Obama MUST Be A One Termer - The Biggest Security Breach We Have Is The Sham Obama Presidency‏ - Where’s The Money Coming From To Help Joplin, Missouri? - The Major Problems With Solar Power And Who’s Really Killing Medicare - You Don’t Negotiate With Someone Whose Clear Intent Is To Destroy The Country From Within - The Disintegration Of The Moral Order Gives You Anthony Weiners - More From Those Wonderful Communist Chinese Whom Obama Wants Us To Emulate -  Obama’s Disrespect For Our Military On Memorial Day - The Sustainable Communists - SSM Architects Seek To Silence Christians -  Gender Nonsense In The Classroom - Our First Lady: Bitter Harridan - Incensed Voters Repudiate Obama’s Leadership - Where Are The Catholic Contributions To Resisting The Green Dragon? -  The Owner Of Big Oil Is YOU - Judge To University: Release Climate Researcher's Mann’s Papers






http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049  stlouisix

It ought to be clear by now that the only way to "fix the problem," as referred to in this article, is to politically ensure that Obama is a one termer!   If that doesn't happen, soon, there won't be outlets like this one to give public voice to the overwhelming opposition to Obama.  In short, Obama will control every aspect of our lives by making opposition to his tyranny a crime, which has always been the first goal of his media managing puppet master, Soros, who envisions himself 'a god', by his own admission, and who wants to remake the world in his own warped image with immigration reform, read amnesty, in the face of an already INTENTIONALLY tanking economy on the part of Obama to make us all serfs on his communist dole, being a main ingredient for Soros' U.S. coup in order to keep Obama in power.

Read more:











on Obama Declares June Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month - Fox News

Just because Obama wants to promote proven changeable aberrant behavior that is directly contrary to the common good doesn't mean that the rest of the country is obliged to do the same, i.e., those who are in opposition have every right to voice same for the sake of faith and right reason, rights which they're guaranteed under the Constitution under the freedom of religion despite the best attempts by the militant homosexual lobby to demonize them.  Sorry, that's not going to happen because the sane care about a country fit to live in for their children and grandchildren where that common good which is supposed to be the state's highest priority is promoted, not bastardized!









on La. Rep. Refuses Obama Invitation to be “Lectured to” at GOP Debt Meeting - Fox News

Hats off to this Rep from LA who cares about his country, as opposed to the Obamunists, their enablers, and supporters, whose deep hatred for America has resulted in every major economic indicator tanking simultaneously as Obama continues to WILLFULLY destroy the private sector.  I wonder how many critics of the LA rep have family members who have suffered because of the communist in the White House, e.g., working as hard as possible to find meaningful work in a field that, pre-Obama, was a fertile ground for jobs, but post Obama is a desert?







Lockheed Network Reportedly Suffers Security Breach

Published May 28, 2011

The Wall Street Journal

Hackers may have infiltrated the networks of top US weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin Corp., The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing a person with knowledge of the attacks.

The security disruptions prompted the company to step up measures to protect its data. It wasn't immediately clear if any sensitive information was stolen or compromised.

Lockheed spokesman Jeffery Adams said the company, as a matter of policy, didn't discuss specific cyber threats or measures taken in response.

"However, to counter any threats, we regularly take actions to increase the security of our systems and to protect our employee, customer and program data," he said. "We have policies and procedures in place to mitigate the cyber threats to our business, and we remain confident in the integrity of our robust, multilayered information systems security."

Lockheed manufactures some of the most sophisticated US military hardware, including the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and the F-22 Raptor. It is also a major international supplier of military equipment.According to the person familiar with the situation, many employees were required to change their "SecureID" passwords. The move may have been prompted by an attack from hackers who may have penetrated the company's cyber defenses by using duplicate SecurID electronic keys made by EMC Corp.'s RSA security division. 

Remote access to some Lockheed systems was temporarily disabled as a result, this person said.

Lockheed sent 90,000 replacement SecureIDs to employees, which is being paid for by RSA, this person said. Employees were also told to reset all of their passwords used throughout the entire company as a precaution.

EMC in March disclosed that it had been hit by a sophisticated cyber attack on its SecurID products, which are widely used by corporate clients.

Network and computer-security issues have taken on heightened importance in recent weeks after a high-profile hack of several Sony Corp. systems led to a breach of personal information. The breach included the names and addresses associated with more than 100 million accounts.

Read more:




http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix 

Right now the biggest security breach that we have is the sham Obama presidency, given Obama's penchant for giving away the farm in arms negotiations that always put America at a strategic disadvantage.  For crying out loud, Obama wants to share our military technology with the former Soviets and the Communist Chinese whom he fetes at every opportunity.  Some people think that Moscow and Beijing are uncontrollably laughing at their good fortune in having an incompetent in the White House.  But that is not the case, as incompetence is not the problem.  THE problem is that our enemies have an ally, weaned on a hatred of anything American, who knows exactly what he's doing in de facto unilaterally disarming America, as evinced by Obama's own words in regard to getting rid of all nukes, which means America getting rid of its nukes while the rest of the world is arming to the teeth.  There was a word for this in the Navy that I served in during the Vietnam War.  It was called treason in the realization that "loose lips sink ships" with another Pearl Harbor opportunity being served up on a plate for any potential adversaries who dislike America as much as Obama, if that's possible!






 http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix 

The fiscal train wreck here was INTENTIONALLY, repeat, INTENTIONALLY caused by the Obamunists whose idea of spending cuts is to hold discretionary spending at its already unsustainable level, thereby driving up the debt more, in order to drive America into the ground making all of us dependent upon the mercy of Comrade Obama's dole for our sustenance. To believe a pathological liar, who uses vintage communist class warfare to turn Americans against each other, is to invite the folly of its dire consequence to what's left of the future of our nation, which will be bleak indeed if the Obamunists are not sent their walking papers in 2012.

This crap about we can't raise the debt ceiling is a bald-faced lie told by a tax cheat, a common characteristic of the Obamunists, who masquerades as Treasury Secretary. GOP leaders with spines can take Washington back, NOW, by refusing to raise the debt ceiling, PERIOD! Heck, US debt jumped $54 billion in the week preceding the deal with the devil to cut $38 Billion.

As has been pointed out in the Non-PRAVDA USA media, "The Heritage Foundation, Investors Business Daily, the CATO Institute and many other credible and authoritative sources have looked at this question and determined that is simply not the case that the debt ceiling has to be raised which is a ploy of the Obamunists to drive us further in debt. Wake up! Washington could still continue to meet the payments on its loan obligations and continue all of its vital and constitutional obligations to the American people with its trillions of dollars of revenues. Nobody else in America has the privilege of borrowing endlessly to pay for whatever they feel like spending – no companies, no individuals, not even state or local governments. It's not responsible and it's not sustainable. The biggest fiscal problem we have in America is unsustainable debt. How are we going to address that with continued borrowing? It makes no sense. What we see in Washington today is Keynesian economics gone wild. There is no borrowing solution to America's economic problems. America's economic problems are the result of too much borrowing. If we pull this out, it would completely tie the hands of Obama and the Democrats for the next two years. They themselves – the Democrats – would be forced to make massive cuts in spending that would require defunding Obamacare, pulling the plug on Planned Parenthood, even killing entrenched unconstitutional bureaucracies like the Department of Education. They simply wouldn't have any choice."

In short, by not raising the debt ceiling, we start taking our country back big time, but that requires a GOP leadership with spines who don't make excuses for raising the ceiling if Obama would be serious about cutting debt. Do these clowns pawning this garbage off think we were all born yesterday? Obama does nothing without it benefiting Obama who never loses sight of his goal of being our master.

"So what is holding back Boehner and the House Republican leadership? Well, they hear the dire warnings of Timothy Geithner, who couldn't fill out his own tax form, and the other so-called experts. They're afraid of getting out-maneuvered by Obama and the Democrats. They're afraid of what the media will do to them. That's why they're not demonstrating the leadership that they were handed by the American people who, according to every poll, support this kind of dramatic action."

We're at the end game here folks for the sake of our country's future.


Read more: http://www.centredaily.com/2011/05/27/2741062/defaulting-on-us-debt-dangerous.html#ixzz1NmfIg9db 




http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix 

It's taken awhile, but the sham Obama presidency is being seen for what it is, a fraud from the get-go.  This is no better evinced than by observing that the speeches Obama gives are nothing more than the regurgitated tripe that he spews out ad nauseam solely for political points, as there isn't one scintilla of sincerity in the man's being.  If there was, our children, grandchildren, and future generations of Americans wouldn't be watching the American dream being turned into a Marxist Socialist nightmare in the face of OVERWHELMING public opposition to Obama's morally bankrupt unconstitutional policies which Obama ignores out of hand since he views himself as a master, not a servant, of the people!   

Where's the money coming from for Joplin, Missouri, money that Obama has already wasted to the tune of trillions and counting in amassing an unsustainable debt, which is basically filling the coffers of his enablers to keep him in power while literally destroying the country, check out the unemployment lines whose real numbers reflect a percentage in double digits approaching 20 taking into account all those who, out of despair, have stopped looking for work,  money that Obama is committing to countries, where he's de facto instigated mob rule in the name of 'democracy run amok,' which now are getting leaders that are more hostile to America than ever, money that isn't there, and won't be until Obama isn't in the White House anymore, i.e., the 2012 election can't come soon enough?

Welcome to warped world of Obama's foreign policy where our former allies are now our enemies, and our former enemies are now our allies, which should tell those still capable of rational thought on this Memorial Day weekend 2011 that our biggest enemy currently resides in the White House, a man who is effectively rendering the sacrifices of all those, who have fought and died in American wars throughout history to prevent tyranny in the world, to have been in vain since tyranny is now in America. And if that doesn't get your attention as to the sorry state of a Republic on life support, nothing will!

As a native Kansan, born and raised in a city about 28 miles north of Joplin, having traveled through the devastated areas many times as a boy growing up in Southeast Kansas, and later as a young man, I can tell you unequivocally that the last thing that is going  to resonate with my former neighbors in Joplin who are salt of the earth hard working people who will, with the help of God, rebuild and survive, and those trying to genuinely help them out via their actions, not just words, in the surrounding four state area of Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, and other parts of the country, are politicians using them for stage props, which is par for the course for the Obamunists!

Read more:






http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix 

And now for the other side of the story, also known as the truth, which you will seldom find in PRAVDA Central PA, regarding the major problems with solar power.

Reference the following excerpted from

Google's $1,500 coffee makers

Google Inc. spends quite a lot of time burnishing its self-created image as a "green" company – largely on the basis of the solar array at its corporate headquarters. It is also trying to build support for the administration's cap-and-trade "energy" bill by pretending that solar energy can substitute for hydrocarbon, nuclear and hydroelectric energy.

Google states that its multimillion-dollar solar array has generated sufficient electricity over the past two years to run 5,158 coffee makers for one hour each day. Google does not mention, however, that this solar array supplies insufficient electricity to run Google's search engine computers for even one minute per day and that the coffee makers, if supplied with solar panels to operate them, would cost approximately $1,500 each.

Google claims that its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters buildings are paved with 1.6 megawatts (Mw) of solar panels. This installation was completed in June 2007, about the same time as the Nellis Air Force Base 14 Mw, $100 million solar panel installation that "energy expert" Obama – who is now attempting to seize control of the energy industries of the United States – visited recently and advertised as an example of his administration's plans for America.

As of June 21, 2009, Google reports that it has generated 4,592,364 kilowatt (Kw) hours of electricity with this installation, or about 2.29 gigawatt (Gw) hours per year. Nellis reports 30.1 Gw hours per year. So, Nellis is producing 25 percent of its advertised quantity and Google is producing 16 percent. The apparent 75 percent and 84 percent losses arise because the sun does not shine 24 hours per day and because these installations are routinely overrated. In fact, the Google installation actually generates, on average, only 0.26 megawatts – not 1.6 megawatts (1 Gw = 1,000 Mw = 1,000,000 Kw).

Google brags that the average 24-hour output of its solar array is sufficient to operate 5,158 coffee makers for one hour – based on its daily reports. It does not, however, reveal the cost of this solar equipment. If we assume that the installations at Google and Nellis are similarly cost effective – they are both 2007 technology and our assumption allows for technical differences in the installations (Nellis has solar-tracking arrays), then Google's installation cost an estimated $7.5 million. With current electricity and maintenance costs, this solar installation will not even pay for itself in more than 40 years, so it produces nothing of net value.

Without considering depreciation, maintenance such as cleaning the panels, and employees to oversee the equipment, this $7.5 million works out to $1,454 per coffee maker. So, if the coffee maker is priced at $46 and delivered with a share in the Google solar array sufficient to operate it for an average of one hour each day, the price is $1,500 per coffee maker.

As with the cost of its solar advertising project, Google also keeps secret the power usage of its computers. The power consumption of the Oregon installation has been estimated at 100 Mw, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. It is also estimated that Google has 19 such centers in the United States and 17 built or under development in other countries. The Dalles installation is one of the largest. If we assume that The Dalles center is about twice the average size, Google is using an estimated 1,000 Mw in the U.S. – or approximately the output of one Palo Verde nuclear reactor. Even if Google's actual usage is as little as half this much, our analysis is still applicable.

If Google generated 1,000 Mw of power with solar panels like those it touts at its corporate headquarters, the construction cost would be approximately $30 billion. Moreover, Google's customers would be unhappy if their Internet search services were only available during midday and in good weather, so a hydrocarbon or nuclear-powered electricity generating station would need to be standing by to provide power most of the time.

Americans currently import 30 percent of their energy – a luxury they can no longer afford. This 30 percent is not made in America because the gradual increase of government taxation, regulation and sponsorship of litigation against American energy industries over the past 40 years has created a business environment in the United States that is very unfavorable for the production of energy. So, even though the United States is awash in plentiful nuclear resources and coal, oil, natural gas and other hydrocarbon resources, most new energy production is instead sited abroad.

Now, Congress and the Obama administration are pushing a new "energy bill" including so-called "cap-and-trade" that will sharply increase taxation and regulation of the energy industries. To sell this greatly increased suppression of free enterprise, Washington politicians are advertising boutique energy technologies like solar and wind, without mentioning that these methods produce very small amounts of energy at very high costs. These costs are so high that they not only require enormous taxpayer subsidies, but also cannot be financed in sufficient quantity to avoid energy shortages, high energy prices and, ultimately, rationing and diminished prosperity.

Google is supporting this political charade. It is using solar energy to supply minor office needs and to enhance its public image, while simultaneously using large amounts of energy generated by nuclear, hydrocarbon and hydroelectric methods to run its business. It apparently thinks that Americans can be fooled into using its products and supporting the political agenda of its friends through "green" advertising.

This hypocrisy should not be rewarded, and Google should not participate in it.

Gresham’s Law of Green Energy
High-cost subsidized renewable resources destroy jobs and hurt consumers.

"The third argument, that green energy improves American “energy independence” and reduces supply volatility, has no basis in empirical evidence. Reducing the demand for a commoditydoes not imply that price volatility will be reduced, unless the demand is reduced to zero."

However, even if the argument were true, the need for additional back-up electric generation to “firm” the changing output of wind and solar power is undeniable.

"As for the energy independence canard, not only does renewable energy provide an insignificant percentage of total energy consumption in the United States, but its ability to displacecrude oil consumption is de minimus."

Renewable Electricity Standards Kill Jobs Too

The high cost of 'green jobs'

This documents the well known Spanish debacle in regard to renewable energy claims that were bogus with their economy tanking as a result. FYI, they're rioting in the streets of Spain now because unemployment has gone through the roof.

For more links debunking the claims in this op-ed, see the following:

The Hysterical Claims Of Gore’s Green Goblins Debunked By Physics Professionals As 31,000 Scientists Reject 'Global Warming' Agenda





Read more:





http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix

The truth is always the first casualty with socialists like Sanders who use mediscare tactics to needlessly frighten seniors which is unconscionable.

Steve King: Dems' Making Huge Mistake with 'Medi-Scare' .  Democrats have decided to frighten seniors into believing their Medicare benefits will be lost under Republican budget plans, senior GOP congressman Steve King has claimed in an exclusive Newsmax.TV interview.

"There is no group of people that is easier to scare with untruthful statements than the seniors in America," said King. "The older people get the more likely they are to be scared by just plain, blatant dishonesties that are perpetrated on this subject matter.

In regard to PRAVDA USA’s lies in reporting on the GOP medicare plan the truth is in order, and Paul Ryan is telling the truth, which is a word not in the radical left's vocabulary in demonizing all who dare to disagree with their morally bankrupt policies like a deathcare program pawned off as healthcare where Medicare is gutted, instead of saved, and seniors can look forward to rationing via a 15 member Obama politburo replacing the doctor-patient relationship. Anytime Ryan can explain in detail his program, seniors immediately overwhelmingly support it because they see its merits, not only for themselves, but also in being there for their children and grandchildren, which the Obamunists couldn't care less about as evinced by their litany of sham lies in trying to destroy Ryan's credibility. The bottom line is that Paul Ryan cares about the future of a prosperous America not sinking under the weight of a debt burden that will take generations to rectify, an America that continues to have the best healthcare in the world instead of playing political games with seniors whom they're stabbing in the back, which is the modus operandi of the Obamunists who couldn't care less about the common good!

To find out who ended Medicare as we know it, see the following link by Betsy McCaughey.

In today's special election for the 26th district US House seat in western New York, Democrats are trying out a tactic they're sure to use nationwide in 2012 -- the obscenely false claim that they will save "Medicare as we know it" from Republican efforts to reform it.

The truth is, the Obama health law, passed by Democrats last year, already eviscerated Medicare -- though seniors won't feel the effects for some time. And the reform plan Democrats are attacking -- Rep. Paul Ryan's entitlement-reform vision -- would undo much of the damage, while charting a new course to ensure Medicare doesn't run out of money.

"Medicare as we know it" can't survive ObamaCare's cuts of $575 billion from the program's funding over the next decade. Just as outrageous is that the Obama law stole $410 billion of those "savings" to expand eligibility for Medicaid.

It's like robbing Peter to pay Paul -- but it's robbing Grandma to create a whole new class of government dependants.

The nation needs to spend less on government, and entitlement reform is key. Instead, the ObamaCare law starts new entitlements -- with its vast expansion of Medicaid and a new insurance program for the middle class -- then imposes sacrifices on seniors to (partly) pay for these new obligations.

The administration's  own actuaries say Medicare will spend $14,731 per senior in 2019, instead of $16,162 if the health law hadn't passed. That's less care for seniors. Richard Foster, the chief actuary for Medicare, testified to Congress that the Obama law makes such severe cuts that some hospitals may stop taking Medicare.

Such cuts might be justifiable if the "savings" extended Medicare's financial life, as President Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius often claim. In fact, the Obama law just pays less to those who treat Medicare patients, then uses the cash for something else entirely. Raiding Medicare leaves less money to care for future retirees.

So what can that next generation, retiring a decade from now, count on? The Obama law puts those decision in the hands of an unelected board called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB -- a cost-cutting panel.

The board is a radical departure from Medicare as we've known it. On the pretext that budgeting decisions should be shielded from outraged seniors and political pressures, the Democratic Congress handed nearly all control of Medicare spending to IPAB. In April, the president reiterated that the board would decide what care is "unnecessary" for seniors, and added that he wants its unprecedented powers increased.

Last week, Obama indicated that he'd like to reduce the deficit by taking another $200 billion from Medicare over the next decade. That would be IPAB's job, too.

Yet IPAB is drawing fire from many who pushed hard for the ObamaCare law -- including the AARP and Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.).

Ryan's reform, passed by House Republicans early this year, would repeal the ObamaCare law in full, thereby restoring the $575 stolen from Medicare and ending IPAB. But, to keep the program sustainable in the decades ahead, the Ryan plan would (starting in 2022) give each new Medicare enrollee a choice of private health plans and pay a premium to the policy chosen. He argues that seniors would be safer choosing their own health plan rather than putting their care in the hands of the cost-cutting IPAB panel.

Let's hope voters examine the plain facts -- because one thing is clear: Obama and the Democratic Party are not saving Medicare "as we know it."

Sanders would have you believe that the American people are with him, which is a bald-faced lied, as they are recoiling from the morally and fiscally bankrupt policies of the Obama administration which are setting new economic lows on a daily basis.

In short, the American people are seeing first hand what socialism is doing to this country, and in overwhelming numbers are in opposition to it when asked specifically about the fallacious claims that fill Sanders' op-ed. 

The fiscal train wreck here was INTENTIONALLY, repeat, INTENTIONALLY caused by the Obamunists whose idea of spending cuts is to hold discretionary spending at its already unsustainable level, thereby driving up the debt more, in order to drive America into the ground making all of us dependent upon the mercy of Comrade Obama's dole for our sustenance. To believe a pathological liar, who uses vintage communist class warfare to turn Americans against each other, is to invite the folly of its dire consequence to what's left of the future of our nation, which will be bleak indeed if the Obamunists are not sent their walking papers in 2012.

This garbage about we can't raise the debt ceiling is a bald-faced lie told by a tax cheat, a common characteristic of the Obamunists, who masquerades as Treasury Secretary. GOP leaders with spines can take Washington back, NOW, by refusing to raise the debt ceiling, PERIOD! Heck, US debt jumped $54 billion in the week preceding the deal with the devil to cut $38 Billion. As has been pointed out in the Non-PRAVDA USA media, "The Heritage Foundation, Investors Business Daily, the CATO Institute and many other credible and authoritative sources have looked at this question and determined that is simply not the case that the debt ceiling has to be raised which is a ploy of the Obamunists to drive us further in debt. Wake up! Washington could still continue to meet the payments on its loan obligations and continue all of its vital and constitutional obligations to the American people with its trillions of dollars of revenues. Nobody else in America has the privilege of borrowing endlessly to pay for whatever they feel like spending – no companies, no individuals, not even state or local governments. It's not responsible and it's not sustainable. The biggest fiscal problem we have in America is unsustainable debt. How are we going to address that with continued borrowing? It makes no sense. What we see in Washington today is Keynesian economics gone wild. There is no borrowing solution to America's economic problems. America's economic problems are the result of too much borrowing. If we pull this out, it would completely tie the hands of Obama and the Democrats for the next two years. They themselves – the Democrats – would be forced to make massive cuts in spending that would require defunding Obamacare, pulling the plug on Planned Parenthood, even killing entrenched unconstitutional bureaucracies like the Department of Education. They simply wouldn't have any choice." 

By not raising the debt ceiling, we start taking our country back big time, but that requires a GOP leadership with spines who don't make excuses for raising the ceiling if Obama would be serious about cutting debt. Do these clowns pawning this garbage off think we were all born yesterday? Obama does nothing without it benefiting Obama who never loses sight of his goal of being our master which is perfectly fine in the warped world of socialists like Sanders.

Read more:







http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix

on Thursday Open Thread  I have a huge problem with the GOP leadership. You don't negotiate with someone whose clear intent is to destroy the country from within, you stop him in his tracks, PERIOD! Delusional Boehner, McConnell & Co. would have us believe that Obama is something that he's not, i.e., that he actually cares about doing what's right for America when, in fact, Obama the Destroyer has a "hammer and sickle" mentality that is rooted in a deep seated hatred for an America under God, as evinced by his ramming the most draconian unconstitutional morally bankrupt legislation and regulations down the throats of Americans who, overwhelmingly, oppose same - the common good be damned!  And until we realize who were dealing with, America is at grave peril!

The 2010 election was a delaying action until the entire cavalry arrives in 2012. There is nothing wrong with gridlock when the very future of our country recognizable to the founding fathers is at stake! History is not going to treat Boehner and his ilk kindly if they give away the farm for worthless political points, i.e., if history's authors are not tyrants, which right now is a very real concern if the Obamunists are not summarily reined in!

And I'm sorry to say that I don't believe that this seminal fact is close to sinking in to the thick heads that comprise the current GOP leadership!




Subject: Another Boehner Betrayal
From: Christopher@grasstopsusa.org
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:35:24 -0400

GrassTopsUSA Masthead

Stop Lying To Us... Stop Negotiating... And Stop Compromising.



It's time for a much needed dose of reality Mr. Boehner; if you honestly believe that Barack Obama and his liberal cronies in Congress will stop their out-of-control spending AFTER you agree to raise the debt ceiling, you're living under a delusion... a delusion that this country can ill afford... a delusion that will destroy this great nation and permanently reduce the United States to a second-rate power.

     And so, Mr. Boehner, understand this: if you raise the debt ceiling for any reason whatsoever, mark our words, the American people will force you to suffer severe political consequences for your idiocy. Stop your so-called "negotiations" with Barack Obama on raising the debt ceiling or, like so many other Americans, YOU WILL be standing in the unemployment line.

     That's the message we're sending to Mr. Boehner and our so-called Republican leaders in Congress, and we want you to join us in sending that message right now.

Use the button below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternately, you can send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the House and Senate. That's over 280 Blast Faxes.

Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that the American people have had enough and are not going to take it anymore. Let them know that any elected official that votes in favor of raising the debt ceiling, for any reason whatsoever, will be walking the unemployment line.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Negotiations With Barack Obama Are A Sham. Stop The Charade.

     On Tuesday evening, 236 Republicans and 82 Democrats (including Nancy Pelosi) in the House of Representatives shot down a measure to give Barack Obama exactly what he wanted... an unconditional raising of the debt ceiling by 2.4 trillion dollars.

AND THEN... the very next morning... just hours later... House Republicans, not even realizing that they were actually snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, trotted over to the White House like children following the Pied Piper of Hamelin, and began their "negotiations" over raising the debt ceiling with Barack Obama.

     And just what is being negotiated?

     Well, Mr. Boehner has made his position very clear. He'll agree to raise the debt ceiling if Obama agrees to
"significant cuts," "meaningful reforms" and agrees to address the "underlying problems" facing this great nation.

     According to the Associate Press:
"The White House session came as the GOP sought to build pressure on Obama for trillions in spending cuts in exchange for any increase in the government's ability to borrow."

     That sounds all well and good on the surface, but what the media and the political elites inside the Washington Beltway are not telling you is that under ANY agreement that Republicans and the White House eventually reach, the debt ceiling will go up IMMEDIATELY and spending cuts would be PROMISED at some point down the road.

     Should we believe that Barack Obama and Senate Democrats will keep any PROMISE to stop their out-of-control spending AFTER Boehner and Republicans in Congress increase their credit line?

     Of course not!

     That's why any
"deals" or "compromises" are nothing more than shams and political charades. As a poster to the Heritage Foundation website put it: "The vote was a sham. The Republicans will cave and give Obama some ridiculous '10-year plan' with trillions of supposed cuts against the baseline (meaningless)."

     And that's why it's time to tell our elected officials, in no uncertain terms, that we will not tolerate ANY move to raise the debt ceiling... period... end of sentence. Join us, and together, we will send that message, in one resounding voice, loud and clear.

Use the button below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternately, you can send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the House and Senate. That's over 280 Blast Faxes.

Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that the American people have had enough and are not going to take it anymore. Let them know that any elected official that votes in favor of raising the debt ceiling, for any reason whatsoever, will be walking the unemployment line.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Will The World, As We Know It, Really Come To An End If We Do Not Raise The Debt Ceiling?

     Of course not.  By now, it should be obvious.  But were we not told that the world as we know it would come to an end if Congress did not raise the debt ceiling by May 16?

     Yup, that's exactly what we were told, but when May 16 came and went and the drop-dead date was moved back to August 2, the earth continued spinning and the sun continued to rise in the morning and set in the evening.

     And yet, believing the American people to be fools, the political elites in Washington are STILL telling us that the United States will default on it's debt if the debt ceiling is not raised.

     Is that necessarily true?

     Senator Pat Toomey, among an ever-growing number of others, says NO:
"In fact, if Congress refuses to raise the debt ceiling, the federal government will still have far more than enough money to fully service our debt. Next year, for instance, about 6.5% of all projected federal government expenditures will go to interest on our debt... why would we ever default?"

     The plain truth, that few pundits acknowledge, is that living under the current debt ceiling WOULDN'T prohibit us from servicing our existing debt... it would simply PROHIBIT THEM from BORROWING and adding more to the national debt; and it would force them to do their jobs and make the tough decision to get our nation’s fiscal house in order.

     And that's something the political elites in Washington do NOT want to do. That's the real reason behind the lies and the scare tactics.

     And it once again appears that Boehner has sided with the political elites over the American people who gave him the Speaker's gavel in November:
“Congress must approve taking on more debt.... If it doesn't approve raising the ceiling, then the U.S. will default on its loans and lose its standing as the globe's most reliable bet."

     That's poppycock. It's a betrayal and it's also insanely stupid. Some would say that when Boehner acknowledged the fable that the debt ceiling must be raised, he burned his trump card before he even walked up to the negotiation table.

     Of course, it wouldn't be the first time. Remember the 2011 budget deal that Boehner struck with Obama and Harry Reid six weeks ago? Remember how Boehner said, before the so-called
"negotiations" even started, that a government shut down was NOT an option.

     It's no wonder that after promising a meager 100 BILLION dollars in cuts (Republicans told us it would be a
"start") from a 1.65 TRILLION dollar deficit, Boehner came out of closed-door meetings with Barack Obama and Harry Reid jumping up and down for joy over a pathetic 350 MILLION dollars (0.3% of the promised "start" figure) in cuts.

     And after Boehner gave away the store and Americans scratched their heads in bewilderment, Boehner actually had the nerve to attempt to defend his ineptitude:
“While we had to drag them [Democrats] kicking and screaming to the table, we finally secured these budget cuts from them.”

     But now, Boehner's back at the negotiation table... and this time around, he would have us believe that he's ready for the fight... ready to secure future spending cuts from Obama and Senate Democrats in exchange for his consent to raise the debt ceiling... oops... we almost forgot... he's already acknowledged that raising the debt ceiling is a foregone conclusion.

     It would appear that the only foregone conclusion is that this great nation may face imminent bankruptcy once Boehner's done
"negotiating" with Barack Obama and Harry Reid.

     We must draw a line in the sand. It's time to cut Congress' credit line. Join us, and together, we will send that message, in one resounding voice, loud and clear.

Use the button below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternately, you can send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the House and Senate. That's over 280 Blast Faxes.

Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that the American people have had enough and are not going to take it anymore. Let them know that any elected official that votes in favor of raising the debt ceiling, for any reason whatsoever, will be walking the unemployment line.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Mr. Boehner: Stop Playing Kick The Can.

     On Wednesday, after emerging from his initial "negotiations" with Barack Obama, Boehner, attempting to sound tough, told reporters: "I told the president, one more time, this is the moment. This is the window of opportunity where we can deal with this on our terms. We can work together and solve this problem. We know what the problems are. Let's not kick the can down the road one more time."

     Yes, Mr. Boehner:
"This is the moment." "This is the window of opportunity" and you're blowing it.  If you believe that you and Barack Obama "can work together and solve this problem," then you're the one kicking "the can down the road."

     Our government does not have a revenue problem Mr. Boehner. You and your cohorts in Washington have a spending problem and raising the debt ceiling isn't the solution to the problem... it's the very thing that is fueling the problem.

http://www.grasstopsusa.com/check.gifDo you honestly believe, Mr. Boehner, that if you raise Barack Obama and Harry Reid's credit line, they'll actually keep any promise to practice fiscal restraint?

http://www.grasstopsusa.com/check.gifDo you honestly believe, Mr. Boehner, that you can dangle a brand new credit card in Barack Obama's face and effectively say; 'I'll give this card to you only on the condition that you curtail your out-of-control spending habits?'

http://www.grasstopsusa.com/check.gifWhile you're at it, why don't you come over to my fictitious alcoholic brother-in-law's house and restock his liquor cabinet under the stipulation that he curtail his excessive drinking.


    As Joseph Farah, the editor and publisher of WorldNetDaily.com, put it: "By definition, a vote to raise the debt limit permits the Democrats to spend more money than Washington collects. Republicans will, in effect, give Democrats license to keep overspending and increasing debt by approving a debt limit increase."

     If you really want significant cuts Mr. Boehner... if you really want to address the
"underlying problems" (translation: out-of-control spending) then admit what so many Americans already know: there's no need to even raise the debt ceiling... walk away from the "negotiations" that you're so anxious to have with Barack Obama.

     Farah again:
"Why Republicans would bargain for budget cuts that Democrats themselves will be forced to implement if the debt limit is not raised makes no sense... government needs to begin living within its means. No more borrowing, no more debt, no more spending. Washington will be forced to make the kind of drastic cuts it should have made decades ago."

     Come on Mr. Boehner. Stop kicking the can down the road. Cut up Barack Obama and Harry Reid's credit cards. REFUSE to raise the debt ceiling and force them to make the spending cuts that you claim are the subject of your sham "negotiations." Make it happen now.

Use the button below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternately, you can send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the House and Senate. That's over 280 Blast Faxes.

Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that the American people have had enough and are not going to take it anymore. Let them know that any elected official that votes in favor of raising the debt ceiling, for any reason whatsoever, will be walking the unemployment line.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Raise The Debt Ceiling For Any Reason And Kiss Your Political Careers Goodbye.

     Unfortunately, Mr. Boehner and the rest of the Republican leadership are still under the idiotic delusion that raising the debt ceiling is a "bargaining-chip" to be used to extract phony promises of spending cuts (that will NEVER materialize) from Obama and Senate Democrats at some point down the road.

     It's time for patriotic Americans to disabuse them of that notion!

     Mr. Boehner, it's high time that you understand that the debt ceiling is not a
"bargaining-chip" that can be used to force your political opponents to agree to stop their out-of-control spending. Au contraire... not raising the debt ceiling is the very means of stopping Washington's out-of-control spending.

     Then again, perhaps Mr. Boehner and Republican leaders are not deluded. Perhaps they believe that the American people are deluded.

     If so, it's time to tell Mr. Boehner and the rest of the so-called Republican leadership that the American people WILL NOT TOLERATE any "deals" or "compromises" whereby Mr. Obama promises (with sugar and cream on top) to stop spending our hard-earned money like a drunken fool in exchange for their consent to raise the debt ceiling.

     Mr. Boehner, the American people did not give Republicans the majority in the House of Representatives to put a GOP-stamp on the radical Obama agenda. The American people placed you, Mr. Boehner, in your present position to STOP the radical Obama agenda, and you can start by ripping up Obama's credit card. DO IT MR. BOEHNER OR RESIGN YOURSELF TO EARLY RETIREMENT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE HAD IT UP TO HERE AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE.

     Today is the day that Mr. Boehner and his cohorts in the Republican leadership are going to learn that hell hath no fury like an electorate scorned. No "deals" ... no "compromises" ... no more, Mr. Boehner. The madness stops today. The American people will not tolerate a rise in the debt ceiling for ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, and the sooner you get the message... the better.

Use the button below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternately, you can send your urgent and personalized Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the House and Senate. That's over 280 Blast Faxes.

Let them know, in no uncertain terms, that the American people have had enough and are not going to take it anymore. Let them know that any elected official that votes in favor of raising the debt ceiling, for any reason whatsoever, will be walking the unemployment line.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


  Chris Carmouche




NEVER, repeat, NEVER forget that the immediate headlines below, which rightfully describe America as heading for a "Great, Great Depression," are caused by the morally bankrupt, UN-AMERICAN policies of the fraud, masquerading as President, who is DESTROYING THE PRIVATE SECTOR, and his enablers, to particularly include PRAVDA USA, now almost in complete control of Obama's teleprompter, America hater extraordinaire, George Soros, in their zeal to turn America into a communist state! - Gary L. Morella

Dow tumbles 200 points...
Private Sector Jobs Grew By Only 38,000 in May...
Planned Layoffs Up...
Manufacturing Slows...


'We're on the verge of a great, great depression'
Trader: Wall Street baffled by slowing economy, low yields



JOBLESS WEAK: 422,000...

Gas Tanks are Draining Family Budgets

Tuesday, May 31th, 2011

Gas Tanks are Draining Family Budgets
Households spent an average of $369 on gas



Congress Mulls Cuts to Food Stamps Program Amid Record Number of Recipients...

Up 39% Since Obama Took Office...



A 62% top tax rate?
Dems say they only intend to bite of Clinton years – in reality it's the Carter years
--Wall Street Journal



Jobless claims rise again
7th straight week in which more than 400,000 added to unemployment rolls





Chart of the day: America the Dependent

May 31, 2011 12:13 PM by Michelle Malkin


Chart of the day: America the Dependent


By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2011 12:13 PM




In April, I reported on the Obama FoodStampCorps’s mission to enroll countless more food-stamp beneficiaries.

Looks like they’re accomplishing their mission of dependency in spectacular fashion.
Kenneth Schortgen Jr at The Examiner reports on fresh SNAP/USDA data:


Food stamp usage by the American people reached a new high last month as more than 44 million people relied upon the government benefit to purchase necessary groceries for their families.

A new chart issued by the Supplimental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on May 31st showed that just under 14.5% of the American public received food stamp benefits that averaged $133.24 per person.

…In 2010, the total number of people on the SNAP food stamp program was a little over 40 million, and in the first five months of this year, that number has grown over 10%. Continued unemployment, and lack of jobs in the economy have led more people to require food stamps to suppl[e]ment their monthly bills, especially as price inflation continues to grow at a faster pace.

… This growth in a program that cost the government over $64 Billion in 2010, will add to the fiscal burden already being experienced by Washington who needs to find ways to cut spending.

Winning the Future(TM), Obama-style.






Morning Bell: The Unstimulated Obama Economy Posted By Mike Brownfield On May 31, 2011 @ 9:35 am In Entitlements |

Newsflash from The New York Times: President Barack Obama’s stimulus did not work. No, the Times doesn’t say that in so many words, but in an op-ed this morning [1], the paper laments the sputtering economy and the fact that Washington just isn’t doing enough to help the economy grow. The problem, of course, is that Washington has done too much of the wrong things to get the economy moving again.
The economic news that’s really sticking in the Old Gray Lady’s craw is revised data
[1] released last week that shows the economy’s growth stuck at 1.8 percent, slow consumer spending, stagnant wages, higher prices for gas and food, the poor housing market, flagging consumer confidence and a recent Labor Department report showing a higher-than-expected rise in claims for jobless benefits. The Times complains:

The grim numbers tell an unavoidable truth: The economy is not growing nearly fast enough to dent unemployment. Unfortunately, no one in Washington is pushing policies to promote stronger growth now.

What the Times forgot to mention, though, is that Washington over the past two years has done a lot—a whole lot—with the biggest ticket item being the Obama-Reid-Pelosi $787 billion stimulus that was designed to “create or save” 3.5 million new jobs by 2011 [2]. Despite the extraordinarily high cost, that didn’t happen, and unemployment has increased to 9 percent.

But don’t tell that to the Obama stimulus apologists, though. In an interview on Fox News Sunday
[3], host Chris Wallace remarked that in light of the dismal economic numbers, the Obama Administration’s policies and near $1 trillion stimulus “isn’t working” and asked Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus to respond. For her, those dots just don’t connect:

Well, I mean – I don’t know that I agree with that, because, you know, first of all – let me finish here. I mean, first of all, the trillion dollars for stimulus package – actually $786 billion – was absolutely necessary to make sure that this economy didn’t go into a freefall. We also know that we had to make sure that we began to stimulate the kind of growth that we need in this country to invest in the future.

For the American people, though, that reality is hitting home. Joseph Lupton, an economist at JP Morgan Chase and Company, says [4], “There are pretty big costs to not really generating a sizeable recovery.” And as The Wall Street Journal reports [4], those costs are high unemployment, with 5.8 million people out of work for more than six months.

The House GOP last week issued a proposal to spur job growth
[5], including reducing regulation and taxes and promoting free trade – essentially aimed at making it easier for businesses to grow, thereby growing the economy and reducing unemployment. And, like clockwork, the left went on the attack claiming that it’s nothing more than “old ideas, fancy new clip art,” [6] while the Times described it [1] as “more of the same ‘fixes’ that Republicans always recommend no matter the problem.” Ironically, though, the left is calling for more of their same ideas – “government help” must come to the rescue, the Times says.
And how do they plan to pay for it? Higher taxes to finance more spending, with “a combined federal and state top tax rate on earnings of 62%.”
[7] The government needs to stay home. Brian Riedl explained [8] why government intervention to boost the economy doesn’t work:

Removing water from one end of a swimming pool and pouring it in the other end will not raise the overall water level. Similarly, taking dollars from one part of the economy and distributing it to another part of the economy will not expand the economy.

There are no-cost ways [9] to get the economy moving again, such as reforming regulations to reduce unnecessary business costs, reforming the tort system, removing barriers to energy production, reducing taxes on companies’ foreign earnings if they bring their earnings home, and passing pending free trade agreements. And with Congress confronting spiraling debt, they need to get their economic house in order.
Despite all the “help” President Obama delivered in the first two years of his presidency, the economy is stuck in the mud and can’t get out. It is overburdened by taxes and regulations, and businesses don’t want to move forward into the dark abyss absent some certainty that the government won’t shackle them with more taxes and regulations down the road. America has had enough of that brand of “help.” It’s time for something different.
Quick Hits:

·        Homeownership is continuing its downward spiral [10], with the percentage of homeowners dropping to 66.4 percent, from a high of 69.2 percent in 2004.

·        The House is set to vote today [11] on the White House’s request that the debt limit be raised without any spending reductions — a proposal that is expected to be rejected.

·        Cyber attacks, which could cripple a power grid or threaten nuclear reactors, can constitute an act of war [12], according to a new finding from the Pentagon.

·        Afghan President Hamid Karzai warned NATO against becoming an “occupying force” in the country [13] and said raids on Afghan homes in pursuit of insurgents were “not allowed.”

·        Rep. Allen West (R-FL) examines the battlefield of the 21st century [14] in the closing address of Heritage’s Protect America Month. Watch live today at 10:30 AM ET. [14]



Article printed from The Foundry: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/31/morning-bell-the-unstimulated-obama-economy/

URLs in this post:


[1] op-ed this morning: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/opinion/31tue1.html?_r=1&hp

[2] 3.5 million new jobs by 2011: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/08/obamas-plan-to-create-or-save-jobs-a-promise-unfulfilled

[3] Fox News Sunday: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-sunday/transcript/reps-allen-west-donna-edwards-debt-ceiling-medicare-sen-john-mccain-talks-arab-spring-lib?page=2

[4] says: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576349792417402616.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

[5] proposal to spur job growth: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/163511-house-gop-seeks-to-refocus-agenda-on-jobs-we-have-a-growth-plan

[6] “old ideas, fancy new clip art,”: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/gop-jobs-plan-old-ideas-fancy-new-clip-art/2011/05/26/AG3XZKCH_story.html

[7] “a combined federal and state top tax rate on earnings of 62%.”: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576343611464445594.html

[8] explained: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/01/why-government-spending-does-not-stimulate-economic-growth-answering-the-critics

[9] no-cost ways: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/02/no-cost-stimulus-would-spur-business-hiring-and-create-jobs

[10] continuing its downward spiral: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/business/31housing.html?hp

[11] set to vote today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-sets-vote-on-debt-to-focus-on-budget-talks-with-white-house/2011/05/27/AGd7zsEH_story.html?hpid=z3

[12] can constitute an act of war: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576355623135782718.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

[13] NATO against becoming an “occupying force” in the country: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/31/us-afghanistan-karzai-casualties-idUSTRE74U0RP20110531

[14] examines the battlefield of the 21st century: http://www.heritage.org/Events/2011/05/Allen-West







150 Economists Back Republicans in Debt Fight...








On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show:  Mark talks about Congressman Anthony Weiner's alleged Twitter photograph and says that he believes that it is him in the photo.  Mark also talks about the state of the economy right now and how the bailout and stimulus programs haven't worked and that we are continually handing over more money and power to temporary politicians, at our own expense.  Why are the American people smart enough to elect these politicians, but then not smart enough to choose our own doctors or light bulbs?  What are all these regulations doing besides moving us more towards a soft tyranny?  Mark also talks about how we have a society that is being further divided between the big government political hacks and the rest of us.


http://mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/users/645/3355/avatar92.jpg?1304706049 stlouisix

on Jonah Goldberg | Weinergate: The Long and the Short of it
What goes around comes around as I've never observed a more conceited obnoxious individual, with the notable exception of Obama, come to the defense of the indefensible in terms of draconian legislation to control every aspect of our lives than Weiner.  News is now out that Weiner has a record of "tweeting with babes including a porn actress."  Wow, that will make for a good marriage, right?  What about laws that may have been broken here in regard to the transmission of this picture with Weiner's weasel comments making him look guiltier daily?  Where's the AG Holder?  Where's the House ethics committee for that matter, or have they become so anesthetized to this type of reprehensible behavior on the part of their reps that it's not even on their radar? 
We can go on and on about the well known fiscal catastrophe intentionally caused by the Obamunists but that is merely a spawn of the disintegration of the moral order that historically precedes societal collapse, i.e., we're living the advocacy of the morally bankrupt as policy.  A country capable of rationalizing the brutal killing of innocents in their mothers' wombs as "legal", promoting proven changeable aberrant behavior as normal under force of unjust law, and incentivizing its doctors to get grandpa and grandma to check out early via a purported health care system that is anything but, no surprise here as abortion is pre-natal euthanasia with euthanasia being post-natal abortion with the latter a logical consequence of the former, is staring directly at its own demise from within.







Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:16:49 -0600
From: pri@pop.org
Subject: "Illegal Children" Abducted by Chinese Authorities and Trafficked Abroad


Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Population Research Institute


Press Release
1 June 2011

"Illegal Children" Abducted by Chinese Authorities and Trafficked Abroad


According to a report in the Caixin Century magazine, population control officials in the Chinese province of Hunan seized at least 16 babies born in violation of the one-child policy, sent them to state-run orphanages, and then sold them abroad for adoption. In the words of Steven W. Mosher, China expert and president of the Population Research Institute, “if this is true (which we at PRI believe it to be based on our own research in China), then this act represents a serious human rights violation and a clear instance of human trafficking.”
“Before 1997, they usually punished us by tearing down our houses for breaching the one-child policy, but after 2000 they began to confiscate our children,” the magazine quoted villager Yuan Chaoren as saying.
The children, reportedly from Longhui county near the city of Shaoyang, were abducted by local authorities who accused their parents of breaching the one-child policy or illegally adopting children. Then, according to Caixin Century, the local family planning office sent them to local orphanages, which listed them as being available for adoption. The report added that the office could get 1,000 renminbi or more for each child. The orphanages in turn receive $3,000 to $5,000 for each child adopted overseas, money that is paid by the adoptive parents. The magazine reported that at least one migrant worker said she had found her daughter had been adopted abroad and was now living in the United States.
According to Steven Mosher, this report is heartbreaking, but not surprising.
“This report,” says Mosher, “is corroborated by research that PRI conducted on the ground in China back in 2009. In Lipu county, located in northern Guangxi province, we were told by a village official that ’at the present time, if you don't pay the fine, they come and abduct the baby you just gave birth to and give it to someone else.’ It is also worth noting that these two reports come from the same general area of China and occurred in neighboring provinces. “
“Of course,” Mosher continues, “local officials deny any involvement in child trafficking. But it is well known that the so-called ‘job responsibility system’ requires them to rigorously enforce the one-child policy, and that their success (or failure) in this area will determine future promotions (or demotions). Abducting and selling an ‘illegal’ baby or child would not only enable an official to eliminate a potential black mark on his record, it would allow him to make a profit at the same time.
“In this way,” Mosher concludes, “the one-child policy, through its system of perverse and inhumane rewards and punishment, encourages officials to violate the fundamental right of parents to decide for themselves the number and spacing of their children.”
Share this article on Facebook. Share this article on Twitter.


Media Contact: Colin Mason
(540) 622-5240, ext. 209
Contact PRI online
(c) 2010 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
PRI is a 501(c)(3) educational organization. If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI, please go to our Donations Page. All donations (of any size) are welcomed and appreciated.
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of "overpopulation." Find us at pop.org.












Barack Obama's decision to play golf on Memorial Day was disrespectful and hardly presidential


By Nile Gardiner World Last updated: May 31st, 2011


Barack Obama has played golf 70 times (Photo: AFP)

Barack Obama has played golf 70 times (Photo: AFP)

Can you imagine David Cameron enjoying a round of golf on Remembrance Sunday? It would be inconceivable for the British Prime Minister to do so, and not just because of the usually dire weather at that time of the year. Above all, it would be viewed as an act of extremely bad taste on a day when the nation remembers and mourns her war dead. I can’t imagine the PM even considering it, and I’m sure his advisers would be horrified at the idea. And if the prime minister ever did play golf on such a sacrosanct day he would be given a massive drubbing by the British press, and it would never be repeated.
Contrast this with President Obama’s decision to play golf yesterday, Memorial Day, for the 70th time during his 28-month long presidency. For tens of millions of Americans, Memorial Day is a time for remembrance of the huge sacrifices made by servicemen and women on the battlefield. The president did pay his respects in the morning, laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery, but later in the day traveled to Fort Belvoir to play golf. The story has not been reported so far in a single US newspaper, but was made public by veteran White House correspondent Keith Koffler on his blog. Here’s Koffler’s report:

The business of memorializing our war dead done, President Obama headed out to the Fort Belvoir golf course today, finding his way onto the links for the ninth weekend in a row.

Obama earlier today laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and met with families of those killed in battle. But he emerged from the day’s solemnity to go golfing for the 12th time this year and the 70th time of his presidency.

The decision to golf on Memorial Day invites comparison with President George W. Bush, who gave up the game early in his presidency and said he did it out of respect for the families of those killed in Iraq.

Does it matter if the president chooses to play golf on Memorial Day, and for the second time in his presidency (he did so as well in 2009)? I think it does, and it displays extraordinarily bad judgment, not only by Obama himself but also by his advisers. His chief of staff for example should have firmly cautioned against it. President Obama is not just any American but Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces. The United States is currently engaged in a major war in Afghanistan with over 100,000 troops on the ground, and more than 1,500 have already laid down their lives for their country.
The least the president can do on Memorial Day is spend
the whole day with veterans and servicemen’s families while acknowledging their sacrifice. As Koffler points out above, President George W. Bush stopped playing golf out of respect for the families of Iraq War dead. This demonstrated not only good judgment but humility and respect for the men and women who keep America safe. It is little wonder that, as Gallup reveals in a new poll, US military personnel and veterans give Barack Obama lower marks for his job performance than members of the general public. The president’s actions smack of poor taste, as well a lack of empathy and support for the US military, hardly the kind of leadership the White House should be projecting at a time of war.





In regard to any commentary about fighting the culture war, we had better get it right with God Almighty, number one; else, we're finished as a country, because without God's blessing, there is no hope of survival!   And that blessing will not be forthcoming if we continue to allow the disciples of the devil, who have America by the jugular, to flout the moral order of God's Natural Law, the obedience of which being recognized by the founders in The Declaration of Independence as necessary for the survival of The Republic! 


See the following links.



The Tyrants Among Us Who Trash The Declaration Of Independence's Reference To The Importance Of The Natural Law Of God As If It Never Existed



Sodomite Judge Ignores Not Only Nature And Nature's God But Also Reason, Given That God's Natural Law IS Reasonably Understood Exclusive Of Divine Revelation Connotations, In An Irrational Extremely Biased Ruling That Trashes Nature And Nature's God In Direct Contradiction To The Declaration Of Independence Which Was Fulfilled In The Constitution - Military Homosexual Scandal Tied To WikiLeaks Treason



The Founders Didn't Put Social Issues On The Backburner In The Declaration Of Independence - Boehner Has Betrayed Those Who Made Him Speaker - Obama To Blame For High Oil Prices - Soros Calling Shots In Obama's Willful Destruction Of America - Republicans Disastrous Victory - Waging War, Union Style, In WI - POLST: "Self-Determination" Or Imposed Death?



Death Panels Crop Up Again As Obama Mentions IPAB In Medicare - The Declaration Of Independence Is Not Going To Be Revised To Accommodate The Godless - Town Hallers Ask Obama: Where Are The Jobs? - Obama IS The Problem With Higher Gas Prices - To Retire Our National Debt, Retire Obama - Radical Lesbian Nominated For Mass. Supreme Judicial Court



The Right To Liberty In The Declaration Of Independence Is Not An Anarchist's Dream - Soros Group Behind Attack On Boehner's Catholicism - Obama Oil Policy Threatens Alaska Pipeline's Existence - The Truth Behind Oil Subsidies - Middle Class Will Be Crushed Within 5 Years - New Birth Certificate Anomalies Inexplicable - We're All Communists Now, Part 3



ATTENTION GOP 'Leadership': You Don't Compromise With Communists Who Are Destroying Your Country From Within - It's Mandatory For Congress To Address 'Un-American Activities' At The Highest Levels Of Government - Military Not A Place For Social Experiments - Michigan State University Joins NOAA In Satellitegate Cover Up - Soros Trying To Prop Up Sinking Obama - New START's Inflated Promises - 'Separation Of Church And State' Is NOT In The First Amendment - Obama Omits 'Creator' From Declaration Rights Language Again - Anyone Who Says That Obamacare Doesn't Fund Abortion Is A BALD-FACED LIAR


Recall, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, that we were given "A Republic if you can keep it!" with a Constitution that was the fulfillment of The Declaration of Independence


 - Gary L. Morella







America's Culture War and How to Fight It, V.:
Some Memorial Day Reflections


Memorial Day 2011 should call to our attention the real state of America today — a nation engulfed in the flames of a Culture War. This is a battle war that many of America's Constitutionalists are fighting poorly. But we cannot learn to fight until we learn to think. This Culture War is, so far, a war of words, but words inciting action - words expressing bitterly opposed philosophies, intellectual values, and policy goals. And as columnist Joseph Sobran observed in the first days of the Reagan Presidency, Americans [then and now] are "philosophically incompetent and intellectually unsophisticated."


Whatever insult some Constitutionalists might see in this observation should be overridden by the challenge of Sobran's words. Memorial Day 2011 can be celebrated in no more fitting manner than by our THINKING ABOUT some of America's most precious foundational principles, how they have been charred almost beyond recognition in the flames of the Culture War, and what we Constitutionalists can do about it — how we can learn more in order to fight better. We shall think about (1) the principles themselves, (2) the policy areas in which these principles have been the most brutally attacked, and (3) the parties in American society — societal institutions — directly victimized by these attacks. We MUST think about and understand — far better than we do — these pivotal aspects of the Culture War.


Four primary principles expressed in four words in the Constitution have been the most badly battered in the Culture War. They are listed below by Constitutional term and philosophical foundation:

·        "Person"/The dignity of the individual;

·        "Life"/The sanctity of human life;

·        "Liberty"/The "blessings of liberty";

·        "Law"/The rule of law.

These principles have been victimized by Reconstructionist (activist/liberal) judges bent on morphing our Judeo-Christian Constitution and culture into a Humanist and Reconstructionist Constitution and culture. The principles are guaranteed primarily by Amendments 1, 5, and 14.  

Collectively, these provisions protect the right of every "person" to "life, liberty," and "due process [the rule of] law." Key components of "liberty" include freedom from establishment of religion and the right to free exercise of religion. Also specifically expressed are freedoms of speech, press, peaceable assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The courts have now created from this specific list a generalized "freedom of expression" not intended by the document but allowing current judges to protect all kinds of mischievous actions from flag-burning to nude dancing.
The Declaration of Independence amplifies the meanings of these principles in expressing a number of vital truths. Let's examine each of these primary principles.


·        "Person"/The "dignity of the individual" is assumed in the Amendments' unequivocal assertion that governments cannot deprive "persons" — not any other creature or thing — of precious fundamental rights. Clearly, the individual receives these rights from his Creator God and is equal in this way before God to every other individual. Every individual as an individual is of great value — "dignity." His value does NOT proceed from his birth into a particular family or class, his membership in the "proletariat," or some other pagan source.


·        "Life"/The "sanctity of human life" principle is closely related to yet separable from personhood. Human life is of the greatest value — "sanctity" — because each human life is created by God as a special — unique — creation. Man is also created with certain precious, inalienable rights which are granted to no one or anything else in the universe, thus elevating man to the highest position in God's created order.


·        "Liberty"/The "blessings of liberty" phraseology appears in the Preamble to the Constitution. The term "liberty" (or "freedom") alone is used in both the Declaration and Amendments 1, 5, and 14. "Liberty" is obviously one of the "inalienable rights" with which men are endowed by God. The Preamble's addition of the phrase "blessings of liberty" clearly connotes that true liberty generates outcomes beyond itself — "blessings" "to ourselves and our posterity."


These phrasings of "liberty" clearly connote the fact that liberty is not unbridled license — the right of an individual to do whatever he please whenever and wherever. Rather, liberty is to be exercised (1) within the order prescribed by the God who is the author of liberty and (2) is to be exercised consistently with other rights and the interests of others in mind.

·        "Law"/The "rule of law" occurs numerous times in the Constitution (and the Declaration) and reveals complementary truths about the meaning and application of "law." One truth is that the Constitution is "the Supreme Law of the land." A second truth we learn in examining the Constitution is that the rule of law encompasses two types of law — "substantive" and "mechanical"; and the rule of law requires that both types flow from the Constitution.

At the core of "substantive law" is the requirement that all valid laws protect and promote the first three primary principles that we have examined: personhood, human life, and liberty. "Mechanical law" requires that the structures and processes through which government acts are enacted and enforced line up with numerous expressed Constitutional requirements (e.g., "due process" and the principles we examined in our last "Court Watch Briefing" as requiring of Americans the obligation of limiting our Reconstructionist/supremacist judges).  

In later Court Watch Briefings, we shall continue thinking about the primary principles of America's Constitution and culture. May we now, on Memorial Day 2011, remember with renewed understanding and gratitude the sacrifices made by past and present Americans to protect and promote the primary principles of our grand and glorious Constitution.








Below is served up as weekly tripe in PRAVDA Central PA, The Centre Daily Times of State College PA, by a series of columnists, red to the core, identifying themselves as community organizers, or some other type of disciple of sustainability which is their god! - Gary L. Morella 



Exclusive Report:

Sustainable Development Puts American Lifestyles in UN's Crosshairs
by Cathie Adams

Eagle Forum International Issues Chairman
Further Reading: United Nations / Global Warming
Americans do not like having our standard of living in the United Nations' crosshairs, especially considering we pay 22% of its $2.5 billion regular budget, plus 27% of its $9.5+ billion peacekeeping budget.

Since 1987, the UN has plied a borderless issue called "sustainable development" to demean American lifestyles and demand economic, social and environmental "justice." They use it to agitate class warfare and control the behavior of people, businesses and organizations. It is the UN's cure-all for the world's real and imagined problems including global warming/climate change, poverty, conflict, etc.


The 1997 Kyoto Protocol was the UN's first major sustainable development conquest, putting mandatory caps on greenhouse gas emissions in only 37 industrialized countries, intended to force moving industrial wealth from rich to poor countries. Even though the U.S. Senate did not ratify that treaty, former President Bill Clinton created the President's Council on Sustainable Development that uses federal grants to infiltrate every classroom and countless local governments with sustainable development.

The UN has a new weapon in its sustainable development arsenal: government benchmarks for "consumption and production." Targeting 1.4 billion "rich" people in every nation, it accuses them of greedily consuming 80% of global output.

The proposal's author, Mohan Munasinghe, a native of Sri Lanka, is Director-General of the Sustainable Consumption Institute at the University of Manchester, U.K. As vice chair of the International Panel on Climate Change, he shared the Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore. His proposal, called "Millennium Consumption Goals: How the Rich Can Make the Planet More Sustainable," would replace "unsustainable values like greed . . . especially among the young" with government benchmarks for consumption and production.

Munasinghe complains that "governments quickly found over $5 trillion for stimulus packages . . . to prop up banks and promote unsustainable consumption. . . . Meanwhile, only about $100 billion per year are devoted to alleviate poverty and far less to combat climate change." Concerning national defense, he adds, "Some types of [government] expenditures . . . also need to be targeted — e.g., the U.S. $1.5 trillion per year spent on armaments worldwide."

The MCGs' objective is to "complement" the Millennium Development Goals, signed by former President Clinton at the 2000 Millennium Summit. Both MCGs and MDGs define sustainable development's three Marxist pillars to equalize the world economically, socially and environmentally, claiming it safeguards the "future survival of humanity."

The Millennium Development Goals are to:

·        Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger


·        Achieve universal primary education


·        Promote gender equality and empower women (Advocate for CEDAW, the international Equal Rights Amendment, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.)


·        Reduce child mortality and promote child health (Advocate for the UN Treaty on the Rights of the Child to usurp parental rights and empower the UN.)


·        Improve maternal health (Advocate for UN Family Planning, including taxpayer funded abortions.)


·        Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (Advocate for condom use.)


·        Ensure environmental sustainability (Advocate for sustainable development.)


·        Develop a global partnership for development (Advocate for wealth redistribution.)


Munasinghe's Millennium Consumption Goals eerily parallel President and Mrs. Obama's agenda for:

·        Conservation of scarce resources like energy and water (Advocate for cap & tax legislation.)


·        Efficient transport (Advocate for expensive public transportation and discourage private cars.)


·        Sustainable dwellings


·        Healthier diets and obesity reduction (Advocate for the First Lady's pet $2.5 billion project.)


·        Healthier lifestyles and greater fitness


·        Progressive taxation and taxes on luxury goods (Advocate for tax-the-rich schemes.)


·        Sustainable livelihoods (Destroy freedom with government master planning.)


·        Reduced workweek and improved working conditions, etc. (Advocate for labor unions.)


At the May PrepCom for the Rio+20 meeting in New York City, a proposed 10-year "Framework of Programs" for sustainable consumption and production was rejected, so Munasinghe's sight is now set on the 2012 Earth Summit, Rio+20, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Americans must elect a new president in 2012 who rejects sustainable development's Marxist intentions and will eliminate all federal grants that advance it.





Sustainable development or sustainable freedom?

Exclusive: Henry Lamb compares U.N.-inspired goals with U.S. founders' goals




Sustainable development or sustainable freedom?

Posted: May 28, 2011
1:00 am Eastern

© 2011 


Editor's note: Listen to this column online.

Sustainable development is based on a set of principles found in Our Common Future, the report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development.

Sustainable freedom is based on a set of principles found in the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress July 4, 1776.

Sustainable development is based on this belief:

From space, we see a small and fragile ball dominated not by human activity and edifice but by a pattern of clouds, oceans, greenery, and soils. Humanity's inability to fit its activities into that pattern is changing planetary systems, fundamentally. This new reality, from which there is no escape, must be recognized – and managed. (Chapter 4.1)


Sustainable freedom is based on this belief:


… all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. ….


Sustainable development is achieved when the recommendations contained in Agenda 21 are fully implemented.

Sustainable freedom is achieved when the U.S. Constitution is obeyed.

Sustainable development and sustainable freedom are mutually exclusive. Sustainable development produces a society managed by government to insure environmental protection, social equity and equal economic opportunity. Sustainable freedom produces a government managed by society to protect individual freedom, private property and the unalienable rights identified in the Declaration of Independence.

Sustainable development was endorsed by the United States in 1992, when President George H.W. Bush signed Agenda 21 at the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. Sustainable Development came to the United States in 1993 when President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order 12852 which created the President's Council on Sustainable Development.

Throughout the Clinton years, the PCSD gave millions of dollars to nonprofit organizations and to state and local governments to encourage the implementation of Agenda 21 at the state and local government levels. Nearly every community in the nation has now been the subject of a "visioning" process to create a "strategic plan" to achieve sustainable development.

With grants from the federal government (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the lead federal agency, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration in the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Economic and Community Development Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), the American Planning Association produced "Growing Smart: Legislative Guidebook." This publication provided three model statutes and two model executive orders states could adopt to convert the non-binding recommendations of Agenda 21 into state law.

Consequently, most states and local communities now have, or are in the process of creating, a county-wide plan to implement sustainable development. A common element in most of these communities is the complete ignorance of Agenda 21 and sustainable development among elected officials. In fact, when asked, elected officials frequently deny that their county's activities are related to Agenda 21 at all. This ignorance about Agenda 21 is deliberate. Gary Lawrence, former director of the Center for Sustainable Communities at the University of Washington and chief planner for the city of Seattle told an audience in London:


In the case of the U.S., our local authorities are engaged in planning processes consistent with LA21 [Local Agenda 21], but there is little interest in using the LA21 brand. … So, we call our processes something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.


In the United States, sustainable development is delivered to local communities in the form of a comprehensive land-use plan, with little or no mention of Agenda 21. Greenville County, S.C., recently updated its comprehensive land-use plan under the banner: "Imagine Greenville County; Tomorrow's Vision Today." Several elected officials insisted that the exercise had nothing to do with Agenda 21. A rather casual analysis of the plan, however, provides direct documentation that both the process and the outcome prescribed by Agenda 21 were achieved in the plan.

Likewise, the officials in Bradley County, Tenn., denied any relationship to Agenda 21 in the development of their "BCC-2035 Strategic Plan." A review of the plan in relation to Chapter 7 of Agenda 21 reveals that the plan is essentially an extension of Agenda 21, modified by local names and places.

There is no doubt that sustainable development in the United States is a concept that arose from the United Nations with the clear purpose of managing societies around to world to achieve environmental protection, equal economic opportunity and social equity. The United States was founded on the principles of limited government, individual freedom, reward for individual achievement and free markets that produce maximum prosperity. Government is imposing sustainable development and its inevitable government management. Only an informed, involved and determined people can stop and reverse this erosion of freedom.

Read more: Sustainable development or sustainable freedom?








·        Live and let live? SSM Architects Seek to Silence Christians - NOM Marriage News June 2, 2011‏




Brian Brown (bbrown@nationformarriage.org) http://sn123w.snt123.mail.live.com/mail/clear.gif


Thu 6/02/11 10:42 PM






Visit NationForMarriage.org



Thursday, June 2, 2011


Dear Marriage Supporter,

Coming to a public school near you?

Watch the Video

Just when you think it can't get any weirder or more disturbing, an Oakland grade school decided to teach kindergartners about multiple genders, under the banner of preventing bullying.

Watch that video. Look at the children's faces. And then look at the activist from a group called "Gender Spectrum" who wants to embed in these children's minds the idea that we all have a right to make up our own gender(s).

"People can be girls, feel like girls, they can feel like boys, they can feel like both, and they can even feel, like I said, kinda like neither," he teaches them.

This is a movement that knows what it is doing.

This has been our busiest and (so far) most successful spring ever! We've seen victories in Rhode Island, Maryland, Minnesota, and now New York.

But this week I want to step back from the incredible flow of events to focus on the great, great challenges we are facing ahead.

I mean what we are facing as a nation, as a civilization founded on moral truth, "conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."

As our Founders understood it, that equality rested on the self-evident decrees of nature and of nature's God.

Could Christianity, which gave birth to America, become an illegitimate stepchild in our own nation?

The evidence is mounting this week that too many advocates of gay marriage aim at nothing less than a revaluation of all values—to create a new, government-backed sexual morality in which those who adhere to traditional views of sex and marriage are demoted to second-class citizens.

"Marriage equality," in other words, means some people will be more equal than others.

I do not believe that most ordinary gay people, or gay-marriage advocates, intend to do harm. Most ordinary Americans are good people, for whom "live and let live" is good enough.

But the architects of this movement, it is increasingly clear, know exactly what they are doing, and why.

What is the evidence?

In Illinois this week, the Rockford Catholic Charities shut the doors to its adoption and foster care program, because a new civil unions bill with the Orwellian title of the "Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Unions Act" failed to explicitly protect religious liberty. The threat of litigation made continuing to help these children too risky—to the rest of the good work Catholic Charities continues to do.

The state legislator who sponsored the bill says that was not his intent, but too bad. He tried to go back and add specific religious liberty protections later, but too late.

He has regrets, but Illinois activists (who understood from the beginning that religious freedom would NOT be protected) are loud and proud about it.

Benjamin Wolf, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois who represents juvenile wards of the state as part of a court-monitored consent decree with DCFS, even noted that children would be the losers because of the special difficulties in finding good child-welfare organizations.

"Rockford would not be the place I would've chosen to start these transitions," Wolf said. "I am very sorry that they would give a greater priority to their commitment to continue discriminating than the health and welfare of Illinois children."

In other words, drive Christians and other traditional faith communities out of the public square, and then blame the victims for your own intolerance.


In Rhode Island, GLAD (Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders) has actually and actively opposed language in the House bill designed to protect religious institutions like Catholic Charities.

Karen Loewy, Senior Staff Attorney for GLAD, called the exemption "unprecedented," and designed only to inflict "gratuitous harm on Rhode Island's gay and lesbian families."

What about the gratuitous harm inflicted on children when religious adoption agencies are told they are no longer welcome unless they agree with the government's views on adoption? What about the gratuitous harm inflicted on every member of a traditional faith community in Rhode Island, when they are told their institutions and their beliefs make them second-class citizens?

Surely we can find a way to help same-sex couples make medical decisions for each other in hospitals, and fulfill other similar needs, without doing that much gratuitous harm?

But what if it's not gratuitous to the activists proposing these same-sex union bills? What if inflicting that kind of harm on religious institutions and people is part of the point?

It's not the details of religious liberty protections which bother these folks, it's the idea that there is anything worth protecting in the great faith traditions' views of sex and marriage.

The crisis in Illinois was precipitated by the conscious decision of same-sex couples not to go to the many agencies known to do same-sex foster care and adoptions, but to seek out religious agencies so they could lodge discrimination complaints.

A modus vivendi that finds room for all is not their goal. A new government-backed morality, which punishes and stigmatizes dissent and dissenters, is the goal.

Marriage Equality Rhode Island is actually now insisting that the Rhode Island senate revise its own civil unions bill to strip it of religious liberty protection, which in the eyes of these advocates is just a "loophole." Religious liberty—a loophole?


In Great Britain this week, another huge step down that road was taken. A gay man asked a Christian counselor to help him change his orientation, or at least live in accordance with his alleged religious beliefs. But this gay man was a liar. Excuse me, an "investigative reporter." He did not want her help, he wanted to punish her for being willing to help.

One need not agree with reparative therapy to see that this tactic represents a deeply troubling attempt to prevent anyone else from getting a kind of help that you don't want for yourself.

And it worked. This week a disciplinary panel found Mrs. Lesley Pilkington guilty of "professional malpractice," according to the Telegraph: "The ruling stated that her accreditation to the organisation will be suspended and she will be ordered to complete training. If she fails to comply she will be struck off the register."

In his newspaper article, Mr. Strudwick said: "I am an out, happily gay man. I was undercover, investigating therapists who practise this so-called conversion therapy (also known as reparative therapy)—who try to 'pray away the gay'.'I asked her to make me straight. Her attempts to do so flout the advice of every major mental-health body in Britain.'"

Folks like Mr. Strudwick are loud and proud and utterly convinced that "live and let live" is a one-way street that ends with his power to punish and hurt those with whom he disagrees. And in Great Britain he can!

Here in the States, for the first time in recent memory a major newspaper has begun to cover the kind of open, ugly hatred that is directed against anyone who dares to stand for marriage as the union of husband and wife.

The New York Daily News, to their credit, reported, "Same-sex marriage foe State Sen. Ruben Diaz & family hit with death threats over stance on issue":

[Sen. Diaz's effort to protect marriage] has also drawn the Pentecostal minister into venomous, online clashes and spawned death threats called into his office. Now a Brooklyn gay bar will host a "F--- Ruben Diaz Festival."

"I have never preached hate," Diaz told the Daily News. "They're showing that they're the ones that are doing the hateful things."



Diaz said he and his family have received death threats due to his vocal stance on keeping gay marriage unlawful in New York State. They were reported to the FBI and Albany police, he said.

"We are in America; we are supposed to agree to disagree and respect each other's positions," the senator said.

On May 10, tweets by opponents of Diaz's May 15 rally included one in which the sender expressed the desire to sexually assault Diaz's daughter.

(Yes, that's me there standing proudly by Sen. Rev. Díaz's side at his rally in May.)

"Be not afraid," I tell you, as the Lord told us. In every crisis there is opportunity, and out of this civilizational crisis, if we come together and stand with courage and love, will come something great.


Let me close by pointing you to a column Maggie published in Patheos, in response to a young Catholic writer who said our fight for marriage is doomed.

Maggie called it "Why Life is Winning," and she pointed out, "Some say that no one will oppose gay marriage a few decades from now. They used to say the same about abortion":

When I was, well, a few years younger than Tim Muldoon is today, the message of despair now directed at marriage was directed at the pro-life movement. All the powerful elites favored abortion. Media coverage of anyone who was pro-life was dreadful. All the wives of Republican power-brokers favored abortion rights. If you said you opposed abortion, people would shout, "You are calling my sister a murderer!" They informed me that by the time I turned 50, the pro-life movement would be dead because young people were so pro-choice.

I'm 50 now, and yet the pro-life sentiment is surging as today's young people are more pro-life than their elders.

How did that happen?

There are many ways to answer that question, and what I offer here is more of a missing piece—the role of politics in cultural change—than a comprehensive theory. ...

By the 1990s, both sides agreed (at least publicly) that pro-life values should be respected, even if they continued to disagree on the specific legislative strategies for reducing abortion.

That political accommodation created a new cultural space for pro-lifers. The pro-life position became "respected" by both sides in the public square, rather than relentlessly de-legitimized by elite organs of culture.

Politics and culture are not separate activities. Sometimes culture determines politics. But sometimes politics, by raising the costs of demonizing pro-life positions, and raising the profile of the issue in the public square, serves cultural change as well.

Speaking of politics changing culture, we just helped form a new ballot initiative committee, Minnesotans for Marriage.

In 2012, we hope, pray and expect that the people of Minnesota, after a dignified and civil debate, will join 31 other states in voting to protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

They will give a visible rebuke to those who claim that the majority of Americans support gay marriage, and rebuking the voices of despair who claim that the fight for marriage cannot be won.

Thank you for all you make possible. At NOM we want no less than to be your voice for your values—and for the truth about the human person: We are born male and female, called to come together in love so that the future can happen.

God bless you; and please pray for Sen. Rev. Díaz, and for everyone on the front lines of this great battle for God's truth about marriage.

Brian BrownBrian S Brown

Brian S. Brown
National Organization for Marriage

P.S. For the sake of the next generation, marriage must be defended and the truth about marriage must be proclaimed in the public square. But for us to get that message out, we need your help. Please consider what you can give, whether it's $15 or $150. We will do everything in our power to make your voice heard, to win more victories for marriage.






Gender nonsense in the classroom
Phyllis Schlafly targets 2-day program teaching kindergartners about 'Princess Boy'





Gender nonsense in the classroom

Posted: May 31, 2011
1:50 pm Eastern

© 2011 


Elementary school curriculum isn't just about the three R's anymore. Reading, 'Riting and 'Rithmetic now have to make time for lessons in gender diversity and for nosy questionnaires that lead kids into teen sex and illegal drug usage.

Students in all grades at Redwood Heights Elementary School in Oakland, Calif., were given two days of gender diversity lessons designed to teach them that gender is not confined to the "binary concept" of two options. The lessons promoted "gender neutrality," the concept that no distinctions between male and female should be legally allowed.

These lessons were taught by an anti-bullying group called Gender Spectrum and paid for by a $1,500 grant from the California Teachers Union. The course featured all-girl geckos and transgender clownfish.

The major message was that "gender identity" means people can choose to be different from the sex assigned at birth and can freely "change their sex." According to Gender Spectrum, "Gender identity is a spectrum where people can be girls, feel like girls, they feel like boys, they feel like both, or they can feel like neither."

Kindergartners were introduced to this new subject by asking them to identify toys that are a "girl toy" or a "boy toy" or both, and whether they like the color pink. They were read a story called "My Princess Boy."

Fourth-graders were told that if someone were born with male "private parts" but identified more with being a girl, he should be "accepted" and "respected." They were taught "gender fluidity," which means a boy might be a boy one day and a girl the next.

The Oakland School District personnel were apparently proud of this course because they allowed Fox News to audit and report on these lessons. District spokesman Troy Flint said that gender identity lessons are required by school board policy and supported by federal, state and local law as a means to support "equity" and a safe classroom environment.

The lessons seem more likely to confuse the kids about who they are, and indeed, Gender Spectrum boasted that its goal is to confuse the children and make them question traditional ideas about who is a boy and who is a girl. It is not surprising that many parents were upset when they heard about the two-day course.

Some of the bills now pending in the California State Assembly indicate that these gender neutrality notions may become the new normal curriculum in California public schools. Gender Spectrum is determined to make children think that boy and girl don't mean anything anymore, and that it's no longer normal to believe people are born male or female or have different roles.

The California State Assembly is considering changes to 34 statutes by redefining gender to include a person's own "gender expression" and on May 17 passed AB 887, which prohibits any discrimination against the "transgendered." Among its predictable effects is that employers can be forbidden to require men to dress like men.

We wonder why anyone is surprised at this Left Coast nonsense, because university women's studies courses have for years taught that the obvious differences we observe between males and females are not a natural occurrence but are a social construct due to conditioning by parents and traditional social norms. It's a misunderstanding of the feminist movement to think it was ever about equality for women; it always advocated the interchangeability of men and women and an end to what they lambaste as gender "stereotyping."

Memorial Middle School in Fitchburg, Mass., featured another type of classroom atrocity: requiring pupils to answer nosy questions that are not only intrusive but designed to lead the kids into unacceptable behaviors. The survey, called the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, was created by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also provided the funding for it to be administered.

One question asked: "The last time you had sexual intercourse, what one method did you or your partner use to prevent pregnancy? ... A. I have never had sexual intercourse; B. No method was used to prevent pregnancy; C. Birth control pills; D. Condoms; E. Depo-Provera (or any injectable birth control), Nuva Ring (or any birth control ring), Implanon (or any implant) or any IUD; F. Withdrawal; G. Some other method; H. Not sure."

Here are a couple more leading questions: "During your life, how many times have you used methamphetamines (also called speed, crystal, crank, or ice)?" "During the past 30 days, how many times did you sniff glue, breathe the contents of aerosol spray cans, or inhale any paints or sprays to get high?"

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment makes such interrogation of students illegal without prior parental consent, which the school did not have. Some parents have appealed to the Rutherford Institute, and we wish them success in stopping the school from asking elementary school children such nosy questions.

Read more: Gender nonsense in the classroom




Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:48:09 -0400
Subject: Transgender lessons now in elementary school!
From: update@MassResistance.org



May 31, 2011

MassResistance Update

Pro-family activism

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
- George Orwell

1. Formal transgender lessons now in CA elementary school! Is this our future if transgender rights bill passes? (See VIDEOS!)

2. Fight back: MassResistance action flier for Transgender Bill H502. Public hearing June 8.

3. "Old Navy" stores now selling "gay pride" shirts - donating percentage to homosexual group targeting kids.

4. Updates . . .

1. Formal transgender lessons now in CA elementary school! Is this our future if transgender rights bill passes? (See VIDEOS!)

Is this YOUR future? It is unless you stop it. The "transgender rights" bills being pushed in Massachusetts and other states bring much more than just "bathroom" problems.

As two transgender bills (AB 433 and SB 48) are poised to be passed by the California Legislature, at least one elementary school in Oakland is already indoctrinating kids starting in kindergarten about "gender diversity."

Young children are being taught that they can choose to be a boy or a girl -- or both. Boys, for example, should be comfortable wearing girls' clothes and nail polish, etc. And there aren't just two genders, there can be a range. And, of course, the school does not allow parents to opt their kids out.

Redwood Heights Elementary School in Oakland, CA has hired a "gender coach" from "Gender Spectrum," a radical gender group, to go into the classrooms. As Fox News observed, Gender Spectrum's mission is to "create more gender-sensitive environments for kids."

WATCH this horrific Fox News report. This even shocked us. You will not believe what you are seeing:


SEE VIDEO: This shows the "gender coach" indoctrinating fourth grade students on transgenderism. http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/11b/CA_trans_elementary/Fox_player1_480.jpg

As the San Jose Mercury News reported

On Monday morning, children in Cynthia Bagby's kindergarten class discussed whether there were, in fact, "girl colors" and "boy colors." Some giggled when Joel Baum, the trainer from Gender Spectrum, read "My Princess Boy," a nonfiction children's book by Cheryl Kilodavis about her son who liked to wear dresses and a tiara.

Not surprisingly, in these tough economic times the program is being paid for by the California Teachers Association (CTA).

Activists using disinformation, intimidation to demonize critics

As the Fox News report shows, the effort to intimidate any criticism of the program  is in full gear. The program is being sold as a "necessity" to help kids, and anyone against it is being labeled as someone who wants to allow kids to commit suicide.

This Fox report features a man who is "the legal director for the Center for Lesbian Rights (at left below, and who we suspect is heavily hormone-induced "transgender" woman) defending this elementary school program. As it turns out, she/he(?) appears to be lying more than just a bit, about what it really is.


SEE VIDEO: Homosexual/transgender activist defends mandatory transgender training for elementary school children.http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/11b/CA_trans_elementary/Fox_player2_480.jpg

Nothing like this could stand on its own, even in California or Massachusetts. Thus, we see the same old lies, misrepresentations, skewed facts, and disinformation being used to silence critics -- which neither public authorities nor the mainstream press ever seriously question.

Phony reasons meant to intimidate. We're told that these "gender" programs must be implemented in elementary schools--without an opt-out ability--because:

  • Parents at home aren't doing their job, aren't supporting kids' choices, and are even throwing kids out of the house if they say they are "transgender".
  • This is absolutely necessary to stop bullying, which "transgender" kids suffer from more than others.
  • We must have respect for differences.
  • "Transgender" kids are committing suicide, and these programs must be done school-wide to stop that.
  • We need everyone to feel welcome and safe.
  • (And our favorite:) If you're against this, then you're in favor of teaching children to hate.


As the Mecrury News reported:

"Really, it's about reducing and dispelling stereotypes and prejudices so kids can show up to school and feel like they can learn and thrive without being stigmatized or teased," said Brett Bradshaw, a Redwood Heights parent who is also chairman of the school's LGBTQ Affinity group.

Who ever heard of an elementary school having an official "LGBTQ Affinity" group? Don't laugh. Yes, it's madness. But it's probably closer than you think. This kind of thing is common for activist parents to do to push agendas in their schools.

Part of the "anti-bullying" agenda

Almost the first thing you see in the first Fox video report is a big sign in the classroom announcing that this is part of the "anti-bullying" effort.


In the Fox report, the "anti-bullying" agenda is used by homosexual activists as a vehicle to push their agendas to kids.

This also confirms (again) what we've been saying and observing all along about the anti-bullying bills being passed in haste across the country which force a range of draconian "fixes" on public schools.

It's no secret that the main force (and funding) behind this national push has been the homosexual and transgender movements. In Massachusetts, the overwhelming number of groups testifying at the public hearing on the anti-bullying bill were homosexual and transgender groups. In every situation we know about, these groups were even involved in the actual writing of the legislation. These laws rarely are crafted by actual behavioral scientists, always by activists.

These anti-bullying laws take advantage of the public's emotions, but are really used as another vehicle to coldly push radical agendas on children.


In Massachusetts, the new "transgender rights and hate crimes" bill - even more radical than last time - is having its public hearing next week. It includes sections directly targeting schools, and will lead to lessons such as in the Fox News video.  (Watch for our complete analysis of Bill 502 in an upcoming email.)

If you have time to get involved, we can use your help over the next week. Please email us back with your contact info. We will get back to you.

(Even if you don't live here, it will be coming to your state soon. We can help you fight it in your state.)

2. Fight back: MassResistance action flier for Transgender Bill H502. Public hearing June 8.

Last year our pamphlet on the Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill (written by Amy Contrada) was a huge help in understanding what the bill was all about, and how to help stop it.

We have just come out with this year's version, in time for the June 8 public hearing. Everything you need to know on one piece of paper:



Flier on "Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill" H502
You can download it here (Adobe PDF format)

It's two-sided, and can be folded in thirds. Feel free to make as many copies as you want and distribute it widely!

3. "Old Navy" stores now selling "gay pride" shirts - donating percentage to radical homosexual group targeting kids.

Just in time for this year's "Gay Pride" parades in cities across the country, the Old Navy clothing chain has announced that its stores are selling a line of "gay pride" shirts. It is clearly an effort to support the homosexual agenda --both culturally and financially.

Old Navy's announcement on this wasn't in the mainstream media (not surprising), and it's not found on its web site, but alternative media is covering it:

Article: Old Navy Launches Gay Pride T-Shirts

Article: Old Navy Debuts Gay Pride T-Shirts For It Gets Better

Although the clothes are for everyone from babies to adults, they are clearly focusing on "LGBT teens" in their sales push.

Donating to radical homosexual group targeting kids

Old Navy is also donating 10% of the proceeds from these sales to the "It Gets Better" project, a homosexual organization that uses the "anti-bullying" front to target kids and help them feel "safe" in their homosexual identities.

"It Gets Better" was founded by Dan Savage, a vile, angry anti-Christian homosexual activist. Among Dan Savage's other activities:

  • He writes a raunchy on-line sex column.
  • He set up a website to attack Sen. Rick Santorum in a most disgusting manner. As you enter the website, on the "splash" screen Savage calls Santorum "the byproduct of anal sex". The site includes disgusting sexual imagery.
  • He set up a website to attack Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Church. More disgusting homosexual imagery.
  • In 2000, Savage pretended he was a conservative and volunteered for Gary Bauer's presidential campaign. He wrote about how he tried to make Bauer ill by licking his doorknobs and desk impliments while he (Savage) was sick with the flu.  The whole idea is sick, in our opinion.


Savage has created a place where he tells kids they can get involved with his group and find "love and happiness" . . .

The "It Gets Better" website describes itself:

The website www.itgetsbetter.org is a place where young people who are lesbian, gay, bi, or trans can see how love and happiness can be a reality in their future. It's a place where our straight allies can visit and support their friends and family members. It's a place where people can share their stories, take the It Gets Better Project pledge, watch videos of love and support, and seek help through the Trevor Project and GLSEN.

(Also on that page is a video of Savage with his "husband".)

The last thing in the world that vulnerable kids need is to have any contact with a hideous, disgusting individual like that. What kind of a demented corporation would support and even fund this?  


Old Navy REALLY needs to hear from as many of you as possible. It won't take you long, but will be effective. Let them know you will NEVER shop in their stores EVER, and you will spread the word.

Contact Old Navy NOW:

     Website: www.oldnavy.com

      Phone: 1-800-OLD-NAVY (1-800-653-6289)

      Email: custserv@oldnavy.com

4. Updates . . .

What really happened at "Youth Pride" in Boston

In our next email we will resume our multi-part expose on what REALLY happened at the state-sponsored May 14 homosexual "Youth Pride" event in downtown Boston, with schoolchildren brought in from across the state. You won't believe what you'll be seeing.

Fundraising update

THANK YOU to everyone who has donated. If you haven't recently donated please consider it. Help support our valuable work! This is a critical time for us financially.



DONATE HERE - Please help us keep going and reach our goal!
Donations can also be mailed to:
MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454

Support our work . . .
Donate to MassResistance!

Better yet - become a monthly donor (email us back to get set up)!

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

Contact us if you want to get involved.

Also, check out the MassResistance blog (for even more in-depth coverage)!







Our first lady:
Bitter harridan
Exclusive: Mychal Massie believes Obamas
'are not liberals – they are Marxist-Leninists'



Our first lady: Bitter harridan

Posted: May 31, 2011
1:00 am Eastern

© 2011 

The axiom, "Show me a man's friends and I'll show you the man," is nowhere more evident than with Barack Obama. In my column "Michelle Obama's inner demons," I wrote "[Obama] claims two mentors and two people of greatest influence in his life – the race-baiting, hate-filled, Jeremiah Wright and his race-conscious, bitter wife." Nothing more need be said of Wright, but not enough can be said about his wife.
Anger and resentment have been her constant companions in search of a home to be cultivated into a more centered hatred. We should be very concerned that she has the unfettered ear of the person who occupies the most powerful office in the world.
Michelle Obama has a deep contempt for white people in America – something she has not been shy in making expressly clear for those who have cared to listen.
Are we to believe that Obama does not share her contempt for the white establishment as well? It was she who got him involved in Wright's church. Obama was little more than a summer clerk, an intern, at the Chicago law firm of Sidley Austin. She was practicing law at the firm when he was hired as summer help and was assigned to mentor him. Something that is not widely publicized is that Sidley Austin also employed Bernardine Dohrn, who was personally hired by Howard Trienens, head of the firm and close friend of Bill Ayers' father. It puts one in mind of the movie "The Firm" – only at this firm, unlike the Tom Hanks theatrical character, the star players aren't motivated by conscience. They're motivated by anarchy and contempt.
Dohrn had been on the run for years as one of the FBI's 10 most wanted as a result of her part in the Days of Rage riots. She and Ayers lived underground as wanted criminals for 11 years – Dohrn eventually being cleared of charges by a judge in New York. It could prove to be very informative to research the relationship between that judge, Sidley Austin, Dohrn's family and Ayers' family.
Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are committed Marxist-Leninists. And it stands to reason no law firm hires outside of its comfort zone – so it is that the elements came together to meld the Obama's into what they are today, i.e., Marxist-Leninists people blindly think are liberals.
At Princeton, Michelle failed to grasp that there's a difference between the elitist white liberal academicians and Marxist-Leninists. Elitist liberals look down on everyone who is not a mirror copy of themselves. In her Princeton thesis she lamented: "I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus – as if I really don't belong." She complained that whites made her feel "black first and a student second."
Today, being recognized as black before anything else is the mindset of inferior blacks – she and her ilk aspire to a higher order, that of hybrid Leninist. In their political sphere, they hate elitist white liberals, but find them useful. Case in point: Obama's czars are Alinskyites and Leninists; they are not elitist liberals.
Michelle's Princeton thesis was made unavailable until Nov. 5, 2008 (interestingly the day after the election). "Why a restricted thesis? asked blogger-pastor Louis Lapides on his [website], Thinking Outside the Blog. Is the concern based on what's in the thesis?" ("Michelle Obama Thesis was on Racial Divide"; Jeffrey Ressner; politico.com; Feb. 23, 2008) In a blog post on Politcal Night Train, entitled "Michelle Obama's Princeton Thesis – Her Black Values Revealed," the author exposes her views of whites in unfettered and unflattering detail (politicalrighttrain.com; Feb. 26, 2008).
A tape that was reportedly filmed in 2004 during the Rainbow/Push Coalition Conference at Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church has mysteriously disappeared from public view. The tape allegedly showed Michelle Obama hysterically ranting about "Whiteys" and savagely attacking Bill Clinton as responsible for African genocide. The wife of Louis Farrakhan was one of the honored guests. (Americanpowerblog.blogspot.com; "What's Up With the Michelle Obama Whitey Tape"; June 4, 2008)
It's widely known that Obama's wife shaped his character. She was bitter with her Princeton black classmates because they were too comfortable interacting with whites. She anguished over taking on what she viewed as conservative values, i.e., "[going to] a prestigious graduate school and getting a high-paying corporate job." Maybe that's why she acts less like a first lady and more like a kennel employee.
Michelle Obama is a bitter harridan – by her own admission contemptuous of whites because she felt like a pariah at Princeton. She found fertile ground to cultivate her hatred at Sidley Austin. And there she discovered Obama, who had the genetic predisposition to embrace Leninism.
These people are not liberals – they are Marxist-Leninists in mindset, belief, association and action. Liberals don't govern as they are – they govern as Marx advocated and Lenin did.

Read more: Our first lady: Bitter harridan


WND Exclusive
Incensed voters 'repudiate'
Washington's leadershiphttp://www.wnd.com/images/breaking.gif

'Data indicate backlash could sweep
Capitol Hill, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.'






GALLUP: Military Personnel, Veterans Give Obama Lower Marks...





Subject: Sher Zieve: "Obama nullifies and ends US Constitution"
From: alerts@renewamerica.us
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:59:00 -0500



Sher Zieve

Obama nullifies and ends US Constitution


Sher Zieve
May 30, 2011

To read the article, click here:






I don't immediately recognize any Catholic contributions to Resisting The Green Dragon , which is very disturbing, because the One, True,  Catholic Church is the most Biblical, in particular, given that the central dogma defining the Church is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass whereby bread and wine is consecrated into the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ using Jesus' words taken directly from the New Testament!
What I HAVE seen is a large apostate element in the Catholic Church doing exactly the opposite of what is being encouraged below, i.e., promoting the environmentalist movement which is communist to the core
See the following links for proof!


Vatican Being Co-opted By Gore Green Goblins Whose Well Documented Pathological Lies Have Been Embraced By The USCCB To Brainwash Catholic Children Via A 'Climate Covenant' That Allows For No Opposition



USCCB Apostates Co-opt The Church To Enable The RED Green Goblin Pathological Lying Obamunists To Destroy The Country From Within



Judas USCCB Supports Comrade Obama's Destruction Of America From Within By Unconscionably Supporting Pelosi's Insane Energy Bill Built On Lies



Exposing The Repeated Lies Of The Obamunist Green-Goblin Crowd Who Are RED To The Core



Lie Again Mr. Boehner And Prep Your Resume - Obama Stimulates Nothing But More Debt, Per Palin - How Obama Czar Uses His Executive Authority - HHS Initiatives Fail To Offer States Meaningful Flexibility - IPAB: The Death Panels - The False Choice Between Existing Medicare And Ryan's Proposal - Sodomites Unhappy With AZ Adoption Law Having Children As Priority - Progressive Media And The War On The Unborn - The Despicable Attack On Gov. Palin's Son With Down Syndrome - We Now Have The Media Of A One Party Totalitarian State - Ten Fracking Things Everyone Should Know To Debunk The Lies Of The Environmental Nazis - The Enactment Of An Economically Crippling Energy Agenda - What Greens Really Believe - Academic Rot

- Gary L. Morella


Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:42:14 +0200
From: alerts@alerts.worldnetdaily.com
Subject: Environmentalist movement 1 of greatest threats to society, church today

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.



Looking for Christian
view of environmentalism?
'Resisting the Green Dragon' video series critiques worldview

http://www.wnd.com/images/email/shop/Greendragon.JPGMany Christian church leaders are embracing the central tenets of environmentalism unaware that it is based on an entirely unbiblical worldview, finds a new video series called "Resisting the Green Dragon."

The series finds the movement to be "one of the greatest threats to society and the church today" and concludes:


·        Environmentalism has become a new religion.

·        Environmentalism's policies are devastating to the world's poor

·        Environmentalism threatens the sanctity of life.

·        Environmentalism is targeting our youth.

·        Environmentalism's vision is global.


"Resisting the Green Dragon" takes its cue from James 4:7, "Submit therefore to God. Resist the devil and he will flee from you," Learn how the Bible powerfully confronts environmental fears and how – in God's wise design – people and nature can thrive together.

The explosive series, conducted by some of the top Christian leaders and scholars in America, contains 12 half-hour sessions along with a special 30-minute bonus documentary and a discussion guide with questions and suggested practical applications suitable for churches, Sunday schools, families, classrooms, home schools, and small groups.


Titles and speakers include:


·        False World View of the Green Movement

– Dr. E. Calvin Beisner

·        Rescuing People from the Cult of the Green Dragon

– Dr. Peter Jones

·        Logos vs. Mysticism: Environmentalism's Flight from Reason

– Dr. Vishal Mangalwadi

·        From Captain Planet to Avatar: The Seduction of Our Youth

– Dr. Michael Farris

·        A Brief History of Environmental Exaggerations, Myths and Downright Lies

– Dr. Steven Hayward

·        Putting Out the Dragon's Fire on Global Warming

– Dr. David Legates

·        How "Going Green" Impoverishes You, Your Church, and Your Society

– Hon. Becky Norton Dunlop

·        Ravaging the World's Poor

– Dr. James Tonkowich

·        The Green Face of the Pro-Death Agenda: Population Control, Abortion and Euthanasia

– Dr. Charmaine Yoest

·        Threats to Liberty and the Move Toward a Global Government

– Dr. E. Calvin Beisner

·        A Biblical Guide to Genuine Creation Stewardship

– Dr. James Tonkowich

·        Go Therefore and Make Disciples: Advancing the Gospel in a World Permeated by Environmentalism

– Dr. Peter Jones


Special guest appearances include:


·        Bryan Fischer, American Family Association

·        Pastor Jack Hibbs, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills

·        Bishop Harry Jackson, Hope Christian Church

·        Dr. Richard Land, Southern Baptist ERLC

·        Tom Minnery, Focus on the Family

·        Dr. David Noebel, Summit Ministries

·        Janet Parshall, National Radio Host

·        Tony Perkins, Family Research Council

·        Dr. Frank Wright, National Religious Broadcasters

·        Wendy Wright, Concerned Women for America


The package includes four DVDs with total programming time more than 360 minutes.

http://www.wnd.com/images/email/shop/Greendragon.JPGClick here to order "Resisting the Green Dragon" now at the WND Superstore. Purchase of this product entitles purchasers who are not current subscribers to three free trial issues of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazine.




WND Operator

Call Toll-Free to Order: 
If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps
toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM  (1-800-496-3266),
Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.





Environmentalist hype
about oil spill was false

Humberto Fontova: 1 year later, predictions about Gulf 'disaster' prove wrongheaded


"The Worst Environmental Disaster in U.S. History!" (One Year Later)

By Humberto Fontova




"There's just no data to suggest this is an environmental disaster, “said Marine Scientist and former LSU professor Ivor Van Heerden who also works as a BP spill-response contractor. “I have no interest in making BP look good — I think they lied about the size of the spill — but we're not seeing catastrophic impacts. There's a lot of hype, but no evidence to justify it."


In fact these observations came-- not a year after the Deepwater Horizon blew-up -- but a mere three months afterwards, making them all the more blasphemous at the time. By now they’ve been amply vindicated, making the Obama team’s “moratorium” and more recent stonewalling on Gulf of Mexico drilling permits all the more preposterous.

Your loyal servant here grew up in South Louisiana and spends most week-ends along the Louisiana coast hooking, spearing, gaffing, blasting and otherwise assassinating the raw ingredients of his family meals. He also shares the resulting joys and debacles with readers and TV-show hosts. So he had more than a casual concern with the BP oil spill.

The reasons for this “disasters’” fizzling out are many and were apparent to non-hack scientists from the get-go. To wit:

“People don’t comprehend how so much oil could break down in such a short time period,” explains Dr. LuAnn White, a toxicologist with the Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, who also serves as Director of the Center for Applied Environmental Health. “But we have natural oil seeps in the Gulf, and over 200 genera of microbes that break down oil already exist there.”

“It cannot be repeated often enough,” says Louisiana Marine Biologist Jerald Horst , Crude oil is a natural substance, its biodegradable. It’s a feast for microbes. And these consumed most of it from the BP spill.”

The horrid black goo that leaked into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP spill last year is certainly toxic—but so are broccoli, beer and salt. It all depends on the dosage. In fact that horrid black goo has spilled naturally into the Gulf of Mexico for millennia— at the rate of two Exxon Valdez spills annually.

A study by the Dept. of Oceanography at Texas A&M found 600 “oils spills,” into the Gulf of Mexico, all ancient if not prehistoric, all antiseptically “natural”, and all courtesy of Earth Goddess Gaia. In fact these “spills” probably saved the survivors of Hernando De Soto’s plucky band of explorers in 1542, who record caulking their boats with the abundant tar balls found along an east Texas beach. The study also reports that in 1909 a genuine gusher was spotted in the same area, shooting crude oil high into the air from the Gulf floor.

Not all these gushers lie below the Gulf of Mexico however. In fact one of Mother Earth’s biggest “spills” is off Southern California’s coast at Coal Oil Point, not far from the homes of ”environmentalist activists” Leo De Caprio, Charlie Sheen, Barbara Streisand, Brad Pitt, Ed Begley Jr and many, many others of their ilk. This spill gushes an estimated 3000 gallons of crude oil daily into the waters off Malibu beach. But none of the above “activists” appear overly agitated over this “disaster.”

Nothing normally soothes the savage beast of an environmentalist like the notion of a substance being “biodegradable.” Indeed, the term “environmentally-friendly,” has become almost its synonym. Well, crude oil is about as biodegradable as substances come, especially when spewed into warm, microbe-filled waters like the Gulf of Mexico. Hence the stratospheric dunce caps crowning so many “environmentalist” heads a mere year after “The Worst Environmental Disaster in U.S. History!”

“The damaging effects of the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico will be felt all the way to Europe and the Arctic!” according to a “top scientist” addressing a congressional panel, as reported by CNN last year.

In fact, the damaging effects were hardly visible in Louisiana itself a few months later. Dr. Van Heerden who spent most of his days inspecting the Louisiana coast found that less than one square mile of coastal marsh had been severely oiled, mostly around Timbalier Bay. That’s out of 5300 square miles of Louisiana coastal marsh and swamp, by the way.

And by last July the “severely oiled” areas were already bouncing back. “Van Heerden's assessment team showed me around Casse-tete Island in Timbalier Bay,” wrote Time Magazine’s Michael Grunwald last July, “where new shoots of Spartina (marsh) grasses were sprouting in oiled marshes and new leaves were already growing on the first black mangroves I've ever seen that were actually black."

“Ah!” you ask. “But what about that poisonous chemical used as a dispersant for the oil?”

You probably ingested traces of this poisonous chemical compound with last night’s dinner, and other traces probably coat your pots, pans, cups, spoons and forks right now. Some people call the dispersant Corexit 9500—and some call it “soap.” Essentially it’s Dawn dishwashing detergent.

“Dispersants are not very toxic.” Explains Dr. Robert Dickey, director of FDA’s Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory. “They are detergents and solvents. And they become rapidly diluted. One square mile of sea water one foot deep is 200 million gallons. We added 1.8 million gallons in the whole Gulf.”

Point is: you add much higher concentration to your kitchen sink to make your dishes “safe” for your family.

After the spill, the FDA’s Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Seafood Inspection Laboratory, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, the Louisiana Dept. of Health and Hospitals along with similar agencies from neighboring Gulf coast states have methodically and repeatedly tested Gulf seafood for cancer-causing “polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.”

“Not a single sample [for oil or dispersant] has come anywhere close to levels of concern,” reported Olivia Watkins, executive media advisor for the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.

“All of the samples have been 100-fold or even 1,000-fold below all of these levels, “reports Bob Dickey, director of the FDA’s Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory. “Nothing ever came close to these levels.”

“Fine,” some might say. But kindly define what constitutes this “level of concern.”

“The small amount of hydrocarbons in a seafood meal is much less than the exposure from pumping gas,” clarifies La. Dept. of Health and Hospitals Dr. Jimmy Guidry

“Anyone who smokes one cigarette gets more PAHs than they could get from eating gallons of any Gulf oysters that have been tested,” clarifies Dr. LuAnn White

After the Exxon Valdez “disaster” a NOAA study found that “residents of village communities (near Prince William Sound) became upset when it was pointed out that samples of smoked fish from their villages contained carcinogenic hydrocarbon levels hundreds of times higher than any shellfish samples collected from oiled beaches.”

The proof of the abundance of Louisiana’s the marine life is in the eating, but first comes the catching and spearing. So let’s head to an offshore oil platform a few months after and a few miles away from “The Worst Environmental Disaster in U.S. History!” and take a peek.





Who owns 'Big Oil?' It's not who you think
Corporate management has only 1.5% of U.S. crude and natural gas industry
--CNS News

Who Owns ‘Big Oil'? Not Who You Think

Thursday, May 26, 2011

By Penny Starr



john felmy

John Felmy, chief economist with the American Petroleum Institute, spoke to economists on May 26, 2011 in Washington, D.C. about the oil and natural gas industry. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)

(CNSNews.com) -- Armed with a Power Point presentation to illustrate the state of American energy, John Felmy, chief economist at the American Petroleum Institute (API), said the majority of “big oil” and natural gas ownership is in good hands – the hands of the American people.

According to a report published in 2007 by Sonecon, an economic advisory firm that analyses U.S. markets and public policy, corporate management owns only 1.5 percent of the U.S. oil and natural gas industry.

The rest is owned by tens of millions of Americans through retirement accounts (14 percent) and pension funds (26 percent).  Mutual funds or other firms account for 29.5 percent ownership and individual investors own 23 percent of oil stock holdings.

Institutional investors hold the remaining 5 percent.

Felmy spoke on Thursday to the National Economists Club in Washington, D.C., about the range of conditions that affect the cost of gasoline at the pump. Some of those include decisions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, geo-political conditions, speculation, inventories, exchange rates and inflation and even the weather.

As for the profits made by U.S. oil and natural gas companies that have been cited by congressional Democrats as reason to end tax incentives for the industry, Felmy put those earnings in perspective when it comes to high gasoline prices.

“If you took 100 percent of the earnings of the oil industry, you’d save 30 cents on the gallon,” Felmy said.


Alaska oil rig

(AP photo)

Moreover, compared to other American industries, the oil and natural gas industry’s profit margin are mid-range compared to other industries – 5.7 percent for each dollar, according to 2010 U.S. Census Bureau data.

Those industries making much higher net income/sales percentages on the dollar include beverage and tobacco products (21.7 percent), pharmaceuticals (19.4 percent), computer and peripheral equipment (17.3 percent) and chemicals (14.7 percent).

Felmy’s Power Point presentation included an image of a one dollar bill showing what American consumers are paying for with that dollar at the pump: 68 percent for crude oil and 18 percent on refining and retailing.


Fourteen percent of each dollar Americans spend at the pump goes to the federal government in the form of excise taxes.





Judge to university: Release
climate researcher's papers

'The more they stonewall, the more they're
making Richard Nixon look like a choirboy'

--Washington Times

Ruling alters climate-papers fight

Judge’s order to UVa. to turn over documents welcomed by Cuccinelli


By Paige Winfield Cunningham

The Washington Times

Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II says a judge’s order compelling the University of Virginia to turn over thousands of pages of climate-change research will likely alter his own battle for the long-sought documents.

The Republican attorney general and state Delegate Robert G. Marshall have battled the university for more than a year over the release of documents related to the work of former professor Michael Mann. Mr. Mann had been involved in a leaked email exchange with colleagues that climate-change skeptics claimed showed scientific misconduct.

Mr. Marshall, Prince William Republican, requested the documents through the Freedom of Information Act, while Mr. Cuccinelli subpoenaed them. Mr. Cuccinelli said an order issued Tuesday in Prince William County Circuit Court that grants Mr. Marshall’s request could affect his own appeal to the state Supreme Court to reverse a previous ruling in favor of the university.

“It certainly can affect what we’re doing,” Mr. Cuccinelli said. “If they essentially disgorge everything, there’s no cause for them to be going to court to try and cover it up.”

He said he plans to review the documents and “see how the process unfolds.”

“If, as and when we get copies of the stuff, we’ll see what’s responsive,” he said. “It’s kind of hard to tell what isn’t produced. You don’t see what isn’t there.”

The university has so far turned over 20 percent of the 9,000 pages of documents it says are responsive to a request from the American Tradition Institute (ATI), a conservative-leaning, environmentally focused group that joined forces with Mr. Marshall in January. ATI filed a petition last week, saying the university had failed to respond to an information request filed early this year.

A judge has given the university until Aug. 22 to supply the rest of the documents. Mr. Marshall said he was pleased with the decision, but is skeptical the university will hand over everything he has requested.

“I want to look at what they’ve given us and examine what they’ve withheld and see why it’s been withheld,” Mr. Marshall told The Washington Times. “The more they stonewall, the more they’re making Richard Nixon look like a choirboy.”

University spokeswoman Carol Wood said the university has been in “frequent and regular contact” with ATI lawyers, working to clarify their request and work out a “reasonably manageable process” to satisfy the public information law.

Mr. Marshall enlisted ATI’s help after a year of pursuing the climate-change documents on his own. After submitting his first information request in December 2009, the university told him it no longer possessed the materials he requested. In response to a second request the following spring, he was told it would cost $8,500 to prepare the documents.

While state law allows public agencies to charge a reasonable sum to compensate for time and effort in meeting public information requests, Mr. Marshall and ATI said the university was charging an unreasonable sum. The court has yet to determine how much the university may charge to meet the request.

“This case is about whether the government can put up a pay wall to frustrate the public’s right to transparency,” said David Schnare, director of the ATI Environmental Law Center. “If it can, the public can’t hold government employees to the high standards of conduct they should meet.”


© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.