The CUC has on site a wide variety of pilot- and demonstration-scale coal preparation and cleaning equipment as well as bench-scale analytical equipment to evaluate the composition of solid and liquid fuels. The effects of various cleaning and preparation techniques on fuel quality, handleability and combustion can be determined. The CUC works in conjunction with the Mineral Processing Section at Penn State often integrating persons from that group and drawing upon specific expertise to meet the needs of a particular project.
The CUC has the capability to characterize selective physical properties and complete chemical composition of solid and liquid fuels.
| Fuel Type | Physical Properties | Chemical Properties
|
Solid
|
|
|
Solid Liquid Mixtures
|
|
|
|---|
The CUC has conducted several successful programs in characterizing and evaluating limestones as reagents in WFGD systems and as sorbents in FBC systems for reducing SO2 emissions. The CUC has particular expertise in determining the qualities of limestones that make them attractive as a reagents/sorbents in a given system and the ability to evaluate limestones in a variety of on-site bench- to pilot-scale units. The CUC has conducted full-scale testing at a commercial FBC facility (30 MW(e)) and is currently seeking to conduct testing at a utility-scale (1,800 MW(e)) WFGD unit.
Relevant Publications| Physical Characterization | Chemical Characterization | Geological Description
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
A summary of project results for limestone evaluation for SO2 reduction in FBC and WFGD systems is given in the section on Emissions Characterization and Reduction, SO2 Control.
The CUC has experience in all aspects of combustion systems from fuel storage and handling to the burner to the stack, and total system integration. The capabilities of the CUC allow for technology development and evaluation to be conducted at the demonstration-scale. Pilot-scale evaluations are also conducted in conjunction with The Combustion Laboratory.
The CUC has been developing technologies for utilizing coal-water slurry fuels (CWSFs) and micronized coal in fuel oil-designed boilers. To evaluate the technical and economic viability of firing coal-based fuels in oil-designed, industrial watertube boilers, proof-of-concept demonstrations were conducted in our industrial-scale boiler. Technical aspects of these demonstrations included: coal storage (hoppers for micronized coal; tanks for CWSF) and handling (conveyors, screw feeders, weigh-belt feeders, and pneumatic transport for micronized coal; pumps and piping for CWSF) and integration with the burner; matching various burners with the boiler; combustion and boiler performance; ash deposition, accumulation, and erosion; emissions; and boiler derating.
Relevant PublicationsAs a consequence of the system integrations, the CUC identified special considerations for transporting, storing, and handling coal-based fuels that are being utilized in industrial boilers that have been designed for fuel oil. These are especially crucial in an one-burner boiler system.
A major element of the system integration was burner development. The CUC is actively involved in the development and evaluation of low-NOx burners for industrial boilers. This includes burner and boiler modeling, burner performance evaluation, and new burner development. Low-NOx burner evaluation and development activities have been conducted in conjunction with ABB Combustion Engineering (High Efficiency Advanced Coal Combustor and Radially Stratified Fuel Core burner) and Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (FlamemastEERTM burner) using the Demonstration Boiler.
Another crucial component in the system integration is coal micronization and transport to the burner. The CUC works closely with TCS, Inc., a mill manufacturer for on-line micronization applications in industrial boilers.
The CUC also works closely with manufacturers of auxiliary components. CUC assisted ABB Air Preheater, Inc. in evaluating its heat pipe heat exchanger, which is installed on the demonstration boiler system, for use as a combustion air preheater. The results from this activity were used to assist in future preheater designs.
The CUC assists in developing pollution control technologies. Currently, the CUC is demonstrating the removal of ultrafine particulate matter with increased particulate collection efficiency through the use of a ceramic filter. A ceramic filtering device is operated in parallel with the fabric filter baghouse to evaluate this new technology, contrast it with conventional filtration, and demonstrate a smaller, more efficient filtering device for boiler retrofit applications.
The CUC is actively participating in the identification/development of a NOx reduction catalyst that is compatible with the typical operating conditions and the economic constraints of industrial boilers. The catalyst is being developed for two applications -- as a monolith supported catalyst on the clean side of a conventional baghouse and as a coating on a ceramic filter. The CUC is collaborating with Englehard Corporation, CeraMem Corporation, and Babcock & Wilcox on this activity.
The viability of future oil-to-coal boiler retrofits has been assessed, starting with the conversion of two package boilers, 1,000 lb steam/h (research boiler located within The Combustion Laboratory) and 15,000 lb steam/h (industrial-scale boiler), from oil to CWSF and pulverized coal. The boilers were used to: determine the effect of boiler operating parameters (i.e., atomization quality, fuel particle size, level of combustion air preheat temperature) on combustion performance; automate the firing system, particularly with respect to start up and shutdown procedures but also to optimize boiler performance; evaluate fuels; determine the level of boiler derating (less than 15%); determine the maximum ash level (~5 wt.%) tolerable; and determine the ideal coal particle size distribution (D(v,0.5) = ~18 µm).
The system and operating knowledge (e.g., level of combustion air and CWSF temperature, proper flow meters, gauges, and piping geometries, mixer types and tank dimensions, coal silo dimensions, and proper coal transport equipment) gained from the demonstration boiler was used to design the retrofit of an oil-designed boiler located on a military base to fire dry, micronized coal and CWSF. The conversion was engineered by the CUC and Energy and Environmental Research Corporation.
| Combustion Research |
|
|---|
Determining combustion behavior is an intergal part of evaluating a fuel. This is especially true in the case of developing new alternative fuels. The CUC has years of experience in conducting combustion tests firing traditional fossil fuels and alternative fuels such as coal-water slurry fuel (CWSF) and emulsions in conjunction with other fuels. The CUC also has the capabilities to evaluate biomass-based fuels.
Relevant PublicationsThe CUC assists the fluidized bed combustion industry by evaluating sorbent behavior for SO2 capture, determining the influence of fuel properties on combustion performance and sulfur capture, assisting in materials handling issues, working with operators and regulatory agencies when developing new policies, and improving combustor operation by reducing bed agglomeration.
The majority of the CUC's activities in fluidized bed combustion focus on evaluating sorbent behavior for SO2 control. A major program, that was recently completed, was conducted with The Combustion Laboratroy, the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority, the Pennsylvania Aggregates and Concrete Association, Meckley's Limestone Products, The Pennsylvania Geological Survey, and Westwood Energy Limited Partnership to determine if low purity (low CaCO3 content) limestones and dolostones can be utilized in fluidized-bed combustors as sorbents for SO2 capture. Prior to this study, manufacturers of fluidized-bed combustors routinely specified the use of relatively high purity limestones (CaCO3 content > 85 wt.%) for this purpose. Specific results from this work include:
Specific results from additional activities include:
CWSF research and development have been an integral part of Penn State's activities since the early 1980's. The focus has been on establishing acceptable formulation and preparation procedures and obtaining satisfactory combustion performance in fuel oil-designed industrial boilers, and during cofiring with pulverized coal in utility boilers. Fundamental, pilot and demonstration scale activities have provided detailed understanding of the chemical and physical phenomena involved in CWSF rheology and stability, atomization and combustion, mineral matter transformations, atomizer tip and boiler tube erosion, ash settling and deposition, boiler derating, and emissions. Specific accomplishments include:
CWSF formulation and preparation have progressed from bench-scale (pound quantities) to pilot-scale (tons/h) and utility-scale production levels. Significant accomplishments include:
Early studies at Penn State focused on increasing the combustion rate of CWSFs so that acceptable burnout could be achieved in the available residence time in retrofitted boilers. Significant accomplishments include:
Interest in cofiring CWSF and pulverized coal stems mainly from its potential as a low cost NOx control technique. As a consequence, the CUC has been active in the development of this technology and has been working with the Pennsylvania Electric Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Electric Power Research Institute's Upgraded Coal Interest Group, Central Illinois Public Service Company, and Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company.
The CUC has visited numerous coal preparation facilities to evalute their coarse and fine coal refuse. Both active and inactive sites have been studied. Of particular importance is the history of the cleaning facility at the site.
Some sites are well documented regarding changes in the circuit design with time while other sites, particularity older inactive sites, are poorly documented. In the case of reclaimed sites, the reclamation plans can provide valuable information as to the volume of waste coal and geometry of the site.
| Field evalation of a site usually involves a drilling program to evaluate the coal fines within the site to determine the extent of lateral and horizontal variation in quality and size. This is particularity important when dealing with a site that experienced numerous changes in the cleaning circuit, types of coal cleaned at the facility, end use of the cleaned product and changes in disposal techniques and plans over time. |
|
| CUC Field Sampling of Inactive Coal Pond Fines Site |
|---|
A fuel oil-designed boiler was modified to fire dry, micronized coal. Major accomplishments, obtained in programs conducted for the U.S. Departments of Energy and Defense and ABB Combustion Engineering while developing three commercial burners (two ABB Combustion Engineering burners and one Energy and Fuels Research Corporation burner) were:
The CUC has experience in determining the combustion behavior of coals and blends on stokers. The CUC, in conjunction with The Combustion Laboratory, completed a program to evaluate the combustion behavior and determine the economics of firing various blends of anthracite with the bituminous coals used at the Jennison and Hickling generating stations of the New York State Electric & Gas Company (NYSEG). Results of the program include:
In a similar program, the CUC is assisting EFH Coal Company to reduce emissions from low stack boilers in the Krakow, Poland region. EFH Coal Company will be constructing and operating a coal washing and grading plant to improve the quality of coal (lower ash and properly sized) fed to these types of boilers. The CUC is supporting the program by performing combustion tests in the stoker simulator, and providing technical assistance during full-scale boiler demonstrations in Poland to evaluate the new feedstock prepared by EFH Coal Company.
The CUC has access to the facilities and has the capabilites for evaluating emulsions including fuel characterization, burning profiles, and combustion performance. For example, a program was conducted by the CUC, in conjunction with The Combustion Laboratory, to evaluate the combustion behavior of an emulsion of hydrocarbon and water, and compare it to No. 6 fuel oil for the Coastal States Management Corporation.
Page 1 2
Return to Coal Utilization Home Page
image copyright Kit McGuire