Second Sample Outline/Brief


 

GOOD WORK. VERY GOOD. 80 AS IS. A LITTLE MORE TO DO, BUT YOU DID THE LEG WORK SO THE REST SHOULDN'T BE TOO TOUGH. SEE THE EXAMPLE THESIS/MAINPOINTS BELOW. REVISE THESE FOR THE HIGH B. WORK ON A LITTLE SHARPER CONCLUSION, TRANSITIONS, NAME-DROPPING OF YOUR [EXCELLENT] SOURCES, AND YOU SHOULD GET AN A. MAYBE I COULD USE YOUR REVISED VERSION FOR A GOOD SAMPLE INFORMATIVE!

 

Outline grading sheet:

 

(Revised 7-24-96)

Name__ ______________

Assignment_Informative_______________

 

Introduction--

 

Make a connection with audience experience? OK

Make use of hard evidence? (quote, example, stat.) OK

Match the central idea? OK BUT MUST BE SHARPER SEE NOTES

Make clean transition to Central Idea GOOD WORK HERE. MATCH TRANSITIONS TO THE CORE IDEAS MORE DIRECTLY...SEE NOTES.

 

Central Idea/Thesis:

 

Thesis stated simply in one sentence? OK

A statement about the topic, not just a label? NO SEE EXAMPLE BELOW

Highlighted by the organization plan? OK

 

 

Preview/Partition:

 

List points as ideas or phrases, not just labels? NO... SEE EXAMPLE

 

Main Points:

 

Logical plan by time, space, categories, analogy, contrast, cause &

effect, or problem-solution? OK. LOGICAL TOPICAL (CATEGORY)

Statements, not labels? NO

Logical progression? (meaningful reason for the sequence of points,

first to last, west to east, etc.) OK. THIS MAKES SENSE

Internal previews, internal summaries, and signposts? GOOD WORK IN THIS DIRECTION. MAKE LINKS A LITTLE MORE SHARP ABOUT LINKING TO THE MAIN POINTS.

 

Supporting Material:

 

"Hard" evidence; quotes, examples, statistics, etc.? VERY GOOD WORK

Support made visible or graphically clear? DROP THE BIOLOGICAL REVIEW, THE NYTIMES, MAKE THE AUDIENCE AWARE OF THE WORK YOU'VE DONE.

Support relevant to central point? GOOD

Does the bibliography list six sources? MORE .. GOOD

Are sources for evidence noted by name or number? GREAT

Are sources highly credible? GOOD

Are copies or descriptions of visual aids attached? YEP. SCRATCH THE HANDOUT, BY THE WAY. JUST DEFINE THE TERMS YOU NEED, LIKE PROTEASE INHIBITOR. GIVE THEM A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF THE WAY IT WORKS, LIKE A KINEX TOY BLOCK THAT ATTACHES TO A LEGO BLOCK SO NO OTHER LEGO BLOCK CAN LINK TO US. SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

 

Conclusion:

 

Make connection with or give an audience experience? SEE NOTE. SHARPEN THE IMAGE A BIT.

Make use of hard evidence? (quote, example, stat.)GOOD

Match the central idea? MAKE LINK DIRECT THRU SUMMARY OR A REFERENCE TO HOPE

Close with a sense of finality? ONE MORE SENTENCE TO CLOSE IT UP.

At 08:07 PM 7/23/96 -0400, you wrote:

>Dr. Lentz, if you get this brief and it is hard to read, e-mail me back and

>I'll try again. If you get it and it is fine, e-mail me anyway so I know

>you received it.

>                                                                                                         

                                                                       

SpCom 100

>                                                                                                         

Dr. Lentz

>                                                                                                         

July 23, 1996

>

>

>Introduction: Picture this: you are standing before a human size maze. There are several entrances that lead in many different directions. There are no short cuts or secret passages. Not quite sure where to start, you enter the maze. After many trials and errors, you try different paths but you continuously end up at a dead end. After endless debates over which path to take, you try again, and this time you think you have chosen the right path just when it leads you in another direction. Should you go left, right, or straight ahead? If I choose the right path, will I come to the end?MAKE THE CONNECTION TO YOUR IDEA DIRECTLY. "SCIENTISTS TRYING TO FIND A CURE FOR AIDS FACE A SIMILAR MAZE OF PATHWAYS, AND NO ONE KNOWS WHICH IS THE RIGHT WAY TO GO. If only major dilemas were AS simple AS REACHING THE END OF THE MAZE we might not have millions people infected all over the world with AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). (2) I'm not going to stand here today and lecture you on the ways HIV is contracted because we already know all that. AIDS has been in the news recently and it caught my attention that researchers have come along way with new drugs. Some believe that they can see the light at the end of the path . . . a cure for AIDS.

>

>Central Idea: Since AIDS affects everyone, I want to inform you and the class of some of the recent developments relating to AIDS and HIV.

MAKE YOUR CENTRAL IDEAL MORE OF A STATEMENT ABOUT WHAT IS TO FOLLOW. TRANS: "SOME RESEARCHERS BELIEVE THERE MAY BE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL. THESIS: THERE ARE SEVERAL HOPEFUL DEVELOPMENTS IN AIDS RESEARCH WHICH MAY LEAD TO A CURE FOR AIDS.

 

PREVIEW: 1) SEVERAL NEW DRUGS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED TO FIGHT AIDS.

2) THESE DRUGS HAVE SHOWN PROMISE IN EXPERIMENTS, ESPECIALLY IF USED TOGETHER. 3) THERE ARE SIDE EFFECTS, BUT DOCTORS ARE HOPEFUL THEY CAN BE CONTROLLED. [NOTE THAT THIS MAKES YOUR MAIN POINTS MORE THAN JUST LABELS AS WELL. THE EFFECT IS TO SHOW YOUR PROF., YOUR BOSS, WHOEVER, THAT YOU HAVE THOUGHT THROUGH THE MATERIAL AND DIGESTED IT A BIT, NOT JUST REGURGITATED IT.]

 

 

>Partition: Doctors have found that by combining certain drugs, they might be able to find a cure for AIDS or a vaccine for HIV. First, I'll describe the drugs and their effects. Then, I'll explain the advantages of such drugs. Finally, I'll express the issues against the new drugs.

TRANS: FIRST LET'S CONSIDER THE NEW DRUGS.

 

POINT I SHOULD RESTATE THE MAIN POINT. SEVERAL NEW DRUGS CALLED PROTEASE INHIBITORS HAVE SHOWN PROMISE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST AIDS.

 

>

> I. The new drugs, ritonavir and indinavir, better known as protease inhibitors, have been

> approved by the Food and Drug Administration to block the production of a key enzyme,

> protease, that the virus needs to replicate itself. (3)

>          A. The experimental drug ritonavir is being administered in laboratories.

>                      1. In an experiment conducted at the Abbott Laboratories, the drug, ritonavir, cut the death rate in half for a group of patients suffering from advanced AIDS             (during a seven month experiment). (3) DROP THE NAMES OF YOUR SOURCES, NEW YORK TIMES, WHATEVER, IN A WORD OR TWO. SHOW THE READER/LISTENER HOW HARD YOU'VE WORKED.

>                      2. The patients were placed into two groups: the ritonavir group and a placebo group. The ritonavir group received the protease inhibitor along with other AIDS drugs. The deaths in the ritonavir group totaled five percent while the placebo group deaths totaled eight and a half percent over the duration of the experiment. (7)

>          B. Another recently approved proteast inhibitor is called indinavir.

>                      1. From a Merck Laboratory EXPERIMENT, researchers found that when they combine indinavir with two other drugs, AZT and 3TC, the levels of HIV in the blood (of 24 patients) was reduced indisputably 1,000 times. (3)

>                                  a. The study was done on ninety-seven HIV infected people. One group was given only indinavir. Another group was given AZT and 3TC drug. And the last group was given all three drugs. (7)

>                                  b. The results showed that the group given all three drugs had the most impressive results. (7)

>                      2. According to Roy M. Gulick, the drug tests have "very few side effects" and "none of the complications observed [were] severe enough to warrant                stopping a patient's treatment." (7)

>                                                                                 

> Transition:THESE DRUGS HAVE OFFERED HOPE TO MILLIONS. THERE ARE MANY REASONS WHY THEY HAVE EXCITED PEOPLE. I've just told you about the two new protease drugs, ritonavir and indinavir, that                          when combined with other AIDS drugs have incredible results. Next, I'll reveal some of the advantages about these new drugs.

>

> II. A GOOD START, BUT PICK UP YOUR KEY IDEAS DIRECTLY. "THE NEW DRUGS HAVE OFFERED HOPE THAT DOCTORS MAY BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE AIDS VIRUS, OR EVEN ELIMINATE IT. [IN OTHER WORDS, DON'T SAY POSITIVE ISSUES, SUMMARIZE WHAT IS POSITIVE. There are many positive issues raised concerning the new protease drugs: ritonavir and indinavir.

>          A. The new drug combinations have recently driven the AIDS virus to undetectable levels in the blood which might be able to eradicate the virus from patients bodies.                 (1)

>                      1. The dream is that this new drug treatment will advance so that it can be stopped forever . . . a cure. (1)

>                      2. Two doctors, from the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York                City, Dr. David D. Ho and Dr. Martin Markowitz, have a hypothesis that a                         cure is possible. (1)

>                                  a. They plan to test their hypothesis at some point by stopping treatment on a very small number of infected patients at the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center. (1)

>                                  b. However, definite proof of a cure probably could not come for years and failure is likely to come sooner. (1)

>          B. For the first time, doctors have at their disposal an abundance of weapons that can fight the AIDS virus at virtually every stage of its life cycle. (3)

>                      1. Groups such as the NIH (National Institutes of Health), OAR (Office of AIDS Research), TAG (Treatment Action Group), CDC (Centers for Disease                    Control) and NIAID (National Institute of and Infectious Diseases) are        working on new drugs and also a vaccine (8,5,6)

>                      2. The protease drugs can be used during the early months of infection, not just in the final stages. (3)

>

>Transition: You now know some of the advantages of the new protease drugs. Ritonavir and Indinavir have disadvantages that DOCTORS HOPE TO CONTROL.

>

>III. There is much controversy over the possibility that these new protease drugs can not only control but also cure AIDS. (1)

>          A. Some scientists believe that merely suggesting a cure for what has generally been a deadly disease is far too premature and dangerous. (1)

>                      1. According to Christine Gorman, [WHO IS GORMAN, AND WHY SHOULD WE CARE WHAT SHE THINKS? IS SHE AN AIDS RESEARCHER, WAS SHE QUOTED BY THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE? CONSTANTLY REMIND YOUR AUDIENCE THAT YOU'VE NAILED GOOD SOURCES, EVEN IF ONLY BY DROPPING THE NAME OF THE JOURNAL WHERE YOU FOUND HER QUOTED, OR THE TITLE OF HER BOOK, ETC.] it is still not clear just how long the new drugs can prolong life. (3)

>                      2. By announcing that scientists have found a cure, they could create a "false sense of security," thus encouraging people to drop their guard against safe sex and other high risk behaviors because people will think that if they contract the virus they will be cured. (1)

>                      3. Additionally, medical science could receive a "huge black eye" if a cure for AIDS becomes widely publicized and fails. (1)

>          B. Most cures for viral diseases occur naturally as a result of the immune systems defenses. (1)

>                      1. For instance, chicken pox is usually considered cured once the last scab has healed; however, "chicken pox remains dormant in nerve cells and often                   causes shingles in infected individuals decades later" (no one knows what                  causes the trigger). (1)

>                      2. It is possible that if scientists think they have found a cure that HIV could react in the same way by hiding somewhere in the body.

>                      3. Therefore, doctors need to search throughout the body especially the lymph nodes (where HIV lies dormant before a person gets AIDS) before they stop combination therapy to test the possibility of a cure. (1)

>                      4. Hidden HIV could return after many years even if a person thinks he of she is cured. (1)     

>          C. The drug therapy requires combinations of drugs that often involve taking fifteen or more pills a day that must be swallowed according to a tight schedule. (1)  

>                      1. According to Dr. Altman, the timing of the pills centers around an empty stomach and the drugs often cause severe irritation of the stomach. (1)

>                      2. Also, if a patient forgets to take a few pills, they could trigger strains of the virus that resisted the protease drugs which would then create a worse                        problem than the original infection. (1)

>         

>Conclusion: One of the most unfortunate characteristics of AIDS is that "it attacks those who are at, or just beginning, the prime of their lives." (4) The most important fear is that we don't know how much the new drugs will cost and if doctors have enough in supply. (3) Ninety percent of all AIDS cases occur in developing countries where the patients would not be able to afford the protease drugs. (1) Dr. Joseph Decosas, an international health expert, brings this terrible disease into perspective when he says, "if the cure for AIDS was a clean glass of water, most of the people in the world today would not have access to treatment." (1)

>MAKE THE CLOSING A PICTURE AS WELL. YOU COULD PICK UP THE MAZE IMAGE, OR TELL A STORY ABOUT ONE OF THE SAD CASES OF PEOPLE CUT DOWN IN THE PRIME BY AIDS. "IN SUMMARY, THERE IS REASON FOR HOPE THAT WE WILL FIND A WAY TO STOP AIDS FROM DESTROYING LIVES. IF WE REMEMBER THE IMAGE OF THE MAZE WITHOUT END, AND PICTURE THE STRUGGLES OF DOCTORS WHO WORK ON AIDS WHILE THEIR PATIENTS DIE, WE CAN FEEL THE DESPERATION OF THOSE INVOLVED IN THIS WORK. NOW, FOR THE FIRST TIME, THERE IS HOPE THAT THE MAZE HAS AN END, AND EVEN, PERHAPS, THAT DOCTORS WILL BE ABLE TO ELIMINATE THE MAZE ENTIRELY. WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP OUR EFFORTS TO PREVENT THE DISEASE. [PICK UP YOUR COST ETC. HERE, AND DR. DECOSAS, AND CLOSE WITH A FINAL SENTENCE THAT REMINDS US OF THE THEME.] YET THERE IS A LITTLE HOPE NOW ON THE HORIZON. THANK YOU.

 

 

>

>

>

>

>Bibliography

>

>1. Altman, Lawrence K, M.D. "Discussing Possible AIDS Cure Raises Hope, Anger and       Question: What Exactly Is Meant by 'Cure'?" , New York Times, Sec.C:3 July 16,           1996.

>

>2. Cowie, Jonathan. "AIDS and education--an update," Journal of Boilogical Education, 1990.           pg. 259-261. BIOLOGICAL?

>

>3. Gorman, Christine. "Battling the AIDS Virus: There's still no cure, but scientist and survivors make striking progress," Time, February 12, 1996. pg.62-64.

>

>4. Hein, Karen. "Adolescents at Risk for HIV Infection," ed. DiClemente, Ralph J.,   Adolescents and AIDS: A Generation in Jeopardy, California: Sage Publications, 1992.        3-17.

>

>5. Stango, J. "Millions of American Youth are at Risk for HIV infection," Teenagers and AIDS in America, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 1995. 1-14.

>

>6. Stolberg, Sheryl. "Rare Form of AIDS Virus Found in California Woman; Changes in Testing Vowed," The Washington Post, Sec.A7 July 5, 1996.

>

>7. Travis, John. "AIDS Update '96: New drugs, new tests, new optimism mark recent AIDS

> research," Science News, 149:184-186.

>

>8. Voelker, Rebecca. "Restructure for Federal AIDS Research," The Journal of the American         Medical Association, v275 n14 p. 1065. April 10, 1996.