong-led Earth summit in 1992, ICLEI set its mission to move into the policy process of local governments around the world to impose Sustainable Development policy.  It now operates in more than 1,200 cities globally, including 600 American cities, all of which pay dues for the privilege of working with ICLEI.

Nothing in Orwell’s 1984 can match the full horror of Agenda 21.  It is serfdom by stealth.

Written in innocent-sounding, Save-Mother-Earth style under the ruse of environmentalism,  this major undertaking is the mechanism to confiscate privately held lands; the ironclad means to dictate to people from all walks of life, where they can live, what they can eat and drink, what to drive, and how to heat and light their apartments or homes.

Agenda 21 is a blight extending over all countries in the world, much worse than the killer flu bugs about which the U.N. sends out its dire warnings.  The Agenda’s main focus is currently the United States of America, now that a Marxist president is in the White House, seeking a second term.

Forget nightmares whose end rounds entire populations in FEMA camps.  Agenda 21 captures communities without their populations even being aware of it.  Like carbon monoxide its intent will not be detected until it is too late.

Why are world cities marching lemming like toward the edge of the cliff?

“Like a cancer, ICLEI begins to infest the local government policy, training city employees to think only in terms of Sustainable Development, and replacing local guidelines with international codes, rules and regulations.” (Tom DeWeese)

Make no mistake about it, ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’, if not blocked,  will make slaves of us all, including our children and grandchildren.

One of the most nightmarish aspects of Agenda 21 can be dispatched with this knowledge.  The architects of this U.N. endeavor are not faceless bureaucrats.  The faceless bureaucrats are only the flunkies.  The masterminds administering Agenda 21 are the David Camerons, Angela Merkels, Francois Hollandes, Hugo Chavezes, et al.  In other words, the world leaders.

God doesn’t live at the U.N., Gaia does

As in-your-face as he is, Obama is only a Johnny-Come-Lately in the theme of world governance; a sock puppet whose actions are manipulated by Maurice Strong and George Soros who put him there—only—for the advancement of their long-planned One World Government power schemes.

There is nothing original about Barack Hussein Obama, whose community organizer talent recommended him for the job as US President.

Don’t look for any voluntary let up from the U.N.  God doesn’t live at the U.N., Gaia does.

But the Almighty, mercifully still rules in the hearts of Christians.

Serfdom of Agenda 21

There is a way to escape the serfdom of Agenda 21.  Its lifeblood is the communities and their municipal/civic governments.  Luckily, municipal elections long dominated by apathy leave openings for patriots.  The best resistance to Agenda 21 is taking advantage of the apathy and running as a councillor, reeve, or mayor in the next municipal election.

Google the dates of the next local election in your community.  Print brochures, knock on doors, use the Internet to contact prospective voters.

Don’t let the prospect of hard work after election hold you back.  Do you know any mayor or councillor who died of hard work in office?

If you are too late to run as a candidate in this municipal election, get ready to take on the incumbent in the next one.

Taking control of your community arms you with know-how when the next stop is Washington.

Meanwhile, don’t let the lofty words of the U.N. fool you.  Hidden in UN doublespeak, Agenda 21 was named for the takeover of society in the 21st century.

Agenda 21 is coming soon to a community near you if it hasn’t already taken it over.

If words can be used to dupe the masses, the masses can change the words to come up with those of their own.

You can turn the name of U.N. takeover around in honor of the most important presidential election of your life time.  It starts by calling Agenda 21, ‘Agenda 12’.

Cities in Canada and the United States,  which have signed onto Agenda 21

See Full List

  • Abingdon, VA
  • Acton, MA
  • Alachua County, FL
  • Albany, CA
  • Albany, NY
  • Alexandria, VA
  • Algonquin, IL
  • Allegheny County, PA
  • Alliance, OH
  • American Canyon, CA
  • Amherst, MA
  • Ann Arbor, MI
  • Antioch, CA
  • Arcata, CA
  • Arlington County, VA
  • Arroyo Grande, CA
  • Arvada, CO
  • Ashland, OR
  • Aspen, CO
  • Atascadero, CA
  • Athens-Clarke County, GA
  • Athens, OH
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Auburn, MA
  • Auburn, WA
  • Austin, TX
  • Babylon, NY
  • Bainbridge Island, WA
  • Beaverton, OR
  • Bedford, NY
  • Belfast, ME
  • Bellevue, WA
  • Bellingham, WA
  • Belmar, NJ
  • Belmont, MA
  • Belvedere, CA
  • Benicia, CA
  • Berea, KY
  • Berkeley, CA
  • Beverly Hills, CA
  • Binghamton, NY
  • Birmingham, AL
  • Blacksburg, VA
  • Blaine County, ID
  • Bloomington, IN
  • Blue Earth County, MN
  • Boston, MA
  • Bothell, WA
  • Bowie, MD
  • Boynton Beach, FL
  • Bozeman, MT
  • Branford, CT
  • Brattleboro, VT
  • Brenkeridge Town, CO
  • Bridgeport, CT
  • Brighton, NY
  • Brookfield, IL
  • Brookhaven, NY
  • Brookline, MA
  • Broward County, FL
  • Burlingame, CA
  • Burlington, VT
  • Cambridge, MA
  • Carbondale, CO
  • Carpinteria, CA
  • Carrboro, NC
  • Cary, NC
  • Cayuga County, NY
  • Champaign, IL
  • Chandler, AZ
  • Chapel Hill, NC
  • Charleston, SC
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Charlottesville, VA
  • Chatham County, GA
  • Chatham, NY
  • Chattanooga, TN
  • Chelmsford, MA
  • Chevy Chase, MD
  • Chicago, IL
  • Chula Vista, CA
  • Cimarron, NM
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Clackamas County, OR
  • Clallam County, WA
  • Clark County, NV
  • Clarkstown, NY
  • Clayton, MO
  • Cleveland, OH
  • Clifton, NJ
  • Cloverdale, CA
  • Coconut Creek, MD
  • College Park, MD
  • Collier County, FL
  • Columbia, SC
  • Commerce City, MD
  • Concord, CA
  • Concord, MA
  • Cookeville, TN
  • Cooperstown, NY
  • Coppell, TX
  • Cortlandt, NY
  • Corvallis, OR
  • Covina, CA
  • Coupeville, WA
  • Creve Coeur, MO
  • Croton on Hudson, NY
  • Culver City, CA
  • Cupertino, CA
  • Cutler Bay, FL
  • Dallas, TX
  • Davie, FL
  • Davis, CA
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Decatur, GA
  • Decorah, IA
  • Dedham, MA
  • Del Mar, CA
  • Delray Beach, FL
  • Denton, TX
  • Denver, CO
  • Devens, MA
  • DeWitt, NY
  • Dixon, CA
  • Dobbs Ferry, NY
  • Dryden, NY
  • Duarte, CA
  • Dublin, CA
  • Dubuque, IA
  • Duluth, MN
  • Dumfries, VA
  • Durango, CO
  • Durham, NC
  • East Palo Alto, CA
  • Eastchester, NY
  • Eatontown, NJ
  • Edina, MN
  • Edinburg, TX
  • Edmonds, WA
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • El Cerrito, CA
  • El Paso, TX
  • Elmhurst, IL
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Encinitas, CA
  • Essex, CT
  • Eugene, OR
  • Everett, WA
  • Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK
  • Fairfax, CA
  • Fairfield, IA
  • Fairfield, CA
  • Fairmont, WV
  • Falls Church, VA
  • Falls, PA
  • Falmouth, ME
  • Fayetteville, AR
  • Ferndale, MI
  • Fitchburg, WI
  • Flagstaff, AZ
  • Flint, MI
  • Fort Collins, CO
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
  • Foster City, CA
  • Frankfort, KY
  • Franklin, TN
  • Fremont, CA
  • Fullerton, CA
  • Gainesville, FL
  • Gaithersburg, MD
  • Geneva, NY
  • Glendale, CA
  • Golden Valley, MN
  • Golden, CO
  • Goodyear, AZ
  • Grand Forks, ND
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • Grapevine, TX
  • Greenbelt, MD
  • Greenburgh, NY
  • Greenville, SC
  • Groton, CT
  • Gunnison County, CO
  • Hailey, ID
  • Hamilton County, TN
  • Hamilton, NJ
  • Harrisonburg, VA
  • Hastings on Hudson, NY
  • Haverford, PA
  • Hawaii County, HI
  • Hayward, CA
  • Helena, MT
  • Henderson, NV
  • Hennepin County, MN
  • Hermosa Beach, CA
  • Hillsboro, OR
  • Hillsborough, CA
  • Hingham, MA
  • Homer, AK
  • Houston, TX
  • Howard County, MD
  • Hunter, NY
  • Huntsville, AL
  • Iowa City, IA
  • Ipswich, MA
  • Irvine, CA
  • Irving, TX
  • Island County, WA
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Ithaca (City), NY
  • Ithaca (Town), NY
  • Johnson County, IA
  • Johnson County, KS
  • Juneau, AK
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Keene, NH
  • Key West, FL
  • King County, WA
  • Kingston, MA
  • Kingston, NY
  • Kirkland, WA
  • Kirkwood, MO
  • Knoxville, TN
  • La Grange Park, IL
  • La Mirada, CA
  • La Plata County, CO
  • Lacey, WA
  • Lafayette, CA
  • Laguna Vista, TX
  • Lake Forest, IL
  • Lake Oswego, OR
  • Lake Worth, FL
  • Lakewood, CA
  • Larchmont, NY
  • Larkspur, CA
  • Las Cruces, NM
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Lawrence, KS
  • Lee County, FL
  • Lee’s Summit, MO
  • Leon County, FL
  • Lewes, DE
  • Lexington-Fayette County, KY
  • Lincoln City, OR
  • Livermore, CA
  • Lomita, CA
  • Los Alamos County, NM
  • Los Altos, CA
  • Los Altos Hills Town, CA
  • Los Angeles County, CA
  • Los Gatos, CA
  • Loveland, CO
  • Lower Southampton, PA
  • Lynchburg, VA
  • Lynnwood, WA
  • Maitland, FL
  • Madison, WI
  • Madison County, NY
  • Mamaroneck (Town), NY
  • Mamaroneck (Village), NY
  • Manitou Springs, CO
  • Mankato, MN
  • Maplewood, NJ
  • Marathon, FL
  • Marlboro, NJ
  • Marshfield, MA
  • Marshfield, WI
  • Martinez, CA
  • McMinnville, OR
  • Meadville, PA
  • Medford, MA
  • Menlo Park, CA
  • Mercer Island, WA
  • Miami Gardens, FL
  • Miami, FL
  • Miami-Dade County, FL
  • Middletown, PA
  • Mill Valley, CA
  • Millbrae, CA
  • Milton, MA
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Milwaukie, OR
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Mission, KS
  • Missoula, MT
  • Monmouth County, NJ
  • Monroe County, FL
  • Monterey, CA
  • Montgomery, AL
  • Montgomery Township, PA
  • Moorpark, CA
  • Moraga, CA
  • Mount Kisco, NY
  • Mountain View, CA
  • Mt. Lebanon, PA
  • Muncie, IN
  • Murrieta, CA
  • Nantucket, MA
  • Napa County, CA
  • Napa, CA
  • Nashua, NH
  • Nashville, TN
  • Natick, MA
  • Nether Providence, PA
  • New Castle, NY
  • New Haven, CT
  • New London, CT
  • New Orleans, LA
  • New Paltz (Town), NY
  • New Rochelle, NY
  • New York, NY
  • Newark, CA
  • Newark, NJ
  • North Andover, MA
  • North Castle, NY
  • North Hempstead, NY
  • North Las Vegas, NV
  • North Liberty, IA
  • North Little Rock, AR
  • North Miami, FL
  • Northampton, MA
  • Northbrook, IL
  • Novato, CA
  • Oak Harbor, WA
  • Oak Park, IL
  • Oak Ridge, TN
  • Oakdale, MN
  • Oakland, CA
  • Oakley, CA
  • Oberlin, OH
  • Olympia, WA
  • Omaha, NE
  • Onondaga County, NY
  • Orange County, FL
  • Orange County, NC
  • Orangetown, NY
  • Orinda, CA
  • Orlando, FL
  • Oshkosh, WI
  • Ossining (Town), NY
  • Ossining (Village), NY
  • Oswego, IL
  • Oswego County, NY
  • Pacifica, CA
  • Palm Bay, FL
  • Palm Beach County, FL
  • Palm Springs, CA
  • Palmdale, CA
  • Palo Alto, CA
  • Park City, UT
  • Passaic County, NJ
  • Peekskill, NY
  • Penn Hills, PA
  • Peoria, AZ
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Pinecrest, FL
  • Pittsburg, CA
  • Plantation, FL
  • Port Townsend, WA
  • Portland, ME
  • Portland, OR
  • Portola Valley, CA
  • Portsmouth, NH
  • Pound Ridge, NY
  • Prairie Village, KS
  • Prince George’s County, MD
  • Pulaski County, AR
  • Quincy, MA
  • Raleigh, NC
  • Red Hook, NY
  • Redmond, WA
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Renton, WA
  • Richardson, TX
  • Richmond, VA
  • Richmond Heights, MO
  • Ridgefield, CT
  • Riverside, CA
  • Riverside, MO
  • Roanoke County, VA
  • Roanoke, VA
  • Rochester, MN
  • Rochester, NY
  • Rock Island, IL
  • Rockford, IL
  • Rockville, MD
  • Rolling Hills Estates, CA
  • Rosendale, NY
  • Roseville, MN
  • Ross, CA
  • Rye, NY
  • Sacramento County, CA
  • Saint George, UT
  • Saint Louis County, MO
  • Saint Louis, MO
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Salem, MA
  • Salinas, CA
  • Salisbury, MD
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • San Anselmo, CA
  • San Antonio, TX
  • San Bruno, CA
  • San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA
  • San Carlos, CA
  • San Clemente, CA
  • San Diego, CA
  • San Francisco, CA
  • San Joaquin, CA
  • San Jose, CA
  • San Leandro, CA
  • San Luis Obispo, CA
  • San Marcos, TX
  • San Mateo County, CA
  • San Mateo, CA
  • San Miguel County, CO
  • San Pablo, CA
  • Santa Ana, CA
  • Santa Barbara County, CA
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Santa Clara, CA
  • Santa Clara County, CA
  • Santa Clarita, CA
  • Santa Cruz, CA
  • Santa Fe, NM
  • Santa Monica, CA
  • Santa Rosa, CA
  • Santee, CA
  • Sarasota, FL
  • Saratoga Springs, NY
  • Saugerties, NY
  • Savannah, GA
  • Seaside, CA
  • SeaTac, WA
  • Seattle, WA
  • Schenectady County, NY
  • Shelby County, TN
  • Shoreline, WA
  • Shueyville, IA
  • Sierra Madre, CA
  • Signal Mountain, TN
  • Silver City, NM
  • Sioux Falls, SD
  • Sitka, AK
  • Skagit County, WA
  • Skaneateles Village, NY
  • Snohomish County, WA
  • Solana Beach, CA
  • Solano County, CA
  • Somers, NY
  • Somerset County, NJ
  • Sonoma City, CA
  • Sonoma County, CA
  • South Bend, IN
  • South Burlington, VT
  • South Daytona, FL
  • Southampton Village, NY
  • South Gate, CA
  • South Miami, FL
  • South Padre Island, TX
  • South Portland, ME
  • Spartanburg, SC
  • Spokane, WA
  • Springfield, IL
  • Stamford, CT
  • Staunton, VA
  • Sullivan County, NY
  • Summit County, UT
  • Syracuse, NY
  • Tacoma, WA
  • Takoma Park, MD
  • Tallahassee, FL
  • Tamarac, FL
  • Taos, NM
  • Tarrytown, NY
  • Temecula, CA
  • Tempe, AZ
  • Tewksbury, MA
  • Thurston County, WA
  • Tiburon, CA
  • Tompkins County, NY
  • Town and Country, MO
  • Tracy, CA
  • Traverse City, MI
  • Tuckahoe, NY
  • Tucson, AZ
  • Tulsa, OK
  • Tumwater, WA
  • Tybee Island, GA
  • Tyngsborough, MA
  • Union City, CA
  • University City, MO
  • Urbana, IL
  • Vacaville, CA
  • Ventura County, CA
  • Vernon,CA
  • Victor, NY
  • Virginia, MN
  • Visalia, CA
  • Vista, CA
  • Warwick Township, PA
  • Washington, DC
  • Washoe County, NV
  • Wellesley, MA
  • Wellfleet Town, MA
  • West Chester, PA
  • West Palm Beach, FL
  • West Sacramento, CA
  • Wiliamson City, WV
  • Willits, CA
  • Wilton, CT
  • Winchester, MA
  • Windsor, CA
  • Windsor, CT
  • Winston-Salem, NC
  • Wolfeboro, NH
  • Woodbury
  • Woodside, CA
  • Woodstock, NY
  • Worcester, MA
  • Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS
  • Yarmouth, ME
  • Yonkers, NY
  • York, ME
  • Youngstown, OH
  • Yountville, CA
  • Campbell River
  • City of Calgary
  • City of Edmonton
  • City of Greater Sudbury
  • City of Guelph
  • City of Hamilton
  • City of Kitchener
  • City of Mississauga
  • City of Regina
  • City of Toronto
  • City of Vancouver
  • Durham Region
  • Essex
  • Federation of Canadian Municipalities
  • Fort St. John
  • Halton Hills
  • Iqaluit
  • Leduc
  • Marlaina Elliot (Associate Member)
  • Metro Vancouver
  • Red Deer
  • Region of York
  • Sustainable Cities International (Associate Member)
  • The Blue Mountains
  • The Corporation of Delta
  • Town of Aurora
  • Town of Oakville
  • Ville de Montréal

Burn down the suburbs?

STANLEY KURTZ — President Obama is not a fan of America's suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them. With suburban voters set to be the swing constituency of the 2012 election, the administration's plans for this segment of the electorate deserve scrutiny. Obama is a longtime supporter of "regionalism," the idea that the suburbs should be folded into the cities, merging schools, housing, transportation, and above all taxation... (more)

Burn Down the Suburbs?
Not exactly, but Obama is already working to get rid of them.

By Stanley Kurtz


Editor’s Note: This article is adapted from Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Citiesby Stanley Kurtzfrom Sentinel HC

President Obama is not a fan of America’s suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them. With suburban voters set to be the swing constituency of the 2012 election, the administration’s plans for this segment of the electorate deserve scrutiny. Obama is a longtime supporter of “regionalism,” the idea that the suburbs should be folded into the cities, merging schools, housing, transportation, and above all taxation. To this end, the president has already put programs in place designed to push the country toward a sweeping social transformation in a possible second term. The goal: income equalization via a massive redistribution of suburban tax money to the cities.

Obama’s plans to undercut the political and economic independence of America’s suburbs reach back decades. The community organizers who trained him in the mid-1980s blamed the plight of cities on taxpayer “flight” to suburbia. Beginning in the mid-1990s, Obama’s mentors at the Gamaliel Foundation (a community-organizing network Obama helped found) formally dedicated their efforts to the budding fight against suburban “sprawl.” From his positions on the boards of a couple of left-leaning Chicago foundations, Obama channeled substantial financial support to these efforts. On entering politics, he served as a dedicated ally of his mentors’ anti-suburban activism.

The alliance endures. One of Obama’s original trainers, Mike Kruglik, has hived off a new organization called Building One America, which continues Gamaliel’s anti-suburban crusade under another name. Kruglik and his close allies, David Rusk and Myron Orfield, intellectual leaders of the “anti-sprawl” movement, have been quietly working with the Obama administration for years on an ambitious program of social reform.


In July of 2011, Kruglik’s Building One America held a conference at the White House. Orfield and Rusk made presentations, and afterwards Kruglik personally met with the president in the Oval Office. The ultimate goal of the movement led by Kruglik, Rusk, and Orfield is quite literally to abolish the suburbs. Knowing that this could never happen through outright annexation by nearby cities, they’ve developed ways to coax suburbs to slowly forfeit their independence.

One approach is to force suburban residents into densely packed cities by blocking development on the outskirts of metropolitan areas, and by discouraging driving with a blizzard of taxes, fees, and regulations. Step two is to move the poor out of cities by imposing low-income-housing quotas on development in middle-class suburbs. Step three is to export the controversial “regional tax-base sharing” scheme currently in place in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area to the rest of the country. Under this program, a portion of suburban tax money flows into a common regional pot, which is then effectively redistributed to urban, and a few less well-off “inner-ring” suburban, municipalities.

The Obama administration, stocked with “regionalist” appointees, has been advancing this ambitious plan quietly for the past four years. Efforts to discourage driving and to press development into densely packed cities are justified by reference to fears of global warming. Leaders of the crusade against “sprawl” very consciously use environmental concerns as a cover for their redistributive schemes.

The centerpiece of the Obama administration’s anti-suburban plans is a little-known and seemingly modest program called the Sustainable Communities Initiative. The “regional planning grants” funded under this initiative — many of them in battleground states like Florida, Virginia, and Ohio — are set to recommend redistributive policies, as well as transportation and development plans, designed to undercut America’s suburbs. Few have noticed this because the program’s goals are muffled in the impenetrable jargon of “sustainability,” while its recommendations are to be unveiled only in a possible second Obama term.

Hypocritical Pelosi Gets Fiscal Religion Over Boehner Hiring Attorney To Defend Oxymoronic Sodomite Marriage Ban - Obama's Teleprompter, Soros, Lays Out His Plan To Take Down US Currency - IPAB Is An Acronym For 'Death Panel' - Hang On As 'Don't Ask' Repeal Faces Fresh Fire - Americans Don't Want Debt Hike By 2 to 1 Ratio - Sodomite Hater Of Christians Given GLAAD Award - Gas Prices Keep Going Up While Obama Uses Thousands Of Gallons Of Fuel To Fly All Over The Country On Our Tax Dollars - WI School Employee Makes Threatening Phone Call To Business For Selling Gas To GOPer - U.N.'s Agenda 21 Is In Your Community As Ubiquity Of Global Restrictions On The People's Land Is Highlighted

House Votes To Halt Oxymoronic Sexually Perverse Unions On Military Bases - Militant Sodomites Want To CRUSH Venerable Adoption Agencies And Religious Liberty - The Insane Redefinition Of Gender - Curbing The Natural Law To Foster The Revolution - A Few Rich Libertarians Help Undermine Freedom - Comrade Obama Admits His Welfare State Creates Dependency - When Did The Fraud Rangle Ever Become Acquainted With Jesus? - Gov. Palin's Consistent Opposition To Debt Ceiling Increase - PRAVDA USA Lobbies For Life Of Killer Rapist - Obama Plan: 'Spike' Energy Costs, Kill 1.4 Million Jobs - Exposing The UN Agenda 21 Of The Communist Disciples Of Sustainability - EPA Set to Implement Economically Ruinous Regulations On Power Plants - Whittaker Chambers, Alger Hiss, And Panettagate - Obama Goes From Hope To Defeatism On Economy

The Lies Of Debt Crisis Politics Exposed - Welcome To Agenda 21's 'Walkability' - Arguing Against Nanny State Regulation Of Light Bulbs, Toilets, Dishwashers - Onward Muslim Soldiers To Blow Up Ft. Hood - Cost Shifting On The Increase Under Obamacare With Care Diminishing And Costs Rising As Predicted

PRAVDA Central PA, Aren't You Just A Little Embarrassed By The Proven Pathological Liar That Leonard Pitts, Jr. Is, And Giving Forums To Local Columnists Who Don't Know What They're Talking About? - Appeals Court Rules That The Foundation Of Obamacare Is Unconstitutional - The "Blame Game" Is Over, Barack, And You Lose - Obama's Worst Judge Yet - Our National Security In Shambles - Gun Rights Require Vigilance - The Direct Link Between Homosexuality And Child Sexual Abuse - Another Judge Rebukes Job-Killing Rogue Interior Department - U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Is Uncompetitive - Obama Lawless Thugocracy Refuses To Comply With House Oversight Subpoena - Obama's Plan To Force Farmers Off Their Land - UN Agenda 21 Marches On In America With The USDA-EPA National Partnership

Compromising The SEALS For Political Gain Is TREASON As "Obama Used Their Heroism To Elevate His Nothingness" - Reagan's Stimulus Vs. Obama's Fiasco - Super Congress Usurps Constitution - Obama's Magical Misery Tour - Generation Vexed: Young Americans Rein In Dreams - Social Degeneration - Oh, How America Has Changed - "Increasingly, People Have Caught On To The Toxic Combination Of Obama's Extreme Leftist Ideology, His Fundamental Incompetence, His Defiant Refusal To Accept Accountability And His Mean-Spirited Partisan Scapegoating" - The Obama Criminal Conspiracy Must Be Exposed - UN's Agenda 21 Forcing Society Back To The Ghetto - The Dream Today: From Hope & Change To Despair & Rage

Obama Killing Energy Industry As Exxon Latest To Feel Dictator's Wrath With No Concern Whatsoever For Jobs Lost While Obama Lives In Luxury - Obama's Fuel Standards To Raise Cost Of Car $11,000+ - More Green Lies From PRAVDA Central PA With Author Belonging In Loony Bin - U.S. Set For Wave Of Power Plant Shutdowns Living The American Nightmare Of U.N. Agenda 21 - Enough With Kowtowing To The Dupes Of The Militant Homosexual Lobby When Government Promotes Immorality - The Push To Normalize Pedophilia - Obama Moving Forward With Amnesty By Fiat In Flouting Congressional Authority - Who Needs Robin Hood When You Can Have Affirmative Action Born Of Class Warfare? - Our National Insecurity Under Obama, As Our Enemies, Now Obama's Friends, See Weakness - Communist China Threatening U.S. Space Superiority - America Can't Wait Any Longer Since It's Time For SCOTUS To Rule, Given Obamacare's Sordid History - New Policy As Anyone Who Disagrees With Obama Is A Terrorist - The Worth Of The RINO Fraud Jon Huntsmans Of The World

The Next Time Someone Tells You That There Is No Connection Between Homosexuality And Pedophilia, Show Them These Links Quoting The Journal Of Homosexuality - Pedophilia Now "Minor-Attracted Persons" - Homofascist Stalkers Ruin Lives Via Social Media - Air Force Vet Dedicates Future To Exposing Obama - Refuting The Latest UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Communist Rot That Appeared In PRAVDA Central PA - No Excuse For Biden's Slip On China's One Child Policy - China's Military Advancing Rapidly - Shameless Obamas Live In Luxury While Their Serfs Suffer The Consequences Of Their Morally Bankrupt Policies - Obama's Plot To Destroy The Constitution - Where We Are As A Nation As America Is Under Attack - Economy Going From Bad To Worse Just As Comrade Obama Planned

Despicable Euphemism For Pedophilia - There Is Nothing "Gay" About Homosexuality - The Unemployment Empty Promise As Just How Stupid Does Obama Think We Are With His Latest Deja Vu Jobs Con? - Shock Finding For The Pathological Lying Al Gore And His Global Green Goblins: The Sun Has Dominant Control Over Earth's Climate - Agenda 21, Sustainable Living, Mass Transit And The Nanny State - Obamacare's Disregard For Consent Of The Governed - Dictator Obama Doesn't Believe In The Rule Of Law As Holder Reassigns ATF Director Who Cooperated With Gun-Smuggling Probe - Obama's Egypt As Rising Leader Has Astonishing Plans To Include 'Exterminate Christians, Close Pyramids, Sphinx' - Communist Giants Are Tremendous National Security Issues As China Working Overtime To Overtake U.S. Military Capabilities While Media Prepare Russian Treaty Trap for U.S.

Sexual Anarchy As Those Inclined To Sexual Perversion In High Political Office - Gov. Palin Effectively Responds In Iowa To The Effect Of A ZERO Masquerading As President With Obama Doing Exactly What Is Expected Of A Communist - Wind Is Our Least Sustainable Energy Option - Congressmen Ask White House For Documents On Solar Company's Federal Loan - UN's Agenda 21 Equals Organized 'Snitching' - CLOUD Rains On Climate Theory - Coverup After Border Agent's Death - When Teachers Are The Cheaters As NEA Ripped For Ignoring Atlanta Scandal, Pushing Left-Wing Politics - Setting The Record Straight On Federal Disaster Funding

Elderly Priest Suspended For Denouncing Abortion, Homosexual Behavior By Apostate Bishop - Militant Sodomite Lobby Wants To Silence Christians - The INTENTIONED Havoc Wrought By Comrade Obama's Destruction Of The Middle Class In America - AP: Wealthiest Pay A Lot More Taxes Than What's Left Of Middle Class - America Hater Extraordinaire, Soros, Is The Power Behind His Communist Puppet Obama - We Don't Want You To Work With Obama, Boehner; We Want You To Stop Him In His Tracks Before He Completely Destroys The USA - New Strategies In The Fight To Stop Agenda 21 - The Fed's New "Operation" Is Twisted As The Problem Today Isn't Monetary Policy But Rather Government Meddling With Gibson Guitars Being Harassed By Obamunists Proof Positive Of That Seminal Fact - The Latest Obamacare Implosion

The Price Of Kowtowing To Sexual Perverts - Comrade Plouffe Not Happy With Tea Party Exposing Obama The Con Man - Army Becomes Tool For Obama's Money Laundering Schemes - Job Killer Pelosi Hypocritically Accuses GOP Of Not Caring About Jobs - Smear Campaign Against Gov. Palin Ends With A Whimper - Since When Did Der Fuhrer Obama Care One Whit About The Constitutional Bounds Of His Authority? - Worthless "I Want To Work With Obama" Boehner Passes Short-Term CR In Dead Of Night - Obama's Regulation Monster Attacks As Congress Schooled On Obama's Sham Jobs Bill - EPA To Property Owner: "Your Land Is Our Land" - Obama's "Scorched America" Contingency - Solyndra Takes The 5th Regarding Government Loans To Nowhere - UN Agenda 21 Tenements In Eastern Europe - New Obama Czar Moonlighting For America Hater Soros - Obamacare's CLASS Clown - OBAMASCARE: Longer Waits, Higher Costs - EPA Wants To Add 230,000 MORE Bureaucrats And Ban Asthma Inhalers As Needless Tighter Ozone Standards Will Strangle Economic Recovery - Obama Wants Complete Federal Control Of Schools - Senate Must Stop Obama Internet Takeover - Obama's HUD Execs Deliver $730,000 To ACORN Spinoffs With Another $15 Billion Proposed For Alinsky-Inspired Groups

We Didn't Ask But They're Telling Anyway As Homosexual Celebration Violates Tenet Of Service Before Self - Demand GOP Prosecute The Obama Thugocracy - UN Global Control Of Our Economy, Our Country, Our Lives, Our Freedom Via Agenda 21 - Peak Oil Scam Is Based Upon Ideological, Fact-Blind Liberalism - Solyndra On Steroids As Obama Commerce Pick Awarded $1.37 Billion In "Stimulus Funds" For Another Risky Solar Plant - According To The Obamunist, Elizabeth Warren, Private Property Is A False Construct - Obamacare Is An Obscenity

We Don't Need The Likes Of Cain And McCain Doing Their Best Imitation Of Pathological Lying Obama - Another Vintage Rant Completely Devoid Of Fact From Comrade "Everyone Is A Racist But Me" Pitts, Jr. - Obama Administration Filled With Activists For Globalism - Obama's Abortion Absolutism - Obama's COMMIE-CON Is OVER - Is Congress Refusing To Stop The Obama Syndicate Crimes? - UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development Power And Control - America Hater Soros Sympathizes With Anarchists - Obama Unilaterally DISARMING U.S. By Sweeping Defense Cuts - The Debit Card Tax Proving That Everything Obama Touches Turns To Garbage - Race Hustlers Of A Feather: Obama And The New Black Panther Party - Take Good Care Of Your Health Care Records Or the Government Will

We're Talking Child Abuse Of The Highest Order Here As The Natural Law Is Bastardized By Homofascist Sexual Perverts - More Evidence That Romney Is A Moral Cretin - Profile Of A Long-Planned "Protest" As Desperate Obamunists Fanning The Flames Of Anarchy Via PRAVDA USA - EUTHANASIA For Elderly Who Are Condemned To Early Death By Secret Use Of DNR Orders - RINO Romney's Nomination Is Not A Fait Accompli By A Long Shot - Only The Brain-Dead Would Believe Obama's Lies - To Say That Harry Reid Is Despicable Is Being Kind - Obama's "Lawless" Justice Department - Importance Of Traditional Values - UN Agenda 21 To Hide Land Use Control, Regulation, And Confiscation Under The Guise Of Environmental Protection - Whither U.S. Condolences For Murder Of Agent Brian Terry? - Backdoor Attempt To Rewrite No Child Left Behind With Morass Of Regulations Dictating Complete Government Control Of Schools

Oxymoronic Same-Sex Marriage Goes Against Basic Rights Of Children - Study Shows That Claims Of Sexual Orientation To Homosexuality Being Final Are False - A Reply To News Story "Atheist Group Sues Over Prayers At High School Football Games That Include 'Jesus'" - The Brain-Dead At FOX News Give Us Another Ridiculous Poll Question - Worthless Boehner & Co. NULLIFYING THE 2010 ELECTION - Traitor In The White House Gutting The Military - While The Troops Were Away, Their Commander Betrayed Them - Obama's Student Loan Fraud Is A Vote Buying Scam - Paul Ryan's Great Speech Rejecting Fear, Envy And Politics Of Division - Ex-ACORN Operatives At Work With OWS - Obama Denounced For Saddling Taxpayers With $600M In Debt Mortgage Bailout - The Battles On The UN Agenda 21 Front - The Insurgent Incumbent - Justice, Obama Style: Border Patrol Agent Sent To Jail; Illegals Granted Waivers - Obamacare Traced To Soros Group, Marketed By Radicals

A Call To Arms To Fight For The Survival Of A God-Fearing America, As "CORRUPTION, Thy Name Is OBAMA" - WWII Reenactors Are Now "NAZI Enthusiasts" In The Warped Minds Of The Desperate Mudslinging Obamunists Clinging To Power - Report Says Secret Service No Fan Of Obamas - The Girl Scouts Are Now Sufficiently Morally Corrupted To Be Assimilated Borg-Like Into Obama's "Citizen Corps" Or "Citizen Corpse", Per Obama's Words, In Order To Become Good Little Communists - The Advantages Of The Radical Left Minority Using Deception And Lies Allowing Totalitarianism To Work - Hospital Limits Merely The Beginning Of Obamacare Which Attacks Families - 12 Nurses Sue Over Being Forced To Help With Abortions - The Truth About Public School Teacher Pay - Green Crony Capitalism Noose Tightens Around Obama As Climategate Exposed - Agenda 21 In Rural MD - The Useful OCCUPY Dupes For The Obamunists Who Are Buying Their Votes - The Risk Taker Vs. The Profit Taker - Muslim Brotherhood Training Our Military, Law Enforcement, And Intelligence Personnel Under Imam Obama With Egypt Heading Toward Shariah Standard Under Growing Influence Of Muslim Brotherhood

Family Group Calls For Removal Of Penn State President For His "Moral Reign Of Terror" - RINO Fraud Romney, The Father Of Oxymoronic Sodomite Marriage - Why Is There A Homosexual Affirming Professor On The Grove City College Faculty? - Ron Paul's Illogic In Regard To No Problem With Those Inclined To Sexually Perverse Acts Being In The Military - The Blame Homophobia Myth Debunked - Obama's Mob Pushes 78 Year Old Woman Down Concrete Steps - ACORN And OWS's White House Connection - 40 House Republicans IRRATIONALLY Ask Unconstitutional Super Committee For Higher Taxes - Bumping Into Agenda 21 At The National Building Museum - U.S. Has Become A "Post-Constitutional Government" Heading For Utopian Tyranny - Communist Sympathizer Panetta Helping Obama DISARM America

Godless Obama BLASPHEMES Christ During Advent Of Christmas - We're Seeing The Trashing Of Anyone Who Opposes The Fraud Romney By Radical Liberal Pundits And Their Pseudo-Conservative Sympathizers - Escaping An Invisible, Chainless Slavery - Agenda 21 And The Threat In Your Backyard - Obama's Job-Killing Global-Warming Agenda Continues Under The Radar - A Refutation Of The Lie That Life Doesn't Begin At Conception - Gingrich Needs To Stop Misleading Voters

Google And Others Embrace Vile Attack On Santorum By Sodomite - California's Assault On Family Values Continues Into 2012 - Will Republicans Commit Romneycide? - We Are Not Going To Let Losers Like The Bushites, Rove & Co, Their AWOL RINO Establishment Leadership, And Their Pseudo-Conservative Media, Tell Us Who Our Nominee Will Be - Final Implementation Of Obama Dictatorship In Progress On All Levels With Traitorous Obama Ready To Share Missile Defense Secrets With Russia - Obama, Whose Arrogance Is Unbounded, Has 'Visceral Hate' For U.S. Military - Public School System In A Panic As Their Con Of Indoctrinating Our Children Into Being Good Little Communist America Haters Is Being Exposed - Shameless Obamas Party To The Hilt While The Country They're Destroying Is In Ruins - Housing Debacle Tied To Implementation Of U.N. Agenda 21 - Salazar And His EPA Eco-Fascists Should Be Prosecuted For High Treason In Willfully Destroying The American Economy From Within

Pastoral Care Workers Ignorant Of The Realities Of "Brain Death" - Obama Nuclear Weapons Plan "Downright Scary" - Obama's Vanishing News On Nuclear Weapons And Unilateral Disarmament - How Obama Learned To Manufacture The "Truth" - Welcome To UN Agenda 21's Marxist Socialist Tyrannical Sustainable City - The Anatomy Of A Global Warming Smear - The Country's Biggest Pollutant That Needs To Go - NEVER Forget This Communist Media Matters Hypocrisy On Gun Control - New CBO Report Decimates "Obamanomics" As Real Unemployment Hits 15% - Desperate For Jobs, Youth Flee Obama - Government Motors Union Ownership Exacts Revenge On White-Collar Workers

The Godless Do NOT Dictate To The God-Fearing, PERIOD - What Else Could Be Expected From A "Judge" In Sodom and Gomorrha, West - Navy Sued Over Manipulation Of Sodomite Data - Know Your Enemy, Comrade Obama, Given Who And What Obama Is And Represents, With The Russians And American Progressives Together Again Rejoicing At Obama's Unconstitutional Dictates - Pelosi's Prayer Life Is Of The Devil - Obama Honors Ash Wednesday By Accelerating Baby Killing In America Under Force Of Unjust Law - The People That Obama Gravitates To Are A Direct Reflection Of Obama's Moral Bankruptcy - When Is Obama Going To Give The Only Apology Necessary, i.e., The One For His SHAM PRESIDENCY? - The High Priests Of Eco-Destruction - PRAVDA Central PA's Claim That Validity Of Climate Science Upheld Is Preposterous - There is NOTHING Christian About Destroying The Jobs Of Millions Of Hard Working Americans - America Doesn't Need Another Worthless Speech From A Pathological Liar Touting His Energy Accomplishments Which Are NILL - Man-Made Global Warming U.N. Agenda 21 Liars Opposed In Virginia - Obama's Crony Capitalist Trap Door - Ann Coulter Is Irrelevant On The National Scene

Obamacare In Its GODLESS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ENTIRETY Must Be Repealed As Senate Rejects The Natural Law Of Almighty God Given To Man For The Common Good In Vote Against The Blunt Amendment - Sebelius: Decrease In Human Beings Will Cover Cost Of Contraception Mandate - Judas GOPE Leadership Helping Obama To Destroy The Country - It's About Time That The GOP Started Calling Obama Out For What He Is In Acting Like The U.S. Is The Soviet Union - Attention NASA: Any Hope Of Comrade Obama Protecting Our National Security Is A Pipedream - Obama's Hateful Feelings Toward Our Military Illustrated - Fraud Obama Ambassador Wants To Take Action AGAINST U.S. Troops In Harm's Way - Communitarianism And Its Evil Plan For Society - Americans Either Overwhelmed Or Blissfully Unaware Of U.N. Agenda 21's Highly Successful Attacks From All Directions - Planting The U.N. Flag On The Earth's Oceans - EPA's Carbon Dioxide Rules Endanger Human Health And Welfare - Solar Company That Received $400 Million Taxpayer Loan Lays Off Large Percentage Of Work Force - Obama INTENTIONALLY Keeping Gas Prices High, Driving Up The Cost Of EVERYTHING, And Causing Misery To Millions Who Are Losing Their Jobs And To Their Families In The Process - Fannie Mae: Brother Can You Spare $4.6 Billion? - Obama "Bundler" Works On Virgin Islands Tax Perks - Don't Wait For Obama To Voluntarily Turn Himself In For His High Crimes Against The Republic

Only In A Country Firmly In The Grip Of The Devil Would A Requirement To Show The Beauty Of An Innocent Baby In Its Mother's Womb Be Considered A Rape - Our Enemy Is The "Treachery From Within," Within The Country, And Within The Republican Party - Everyone Is To Blame For Everything Except Comrade Barack Hussein Obama, THE INDISPUTABLE CAUSE Of The Misery In The Land - Politicians In America And The Current Administration Are Fleecing The American Public With Their Green Environmentalist Agenda 21 Driven By The United Nations And Its Bureaucrats - Ignoring Islamo-Fascism At Our Peril

It Is Blasphemous To Say That "Jesus Christ Is In The Liberal Camp" - Pro-Sodomites Want To Silence All Opposition To Sexual Perversion, The Common Good Be Damned - End Obamacare, Don't Mend It, As Americans Must Ensure Republicans Don't Settle For Partial Repeal - The Political Castration Of The American Military - Obama Has No Right To Dictate To Private Companies How To Run Their Business - Obama Drives Another Nail Into The Coffin Of Small Business In America By Forcing Small Oil Producers Out Of Work - Tennessee Lawmakers And UN Agenda 21

NEWS FLASH: Jimmy Carter Announces That He's Replaced Almighty God In Regard To The Moral Order Dependent Upon God's Natural Law - More Marines Voicing Disapproval Of Obama - Obama Doubling Down On His Green Money Laundering America Destroying Agenda - Obama's Algae Racket - Obama's Energy CONs Are No Longer Working With An Idea For A New Bumper Sticker "LEAVENWORTH AWAITS OBAMA" - "Ears" Takes Major Hit From SCOTUS In Reining In Draconian EPA - Van Jones Is A Communist Rabble-Rouser For Obama; Enough Said - Regionalization Is A Step Closer To Total Federal Control Of Every Aspect Of Our Daily Lives Following UN Agenda 21 - Green Money Laundering Is The Name Of The Game For The Obamunists - The "No Energy" Secretary's $10M Fiasco - Bushites Have A Death Wish For America In Endorsing Romney Whose Long Time Campaign Advisor Says Romney's Platform Is As Changeable As "Etch-A-Sketch" - The FRAUD That Is Ms. Fluke - Rep. Issa Had Better Start Doing His Job Per The Unconstitutional Dictates Of HHS In Regard To Diabolic Obamacare - Obama's "Indoctrination Masquerading As Education Department" Partners With Soros

Agenda 21 Treaty On The Horizon - Louisiana Oil Companies Claim "Legalized Extortion" - Boxer Speaks Like The True Communist She Is - We're Living The Forced Misery Of A Tyrant Upon The Citizenry - The Hypocrisy Of Obama's Politburo Of Thieves - Pesticide Residue Risks Recalculated - The Obamacare Hydra - Why The Individual Mandate Is Unconstitutional - Obama's Healthcare Claims Unravel - What Obamacare REALLY Is - Obama Wants To Put Air Travelers At Inordinate Risk - Shameless Obama Playing The Race And Class Warfare Card For Political Gain - It Is Obama Who Is The Biggest Nuclear Threat To The World - Obama Can't Wait To Unconstitutionally Take Away Our Gun Rights - Interesting That Obama's Crony Capitalists Pay Little, Or NO, In The Case Of GE, Taxes While The Rest Of Us Are Taxed Into Oblivion

USA Under Siege - Comrade Obama Is Negotiating Away America's National Security - Sarah Palin On The Audacity Of Obama's Intentions Revealed - Our Military Is Being Betrayed By Obama - The "Flexibility" Obama Promised Russia On Nukes As A Function Of His Diabolic Advisors - Obama Couldn't Care Less About America's Sovereignty - Let Us Not Lose Sight Of What Obamacare REALLY IS In Its Diabolical Design With Top 5 Freedoms At Stake If Obamacare Is Upheld - Pray The SCOTUS Invalidates DictatorCare - Obama's Solicitor General Was Undressed By SCOTUS Today For His Duplicity - Shameless Kagan Sits In Judgment Of Obamacare Despite Cheering Its Passage And Assigning Lawyer To Defend It - Obama's Executive Order, Agenda 21, With Nancy Pelosi Chief Facilitator In Selling Off America To UN - Obama Wasting Money We Don't Have On The World's Global Warming Lies - Obama Bill Would Be The Death Knell For Small Oil Producers - Domestic Drilling Advocates Warn Of Increased Global Demand For Oil, Dwindling Supply - Internal Memo Shows ATF Rank And File Don't Trust The Brass - Payback For The Money Laundering To Obama From His Crony Capitalists - The Result Of Imam Obama's Arab Spring In Egypt - More Obama Birth Certificate Media Threats Surface With The Latest On This Issue Getting More Disturbing Reflecting The Actions Of A Tyrannical White House Out Of Control - Obama Relies On Debt Collectors Profiting From Student Loan Woes - The Lies Of The Professional Race-Baiters Being Exposed As Trayvon Martin Investigation Continues

There Is A Word For What The Biggest Collection Of Political Antichrists In History Are Doing In Using Jesus As Justification For Their Diabolic Policies - This Is Who Planned Barrenhood Prays To - The Cure For Obamitis - "Communist Cells" Is Another Name For "Communities Of Opportunity" Following U.N. Agenda 21 To The Letter - Reporter Grills Obama Over Jet-Set Lifestyle While Americans Struggle As A Result Of Obama's Tyranny - Major Obama Crony-Contributor Company To Count And Manage 2012 U.S. Vote Results? - Alarms Over Obama Coup Against Constitution Surging - Breitbart Disciple Exposes Red Influence In Congress But No One Cares - Why Should National Security Be A Concern For Our Schools When Our Students Can Put On Condoms With The Best Of 'Em? - Hey, No Problem With North Koreans Who Are Obama's New Allies - What A Farce As Comrade Obama's "Secretary Of No Labor" Complains About Lack Of Job Growth

There Should Be A Bigger Concern For A "Jewish Movement" Promoting Sexually Perverse Rabbis - "Stand Your Ground" Law Not Invalidated By Zimmerman Shooting - Flee Your Homes As Obama's Friends Are Coming To Town - 10 Things You Need To Know About Obama's Second Term - No More "Mr. Obama Is A Nice Guy" - Will Obama Fine Catholic Institutions Into Oblivion? - If I Wanted America To Fail: The Environmental Agenda Has Been Infected By Extremism As It's Become An Economic Suicide Pact - Was The GOP Leadership In Congress All Born Yesterday, Or Worse, As GOPE RINOS, Do They Even Care About Obama Destroying America From Within As Study Belies Obama Oil Claims? - You Can Bet The Farm That Comrade Obama Will Support This Eco-Fascist Rot - Earth Day And Agenda 21 - No Accident That Earth Day Is Celebrated On The Anniversary Of Lenin's Birth - The Liberal Madness Of Cook Stoves And Climate Change - Climate Alarmist Calls For Burning Down Skeptics' Homes - Obama Quietly Seeking To Cede U.S. Oceans To U.N. Law - There Is No Real Opposition To Obama In A Feckless GOPE Congressional Leadership - Obama Is All About Totalitarian Control Of The Masses - The Despicable Loon That Unconstitutionally Rammed Obamacare Down Our Throats Now Leading The Commie Dem Charge To Gut The First Amendment - Stand By For Black Panther Bounty On DOJ Alum At Racial Profiling Hearing Rightfully Calling Crimes, Out Of Wedlock Births In Black Community "Elephant In The Room" - The Latest From The Pelosi Freak Show: Obama Has Been "So Respectful" Of GOP Lawmakers And "Engaged With American People" - An "In Your Face" To Pro-Lifers And The Church As Notorious Pro-Abort HHS Head Hires Former Planned Barrenhood Spokesman - Syria Next For Muslim Brotherhood Courtesy Of Imam Obama - What I See When I Look At Chuckie Schumer - Facts Don't Get In The Way Of The Pathological Lying Sham Obama Administration Which Tells Us That Skyrocketing Debt Destroying The Country From Within Is Good - Comrade Holder Refuses To Enforce The Law Against WikiLeaks And Russia Today

A Response To Notre Dame Professors Demanding Removal Of Bishop Who Blasted Obama's HHS Mandate - A Response That Should Be Common To All REAL Americans Fighting For A Country Worthy Of God's Blessing, Not His Condemnation - An $8B Trick Toying With Medicare To Fix Elex - Seniors Had Better Wake Up To What Obama Is Really Trying To Do To Them - Russia And China Hold First Joint Naval Maneuvers While Comrade Obama Unilaterally Disarms America - America Cannot Afford To Allow The NLRB To Play Favorites At The Expense Of Our Job Creators - The Barack And Michelle Obama Monopoly On Your Privacy - The Coming Chaos From The Obama-Soertoro Playbook - UN Agenda 21, ICLEI, International Council For Local Environmental Initiatives, As One-World Governance Policies Begin In New Rochelle, NY - Fifth Column GOPE Attempting To Ram Worst Candidate Possible Down Our Throats - Obamunists Dictating To The Family Farm - THE REAL Violence In Our Public Schools Is The Moral Murder Of Our Children By Communists - What A Pathetic Joke As Corrupt White House Investigates Itself - What The First Action Of Obama's Atrocities Prevention Board Should Be

Eventually, When You Harvest Warped Brainwashed Minds You Get Communist Leaders At All Levels Of Government - Comrade Obama Designated Driver On "Road To Socialism" With Endorsement For President In 2012 Coming From The Chairman Of The Communist Party USA - Obama Believes That He Can't Be Stopped From Destroying America From Within But "We The People" Have Other Ideas About That - It Looks Like Allen West Underestimated The Number Of Communists In Congress - PRAVDA USA Finds Humor In Feting Their Head Communist Who Is Destroying America From Within - Humor Is Ridicule Marxist style - Barack Hussein Obama Is Not A "Nice Man" - We As A Society Have To Say "No" To These Punk Anarchist Occupiers - Agenda 21's Role In Financial Meltdown - Chu Memo On Marketing Administration Of Federal Hydropower Reflects The Religious Fervor Of The Radical Left Which Cares About Nothing But Power To Control The Masses - America's Budget Crisis In Pictures - Obama Touts GM's "Record Profits" But GM Paid NO Income Taxes - More Obama Lies On GOP Agenda Resulting In OVS (Obama Vomit Syndrome)

Obama Makes War On Almighty God And The Eternal Truth Of His Natural Law For Which The Arrogant Get No Points In Trying To Rebut - Exorcisms Are Definitely In Order For The Entirety Of The Sham Obama Administration - The Key To Understanding Obama Is His "Communist Sex Pervert" Mentor, Frank Marshall Davis - What Obama Is Doing To Our Military Is Diabolic - Flag Officers Allowing Military To Be Abused By A Social Engineering Agenda Are Not Fit To Wear The Uniform - Pelosi's Never Ending Insane Rants Prove She Is A Bastardization Of Humanity - Mini-Hitlers Dictate To Church That They Can't Justly Discriminate Against Sexual Perverts - The Real Face Of Hate In Pro-Sodomite PRAVDA Central PA - The Truth About Harvey Milk - A Country On The Brink, And Our Choice Is Between Obama And An Obama Clone In Pathetic Romney Who Makes Obama Look Like Mother Teresa On Social Issues Upon Which Civilizations Thrive Or Die - We're Not Drinking The Obama Enabling Boehner GOPE Kook-Aid, And We're Not Supporting RINOS Endorsed By Benedict Arlen Specter - You Can't Find Middle Ground With Communists Whose Intent Is To Destroy Your Country From Within - The Tea Party Is Alive And Well In Responding To Sarah Palin's Call To Stop The Pathetic GOPE Status Quo - Socialists And Marxists Become Rich Confiscating Private Property - Make No Mistake About It, We're Talking "Sustainable Communism" Here, BIG TIME - The Dangerous Rise Of U.N. Agenda 21 - Climate Nazis - Convenient Green Water Lies And Governance Of The Earth - Global-Warming Policies And The Threat To U.S. - Farcical DOE Looking To Harness Energy From Ocean Waves Off Hawaii When, In Reality, Green Money Laundering Is Being Harnessed To Fill Obama's Campaign Coffers - Taxes Soaring Past Highest Level Ever Under Obama The Destroyer - Obamanomics Loved By One World Order U.N. Crowd To Tax Mankind Into Oblivion - Three Devastating Charts Dispute Biden's Claim That Economy Is Coming Back - Comrade Obama Demonizes The Word "Success" In Order To Turn Us Into Serfs On His Government Dole - Voter Fraud Rampant Under Obama - SOP For Communists As Obama's Redistribution Of OUR Wealth Going To His Politburo Of Thieves - A "Global Zero" Is What America Is Going To Become By Unilaterally Disarming As Obama Threatens To Veto Defense Bill - Obama's Political Opportunism Of The Worst Kind Compromising Our National Security - America's Antique Air Force Under Obama - Catholic School Dropping Insurance Over Obamacare - Obamacare's CO-OPs Put Taxpayer Dollars At Risk For No Good Reason - Obamacare's Patient-Dumping, Privacy-Meddling Scheme - Obama Couldn't Care One Whit About Older People, PERIOD - A Very Good Response To Obamacare's Lies - You Lie When You Have No Accomplishments Like Obama - Hillary The Hypocrite - Why The Left Dropped The Trayvon Story - Barack Looks Like Trayvon - A Traitorous Act By Imam Obama As Hezbollah Leader Tied To Soldiers Killings, Set For Release - Imam Obama's PC Law Enforcement As FBI Director Incredibly Says Terrorist Who Killed Thousands Of Americans NOT An Enemy Combatant - Indoctrination Masquerading As Education In 21st Century America Means If You Can't Pass An Exam, Lower The Grade Necessary For Passing

Local Unitarian Not Going To Get Away With Cheapening Memorial Day - Memorial Day Weekend Is Here And The Traitor Obama Compromises Our National Security - Obama's Foreign Policy Is Appeasement To Tyrants Because Obama Is One Of Their Own - Onward Muslim Soldiers Under The Imam Obama - Imam Obama's Friends Are America's Enemies - Militant Sodomites Want Navy To Sail On The U.S.S. Lucifer Straight To Hell - Catholics Not Backing Down From Fighting Homosexual Agenda In MA - USA Promotes Homosexuality To The World - The Sexually Perverse Obama Administration At Work Trashing The Natural Law Of Almighty God - MLK Jr.'s Niece Blasts NAACP, Argues Family's Long Line Of Black Leaders Didn't Back Homosexual Agenda - Homosexuality Expose Restored To Youtube As Censorship Reveals How "Political Lobby" Wants To Control Message - Anti-Bullying Is About Shutting Up Opposition To The Pro-Homosexual Agenda - Undeniable Proof That The Devil Exists From A D.C. Abortionist - A "Drill Down" Is Needed On The Obama Administration, "Way Down" - HHS Spends $20 Million To "Encourage" Use Of Obamacare's Preventive Benefits, Including Contraception - Why Do You Want To Dialogue With The Devil, Bishop Blaire? - For Greater Glory Star: "I Don't See Any Difference Between Obama And Henry VIII" - Reagan Knew, As We Must, That God Matters - No Veteran Worth His Salt That I Know Would Support Comrade Obama, Which Is A Truth Gutless Romney Will Never Tell - Romney Must Be Denied The GOP Nomination For The Good Of The Country - Getting The Pure Unadulterated Truth Out About The Sorry Romney Candidacy Being Foisted On The Country By A GOPE Leadership That Is As Morally Bankrupt As Obama - Hey, Rubio, We Have Immigration Laws, Remember? - The Danger Of Article 82 And Obama's Latest Treaty - Obama's War On Coal Hits Your Electric Bill With The Threat Of Blackouts After The Election - Green Extremists Jeopardizing U.S. Defense - U.N. Agenda 21 And The Military - Four Big Problems With Obama's Energy Subsidy Push - The New Math Of Renewable Energy: $50 = $100 - ICE Official: Mexican Drug Cartels Now "Dictating" Flow Of Human Smuggling Into U.S. - Imam Obama Neuters War On Islamic Terrorists - The Brain-Dead Drones Worshipping At The Altar Of Obama In Our Colleges Are Hit The Hardest In The Obama Non-Economy - There Is Something More Despicable Than Obama - Actually The Obama Spending Binge Really Did Happen Despite Obama's Fiscal Fantasy Land, As Where There's Smoke, There's Liars - Obama's Secret Police State Well Underway With Dems Continuing To Threaten SCOTUS - Top Five Ways Obamacare Crushes The Middle Class - The Arrogance of Obama The Pothead Is More Than Evident In Obama The Fraud President

The Godless DON'T DICTATE To Catholic Institutions - The Bishops Are Being Played Like Cheap Fiddles As When You Dance With The Devil, You Get Burned - Tyrannical Sham Obama Administration Trashes Religious Freedom As A Matter Of Course - MA GOP Embraces Sexual Perversion In Supporting Sodomite Candidate - Illinois Elementary School Defies Political Correctness Catering To Sexual Perversion - Planned Parenthood Embraces More Gendercide: The Monstrous Consequences Of "Non-Judgementalism" - Raping The Minds Of Our Children In Fifth Grade - When You're Fighting A War, You Fight To Win ASAP With Overwhelming Force To Minimize The Casualties To Your Military; Else, You Should Not Be Fighting, PERIOD - The Treasonous Actions Of A Sham President Who Has No Qualms Whatsoever About Putting America's National Security At Grave Risk For His Personal Aggrandizement - Panetta Going Out Of His Way To Help Comrade Obama Unilaterally Disarm America - The Fraud Of U.N. Agenda 21 On Being Green Only If The Wind Is Blowing - Obama EPA Uses Spy Drones In Agenda 21 Regulation Of American Farmers - Global Warming Cash Cow In Peril - EPA Threatens To Wreck The Nation's Auto Fleet - Commonsense Wisdom From African Farmers - Obama Puts Big Oil, Big Coal On Kill List - A Massive Land And Water Grab - Rubio Part Of The RINO GOPE Infestation That Is Destroying The Republican Party As There's No Hope Of Righting The Ship Of State When Repeatedly Sabotaged By A GOPE RINO Cabal Who Are Enemies Of The State - The Private Sector Is Not "Doing Fine" - Obama's Latest Fantasies and Fabrications - Obama Is Blocking Putting America Back To Work As His Lies Increase - Auto Bailout Was A UAW Bailout - There's A Huge Difference Between Becoming Eligible For Medicare, And Actually Reaping The Benefits From Same - Republican Surrenderists For Obamacare - The Pathological Law-Breaker Masquerading As AG Does Not Deserve An Out For The Fast And Furious Scandal - REAL Americans Don't Obey The Dictates Of Communists - Why Holder Stuck By His Guns - Flipping Ridiculous Racism Allegations Against Obama's Critics - Property-Tax Fight: Whose Land Is It, Anyway?

A New and Intrusive Ecclesiastical Communism

Anne Erickson

With each passing day it becomes more obvious that we are facing battles on both the spiritual and secular fronts. We are well aware of the dangers and treacheries being perpetrated against the Catholic Church worldwide, with the most egregious offenses coming from within her. But, in order to understand the magnitude of this crisis, we should consider other treacheries taking place with Rome’s knowledge and consent.

Here are three other attempts of the Revolution to achieve total domination of the temporal world and the strategic progress it has made.

‘Unified Christianity'

The Pope has announced The Year In Faith to begin on the same date that commemorates the 50th anniversary of Vatican II. What better way to celebrate something that has brought the Catholic Church into the crisis in which she finds herself today than to introduce the Vatican’s plan for a ‘Unified Christianity’ of New Evangelization? (1)

This plan for New Evangelization gives many credits to its initiator, Paul VI, with kudos to John Paul II for advancing many of its doctrines. Today’s Pope, then Card. Ratzinger, certainly fostered it and now has the honor of striking the champagne bottle against the vessel as part of Rome’s greatly anticipated Third Millennium. I leave it up to the reader to decide if this is another departure from the continuity of the last 2,000 years of Catholicism.


This plan is being presented to save and advance “Christianity” through ecumenism, pilgrimages and missionary work by religious and lay alike. It also aims to decentralize the authority of the Bishops to benefit local communities - a bottom-up form of communitarianism. In fact, it is a Protestant concept of “being Church” through which we will all be brothers in this man-centered utopia.

It appears that this ecumenical “Christianity” is replacing Catholicism. What happened to the duty of Catholics to convert Protestants and Schismatics? Much has been written about recent Popes and their collaborators diminishing the importance of conversion. Now, Rome has this plan in place to negate the idea all together.

One might think it does not matter because Rome has already lost its way with the errors and novelties of Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Mass. In fact, we are seeing religious customs of heretics, schismatics, Jews and pagans appear on altars in Catholic churches worldwide.

Below, I will analyze Rome’s involvement in disturbing plans to influence governments through far-reaching policies that seem meant to affect the entire world.

Yes, I am suggesting, in no uncertain terms, that not only will this plan for a “Unified Christianity” lead us further toward a One New World Religion, but the nature of this ”Christianity” implies that the resulting convoluted religion will not be supernatural, but entirely natural or, better, preternatural, since nothing naturally bad occurs without the help of the devils. This potential outcome is further evidenced by the fact that the Pope and his collaborators are well on their way to influencing the plan for a One New World Order.

Communism & global sustainability

Cardinal Reinhard Marx, Archbishop of Munich and Freising, is President of COMECE, the Commission of the Bishops Conference of the European Community, linked with other important groups.

In October 2008, Card. Marx launched the book Das Kapital: A Plea for Man, named after the work by Karl Marx Das Kapital against Capitalism. Card. Marx sustains that the current worldwide financial crisis requires a fundamental social debate and raises questions about the capacity of contemporary economies to ensure the welfare of the world.

Cardinal Marx comece

With Card. Marx the Church enters an open campaign against Capitalism

COMECE intends to partner with non-Catholics for a greater European cohesion. (2) It says it is important to implement demographic changes to ensure a just welfare system and the development of a set of conditions for an equal and sustainable quality of life - in other words egalitarianism.

This commission is meant to develop the framework for a green economy in the context of sustainable development. A document by Card. Marx (3) indicates this global concept and suggests that the world needs to change both production and consumption of material goods, which will demand a distinction between that which is essential vs. that which is superfluous. Marx also suggests a global sustainable agricultural system achieved through efficient land tenure. COMECE has published a five-page position paper on ‘The Role of Church Actors in the European Cohesion Policy’ (here).

The positions of COMECE include its support of upgrading the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) to a ‘World Environmental Organization’ as it proposed in 2001.

Agenda 21

COMECE further supports and promotes Agenda 21, a non-binding and voluntarily plan of the United Nations related to sustainable development. It was a core work produced from the first UN Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Agenda 21 is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be adopted globally, nationally, and locally by organizations of the UN, governments, and major groups in every area of human activity. The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to 21st century. The blueprint has been affirmed and modified at subsequent UN conferences. (4)

AGenda 21

A UN plan to infiltrate every institution of society.
It is endorsed by the Church

When we read the table of contents of Agenda 21, we realize how much worldwide control of every aspect of each individual’s life and behavior will be affected. Please note that in addition to the religious leaders’ grasping every opportunity to define their roles in this plan, there is also a separate, specific strategy to use women and youth to assist in advancement of this Agenda. No doubt the goal is to further empower women to foster Feminism and to influence youth further alienating them from the family structure and its authority.

In the United States, some Tea Party activists view Agenda 21 as a conspiracy by the United Nations to deprive individuals of property rights. Several state and local governments have passed motions and legislation opposing Agenda 21. Nationally, the Republican National Committee drafted a resolution in 2012 opposing Agenda 21, calling it “a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering and global political control”.

How anyone could not be offended by the fact that Roman Catholic leaders are proud to play a role in this diabolical plan to inflict this utopia is beyond astonishing. How aptly and tragically the maxim applies here, Where the Catholic Church goes, so goes the world!


1. The outlining [lineamenta] of this plan, Synod of Bishops, XIII Ordinary Assembly, ‘The New Evangelization for the Transmission of the Christian Faith’ can be found on the official Vatican website here
2. Vatican Insider website (
3. COMECE is working toward a plan that is best described in a document published by Cardinal Marx, ‘Our Collective Responsibility for the Future of the World’, as part of The U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) Rio +20. Full text of the Cardinal’s writings can be referenced here
4. A pdf of the Agenda 21 document in its entirety can be found here.  stlouisix

on 'Corporate Welfare' Costs Taxpayers Almost $100 Billion in FY 2012r, Cato Finds 

Let's tell it like it is here using a well known notorious example.
"We the people" are being robbed blind by the criminal conspiracy known as the sham Obama Administration by subsidizing money laundering from Obama's crony green capitalists for worthless "green goblin boondoggles" based on the proven lies of the eco-fascists, which sane countries have long since abandoned, directly back into Obama's campaign coffers for his reelection!
Obama seeks out failure because the narcissistic megalomaniacal Obama is all about making America fail anyway that he can in order to make Obama succeed at all costs to particularly include the destruction of a free America from within which has been his goal since his occupation of the White House began in 2008.

'Corporate Welfare' Costs Taxpayers Almost $100 Billion in FY 2012, Cato Report Finds 




White House 'Pressure' Got Solyndra DOE Loan

Congressional report finds White House eagerness to tout stimulus fast-tracked ill-fated $535M loan


Email shows ex-Solyndra CEO thanked 'Bank of Washington,' as new report rips loan process

Published August 02, 2012



E-mail shows ex-Solyndra CEO thanked 'Bank of...

White House analysts feared risks in revamped...


A congressional report concluded Friday that "political pressure" by a White House eager to tout stimulus spending was largely to blame for fast-tracking the ill-fated $535 million Solyndra loan guarantee -- findings compounded by the release of an email that showed the former CEO once referred to the aid as "The Bank of Washington." 

The email and the report were released by Republicans, who continue to use the scandal to portray the Obama administration as careless with taxpayer money in pursuit of its alternative-energy agenda. 

The email, posted online by the Republican National Committee, was a late 2009 message from ex-CEO Chris Gronet. "The Bank of Washington continues to help us!" he exclaimed, pointing to the recently approved loan guarantee and other tax incentives the company might use. 

The report, meanwhile, was released by Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and caps a nearly yearlong investigation by the panel into why the government allegedly ignored red flags to approve the loan. Solyndra, a solar-panel firm, filed for bankruptcy last year. 

"It is clear (the Department of Energy) should never have issued the loan guarantee to Solyndra," the report said, adding that a subsequent decision to restructure the terms "violated the plain language of the law." 

The report, which follows another GOP-authored congressional study earlier this week on the Justice Department's Fast and Furious scandal, is sure to fuel an election-year furor over questionable taxpayer investments in private companies. 

The Obama administration has argued that the overall loan guarantee program has been successful and critical to supporting alternative energy innovators. In response Thursday, the administration blasted the GOP report and defended the integrity of the program. 

"This is month 18 of this congressional investigation and everything disclosed ... affirms what we said on day one: this was a merit based decision made by the Department of Energy," White House spokesman Eric Schultz said. "As Republicans won't answer how much investigation has cost taxpayers, we believe they should instead be focused on legislation to creating jobs and grow the economy." 

But an overriding theme in Thursday's report is that the Department of Energy was under pressure from the beginning in 2009 to approve the Solyndra loan guarantee despite warning signs. 

"This report conclusively shows that DOE pushed forward with the guarantee despite these warnings because of the Obama administration's desire to use the Solyndra guarantee to highlight its stimulus," the report said. 

The report cited a March 2009 phone call between an Energy Department official and the White House, calling that the genesis of the "conditional commitment" -- incidentally just a few weeks before a major Obama speech on the stimulus -- though "key terms" of the deal were not settled. 

Further, the report said the September 2009 closing was guided by a Sept. 4 groundbreaking event, claiming the closing date was set by the White House and Energy Department before the budget office's review. 

That review, the report said, then "took a mere 9 days, even though it was the first DOE loan guarantee ever made." 

The report concluded that the overall loan guarantee program was a "poor fit for the stimulus," citing an October 2010 memo that noted some projects probably would have gone forward without federal funding. 

The report did not level corruption charges at the administration, despite early suggestions by lawmakers that cronyism was at play. The report did claim that George Kaiser, an Obama backer whose foundation invested heavily in Solyndra, was "closely involved" in decisions on the loan. 

Meanwhile, the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday approved a bill that would end for good the loan guarantee program and impose new safeguards over existing loans.

Read more:



Morning Bell: Solyndra Revelations Show It’s Time to Close the “Bank of Washington”
Posted By Amy Payne On August 6, 2012 @ 8:46 am In Energy and Environment,The Morning Bell |

“The Bank of Washington continues to help us!” bragged Solyndra CEO Chris Gronet in emails [1] released last week.
An investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee revealed that Solyndra—the solar company that went under, taking more than $600 million in taxpayer funds with it—wasn’t ever supposed to be an independent business. It was built to rely on the taxpayers.
“Getting business from Uncle Sam is a principal element of Solyndra’s channel strategy,” wrote Tom Baruch, founder of Solyndra investor CEMA Capital, in an August 10, 2010 email.
Getting federal money was integral to Solyndra’s business model. But even with government backing, Solyndra failed—just one of a growing list of companies in the Green Graveyard [2] that took taxpayer money and went bankrupt.
The emails released [1] between Solyndra stakeholders and Obama Administration officials show that Solyndra’s investors knew the company was a bad bet for taxpayers, but the Administration wanted the energy loan guarantee program to be perceived as successful. Meanwhile, the Government Accountability Office was finding that the Department of Energy played favorites [3] with the program, and high-level advisers including Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner were raising red flags [4].
When it became clear that the company wasn’t going to make it, White House communications director
Dan Pfeiffer wrote to White House insiders Stephanie Cutter and David Plouffe: “This is going to be a real pain, Solyndra is about to go under apparently.”
Despite 12 such failures—companies taking taxpayer money yet going bankrupt—the Administration hasn’t given up its push for solar. In July, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar characterized the bankruptcies and delays that have plagued the solar manufacturing sector as “just minor (and expected) blips for the industry.”
“Across the Administration, we’re looking at ways to create jobs and strengthen the economy—and a big part of that is building a sustainable, clean energy future,” Salazar said. But as Heritage’s Michael Sandoval reports [5]:

Salazar’s touting of job creation is at odds with the Department of Energy’s David Frantz, who oversees the DOE loan guarantee program.…Frantz told House members that these large, utility-scale renewable projects really could not be counted upon for creating jobs. “The predominance of our portfolio—and the objective, really, of the act—is to be creating large infrastructure, utility-scale projects; and, by definition, they are not a multiplier for job creation,” Frantz said.

Still, lawmakers in both parties have embraced the job creation fallacy. Heritage’s Nicolas Loris has noted [6] that both Democrats and Republicans:

…like loan guarantees (or tax credits or direct grants) if they support projects for their politically preferred sources of energy, such as clean coal and nuclear, or if they bring jobs to their districts that they can take credit for creating. But these programs do not create jobs. They misallocate labor and capital by shifting taxpayer dollars away from economical projects and toward political ones.

Energy subsidies, whether in the form of taxpayer-backed loans or outright grants, are a bipartisan boondoggle that simply does not work. Looking back, President George W. Bush’s solar initiative sounds very similar [6] when compared to President Obama’s.
The aptly named “No More Solyndras” Act, now in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, would stop the government from giving out new taxpayer-backed loan guarantees. For applications that are already under consideration or have received conditional commitment, the bill would require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a recommendation based on the merits of the program. Although not perfect, the legislation moves us in the right direction toward finally ending this program.
As subcommittee chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY) said [7]last week, “Instead of handing out billions in loan guarantees to selected companies, we can do much more good by removing billions in unnecessary regulatory compliance costs.”
There are plenty of job-killing regulations holding back American companies. A lack of taxpayer dollars is not the problem. It’s time to close the “Bank of Washington” and allow truly successful, viable technologies to rise to the top.
See the 10 Most Revealing Solyndra Emails [1]
Quick Hits:

·         “Saudi King Abdullah invited Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for an extraordinary summit of Muslim leaders to be held this month in the holy city of Mecca,” reports [8] AFP.

·         Iran is test-firing short-range missiles, which its defense minister said [9] “will only be used against those who have bad intentions towards the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

·         A gunman killed six people [10] and critically wounded three others before being killed by police at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin yesterday.

·         The NASA rover Curiosity successfully landed on Mars [11] early this morning.

·         When voters in four states go to the polls in November, they will face ballot questions about the future of marriage [12] in their states.


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation:
URL to article:
URLs in this post:


[1] emails:


[2] Green Graveyard:


[3] played favorites:


[4] raising red flags:


[5] reports:


[6] noted:


[7] said :


[8] reports:


[9] said:


[10] killed six people:


[11] landed on Mars:


[12] future of marriage:




Melting Our Money Away
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh Full Story

Solar Panels

Melting Our Money Away



- Dr. Ileana Johnson

Citing national security and environmental degradation, the federal government has pressured the manufacture of solar panels in the U.S. by enacting tax credits, loan guarantees, and state mandates for utilities to derive a certain percentage of their electricity from green energy even though the green energy is more expensive than traditional energy and the cost would be passed on to the consumer while the taxpayers guarantee the loans.

With all the government involvement in “green” energy, less than 0.1 percent of all electricity produced in the U.S. is generated by solar panels. Stimulus funding and tax incentives have kept the solar industry alive worldwide. When government funding stopped, as it has been the case of four large solar panel manufacturers in Germany and numerous ones in the U.S., those companies declared bankruptcy.

Photovoltaic solar panels can be used on a small or large scale while concentrated solar technologies can only be used for utility-scale electricity generation.  This administration declared in the Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future:

“We invented the photovoltaic solar panel, built the first megawatt solar power station, and installed the first megawatt-sized wind turbine. Yet today, China has moved passed us in wind capacity, while Germany leads the world in solar.”

What bureaucrats fail to mention is that the four largest German suppliers have gone bankrupt and twelve American manufacturers involved in solar panel production and/or renewable energy storage have filed for bankruptcy. Amy Payne of Heritage Foundation calls the twelve American manufacturers “the Green Graveyard of Taxpayer-Funded Failures.”

Alexandre E. Becquerel discovered the photovoltaic effect but it was the American inventor, Charles Fritts, who made the first solar cell in 1883. RCA, Texas Instruments, and the Japanese used PV panels on a small scale. It was the oil crisis of the 1970s that increased the attractiveness of solar panels but they remained expensive. President Carter offered the first “direct federal support for solar [panel] manufacturing.”

There are two types of solar panel manufacturing:

A polysilicon plant requires $500 million-$1 billion in construction capital. European, American, and Japanese companies dominate the polysilicon manufacturing. Polysilicon, which is based on sand, represents about one-fourth of the total cost of a solar panel.
(Green Rhino Energy, Value Chain Activity: Producing Polysilicon)

The production of solar glass requires massive capital and large shipping costs. Sixty percent of the global supply is produced by four manufacturers, Asahi, NSG Group, Saint Gobain, and Guardian.  (Green Rhino Energy, Value Chain Activity: Manufacturing Solar Glass)

According to Paula Flowers, Asahi Glass of Japan produces more than 50 percent of the world’s solar glass through its AGC Solar, a Belgium-based company. Its factory in Kingsport, TN produces solar glass for the U.S. market. (TN Solar Energy Activities Update, TN Chamber of Commerce and Industry, October 7, 2011)

The Department of Energy estimates that the plant manufacture of 120 MW of solar cells per year would need at least $40 million in initial investment. The solar cells are cut wafers into 5X5 or 6X6 inch pieces linked by copper leads. A wafer is a shaped polysilicon into an ingot.

(U.S. DOE, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Photovoltaic Economic Development, Building and Growing a Local PV Industry, November 2011)

The modules weigh 34-62 pounds and are comprised of 60-72 cells covered by solar glass to protect against environmental damage and are attached to an aluminum frame and supported by a plastic backing.

Currently, lack of profitability has driven the consolidation of the solar panel industry into the hands of ten companies that control half of the global production of photovoltaic solar panels and they are located in China and Taiwan who subsidize exports and have been accused of engaging in dumping of products on foreign markets at prices lower than prices charged on domestic markets. China currently exports 95 percent of all the photovoltaic panels it produces. (CRS Report for Congress, April 27, 2012, p. 17)

Federal programs that created our domestic demand for solar photovoltaic panels have reached funding limits and have expired such as the 1603 cash grant program, the advanced energy manufacturing tax credit, and the S. 591, introduced by the 112th Congress to extend the credit, will expire at the end of 2016. (U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing:  Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support, Michaela D. Platzer, April 27, 2012)

Examples of government support for solar power include advanced energy manufacturing tax credit (MTC) which reached funding cap in 2010, Section 1705 Loan Guarantee Program for “new and significantly improved” technologies, the investment tax credit (ITC) which ends in 2016, the Section 1603 Treasury Cash Grant Program, and the Sunshot Initiative of the DOE.

The White House Fact Sheet lists 27 Solar PV manufacturers who received 48C Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC) from approximately $1 million to $142 million. Two of the companies listed have already filed for bankruptcy:  Abound Solar Inc. which received $12.6 million in 48C MTC and Amonix Inc., which received $3.6 million in 48C manufacturing tax credit. (CRS Report for Congress, April 27, 2012, pp. 28-29)

John Boehner’s office issued a statement last week that the former Office of Management and Budget Director ignored warnings on Solyndra’s insolvency – millions of taxpayer dollars could have been saved by closing the company immediately and selling its assets. “Instead, the DOE restructured the loan to Solyndra (a solar cell manufacturer), putting private investors ahead of taxpayers for repayment if the company closed (crony capitalism). Solyndra’s liquidation will recover just $24 million of the $527 million that taxpayers lent to the company.”

A bill is making its way through Congress, No More Solyndras Act, which will ban any new loan guarantees from title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

“The competitiveness of solar PV as a source of electric generation in the United States will likely be adversely affected both by the expiration of these tax provisions and by the rapid development of shale gas, which has the potential to lower the cost of gas-fired power generation and reduce the cost-competitiveness of solar power, particularly as an energy source for utilities. In light of these developments, the ability to build a significant U.S. production base for PV equipment is in question.” (CRS Report for Congress, Summary, Michaela D. Platzer, April 27, 2012).





Issa exposes Obama's 'green jobs' scam

You won't believe what type of employment qualifies

Does the teenage kid who sells used records count as someone who has a green job?  What about an oil lobbyist, or someone who works at an antique shop?  Those all count as “Green Jobs” according to the Obama Administration’s top statistician at the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The “Green Jobs” initiative cost $38.6 billion or $5 million per job and now through the Oversight Committee’s work we are learning more about how the Obama administration gambled away tax payer dollars to support their ideological interests.  Take a look at the Oversight Committee’s excerpt video below:

Of course, those of us who have been paying attention know that the Green Jobs movement has been a scam all along.  One need only read Morriss, Bogart, Dorchak and MeinersGreen Job Myths to know that promoting specialized jobs the market was not demanding, rather than focusing on productivity, would create low-paying jobs in less desirable conditions.

How did we get here?  In part we can attribute the Green Jobs Debacle to the Obama Adminstration’s trust of special interest groups who promoted the idea of green jobs by embedding within their analysis dubious assumptions and techniques.  In short, the vaunted “science-driven” forces of the Left were driven more by ideology than by empiricism.  As Morriss predicted, there were 7 myths associated with green jobs, myths that flew in the face of science and logic:

  1. Myth 1: Everyone understands what a “green job” is.
    Fact 1: No standard definition of a “green job” exists.
  2. Myth 2: Creating green jobs will boost productive employment.
    Fact 2: Green jobs estimates in these oft-quoted studies include huge numbers of clerical, bureaucratic, and administrative positions that do not produce goods and services for consumption.
  3. Myth 3: Green jobs forecasts are reliable.
    Fact 3: The green jobs studies made estimates using poor economic models based on dubious assumptions.
  4. Myth 4: Green jobs promote employment growth.
    Fact 4: By promoting more jobs instead of more productivity, the green jobs described in the literature actually encourage low-paying jobs in less desirable conditions. Economic growth cannot be ordered by Congress or by the United Nations (UN). Government interference in the economy – such as restricting successful technologies in favor of speculative technologies favored by special interests – will generate stagnation.
  5. Myth 5: The world economy can be remade by reducing trade and relying on local production and reduced consumption without dramatically decreasing our standard of living.
    Fact 5: History shows that individual nations cannot produce everything its citizens need or desire. People and countries have talents that allow specialization in products and services that
    make them ever more efficient, lower-cost producers, thereby enriching all people.
  6. Myth 6: Government mandates are a substitute for free markets.
    Fact 6: Companies react more swiftly and efficiently to the demands of their customers/markets, than to cumbersome government mandates.
  7. Myth 7: Wishing for technological progress is sufficient.
    Fact 7: Some technologies preferred by the green jobs studies are not capable of efficiently reaching the scale necessary to meet today’s demands.

Nearly every myth they highlighted has since been proven to be just that, a myth, founded on nothing but ideology.  Solyndra and the dubious counting methods employed by the Obama Administration are just further proof of the Green Jobs Scam.  Indeed, as Morris, predicted “To attempt to transform modern society on the scale proposed by the green jobs literature is an effort of staggering complexity and scale. To do so based on the wishful thinking and bad economics embodied in the green jobs literature would be the height of irresponsibility.”  In light of the dubious counting methods employed by BLS, it seems the Green Jobs Scam was indeed the height of irresponsibility.





Biofuels boondoggle: Air Force pays $59 a gallon

Pentegon used to pay $2 a gallon for jet fuel – Obama donors benefit

The Pentagon pays less than two dollars a gallon for jet fuel.

Under President Obama's half a billion dollar 'green energy' initiative for the military the Navy spent $26 a gallon for biofuel made from algae

Think that's expensive?  That's nothing.  The Air Force recently spent $59 a gallon for biofuel made from sugar.

The negative impact of using sugar for biofuels is that it causes a rise sugar prices, driving up the cost of thousands of food products.  Hitting every American family in the pocketbook.

But don't think this is about green energy.  Or renewable energy.  Or any other bumper sticker slogan.

It's all about paying-off supporters and donors.  A company named Solazyme makes the Navy biofuelGevo produces the Air Force biofuel.  Both companies are surrounded by Obama insiders, supporters and donors.

Solazyme has spent more than $300,000 on lobbying federal decision-makers since 2009.  Its executives have contributed thousands of dollars to Obama and influential Congressmen.

A major shareholder in Gevo has contributed more than $535,000 to political campaigns since 1996, including to Barack Obama.

This is nothing more than plundering the U.S. Treasury to enrich friends, donors and supporters.



Obama waging 'all-out war' on coal industry

Ohio congressman: 'Unreasonable' clean-air standards imposed on plants

On Wednesday, President Obama traveled to eastern Ohio to campaign in one of the most critical states of the 2012 race. But in the very same region where Obama asked for another four years in office, Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, says anti-coal regulations just resulted in scores of layoffs at a coal-fired power plant.

“Ohio gets 87% of its energy from coal … there are thousands and thousands of Americans whose livelihoods are dependent on their jobs in the coal industry,” Johnson told WND.

Johnson tells us that regulations triggered this downsizing and why he believes we may soon be looking at an 800percent increase in utility rates. Johnson also recounts his confrontation with Environmental Protection Agency representatives in his district.  stlouisix

on Pardon Rain Man? Oregon Gov. Ducks for Cover

Obama's Amerika is now a country where being an American is a crime!
We're living Communism 101 under the tyranny of the environmental wackos who won't be satisfied until we're all living in caves, after commuting there on our bicycles, rubbing sticks together to start fires while howling at the moon, being reduced to being no better than animals many of which at least have a sense of self-preservation which the Gore Green Goblins couldn't care less about in making misery the order of the day!
These certifiable lunatics need to be thrown out, lock, stock, and barrel; else, the free America of the founding fathers will be only a distant memory for future generations of Americans who will wonder, "What caused the country to go collectively insane?"

Pardon Rain Man? Oregon Gov. Ducks for Cover    







Beetle to delay Keystone pipeline?


Published Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 4:48 pm / Updated at 6:56 am

article photo

article photo

The endangered American burying beetle buries dead rodents it finds to protect the food from other animals.

Agency's decision on beetle could affect Keystone XL pipeline

By Paul Hammel

LINCOLN — A federal agency's recent decision involving the endangered American burying beetle could cause up to a year's delay in construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, if the project wins federal approval, an environmental group said Tuesday.

But a spokesman for pipeline developer TransCanada Inc., said that assessment was premature and that the company would be able to work around new rules concerning the beetle.

On Tuesday, an official with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed the agency is not allowing researchers hired by pipeline TransCanada to trap and relocate the endangered beetles from the new path of the controversial crude-oil pipeline until the project receives federal approval.

That's a change of procedure. Researchers hired by TransCanada were allowed to move hundreds of beetles from the initially proposed path through Nebraska's Sand Hills in the name of research.

Mike George, state supervisor of the federal agency, said a lawsuit filed by anti-pipeline environmental groups last year prompted Fish and Wildlife attorneys to re-evaluate its practices.

Now, he said, research projects on endangered species that require disturbing the species will not be allowed before major construction projects, like the Keystone XL, gain a federal permit.

An official with the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the groups that sued the Fish and Wildlife Service last year, said the decision might delay construction of the pipeline by up to a year. That's because trapping and relocating American burying beetles can only be done in the spring and summer.

Noah Greenwald of the Tucson, Ariz., group said that the change is a “surprise victory” for the beetle because the lawsuit had to be dropped after the Obama administration rejected the initial permit application for the Keystone XL due to concerns about crossing the groundwater-rich Sand Hills.

Greenwald said that if TransCanada has to wait to relocate beetles in the new pipeline path, it could delay construction for an entire year.

But TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard said the environmental group was “getting way too far ahead of themselves.”

It's unclear how many beetles might be in the pipeline's new route around the Sand Hills, Howard said. He added that construction of the Keystone XL is expected to take two years, and work could be adjusted to allow for removal of any beetles without affecting that timetable.

“There's a lot of ways to deal with this,” Howard said.

One of the nation's experts on American burying beetles, Wyatt Hoback of the University of Nebraska-Kearney, was hired by TransCanada to trap, document and relocate beetles in the path of the original pipeline. A wide strip of grass was mowed to discourage the beetles from returning.

The research found higher densities of the burying beetle — which buries dead rodents it finds to protect the food from other animals — than originally expected.





Obama's 2nd term will feature 'green bank'

Get ready for more Solyndra-style waste, say authors

 New book: Obama’s 2nd term will feature ‘green bank,’ more energy stimulus, talk radio censorship

Published: 2:06 PM 07/30/2012

By Matthew Boyle

A new book claims that if President Barack Obama is re-elected in November, he’d take his Solyndra-esque “green” agenda several steps further with many new “progressive” policies – including a “massive ‘green’ stimulus.”

In “Fool Me Twice,” which will be released on Aug. 7, WorldNetDaily’s Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott lay out a vision of what Obama’s second-term agenda would look like – and The Daily Caller has gotten an exclusive look at the plans Klein and Elliott say Obama would have for his “green” agenda.

Specifically, Klein and Elliott write that Obama would establish a “green bank” and try to “’green’ the Pentagon, even as America’s true defense capabilities are radically diminished,” all while launching a “giant international spread-the-wealth scheme, with Uncle Sam paying penalties to the developing world for our ‘climate crimes,’ based on the questionable ‘science’ behind global warming.”

The authors also say Obama will implement a “new massive ‘green’ stimulus,” the consequences of the failures surround Obama’s 2009 stimulus – and the crony capitalism behind loan guarantees like Solyndra – be damned.

Klein and Elliott add that “integral to the progressives’ green agenda is the ‘shutting up’ of conservative opposition to bogus ‘climate science,’ its corrupt cronyism and financially unsustainable green industries.”

“This includes revived proposals for using the Federal Communications Commission to shut down conservative talk radio critics of the green (and greed) agenda,” the authors write.

The way Klein and Elliott deduce Obama’s upcoming green agenda is from a series of organizations connected directly to the president’s policymaking. “An organization that calls itself the Presidential Climate Action Project, or PCAP, has been working with the Obama administration since day one to help craft and implement White House environmental policy,” they wrote.

“If Obama is reelected, progressive plans backed up by proposed legislation aim for an immediate and massive increase in federal funding for domestic ‘green’ projects,” they added. “A seminal November 2010 report by the de facto policy nerve center of the Obama White House, the Center for American Progress, titled ‘Cutting the Cost of Clean Energy 1.0,’ recommends a de facto federal ‘green bank’ for the sole purpose of loaning or granting public funds to so-called clean energy companies.”

Klein and Elliott point out that the Center for American Progress (CAP) report calls for the establishment of an “Energy Independence Trust,” that would “borrow from the federal treasury to provide low-cost financing to private-sector investments in clean energy.”

The authors then highlight how President Obama used his most recent State of the Union address – the last one before the upcoming November election – to call for “exactly” what far left wing advocates at CAP have been demanding for a “full fourteen months.”

That’s because “the direct links between the seven authors of CAP’s Energy Trust report and the Obama administration leave little to the imagination about how the progressive think tank’s recommendations become Obama’s policies.”

Perhaps even more controversial than his plans to establish politically left wing “green” policies in a second term, many of which haven’t worked in his first term, are what the authors say are Obama’s plans to regulate media to discourage dissenting thought.

Citing the November 2009 Climategate controversy – where scores of emails showed a conspiracy to withhold information and research that contradicted “global warming theory” from the public – Klein and Elliott argue a second-term Obama administration would “want to silence the theory’s critics in the public media.”

In fact, PCAP argues for the re-implementation of the “Fairness Doctrine.” That policy forced radio broadcast license holders to “treat ‘controversial issues of public importance’ in a ‘balanced’ manner, giving equal time to both sides.”

In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan rescinded the policy because it was viewed as “obsolete” with a wide range of new media then available.

Klein and Elliott add that PCAP “is not alone in calling for the silencing of global warming theory’s critics.”

“In a remarkable display of paranoia, just prior to his appointment as President Obama’s so-called Regulatory Czar in 2009, Cass Sunstein wrote a lengthy academic paper suggesting the government should ‘infiltrate’ social network websites, chat rooms and message boards,” they wrote. “Such ‘cognitive infiltration,’ Sunstein argued, should be used to enforce a U.S. government ban on ‘conspiracy theorizing.’”

Above all else – while Obama would, if re-elected, continue trying to further the cause of left wing environmentalists – crony capitalists will continue to get richer, Klein and Elliott argue.

“Easily overlooked in the morass of Obama’s second-term drive for a radical increase in federal spending on ‘clean energy’ is not simply the utter incompetence of some of the major recipients of ‘green stimulus’ funds but also the rank corruption intrinsic to those hand-outs, as Washington cronyism is routinely ignored by the mainstream news media,” they wrote, adding later: “One thing we do know for certain is that investors like T. Boone Pickens and George Soros will not lose one dime—nor will Big Energy.”

Read more:



Car Industry Warns Against New Obama Fuel Standards

Car dealers warn Obama fuel standards will make new vehicles unaffordable, hurt recovering industry

Car dealers fear Obama fuel standards will make new vehicles unaffordable

Energy In America

Published July 29, 2012


FILE: July 26, 2012: Visitors inspect cars at the Nissan Motor Co. global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan. (AP)

The White House is expected to OK federal standards in the next few weeks that will nearly double vehicle gas mileage for vehicles by 2025, as automotive dealers warn the changes could slam the recovering retail car industry because they will come with sticker prices that will keep buyers off their lots.

The recommendations call for “fleet wide” gas mileage of 54.4 miles a gallon by 2025 -- essentially the average gas mileage for cars, trucks, vans and all other vehicles in a model year.  

The Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration submitted their proposed 2017-2025 fuel-efficiency recommendations in mid-July to the administration’s Office of Management and Budget.

“Dealers support fuel economy increases,” Bailey Wood, a National Automobile Dealers Association spokesman told Saturday. “But if dealers cannot put vehicles on the road, we cannot reduce greenhouse gases or our dependence of foreign oil.”

He confirmed a final decision could be issued as early as August 15.

If approved, the changes are projected to save average American motorists roughly $8,200 at the pump over the life of their vehicles, but would also cost them as much as $3,000 more for a new vehicle.

One major concern is whether buyers will be able to get a loan, which critics of the proposal say would hurt Detroit automakers, including Chrysler and General Motors, who needed billions in taxpayer-funded bailouts during the recession to stave off bankruptcy.

Another concern is the Obama administration’s plan -- which includes more hybrid and electric cars -- will not achieve its goal of “getting gas-guzzlers off the road” because motorists will keep their existing cars or be forced to buy less-fuel-efficient used ones, Wood said.

The recommendations have the support of the Detroit's Big Three, which also includes Ford, and roughly 10 other major automakers, despite them costing the industry a reported $157.3 billion.

Another concern is that better fuel efficiency will result in less gas buying and, consequently, $57 billion less in federal gas-tax revenue through 2025, according to a May 2 report by the Congressional Budget Office.

The nonpartisan office also proposed several options including an increase to the 18.4-cents-a-gallon gas tax or cutting funding to mass transit and road repairs, for which the taxes help pay.

“This agreement on fuel standards represents the single most important step we’ve ever taken as a nation to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” the president said in July 2011 when announcing the proposed changes. “Using less oil also means our cars will produce fewer emissions.  So when your kids are biking around the neighborhood, they’ll be breathing less pollution and fewer toxins.”

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said that, if elected, he would look for a better way to improve fuel economy than changing corporate average fuel efficiency, or CAFE, mileage requirements.

"The best approach is to try and build vehicles that people want, rather than having the government telling the companies what they must make," he told The Detroit News in June.

"I would work with the manufacturers to find ways to encourage fuel economy on the part of the consumer. But trying to have the manufacturer push the product on the consumer — that the consumer doesn't want — is not the right approach."

Read more:

The Assault on Coal and American Consumers

By Nicolas Loris
July 23, 2012

 Abstract: For decades, coal has literally been the rock that has powered America with cheap, reliable energy. Yet the federal government is using every possible avenue to reduce coal’s role in American energy production by creating an environment in which coal production’s decline is inevitable. Congress should reform federal policies and regulations to enable the market—not federal politicians and bureaucrats—to determine the role of coal in U.S. electricity generation. This includes repealing, preventing, or freezing unnecessary regulations and empowering the states to appropriately balance economic growth and environmental protection.

Used to power nearly half of all electricity generation for years, coal is the single largest electricity source in America. With 497 billion tons of recoverable coal in the United States—enough to provide electricity for 500 years at current consumption rates—coal has the potential to be an important resource long into the future.[1] Regrettably, the Obama Administration has taken actions that significantly reduce coal’s share of America’s energy portfolio now and in the future. The proposed and newly implemented regulations affecting coal will drive up energy costs for Americans and business owners and destroy jobs, but do little to protect the environment. These regulations will not only drive up the costs of goods and services that promote public health, such as access to affordable heating and air conditioning, but also divert resources away from activities that could truly improve America’s public health. They are based on a weak scientific foundation and would significantly increase compliance costs for existing coal plants and effectively bar construction of new ones, which will increase the cost of electricity for consumers and business.

The attempt to drive coal out of America’s energy portfolio goes even further. A host of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) permit requirements have delayed construction of new coal plants, led to fuel switching, or resulted in withdrawn permit applications. Further, despite remarkable improvements in coal mining operations and mining safety, the permitting process for mining and regulations for worker safety have been costly and failed to produce the desired effects. Congress should overhaul the regulatory approach to coal to create a framework that restricts overregulation, empowers the states, balances economic growth and environmental well-being, and creates a timely permitting process for all aspects of coal production. Congress should also eliminate all subsidies for coal technologies.

Driving Out Coal Hurts Consumers and the Economy

During his first presidential campaign, Barack Obama warned Americans that electricity prices would “necessarily skyrocket” under his proposal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions with a cap-and-trade system. Specifically, legislative attempts to cap carbon with stringent cap-and-trade provisions would force power companies to take coal power plants offline or make costly upgrades, and both choices would increase the cost of generating electricity. Although cap-and-trade never became law, unelected bureaucrats are implementing regulations that have the same effect. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) in the Department of the Interior, and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) in the Department of Labor have promulgated a host of new rules that will increase the costs of mining coal, building new plants, and operating existing plants. These regulations include:

The consulting group ICF International estimates that 20 percent of America’s coal power plants could be retired as soon as 2020 because of the EPA’s air, waste, and water regulations.[2] The Institute for Energy Research projects that the Cross State Air Pollution “transport rule” and the Utility MACT “toxics rule” will remove more than 33 gigawatts (GW) of electricity generation—almost 10 percent of the electricity generated by coal plants—from production.[3] Several other economic analyses project that EPA regulations could take an additional 75 GWs of coal generation offline, which would significantly raise electricity bills for American consumers and threaten reliability of the electricity grid.[4]

These higher energy prices will also have rippling effects throughout the economy. As energy prices increase, the cost of making products rises. Higher operating costs for businesses will be reflected in higher prices for consumers. Because everything Americans use and produce requires energy, consumers will take hit after hit. As prices rise, consumer demand falls, and companies will shed employees, close entirely, or move to other countries where the cost of doing business is lower. This results in fewer opportunities for American workers, lower incomes, less economic growth, and higher unemployment.

This process is already in motion. Energy companies are announcing premature closures of coal plants and are retracting permit applications because of regulations. For instance, Ohio’s FirstEnergy Corporation announced that it will close six coal facilities because of the new environmental regulations.[5] A Georgia utility recently retracted funding for a permit application, citing the EPA’s air quality rules.[6]

The EPA’s Regulatory Train Wreck

The Environmental Protection Agency’s plethora of new regulations has been appropriately called a “regulatory train wreck.” They will adversely affect existing coal plants by requiring costly retrofits, in many cases causing shutdowns because installing scrubbers and other emission-reduction controls would be too costly. Although these regulations affect all large power plants and electric utilities, they hit coal plants the hardest. As a result, a considerable amount of electricity generation will be taken offline, significantly increasing electricity prices for American ratepayers and risking potential blackouts. Furthermore, some of the EPA’s newly proposed rules will make it prohibitively expensive to build new coal plants. Many of the new rules carry exorbitant costs, provide little to no benefit, or are based on weak scientific and empirical evidence.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule targets pollution that crosses state boundaries, and it aims to reduce sulfur dioxide 73 percent below 2005 levels and nitrous oxide 54 percent below 2005 levels by 2014.[7] CSAPR has separate compliance deadlines for 2012 and 2014 and has much more stringent reduction targets and a tighter time frame than the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), its predecessor rule. The CSAPR rule was finalized in July 2011 and was scheduled to go into effect in the beginning of 2012. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington stayed the rule, and CAIR remains in effect. If CSPAR takes effect, the rule would negatively impact 28 states, and the EPA is moving forward with the rule despite warnings from the utility industry that the deadlines to design, permit, and install emission-reduction controls are unreasonable.[8] The North American Electric Reliability Corporation estimates this rule alone will compel companies to retire 3 GW to 7 GW of electricity generation and retrofit 28 to 576 plants.[9] Texas has been the most vocal in opposing CSPAR. The state’s lignite coal industry, which directly supports 10,000–14,000 jobs and provides 11 percent of the state’s electricity, would vanish.[10] Power companies have filed dozens of lawsuits challenging the rule and are warning that the rule, if implemented, will cause dramatic increases in electric costs and possibly lead to rolling blackouts.[11] Even the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has warned that the CSAPR rule threatens grid reliability.[12]

These costs come with little added environmental benefit. The EPA is ignoring the remarkable achievements in reducing nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions over the past four decades. These advances are largely the result of market-driven technologies, but existing regulations have contributed. Since 1970, coal power plants have reduced sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, and particulate matter (PM) emissions by 84 percent per kilowatt hour.[13] However, the industry has reached a threshold where the additional emissions reductions are marginal and do not justify the costs. The EPA’s cost estimates are conservative, and its projected health benefits are wildly exaggerated. The EPA approximates annual compliance costs with CSPAR will be $7 billion annually and monetized health benefits will be from $111 billion to $294 billion annually.

Yet the benefits are not empirically substantiated. The EPA uses outrageous worst-case scenarios, ignores state and local emissions controls, uses outdated data, and models air quality problems using emissions data that contradict actual monitored readings. Kathleen Hartnett-White, senior fellow of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, writes that the downwind states the EPA is attempting to protect from particulate matter already meet the standard:

EPA stresses the environmental urgency of this rule intended to help the downwind states attain the federal standards for PM and ozone. Oddly, however, the downwind states targeted in the rule violated the 24-hour fine PM standard less than one-half percent of the time from 2007-2009. In fact, more than 80 percent of the downwind areas CSAPR targets as either currently or at risk of violating the federal standards for ozone or PM already attain the air quality standards in question. EPA, however, still finds risks and calculates the monetized health benefits at emission levels below the federal standards set to protect public health.[14]

In other words, additional regulation is unnecessary because emissions are already at acceptable levels.

To make matters worse, the EPA will implement the rule through Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) rather than the long-standing method of setting emission reduction standards and allowing states to effectively enforce the standards with State Implementation Plans (SIPs).[15] If a state’s emissions causes another state to reach nonattainment, state regulators have the knowledge and flexibility to reduce emissions, but this change would usurp the state’s authority. The EPA’s new targets are unjustifiably onerous and unachievable to the point that many coal-fired plants have already announced layoffs, reduced operations, and permanent closures.[16]

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. In February 2012, the EPA finalized new mercury and air toxics standards that would force utilities to use maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards to reduce mercury emissions and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). More commonly known as the Utility MACT regulation, the EPA began the process to regulate mercury emissions in 1998, but during its evaluation, it did not find demonstrable direct health benefits from regulating other HAPs. Nevertheless, the new EPA rule targets not only mercury but also arsenic, chromium, nickel, and acid gases. The EPA estimates this rule could cost more than $10 billion per year by 2015, but the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council estimates it could cost as much as $100 billion per year.[17]

Utility MACT is another instance in which the environmental and health benefits do not justify the costs. The EPA claims this rule would produce $53 billion to $140 billion in annual benefits, but the mercury reductions would produce at most $6 million in benefits.[18] The EPA exaggerates the environmental benefits by including estimated benefits from reducing particulates (co-benefits) already covered by existing regulations. Those co-benefits account for 99.996 percent of the agency’s estimated benefits. Even the $6 million benefit might be an exaggeration because the EPA ignores clinical studies that demonstrate the human body’s ability to protect itself against high levels of mercury.[19]

Coal Combustion Residues (Coal Ash). The EPA is proposing the first-ever federal regulations on coal combustion residues that would classify the by-product as a hazardous material and impose costly and unnecessary requirements for managing and disposing of the residues. Coal combustion residues, also known as coal ash, are commonly recycled to make cement, drywall, asphalt, and bricks. They are processed to make plastics lighter and stronger and as filler in wood products. Coal ash was even used to make the concrete in the EPA’s headquarters building and the concrete platforms and structures of the subway system in Washington, D.C. Businesses reuse almost half the coal ash produced annually in electricity generation. Prior to the coal ash spill from the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston Fossil Plant in December 2008, the EPA repeatedly concluded that coal ash does not exhibit any characteristics of hazardous wastes and should not be regulated as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). In fact, the agency chose not to pursue hazardous waste regulations because this would adversely affect the reuse market, which conserves natural resources and reduces the amount of coal ash destined for disposal. However, the Kingston spill spurred the agency to reconsider that decision and initiating a federal rulemaking to regulate the disposal of coal ash from electric utilities.

On June 21, 2010, the EPA issued a proposed rule with two options for regulating the disposal of coal ash as either a hazardous or nonhazardous waste.[20] While the Kingston spill demonstrated a need to better engineer and regulate the construction of impoundments, the incident does not justify regulating coal ash as a hazardous waste. In fact, despite the magnitude of the accident, the Tennessee Department of Health found no adverse health effects caused by the spill.[21] Importantly, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association warns that as much as 18 percent of the nation’s coal generation would be at risk of closure if EPA classifies coal ash as hazardous.[22] Nearly every state, the Environmental Council of the States, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials oppose regulating coal ash as hazardous waste.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In June 2007, the EPA proposed a more stringent revision of NAAQS for ground-level ozone, the primary component of smog. At the time, the eight-hour ozone standard was 84 parts per billion (ppb), and the Bush-era rule lowered that to 75 ppb. The Obama Administration began to pursue a much more aggressive standard of 60 ppb, but understanding that the lower standard would destroy millions of jobs, President Obama recently asked EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to withdraw the agency’s draft for more stringent NAAQS. Attaining the 60 ppb standard would have exceeded $1 trillion in costs between 2020 and 2030 and destroyed more than 7 million jobs by 2020.[23] Although Jackson begrudgingly complied, the EPA is still moving to enforce the misguided 75 ppb rule that was adopted in 2008.

The 84 ppb ozone standard is already more stringent than it needs to be and provides more than enough protection for citizens’ health. The massive costs of tightening the standard have outweighed the negligible environmental benefits in the past, and enforcing the 75 ppb standard will yield diminishing marginal returns—possibly to the vanishing point. Even the EPA acknowledged that lowering the ozone standard to 70 ppb would lower asthma and respiratory diseases by only a few tenths of a percent.[24] Enforcing a 75 ppb standard would have similar marginal benefits. Furthermore, the causality between more stringent ozone standards and better health effects is unclear. Laboratory studies on both humans and animals show that real-world ozone exposure is not deadly and that “college student volunteers who breathed controlled concentrations of ozone 50 percent greater than the current standard while vigorously exercising for six hours registered only small, short-term changes in lung function.”[25] However, it is clear and well established that improved economic well-being means that people are healthier and live longer. A tighter ozone rule will slow economic growth and reduce economic well-being.

Cooling Water Intake Structures (CWIS). Many power plants, including coal plants, have cooling systems that use large volumes of water from streams, lakes, rivers, and oceans to condense the steam used to generate electricity. The water is ultimately returned to its original source. In April 2011, the EPA proposed a rule under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act that would require changes to cooling water intake structures to implement “best technology available” in order to minimize aquatic mortality, mostly of small fish, eggs, larvae, and plankton. Although it is encouraging that the EPA chose not to require costly closed-cycle technology at all facilities, the proposed rule imposes inflexible numeric requirements for impingement (where aquatic life is trapped against the cooling intake screen) or low-water intake velocity that is not available at all facilities. The proposed rule ignores site-specific requirements, alternative methods that power plants use to protect fish populations, and states’ capability of managing 316(b) requirements. The U.S. Supreme Court even recognized the EPA’s authority to grant power to the states to manage environmental and grid reliability concerns.[26] Furthermore, the rule fails the cost–benefit analysis test. The EPA projects the rule will cost $384 million per year and produce annual benefits of $18 million.[27] However, the Electric Power Research Institute projects compliance costs will actually reach $64 billion.[28]

Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In April 2009, the EPA issued an endangerment finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases pose a serious threat to human health and public safety. Administrator Lisa Jackson recently announced that the EPA would proceed with twice-delayed regulations targeting power plants that emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The proposed rule will prohibit new power plants from emitting more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt of electricity generated. Since natural gas power plants already meet that requirement, the rule targets new coal-fired plants.[29] This is a rule with all costs and no benefits. The EPA classifies carbon dioxide (a colorless, odorless nontoxic gas) as a pollutant not because it directly affects human health, but because some believe it contributes to global warming, leading to rising sea levels, stressed water resources, increased size and quantity of wildfires, and other effects.

The EPA has long ignored the disagreement within the scientific community on classifying carbon dioxide as a pollutant and on the magnitude of anthropogenic (manmade) global warming. Yet even setting aside the scientific dissention on these two points, the EPA regulations will not reduce carbon dioxide enough to have any meaningful effect. Attempting to reduce carbon dioxide unilaterally will significantly change overall global emissions. China and India’s carbon dioxide emissions are rapidly increasing as their economies continue to expand, and they have no intention of slowing economic growth to curb emissions. Even if the EPA were to reduce U.S. carbon emissions 83 percent below 2005 levels by 2050, as mandated by cap-and-trade bills, the reduction would constitute a negligible portion of worldwide emissions and do nothing to impact global temperatures.[30]

Existing Regulatory Challenges

Beyond the EPA’s regulatory train wreck, a number of other problematic regulations are prematurely shuttering coal facilities and preventing the building of new plants and the expansion of existing ones. Chief among these is New Source Review (NSR), one of the 1977 Clean Air Act amendments. In areas that meet air quality standards, plants must follow Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) rules to demonstrate that the construction and operation of new projects and major modifications will not increase emissions above a specified threshold. In areas that do not meet the NAAQS that NSR requires, new plants must install equipment to achieve the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), buy emission offsets, and provide opportunity for public involvement.[31]

There are several problems with NSR and PSD. What constitutes a significant modification is subjective under the rules. The amendment excludes routine maintenance, repair, and replacement, but what falls under the definition of significant modification remains murky, despite multiple administrative attempts to clarify the meaning.

Plant upgrades can improve efficiency and reduce operational costs, thereby lowering electricity costs, increasing reliability, and providing environmental benefits. Nevertheless, NSR requirements for upgrades discourage these activities. Increasing the efficiency of a plant will cause it to run longer and consequently cause the plant’s emissions to rise. NSR does not account for the emission reduction that would occur if a less efficient plant reduced its hours of operation to compensate for increases in operation of a more efficient plant.

The lack of clarification also forces companies into years of litigation over NSR violations. For instance, in 1999, the EPA filed a complaint against Cinergy Corporation, which was later bought by Duke Energy, claiming that modifications to two of the plants at the Gallagher Generating Station in New Albany, Indiana, violated the Nonattainment New Source Review and PSD provisions of the Clean Air Act.[32] Duke maintained that the upgrades were part of the routine maintenance exclusion, but after 10 years of litigation, the company entered into a consent decree to retire two of the plants or convert them to natural gas and to spend $85 million on plant modifications and $6.25 million on environmental mitigation projects, and to pay a $1.75 million civil penalty.[33] In total, power companies have entered into 17 consent decrees with the U.S. Justice Department.

NSR is a vaguely written rule that disincentivizes efficiency improvements. As Robert Peltier, editor in chief of POWER Magazine, writes, “A good analogy would be if you put a new carburetor on your 1957 Chevy you would then have to meet all the 2010 air quality standards. Often the cost of the upgrades cost more than the first cost of the plant.”[34]

The Assault on Mining

The attack on coal reaches well beyond power plant construction and operation. Although not a new problem, starting new coal mining operations or expanding existing operations has become increasingly difficult. Coal mining operations are subject to 10 federal environmental laws as well as state requirements and regulations. Furthermore, environmental regulations have been implemented in extreme, subjective, and contradictory ways that delay and restrict access to critical energy sources, preventing the creation of new jobs, destroying existing jobs, and providing little to no environmental benefit.

Clean Water Permits. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Army Corps of Engineers administers permits for activities, including coal mining, that discharge dredge or fill material[35] into U.S. waters and wetlands. The EPA also reviews, comments, and can veto the permit application. However, the EPA is abusing its ability to place holds on permit applications. The EPA held nearly 200 permit applications—many in the final stages of processing by the Army Corps—in a state of limbo and altered the permit requirements in violation of its authority under the Clean Water Act as determined by the courts.[36] In an unprecedented move, in January 2011, the EPA revoked a water permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers in 2007 for a West Virginia mine.[37]

On October 6, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia struck down those EPA procedures stating that the “EPA has expanded its role in the issuance of Section 404 permits and has thus exceeded the statutory authority afforded to it by the Clean Water Act.”[38] On March 23, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the EPA’s attempt to retroactively veto the dredge-and-fill permit, allowing the people of Mingo Logan Coal to go back to work: “This attempt to withdraw the specification of discharge sites after a permit has been issued is unprecedented in the history of the Clean Water Act.” The court went on to find that the EPA interpretation of the rule was “unreasonable.”[39]

These were important victories in reining in the EPA. Regrettably, environmental groups are urging the EPA to appeal and are urging the EPA to continue to usurp the authority of the Army Corps of Engineers and states in issuing water quality permits, which creates uncertainty in the mining industry.

Stream Protection. The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977 plays an important role in protecting the environment from coal mining and reclaiming abandoned mined lands. It creates regulatory certainty and for the most part allows states to tailor regulatory requirements to their regional and local needs. However, proposed federal rules would fundamentally change the federal–state relationship. This is exactly what is occurring with the revised Stream Buffer Zone Rule. For example, from 2003 to 2008, the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) worked with the EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a stream buffer rule to avoid mining activities near streams when possible and to use the best technology available to minimize sediments entering streams to protect fish, wildlife, and water quality. After two environmental impact statements and consideration of 43,000 public comments, the OSM published a final rule, which the Obama Administration attempted to summarily set aside without the required rulemaking procedure. The court ruled that the Administration’s action violated the Administrative Procedure Act and that the OSM must either implement the rule as written or begin a new rulemaking process. The OSM chose to begin writing a new rule, which could significantly reduce coal mining in Appalachia, the Illinois Basin, the Gulf Region, and Alaska.[40] According to the OSM’s own projections, the proposed rule could eliminate 10,749 jobs in Appalachia.[41]

The new rule would impose additional permitting and reporting requirements and restrict various mining activities. The rewritten rule also has several serious problems. It only vaguely defines permit requirements, monitoring, and stream classifications, which it applies to both surface and underground mining.[42] It removes flexibility in how companies reclaim mine sites, for instance by requiring reforestation even though wildlife organizations are working with the coal industry to provide grassland habitats for a wide range of species.[43] Furthermore, it ignores regional differences and the efficient state regulatory work that manages those differences.[44] State and local agencies’ specific knowledge often enables them to tailor regulations to promote economic activity while protecting the habitat and environment. In September 2011, John Corra, director of the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, testified before the House Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee that his state has the necessary regulations in place for stream protection and reclamation.[45] Thomas Clarke, director of the West Virginia Division of Mining and Reclamation in the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, echoed this sentiment:

The current OSM rulemaking will diminish the regulatory flexibility that states have in favor of national solutions dictated from Washington. West Virginia has been successful in addressing new issues as they arise, within SMCRA’s regulatory framework.[46]

Worker Health and Safety. Mine worker safety is critically important. U.S. mining is constantly improving mining safety and has implemented CORESafety, a new safety and health management system that commits the industry to eliminating fatalities and reducing the mining injury rate by 50 percent within five years. However, the Mine Safety and Health Administration is imposing unneeded rules that are being implemented in unworkable time frames or removing responsibility from the miner.

Proximity Detection Systems. In 2011, the MSHA proposed a new rule for proximity detection systems for continuous miners (a large electric-powered machine that cuts the coal from a seam) to prevent miners from being run over, pinned, or crushed by the machinery. While the industry broadly supports the use of proximity detection technology, they warned the MSHA that the proposed implementation time line could jeopardize the device’s efficacy. Implementation must be carried out within 18 months of the rule’s publication, but Ernal Shaw, Safety Manager at Bowie Resources LLC, said that the time frame is literally impossible and that implementing the rule would take at least 24 months.[47] In comments submitted to MSHA, Alpha Natural Resources Vice President of Safety John Gallick emphasized the importance of red zone[48] training and deeper and longer cuts to the mine to minimize injuries and fatalities.[49]

Examinations of Work Areas in Underground Coal Mines. This rule would change the duties of the mine examiner, a person hired by the mining company to identify hazardous conditions, by requiring examiners to identify health or safety standards violations. On the surface, this sounds beneficial, but examiners do not receive the same training as inspectors, and the standard violations inspectors cite are much more particular than what an examiner should check. Changing the role of the mine examiner has the unintended consequence of detracting from the examiner’s core function of recognizing and preventing hazardous conditions. The MSHA recognized this in 1996 when it proposed a similar rule, noting, “Most hazards are violations of mandatory standards. Requiring the examiner to look for all violations regardless of whether they involve a distinct hazard could distract the examiner from the more important aspects of the examination.”[50] The MSHA recently released the rule, but the agency should reconsider it and once again recognize that states have taken the lead on this issue and have different certification programs for examiners.

Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust. Another MSHA overreach is the proposed rule to reduce exposure to coal mine dust. Implementation of coal mine dust regulations to prevent pneumoconiosis (black lung) began in 1970 by setting a standard of 3.0 milligrams per cubic meter. The MSHA lowered the standard to 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter in 1973 and is now proposing to lower the standard to 1.0, claiming that cases of black lung are on the rise. The proposed rule also requires the use of the continuous personal dust monitor and relies on those devices to send data on dust exposure to MSHA.[51] Yet contrary to the statutory requirement, MSHA does not use the best available science to justify the lower coal dust standard.[52] A May 2011 study in Occupational and Environmental Medicine studied regional differences in increases in coal worker pneumoconiosis, the relationship to coal dust, and federal regulations implemented by MSHA. The study concluded that increases in pneumoconiosis were not explained by dust exposure, but likely by mine size and low-seam mining (coal mines with a seam of 1.2 meters or less). It emphasized the need for more study to identify the contributing factors to pneumoconiosis.[53] Furthermore, continuous personal dust monitors can reliably measure relative differences in dust exposure, but should not be used to determine numeric compliance with any federal regulation.[54]

Patterns of Violations. The MSHA issues patterns of violation (POV) for mines that have persistent health and safety violations, and such an issuance shuts down the entire mine or part of the mine. MSHA’s proposed rule for POV takes a guilty-until-proven-innocent approach by basing the decision on violations issued. The proposed rule also removes the provision in which MSHA warns a mining operation before issuing a POV and does not provide a way for operators to avoid a POV issuance. The MSHA’s main reason for the rule is to remove the backlog of contested violations before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. Much of the backlog is the result of MSHA issuing more violations. MSHA reduced 20 percent of the significant and substantial violations issued in 2009 and 2010 to nonsignificant and substantial as a result of the litigation process.[55] MSHA has also had difficulty in accurately evaluating a mine’s inspection theory. Given that the MSHA has not outlined how many violations it will take to issue a POV, these margins of error would prove to be unnecessarily costly. Because of the ambiguity and lack of due process, the MSHA should rescind this rule.

What Congress Should Do

Congress should change the regulatory landscape for coal mining with several principles in mind. Some regulations are simply unneeded, and Congress should prohibit the EPA from implementing such regulations. Other regulations have reached a point of diminishing returns at which further tightening will impose exceedingly high costs on American energy consumers for unnoticeable environmental benefits that are often estimated based on unsound science. State regulators have the incentive to balance economic and environmental well-being and can use local knowledge to manage the interests of all affected parties. Congress and the Administration should:









Allow Coal to Rock On

The U.S. should not mine coal or build coal power plants just for the sake of using coal. If other sources of energy are more affordable and more efficient, the market will move to different power sources. For decades, coal has literally been the rock that has powered America with cheap, reliable energy. Yet the federal government is using every possible avenue to reduce coal’s role in American energy production by creating an environment in which coal production’s decline is inevitable. Congress should reform federal policies and regulations to enable the market—not federal politicians and bureaucrats—to determine the role of coal in U.S. electricity generation.

Nicolas D. Loris is the Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation

[1]Institute for Energy Research, “North American Energy Inventory,” December 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[2]“Nearly One Fifth of U.S. Coal Fleet to Retire by 2020,” Electric Light & Power, January 7, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[3]Institute for Energy Research, “EPA’s Latest Assault on Coal: New Regulations to Take Over 28 GW of Electricity Generating Capacity Offline,” October 4, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[4]Benjamin Salisbury, Marc de Croisset, David M. Khani, et al., “Coal Retirements in Perspective—Quantifying the Upcoming EPA Rules,” FBR Capital Markets, December 13, 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012), and Metin Celebi, Frank Graves, Gunjan Bathla, and Lucas Bressan, “Potential Coal Plant Retirements Under Emerging Environmental Regulations,” The Brattle Group, December 8, 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[5]Manuel Quinones, “Ohio Power Company to Shutter 6 Coal Plants, Blames EPA Rules,” E&E Publishing, January 27, 2012, (accessed April 6, 2012; subscription required).


[7]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule: Reducing the Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone,” (accessed April 6, 2012).

[8]American Electric Power Company, “Clean Air Transport Rule,” (accessed April 6, 2012).

[9]North American Electric Reliability Corporation, “2010 Special Reliability Scenario Assessment: Resource Adequacy Impact of Potential U.S. Environmental Regulations,” October 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[10]Nicolas Loris, “EPA Regulations Will Kill Coal, Jobs in Texas,” The Heritage Foundation, The Foundry, June 12, 2011, (accessed June 22, 2012).

[11]Tom Schoenberg, “EPA Defends Cross-State Air Pollution Rule to U.S. Court,” Bloomberg, March 1, 2012, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[12]Jon Wellinghoff, chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, letter to Senator Lisa Murkowski, August 1, 2011, quoted in Kathleen Hartnett-White, “EPA’s Approaching Regulatory Avalanche: A Regulatory Spree Unprecedented in U.S. History,” Texas Public Policy, February 2012, p. 8, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[13]Hartnett White, “EPA’s Approaching Regulatory Avalanche.”


[15]States can still apply for an SIP but initial enforcement will come through an FIP. The EPA will also promulgate an FIP if the agency finds the state’s SIP to be insufficient or if it fails to submit one. “Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone in 27 States; Correction of SIP Approvals for 22 States,” 40 CFR Parts 51, 52, 72, 78, and 97 Final Rule, Environmental Protection Agency, July 6, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[16]Bryan W. Shaw, “Out of Thin Air: EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule,” testimony before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, September 14, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[17]Scott H. Segal, “ERCC Comments on Utility MACT,” Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, August 4, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[18]Anne E. Smith, “Technical Comments on the Regulatory Impact Analysis Supporting EPA’s Proposed Rule for Utility MACT and Revised NSPS (76 FR 24976),” NERA Economic Consulting, August 3, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[19]Willie Soon and Paul Driessen, “The Myth of Killer Mercury,” The Wall Street Journal, May 25, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[20]75 Code of Federal Regulations §§ 35 and 127 (June 21, 2010).

[21]Tennessee Valley Authority, “Kingston Ash Recovery Project,” June 6, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[22]National Rural Electric Cooperative, “Benefits of Coal Combustion Residual Materials,” (accessed July 5, 2012).

[23]Donald A. Norman, “Economic Implications of EPA’s Proposed Ozone Standard,” Manufacturers Alliance MAPI, September 2010, (accessed June 22, 2012).

[24]H. Sterling Burnett, “A Clean Air Regulation Hazardous to Health,” American Enterprise Institute, October 22, 2007, (accessed June 19, 2012).


[26]American Legislative Exchange Council, “EPA’s Regulatory Train Wreck: Strategies for State Legislators,” 2011, pp. 10–26, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[27] Federal Register, “Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures,” Unified Agenda 2040-AE95, Fall 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[28]American Legislative Exchange Council, “EPA’s Regulatory Train Wreck,” pp. 10–26.

[29]The EPA will eventually propose rules for existing plants as well.

[30]Chip Knappenberger, “Climate Impacts of Waxman–Markey (the IPCC-Based Arithmetic of No Gain),” Master Resource, May 6, 2009, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[31]Environmental Protection Agency, “Nonattainment NSR Basic Information,” (accessed June 19, 2012).

[32] U.S. v. Cinergy Corporation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[33]Environmental Protection Agency, “Duke Energy Gallagher Plant Settlement Information Sheet,” December 22, 2009, (accessed March 29, 2012).

[34]Robert Peltier, “Time to Repeal New Source Review? (Up to 30 GW of Coal-Plant Upgrades Hangs in the Balance),” Master Resource, February 4, 2010, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[35]Dredge is material excavated from U.S. waters. Fill material is any material used when replacing water or a wetland with dry land.

[36]U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works Minority Staff, “The Obama Administration’s Obstruction of Coal Mining Permits in Appalachia,” May 21, 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[37]Stephen Power and Kris Maher, “EPA Blasted as It Revokes Mine’s Permit,” The Wall Street Journal, January 14, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012). In testimony, Hal Quinn, CEO of the National Mining Association, explained the flaws in the EPA’s justification for revoking the permit. Hal Quinn, “EPA Mining Policies: Assault on Appalachian Jobs—Part I,” testimony before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives, May 5, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[38] National Mining Association v. Jackson, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, November 6, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[39] Mingo Logan Coal Company v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[40]Eugene Kitts, testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, April 7, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[41]Thomas A. Clarke, testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, September 26, 2011, (accessed April 6, 2012).

[42]National Mining Association, “Stream Buffer Zone (SBZ),” (accessed June 19, 2012).

[43]David Ledford, “Comments to Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Regarding the Stream Protection Rule, and the Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement,” Appalachian Wildlife Foundation, June 30, 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[44]Bradley C. (Butch) Lambert, written testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, September 26, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[45]John Corra, written testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, September 26, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[46]Clarke, testimony.

[47]Ernal Shaw, “Comments on the Proposed Rule Proximity Detection Systems for Continuous Mining Machines in Underground Coal Mines,” memorandum to Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, November 23, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[48]The unsafe proximity of people to the machinery.

[49]John Gallick, “RIN 1219-AB65 Comments on the Proposed Rule Proximity Detection Systems for Continuous Mining Machines in Underground Coal Mines,” letter to Roslyn Fontaine, acting director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, November 28, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[50]John Gallick, “Comments on Proposed Rule on Workplace Examinations,” testimony, (accessed April 5, 2012).

[51]U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, “MSHA’s Proposed Rule on Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors,” October 14, 2010, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[52]Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, Public Law 91–173, § 101(a)(6)(A).

[53]Eva Suarthana et al., “Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis in the United States: Regional Differences 40 Years After Implementation of the 1969 Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act,” Occupational Environmental Medicine, Vol. 68, No. 12 (May 19, 2011), pp. 908–913.

[54]Edward M. Green, “Comments on Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors, Proposed Rule,” e-mail to Roslyn B. Fontaine, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, June 20, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[55]David A. Gooch, “ RIN 1219-AB73: Comments on MSHA’s Proposed Rule for Pattern of Violations,” letter to April E. Nelson, acting director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, April 4, 2011, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[56]Defending America’s Affordable Energy and Jobs Act, S. 228 and H.R. 750, 112th Cong., 1st Sess.

[57]James L. Gattuso and Diane Katz, “Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three-Year Mark,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2663, March 13, 2012,

[58]Institute for Energy Research, “The Facts About Air Quality and Coal-Fired Power Plants,” June 1, 2009, (accessed June 19, 2012).

[59]Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act, H.R. 2273, 112th Cong., 1st Sess.



Skeptics put the freeze on NASA 'hot air' about Greenland ice

By Jeremy A. Kaplan

Published July 26, 2012

greenland icemelt.jpg

Extent of surface melt over Greenlands ice sheet on July 8 (left) and July 12 (right). Measurements from three satellites showed that in just a few days, the melting had dramatically accelerated and an estimated 97 percent of the ice sheet surface had thawed by July 12. (Nicolo E. DiGirolamo, SSAI/NASA GSFC, and Jesse Allen, NASA Earth Observatory)

NASA’s claim that Greenland is experiencing “unprecedented” melting is nothing but a bunch of hot air, according to scientists who say the country's ice sheets melt with some regularity.
A heat dome over the icy country melted a whopping 97 percent of Greenland’s ice sheet in mid-July, NASA said, calling it yet more evidence of the effect man is having on the planet.
But the unusual-seeming event had nothing to do with hot air, according to glaciologists. It was actually to be expected.
"Ice cores from Summit station [Greenland’s coldest and highest] show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," said Lora Koenig, a Goddard glaciologist and a member of the research team analyzing the satellite data.
But rather than a regular 150-year planetary cycle, the new NASA report calls the melt “unprecedented,” the result of a recent strong ridge of warm air, or a heat dome, over Greenland -- one of a series that has dominated Greenland's weather since the end of May.

'NASA should start distributing dictionaries to the authors of its press releases.'

- Patrick J. Michaels, a climatologist
"Each successive ridge has been stronger than the previous one," said Thomas Mote, a climatologist at the University of Georgia. This latest heat dome started to move over Greenland on July 8, and then parked itself over the ice sheet about three days later. By July 16, it had begun to dissipate, along with the ice, NASA said.
Climate skeptics said the NASA report itself was the only “unprecedented” item.
“NASA should start distributing dictionaries to the authors of its press releases,” joked Patrick J. Michaels, a climatologist and the author of the World Climate Report blog.
“It’s somewhat like the rush to blame severe weather and drought on global warming,” Anthony Watts, a noted climate skeptic and the author of the Watts Up With That blog, told “Yet when you look into the past, you find precedence for what is being described today as unprecedented.”
It's the latest hot water for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which critics say has shifted focus and priorities from space and aeronautics to the earth we live on -- and the planet's changing climate.
NASA chief cryospheric scientist H. Jay Zwally told that the melting has been increasing as the temperatures in Greenland have been increasing.
“Climate in the Arctic has been warming about three to four times more than the global average, and Greenland surface temperatures (observed by satellite and surface instruments) have been increasing about 2 degrees Celsius per decade during about the last 20 years,” he said.
Zwally would be in a position to know: He was lead scientist for the ICESat project, which ran from 2003 to 2010, and used satellites to measure Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets.
“This is the most extensive area of surface melting during last 40 years of satellite observations,” he said.
It may be in line with the 150-year cycles of melting, however. Mary Albert, executive director of the NSF Ice Core Drilling office, and Kaitlin Keegan, an engineering PhD student and a fellow in Dartmouth’s polar environmental change program, are working on a paper on the Greenland ice sheet melt, a school spokeswoman told
Neither was available to describe the exact findings, but in a blog posting detailing her work, Keegan noted that several cores dating back millennia have also reflected the 150-year cycle.
“In Greenland there have been many deep ice-core drilling projects which drilled ice to the bedrock,” she wrote. “In the past 10,000 years (the Holocene), there is on average a melt layer every 150 years.”
NASA ice scientist Tom Wagner told the Associated Press researchers don't know precisely how much of Greenland's ice had melted in this latest event, but it seems to be freezing again.
“The belief that almost any aberration in weather and climate today can be attributed to global warming is pure folly,” Watts told

Read more:




Anti-carbon war: Hiking taxes, Driving up energy costs, Hobbling industry, Costing jobs, Creating fuel poverty
Debunking the Great Carbon Tax Hype

Peter C. Glover Full Story


Anti-carbon war: Hiking taxes, Driving up energy costs, Hobbling industry, Costing jobs, Creating fuel poverty

Debunking the Great Carbon Tax Hype



- Peter C. Glover  

With global temperatures flat-lining for 15 years, climate alarmist arguments are looking far more fragile than the earth’s (actually robust) eco-system. Of late, climate activists of all ideological shades have thus attempted to posit a “third way” between the “extremes” of interminable left-right, alarmist-sceptic arguments.

Thus the new climate mantra is for a global carbon tax. It is, so we are told, is the best way to “incentivize” people to act on the “problem” and provide a “solution”. Step forward Tim Worstall of the UK’s Adam Smith Institute (ASI) and his “third way” contentions.

Now, I like Tim Worstall (TW). Tim is a senior fellow at the excellent UK ASI free market think-tank. Generally speaking, Tim contributes a great deal of worthy economic analysis on public policy issues. But in his belief that “climate change is a problem and yes, we have to do something about it” TW has, quite simply, ‘lost it’.

Let’s be clear, TW is not, as he pithily puts it, a “tits up for humanity” doomsayer. Fine anti-alarmist publications such as The Register are happy to run his articles such as “Global warming is GOOD for the environment”. But even there the alarm bells begin to sound. In it TW hopes that the upcoming fifth IPCC report “will report honestly and openly” so that we can assess whether it’s worth “ditching industrial civilisation” or not. So whether the industrial revolution was a massive mistake, for TW, rests entirely on the integrity of a highly politicized body which has already proved to be involved in massive scientific and data tampering (the hockey stick fiasco, Climategate, to name but two).

Clearly TW has bought into the notion that man is able to ‘manipulate’ the climate both for ill and for good, the Warmist argument of Greenpeace and co. TW’s case is, therefore, that we need to act on climate change. To that end he purports to show that Britain already provides the blueprint for action having already imposed a raft of green taxes that amounts to carbon tax.

To make headway, Worstall first insists we must: “Put the [James] Delingpoles over here, the vileness that are Greenpeace, FoE and the rest of the forward-to-the-Middle-Ages crowd over there”. In other words, ditch what he perceives as ‘extreme’ positions. Unfortunately Worstall’s conveniently circumvents any need for empiricists actually to prove the scientific case against CO2 which they have still to do, bizarrely citing scientific “uncertainty” as grounds for acting. In a recent Forbes column TW thus agrees with the case made in a NY Times op-ed calling for the substitution of a carbon tax directly on emissions rather than green taxes on “good things” like consumer items. According to Worstall, “a carbon tax brings us the right amount of climate change” by pitching it at “whatever the ‘social cost’ of carbon is.” The goal: “to change people’s incentives and then see how they solve the problem.”

Worstall explains how, if we convert all the methane and associated gases into CO2 equivalents and add this to CO2 creating CO2-e, the effect would be to “a 0.7 degree rise in average temperature”. This “straight physics” he maintains is demonstrated “in all the IPCC reports”. But that is “not the end of the story”. For TW the key to action is “the feedbacks”, that is “processes started by that 0.7 degree warning”, which are then able to “amplify…the initial direct impact of CO2”. He admits that we don’t know whether these “feedbacks” are actually “positive or negative”. Indeed, “we don’t know where they will lead”.

So for clarity, let’s sum up. Even though a 0.7 degree warming would have all sorts of vegetation growing benefits, it isn’t actually happening, but, theoretically, it could. That in itself is not necessarily a problem but the possible “feedbacks” might be, even though we have no idea whether those “feedbacks” would be “positive or negative”. Equally, “The cumulative effect of all of these feedbacks is something we simply don’t know”. Is it me? Or, as a call to action, is it so shot through with wildly uncertain caveats that it is not worth getting out of bed for? TW ploughs on concerning how the UN IPCC—a political organisation already furiously back-peddling on previous alarmist claims—believes a global temperature rise could be “in the 2 to 4.5 degree range”. Again bemusingly, Worstall insists, “It is this ‘we don’t know’ that leads to needing to do something. Economists call this uncertainty, and the correct and reasonable reaction to uncertainty is insurance”. Bottom line: “The science tells us there is uncertainty; uncertainty is an economic problem to be solved through economic methods”. Strange, but I have always thought “uncertainty” called for caution before taking action—and that insurance policies are normally taken out in the face of proven threats. No matter, as Worstall’s ‘third way’ is merely the Warmists ‘precautionary principle’ dressed up as an ‘economic solution’; the same kind of ‘solution’ posited by the green lobbies for years.

The spurious nature of Worstall’s argument gets worse-still (pun intended). TW rightly identifies that we Brits are already paying the equivalent of a carbon tax via a raft of green taxes, which include levies on fuel, air travel, electricity bills, to be but a small number. He points out that while UK emissions stand at around the 500-million-ton mark Brits currently pay around $80 per tonne, a figure that could be a starting point for a new carbon tax. Unfortunately, TW omits to also point out that Britain’s extensive green tax regime is an abject failure. It has actually had zero impact on Britain’s carbon footprint which, during the tenure of green taxes, actually saw emissions increase by 20 percent. What it is has achieved is provide an unprecedented windfall for government coffers, some of which has subsidized Britain’s frivolous and costly renewable energy projects. In addition to making Britain’s domestic electricity bills

are now among the highest in Europe, badly skewing—something that should rankle with TW’s ASI think-tank associates—free market power costs.

Equally, as a recent US report Dissecting the Carbon Tax points out, globally speaking: “There would be virtually no environmental benefits to unilateral greenhouse gas emission reductions by developed countries ... while developing countries are pouring out virtually every kind of pollutant with joyous abandon.” But if economics really is TW’s higher concern, he perhaps ought to read the recently published from the European Institute for Climate and Energy. In it EU Parliamentarian Herbet Reul states that computer models predict Germany’s green isolationist energy policy could cost a mammoth ‚Ǩ2 trillion+ to achieve a mere 0.0003oC impact on temperature. And even then, of course, any impact would be “uncertain”—that word again. With Berlin’s anti-carbon-renewable subsidy regime having helped 15 percent of Germans into fuel poverty, with households facing a further rise of ‚Ǩ175 billion in fuel costs and Germany’s power grid teetering on collapse, it is no wonder German politicians fear a voter backlash. UK politicians too are aware of the ‘political risk’ inherent in pushing anti-carbon measures. Precisely why some scientists now suggest ‘suspending democracy’ altogether—ah yes, tyranny—as the only realistic way of imposing a global carbon tax without governments being voted out of office.

Britain (and Germany’s) anti-carbon war has actually succeeded only in hiking taxes, providing a windfall for government, driving up energy costs, hobbling industry competitiveness, costing jobs and dumping half a million people into fuel poverty while having precisely zero impact on carbon emissions. Tim Worstall’s ‘solution’ proposes the assimilation of the pestilence of (failed and financially sapping) green taxes into a socially ubiquitous carbon ‘poll’ tax toward, as even Worstall admits, is an entirely “uncertain” end of ‘man-made’ climate manipulation.

Or put more succinctly: translate the unworkable into the unacceptable to achieve the delusional.

For a fuller debunking of the anti-science case against carbon dioxide (a harmless trace and minor greenhouse gas) read ‘Energy and Climate Wars’ (Continuum, 2011) by Peter C Glover and Michael J. Economides.

radio microphone


House Republicans: Let's drill for oil!

Rep. Canseco outlines GOP plan to expand energy exploration, slash gas prices

 House Republicans are focused on job creation this week through two primary avenues.

Later this week, the GOP will look to roll back what it sees as far too much bureaucratic red tape that stifles businesses and hiring. But first, the House will take up energy legislation – a bill to roll back Obama administration restrictions on exploration and greatly expand the coastal waters available for energy exploration.

Texas Rep. Francisco “Quico” Canseco said ending America’s huge dependence upon foreign energy should be a major goal, and it will easily create tens of thousands of jobs in the process. Canseco said President Obama’s claim of greatly expanding exploration is stunningly deceptive, and he explains the big difference between the administration approving drilling permits and drilling leases.

Canseco details how the House bill will expedite the process for companies wishing to explore for energy. He also responds to criticisms that the bill does nothing to advocate renewable energies and explains how embracing the House Republicans’ agenda could lead to a considerable drop in gas prices before long.






Solyndra figures attend swanky Obama fundraiser

Republicans attack what they say is 'crony capitalism'

By Dave Boyer  - The Washington Times

President Obama rubbed elbows Monday night with two men at the center of the Solyndra loan scandal at an exclusive fundraiser in California.

Steve Westly, a financier whose money-raising prowess helped to snag him a post on the administration’s energy advisory board, and Matt Rogers, a former Energy Department senior adviser who helped to approve the Solyndra loan, were spotted by reporters at the $35,800-per-person fundraiser for the president’s re-election campaign.

Mr. Westly sent warnings to the president not to attend an event at Solyndra's headquarters in the Bay area because of shaky finances at the solar energy company, which had received a fast-tracked $535 million federal loan guarantee in 2010 as part of the administration’s economic stimulus program. Mr. Rogers was partly responsible for overseeing stimulus awards at the Energy Department.

They were among about 60 wealthy donors who attended the fundraiser at the swanky home of progressive activist Quinn Delaney and real estate developer Wayne Jordan, a big Obama bundler, in Piedmont, Calif., near Oakland.

Reporters traveling with the president saw Mr. Westly juggling lemons, entertaining kids at the party. He was seated later at one of the tables farthest from the president as he spoke.

Mr. Obama stayed away from any discussion of alternative energy at the fundraiser, except to say that his re-election would ensure that the government promotes “smart regulations … that are going to deal with issues like climate change.”

Republicans, including presidential candidate Mitt Romney, have attacked the administration’s support of the Solyndra loan and other stimulus programs as examples of Mr. Obama’s “crony capitalism.” The solar-energy start-up firm later went bankrupt.

“The Obama Administration betrayed American taxpayers when it dumped hundreds of millions of public dollars into Solyndra while ignoring clear warnings about the company’s dire financial situation,” Romney campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said in a statement.

“President Obama’s first term worked out well for his donors who got special access and taxpayer money for their failed ventures. It hasn’t worked as well for the 23 million Americans struggling for work in the worst economic recovery our country has ever had.”

On Monday, the White House said it would veto a House bill that would require a significant expansion of offshore oil and gas leasing. The administration said the legislation “would undermine the targeted, science-based and regionally-tailored offshore development strategy that the American people and the States have helped develop over the last three years.”

Romney campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said the veto threat was more evidence of the president’s misguided energy policies.

“As energy prices have risen and our economy continues to struggle, President Obama insists on hindering efforts to expand domestic production and create American jobs,” she said. “His self-described ‘hodgepodge’ energy policy has been an abject failure. Whether blocking job-creating initiatives like the Keystone pipeline or wasting taxpayer money on boondoggles like Solyndra, President Obama doesn’t have a clue when it comes to America’s energy future.”

Read more: Solyndra figures attend swank Obama fundraiser - Washington Times






Busted! Leaked emails snag global-warming alarmists

'Skeptics will be all over us – the world is really cooling'

While NASA climate alarmist James Hansen insists record summer heat and drought are caused by man-made global warming, leaked internal emails from just three summers ago reveal that he and his colleagues expressed alarm that the planet was inexplicably cooling.

Hansen, often called the “godfather of global warming,” asserted earlier this month that blistering heat across the United States is so rare that it can’t be anything but the man-made global warming he has been warning about for decades.

“This is not some scientific theory,” he told the Associated Press. “We are now experiencing scientific fact.”

But in 2009, as the thermometer hit record lows in America, he and other climate scientists panicked in a flurry of emails: “Skeptics will be all over us – the world is really cooling, the models are no good.”

They lamented that Mother Nature was not cooperating with their predictions that global temperatures would smash heat records last decade. They blamed their miscalculation on sulfate emission trajectories and revised their forecast to show a cooling trend lasting until 2020.

Then, they predicted, global warming would return with a vengeance.

In an Oct. 12, 2009, email to Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, fellow warming alarmist Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., asked, “Where the heck is global warming?”

“We have been asking that here in Boulder where we have broken records the past two days for the coldest days on record,” he added. “The Rockies baseball playoff game was canceled on saturday[sic] and then played last night in below freezing weather.”

Then Trenberth dropped a bombshell: “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment, and it is a travesty that we can’t.”

He ended by admitting the global warming “data are surely wrong.”

“Our observing system is inadequate,” he wrote.

The leaked emails were obtained from the computer server at the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain. Some of the scientists there were copied in the emails between Trenberth and Hansen.

Critics say the hacked messages show that climatologists in the U.S. and U.K. have engaged in a conspiracy to manufacture a case that global warming is occurring due to auto and factory and other emissions related to human activities.

Critics say Hansen, who has called for a worldwide tax on carbon emissions and advocated a ban on the construction of coal-fired power plants, is an activist with a political agenda.

Ignoring the record-breaking 2009 cooling period, Hansen recently argued that the evidence for human-made global warming is “overwhelming.”

“We can say with high confidence that such extreme anomalies would not have occurred in the absence of global warming,” he said.

Left unexplained, however, is the 2009 cooling anomaly.

Trenberth, for his part, later explained that while most of the planet experienced record cooling that year, “there were exceptional conditions in Southern Australia,” where temperatures rose.

He now says the record heat wave is proof of “global warming from the human influences on climate.”

“This is a view of the future,” Trenberth warned last month in a PBS interview. “So watch out.”

His analysis, however, ignores cool spots such as the Pacific Northwest, where Washington and Alaska have experienced the coldest spring and summer on record.  stlouisix

on Obama: Romney Calls Wind Energy ‘Imaginary’ 

It's too bad that the sham America-hating Obama presidency isn't "imaginary" as are the Obamunists' green goblin energy lies, which were designed solely for money laundering schemes on our dime from Obama's crony green capitalists directly back to his campaign coffers, that have been long since rejected by sane countries since we would have an America thriving, not dying - the latter being the express intent of Comrade Obama marching to his Marxist Socialist new world order puppet masters like the Soros crowd who, by their own admission, demand a utopia of the father-of-lies designed in their warped morally bankrupt image, where all who don't worship at their secular altar are scheduled for persecution in their gulags!
The November 2012 election is for the very survival of the free America of the founding fathers who understood, as referenced in The Preamble to the Declaration of Independence, the importance of "the law of nature, and of nature's God" for America's survival, in particular, the need for good moral leaders who would live the words of the founding documents, as opposed to trashing them on a daily basis!

Obama: Romney Calls Wind Energy ‘Imaginary’ 



on Open Thread 

EPA’s ‘Border Environmental’ Agreement Ignores Damage Done by Illegal Aliens
It's called a ready reservoir of "voters" to go along with "dogs" and "the dead", who, per reports, are being registered to vote for Obama, with the trash being left by same of no consequence as "trashing" a free America is all that Comrade Obama cares about!

EPA’s ‘Border Environmental’ Agreement Ignores Damage Done by Illegal Aliens


Lifting Drilling Restrictions Could Increase U.S. Reserves by 30 Percent, Study Finds

Comrade Obama is not about anything that has to do with the common good for America. Rather, Obama is all about destroying anything and everything American, which is why the election of November 2012 is the most important in the Nation's history with the very survival of The Republic at stake!

Lifting Drilling Restrictions Could Increase U.S. Reserves by 30 Percent, Study Finds 


on Obama’s ‘None-of-the-Below’ Energy Policy Puts Half of Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve Off Limits, CEO Says

Karl Rove's sorry modus operandi is being described in detail by Mark Levin as I post this!


Comrade Obama couldn't care one whit about the topic of this report because Obama wants to DESTROY America from within. You would have to be brain-dead to not understand that seminal fact by now, or worse, an enabler of the communist destruction of our country, which is exactly what an impotent, by choice, GOPE leadership under Boehner and McConnell has done, and continues to do, by incredibly believing that Obama is otherwise, i.e., can somehow be dealt with as if he cared!

You don't compromise with someone who was weaned on a hatred of anything and everything American. You stop him in his tracks for the sake of a country fit to live in for your children, grandchildren, and future generations of Americans. That was the message of the 2010 election in no uncertain terms, a message that was ignored by GOP leadership that couldn't care less in neutering a large part of the freshmen class that became unrecognizable to those who voted them in office!
We have a real mess on our hands here. We not only have to get rid of Obama and his minions, but also the influence of his mole enablers and their fawning press, which is nothing more than another branch of PRAVDA USA, both in the halls of Congress, and masquerading as concerned GOP, typically considering themselves the self-appointed experts of what has to be done whose enemy is an authentic conservatism that loves America enough to fight for it in favor of a status quo dragging the country down.
If America has any hope of digging itself out of the abyss intended for it by those who masquerade as Americans that have so infested this country, an exorcism is required of their morally bankrupt policies and positions in order to right a ship of state that is foundering upon the rocks of their betrayal!

Obama’s ‘None-of-the-Below’ Energy Policy Puts Half of Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve Off Limits, CEO Says 



on Obama Cites Auto Bailout as Model for Reviving American Manufacturing

Comrade Obama's comments should be chilling here, in regard to his planned nationalizing of everything American to make it unrecognizable as such, because if this news doesn't get your attention, you're dead!

Obama Cites Auto Bailout as Model for Reviving American Manufacturing 





Obama's massive 2nd-term industry takeover plans

Documented: Aim to expand bailouts across entire economy


Yikes! Obama to regulate your paycheck?

Plan would let government determine 'value' of private market jobs



Nationalize All Industries
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh Full Story

The President is right that GM is number one again – in China

Nationalize All Industries



- Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh  

Our President said, “When the American industry was on the brink of collapse, more than one million jobs at stake, Governor Romney said, let’s let Detroit go bankrupt. I said, I believe in American workers, I believe in this American industry, and now the American auto industry has come roaring back and GM is number one again. So now I want to do the same thing with manufacturing jobs, not just in the auto industry, but in every industry, I don’t want those jobs taking root in places like China.”

Nationalizing entire industries worked very poorly under dictatorships and communist centralized economies. In fact, they were so dysfunctional, despite grandiose economic five-year plans designed by the communist party apparatchiks who had no idea how to run a lemonade stand, they have all collapsed since 1989, with the exception of Cuba and North Korea, and we know how “well-off” their citizens are and how much individual freedom they have. Communist China had to modify its centralized economic control and adopt successful capitalist models. Managed economies are not the solution, capitalism and entrepreneurship are.

GM and Chrysler Fiat’s roaring sales are due to subsidized sales, indirect funding by the government

President Obama’s auto bailout cost taxpayers $60,000 per job saved. GM and Chrysler Fiat’s roaring sales are due to subsidized sales, indirect funding by the government, “sub-prime auto loans to inflate their car sales, selling automobiles to people who cannot afford them.” (Michael Savage, Savage Nation, August 9, 2012)

Taxpayers lost $20 to $23 billion in the auto bailout. The Obama Administration redistributed $26.5 more to the union than UAW would have received legally in the bankruptcy proceedings had the rule of law and contract been followed. “Thus the entire loss to the taxpayers from the auto bailout comes from the funds diverted to the UAW.” (Amy Payne, Heritage Foundation, June 13, 2012)

Mismanagement and high union labor costs contributed heavily to the bankruptcies

Mismanagement and high union labor costs, $70.51per hour in wages and benefits for GM and $75.86 per hour for Chrysler, contributed heavily to the bankruptcies that necessitated the bailout in the first place.

Secured creditors and investors should have had prior claim, in accordance with the law. Unsecured creditors should have received proportional payouts from the bankruptcy. A special trust fund protected UAW, while other creditors received fractions of what they were owed. UAW received billions and partial ownership, and Fiat, a foreign corporation, received part-ownership of Chrysler. UAW workers continued to receive huge compensations when compared to the much lower compensation of $47 per hour for Nissan and Toyota workers. Stephen Rattner, President Obama’s car czar said, “We should have asked UAW to do a bit more. We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in their pay.”

According to Amy Payne, the auto bailout was not a bailout of GM and Chrysler but a bailout of the auto union by American taxpayers who make on the average $30 per hour in wages and benefits. (Auto Bailout Was Really Just a UAW Bailout, Heritage Foundation, June 13, 2012)

GM did not just become Government Motors, it became China Motors

The issue is more complex. GM did not just become Government Motors, it became China Motors. After $80 billion of taxpayers’ dollars “saved” GM and Chrysler, GM opened a plant in Wuling, China. Research and development for car design was moved to China. Dan Akerson, CEO of GM said in Shanghai, China, in February 2011:

“Seven out of ten automobiles were made outside of the United States. We have 11 joint ventures in China with SAIC and FAW. We operate 11 assembly plants in China, four power train plants in eight cities across the country. We have more than 2,700 dealerships and sales outlets nationwide. We regard our eleven joint ventures as 11 keys to success. Not just in China but globally. Our commitment to working in China, with China, for China remains strong and focused in the future. We are now building out the advanced technology center which will bring our research and development that is centered largely in the U.S.; we are going to diversify that more into China because we think this market is so critically important to the success of our company. GM is a company well established for the future in China.” (May 4, 2012, video clip narrated by Vince Wade)

I wonder how millions of unemployed Americans feel about their bailout money that is now invested in China with SAIC, the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation which is run by the communist government of China who owns and controls most of the manufacturing and with the FAW, another Chinese government owned manufacturer. If Americans truly own GM, should the cars, jobs, and investments not be made in the United States? Why build China from the ground up while our American economy and infrastructure crumbles and turns to “has been” and dust?

Cadillac, a division of GM, sponsored “Birth of a Party,” a propaganda film about the Chinese Communist Party. Chinese leaders love to drive Cadillacs, the ultimate status symbol car. The banner advertising the movie had the hammer and sickle next to the famous Cadillac logo.

There is no democracy or free trade in China. The Chinese have demanded American technology with every deal signed since 1990, in exchange for promises of big profits from China’s 1.3 billion people. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, GM’s one billion dollar bid from China was won in exchange for “GM’s willingness to transfer a good deal of state-of-the-art technology.” (Vince Wade)

State-owned corporations of the communist government of China are buying key segments of the U.S economy as well, energy resources, and key industrial plants. The Wall Street Journal reported the purchase of Nexteer Automotive of Saginaw, Michigan, the largest employer in the area, by Pacific Century Motors and an industrial authority for the city of Beijing. Ownership was transferred six months later to AVIC, the Aviation Industry Corporation of China. (Vince Wade)

We now have 257 Chinese Free Trade Zones, presumably to produce goods that will be sold in the U.S. Do we not have enough unemployed Americans and newly-minted college graduates without job prospects who could produce goods and services here in the U.S.? Do we need to insource jobs to imported Chinese workers into the Free Trade Zones, and outsource every manufacturing job and many service industries to China and India?

President Obama’s $3 billion centralized “cash for clunkers” program artificially and temporarily stimulated new car sales while destroying 690,000 good used cars that could have been sold on used car lots to people who were not willing, or able to buy a new car.

To make matters worse, the Obama Administration is planning to increase the new car mileage standards from 35.5 miles per gallon to 54.5 miles per gallon which will cause further pain for Americans. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) the new mileage requirement will add $3,000 to $4,800 to the average price of new vehicles until 2025.  The National Auto Dealers Association (NADA) said that 6-11 million low-income drivers will not be able to afford new cars through 2025. Because of the new “corporate average fleet economy” (CAFÉ) standards, cars will have to be made smaller, less safe, resulting in more potential fatalities with each crash. The Smart Car may be smart in theory.

The idea behind the new standards was driven by the “green” environmentalist agenda who proposed to eliminate the use of fossil fuels and replace them with renewables because fossil fuel burning destroys the planet, and we are running out of oil and gas reserves. That is of course, not the case, the Obama Administration tried to purposefully increase our dependence on foreign oil by imposing moratoriums on drilling in the gulf, refusing the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, and denying permits for the exploration of domestic shale oil on federal lands. Furthermore, he promised to bankrupt the coal industry and make electricity prices skyrocket.

The President is right that GM is number one again – in China. Nationalizing the auto industry was not necessary. Extending the same business model to all American industries is not a good idea in capitalism, it WILL “drive jobs away, taking root in China” and elsewhere.



EPA Foolishly Seeks to Destroy Nation's Coal Industry

Thursday, August 9th, 2012

EPA Foolishly Seeks to Destroy Nation's Coal Industry 

Deliberate gov’t efforts to end an industry are not part of normal competitive market pressures

By ANDREW P. MORRISS TUSCALOOSA, Ala. — The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates the share of U.S. electricity generated from coal will fall from 42 percent in 2011 to 36.8 percent in 2013.

Some of that decline is due to advances in fracking making cheaper natural gas available. That's bad news for coal miners but no different than problems all industries face from competition.

Cheaper natural gas cannot explain all coal's decline, however. A federal study found that coal use in electricity declined just 1.4 percent for every 10 percent change in relative prices between the coal and natural gas. This is not surprising because electric plants cannot change from coal to natural gas by just throwing a switch.

An important reason for coal's decline is the administration's war on coal.

Vice President Joe Biden made that clear during the 2008 campaign when he said the Obama policy was "No coal plants here in America." Similarly, candidate Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle that he would ensure that building a coal plant would "bankrupt" the operator because of the cost of complying with new carbon-dioxide emission regulations.

Deliberate government efforts to end an industry are not part of normal competitive market pressures and bad for the U.S. economy for three reasons.

First, virtually all our coal production goes directly to generate electricity. Changing that is costly: our electric grid was designed based on generation patterns dominated by multiple coal plants. Eliminating coal requires both costly new generation facilities and expensive grid modifications.

Moreover, while the rapid development of domestic natural gas is cutting generation costs today, it is not guaranteed to continue indefinitely. If anti-fracking activists - who are also often anti-coal activists - succeed in their campaign to restrict natural gas production and pipeline construction, natural gas costs will rise.

Second, diversity in sources enhances our energy security by minimizing the chance that politics or wars in unstable and unfriendly countries will disrupt our energy supplies.

America is called the "Saudi Arabia of coal" because it has more than a quarter of world coal reserves. Energy security is vital because energy is embedded in most goods and services. Almost half of our energy use is indirect and so invisible to consumers. Among the most energy intensive sectors of our economy are health care and food; we risk much more than higher utility bills if we remain vulnerable to unfriendly and unstable energy suppliers.

Third, the coal industry is a significant source of jobs. The typical coal miner earns $73,000 a year, says the National Mining Association, which represents the mining industry in Washington.

An estimated 60,000 Americans work in coal-fired power plants. These are high-productivity jobs because the employees work with large amounts of capital. Electricity generated by coal takes just 0.18 employees per megawatt of plant capacity.Coal-fired power plant jobs pay high wages because their employees are skilled. Yet new EPA regulations are estimated to cut total coal employment by 1.4 million job-years between 2011 and 2020.

Besides destroying jobs, the new regulations imposed by the administration will lead to the closing of 40 gigawatts of electric generation capacity. A staggering 12 percent of America's current coal capacity will be shut down. There could be many long, hot summers if we lose these reliable sources of power.

Coal plays a key role in electricity generation. The power produced from coal-fired plants is embedded in everything from our prescription medications to the food we eat.

Tens of thousands of Americans earn good livings in coal-related industries. Domestically produced coal reduces our dependence on unstable and unfriendly suppliers.

Those facts make it obvious that market forces - not Washington bureaucrats - should determine the role coal plays in our economy.ABOUT

THE WRITERAndrew Morriss is a law professor at the University of Alabama. Readers may write him at 101 Paul W. Bryant Drive East, Tuscaloosa, Ala. 35487; email:

Read more here:



Ethanol Mandate Ignores the Free Market Posted By Salim Furth, Ph.D On August 10, 2012 @ 6:30 pm In Energy and Environment |

In the midst of one of the most severe droughts [1] on record, Washington’s ethanol mandate is making the corn shortage even worse. Markets have responded quickly and flexibly to the drought where they can, but some corn buyers are sidelined by the rigid government ethanol mandate.
Corn prices are skyrocketing [2], and livestock farmers are suffering from the high price of corn-based feed. Nonetheless, the government mandates that 13.2 billion [3] gallons of corn ethanol must be produced in 2012. The mandate has not been changed at all in response to changing real-world conditions, despite repeated pleas from American beef and pork farmers.
Under a free market system, the pain of the drought would be spread around—corn growers, livestock farmers, fuel producers would earn a little less than usual, and the consumers of corn, meat, and gasoline would pay a little more. A free market allows participants to change the quantities they supply or demand in response to price fluctuations.
A government mandate, by contrast, fixes quantities and forces prices to rise rapidly when nature reduces the supply. In this case, livestock farmers and corn consumers—including the poor in America and abroad—bear the brunt of the inflexible ethanol mandate. Even in a good year, the ethanol mandate makes food more expensive [4] for American consumers. The Heritage Foundation’s Nick Loris has written further [5] on the damage done by government mandates and subsidies in the corn ethanol industry.
No government policy can restore the corn lost to the 2012 drought, but a compassionate government would permanently repeal the ethanol mandate and allow Americans to meet one another’s needs at mutually agreed prices in a free and flexible marketplace.

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation:
URL to article:
URLs in this post:


[1] severe droughts:

[2] prices are skyrocketing:

[3] 13.2 billion:

[4] makes food more expensive:

[5] written further:



Does July heat record show rise in global temp? 

Does July heat record show rise in global temp?

Chris Woodward - OneNewsNow - 8/10/2012 3:55:00 AM

global warming or cooling?The federal government says July was the hottest month on record for the continental U.S., but one prominent climate-change skeptic says people should not jump to any conclusions about this being signs of global warming.

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the average temperature last month was 77.6 degrees. That breaks the previous record from July 1936 by 0.2 degrees. Meanwhile, July was also 3.3 degrees warmer than the 20th century average for July.

Even so, Marc Morano of Climate Depot sees all of this as nothing more than a political claim by the government and NOAA.

Marc Morano (GOP EPW)"What I mean by that is this is all designed hype," he says. "They make the scientists available, all to come out and hype this -- that this is unprecedented heat, and they're trying to draw conclusions. People like Michael Mann are quoted in these articles, saying this could only happen with man-made global warming. The Continental U.S. is only 1.6 percent of the surface of the Earth, and they're drawing conclusions now about the whole globe."

Morano points out that global temperatures are currently below the 15-year average, according to satellite data in July, the same month in which climate alarmists are claiming as evidence of global warming. Meanwhile, snow fell in Johannesburg, South Africa this week for the first time since 2007, part of what The Associated Press describes as "an extreme cold snap now biting into a nation still in its winter months." In Pretoria, South Africa's administrative capital, flurries were spotted for the first time since 1968.

"Why aren't we looking at that as a consequence of global cooling?" he asks. "This is pure politics at play, and when you look at the claim of July being the hottest, if you look at the actual thermometers that have been around since the 1930s at least and compare them to today, the 1930s -- in particular, 1936 -- wins hands down."


Morning Bell: Higher Gas Prices Add to Economic Slump Posted By Amy Payne On August 9, 2012 @ 8:41 am In Energy and Environment,The Morning Bell |

Unemployment is at 8.3 percent. The economy is sputtering at 1.5 percent growth. Food prices are rising due to drought conditions across the country. And gas prices are up again, pinching Americans’ summer budgets. It is past time for the President and Congress to pursue smart policies that would put us on a path to relief.
According to AAA’s Fuel Gauge Report [1], the current national average for regular is $3.66 per gallon. That’s up 28 cents per gallon from a month ago, and July had its biggest price jump since AAA started tracking prices in 2000.
There are many factors affecting prices that we cannot control—worldwide tensions, especially in the Middle East, can drive up oil prices. Global demand, especially from China and India’s rapidly growing economies, continues upward.
But after three years of adding regulatory hurdles and blocking exploratory access and development, President Obama’s policies are helping keep prices higher than necessary.
If the President truly wanted to lower gas prices, he would work to increase supply. But when given the opportunity, he has done the opposite. He turned down the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day from Canada. His Administration has made it even harder for companies to explore and extract domestic energy resources by canceling, delaying, or withdrawing a number of lease sales for exploration and development. Meanwhile, huge swaths of federal lands have been put off limits for energy exploration.
Domestic refinery outages have had a recent impact on gas prices. Two of the factors holding back domestic energy production are regulatory red tape and litigation—and these, we can do something about. As Heritage’s Nicolas Loris notes [2]:

Environmental activists delay new energy projects by filing endless administrative appeals and lawsuits. Creating a manageable time frame for permitting and for groups or individuals to contest energy plans would keep potentially cost-effective ventures from being tied up for years in litigation while allowing the public and interested parties to voice opposition or support for these projects.

We don’t have to stand still. Congress could alleviate the energy crunch in 10 different ways [3] by taking action on things we can control, like restrictions on oil shale development and offshore drilling.
One of the most common objections is that increasing domestic oil production takes too long and would not impact the market for at least a decade. The longer people make this argument, however, the longer it will take. The sooner we make investments in domestic energy, the sooner those benefits will be realized. And with some serious reforms, some of this oil can reach the market in much less than a decade.

Gas prices aren’t under the control of any one President. But Americans shouldn’t settle for policies that restrict oil exploration, refining, and production and artificially drive prices higher.

High Gas Prices: Obama’s Half-Truths vs. Reality [2]
Obama’s 10 Worst Energy Policies [4]
Quick Hits:

·         More than 40 percent of immigrants—both legal and illegal—who have been in the U.S. for 20 years are on some type of welfare [5], according to a new report.

·         The U.S. Navy rescued 10 people from the Gulf of Oman, where their ship flying the Iranian flag [6] had caught fire. “It’s not uncommon for U.S. Navy ships to rescue mariners in distress whatever their nationality,” says ABC.

·         Democratic Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill called conservative views “outside of the mainstream” and “dangerous” [7] in an attack on her new opponent Todd Akin, the winner of Tuesday’s Republican primary.

·         NASA scientists are “thrilled” with the quality of images the Mars rover Curiosity is sending back, reports [8] the L.A. Times.

·         A new Heritage Legal Memo [9] explains the section of the 1996 welfare reform law that Obama’s Health and Human Services Department has changed—and shows why HHS has no authority to do so.


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation:
URL to article:
URLs in this post:


[1] AAA’s Fuel Gauge Report:

[2] notes:

[3] 10 different ways:

[4] Obama’s 10 Worst Energy Policies:

[5] some type of welfare:

[6] flying the Iranian flag:

[7] “outside of the mainstream” and “dangerous”:

[8] reports:

[9] new Heritage Legal Memo:

on Federal Conservation Service With 11,000 Employees Owns 9,000 Vehicles 

This is what happens when the certifiably insane are hypocritically allowed to accuse the sane of having too large a "carbon footprint."

Federal 'Conservation' Service Operates 9,516 Vehicles for 11,605 Employees




on Fed Agency Leases Luxury SUV That Violates Obama’s Fuel Efficiency Standards to Transport Obama Appointee Three Blocks

No news here as the politburo does not feel that it's obliged to abide by its draconian rules that are reserved for the serfs that it wants to control, which is the communist modus operandi!