HX83/200MMX: Millennium Vs Nine 128-2 at 08, 16, and 32 bit Color Depth

1024X768X-08,16,32@85 HX83/512 3X75=225MHz 96M EDO 2940UW ST34501W (Cheetah UW) FAT32

Table of Results , Current Results, BIOS Settings

This site has been accessed times since June2nd, 1997

Note: The Millennium yields better benchmarks than the 128-2 at all color depths. However, the margin is sufficiently small at high color depth to warrant considering qualities other than speed. On my Nanao T2-17, the Millennium lacks contrast and depth relative to the 128-2. This is especially the case at 1280X1024 resolution. The Millennium is fast. The 128-2 is much easier to read. The monitor is more "alive" when driven by the 128-2.

• Top bar: 8 bit depth Matrox Millennium 4M Driver 3.61 Disclosure
• Second bar: 8 bit depth Nine Imagine 128-2 Driver 416p Optimize Disclosure
• Third bar: 16 bit depth Matrox Millennium 4M Driver 3.61 Disclosure
• Fourth bar: 16 bit depth Nine Imagine 128-2 Driver 416p Optimize Disclosure
• Fifth bar: 32 bit depth Matrox Millennium 4M Driver 3.61 Disclosure
• Bottom bar: 32 bit depth Nine Imagine 128-2 Driver 416p Optimize Disclosure