HISTORY
144
THE
WORLD AT WAR 1939-1945
Philip
Jenkins
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/p/jpj1/144.htm
SOME SELECTED
HANDOUTS
THE MYTH OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR:
Or, what is wrong
with this picture?
1.World War II
began in 1939 with HitlerÕs invasion of Poland.
2.In 1940,
Germany conquered most of the countries of Western Europe, occupying France.
3.Britain
survived, fighting off the Germans heroically in the battle of Britain, but
stood alone against the Germans, supplied by US convoys.
4.In 1941, the US
entered the war after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.
5.US forces
gradually defeated the Japanese, beginning an island-hopping campaign that
included such great battles as Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa. By 1945, US forces
were poised to strike at Japan itself.
6.US forces
fought the Germans in North Africa and Europe, fighting a series of campaigns
in Tunisia and Italy. Meanwhile, US bombers were devastating the German homeland.
7.In 1944, US
forces invaded the French mainland on D-Day, and defeated the Germans in a
hard-fought series of battles. The Germans tried to recover by launching a new
surprise attack at the end of 1944, but the ensuing Battle of the Bulge resulted
in a US victory.
8.In 1945, the
Allies occupied Germany, ending the war in Europe.
9.In 1945, the US
used atomic bombs against Japanese cities, bringing the war to a close.
10.We won.
THE BLOODIEST BATTLES OF THE TWENTIETH
CENTURY
1 Leningrad, WWII
(8 Sept. 1941-27 Jan. 1944) 850,000
2 Stalingrad,
WWII (Sept. 1942-31 Jan. 1943) 750,000
3 Moscow, WWII
(Sept. 1941-Jan. 1942) 719,000
4 Kiev, WWII (7
July-26 Sept. 1941) 678,000
5 1st Smolensk,
WWII (10 July-10 Sept. 1941) 535,000
6
Voronezh-Voroshilovgrad, WWII (28 June-24 July 1942) 371,000+
7 1st Belorussia,
WWII (22 June-9 July 1941) 375,000
8 Operation
Bagration or 2nd Belorussia, WWII (23 June-29 Aug. 1944) 350,000
9 Kursk, WWII
(4-22 July 1943) 325,000
10 Somme, World
War I (1 July-18 Nov.
1916) 306,000
11 Verdun, World
War I (21 Feb.-16 Dec.
1916) 305,000
12 Rzhev-Vyazma,
WWII (8 Jan.-20 Apr. 1942) 272,000+
13 2nd West
Ukraine, WWII (24 Dec.-17 Apr. 1944) 270,000+
14 North
Caucasus, WWII (25 July-20 Apr. 1942) 262,000+
15 Berlin, WWII
(16 April-7 May 1945) 250,000
16 1st West
Ukraine, WWII (22 June-6 July 1941) 189,000
17 Battle of
France, WWII (10 May-22 June, 1940) 185,000
18 Lower Dnieper,
WWII (26 Sept.-20 Dec.1943) 173,000+
19 Kšnigsberg,
WWII (13 Jan.-9 April 1945) 168,000
20
Donbass-Rostov, WWII (29 Sept.-16 Nov. 1941) 157,000
21 Passchendaele
or 3rd Ypres, World War I (31 July-12 Nov. 1917) 150,000
22 Okinawa, WWII
(1 April-21 June 1945) 148,000
23 Normandy, WWII
(6 June-19 Aug. 1944) 132,000
24 Gallipoli, World
War I (19 Feb. 1915-9
Jan. 1916) 130,000
25 Budapest, WWII
(late Oct. 1944-mid Feb. 1945) 130,000
Source: http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/battles.htm
SOME THINGS INTELLIGENT PEOPLE IN THE 1930S
EXPECTED TO HAPPEN IN THE ÒNEXT WARÓ BUT THAT DIDNÕT
1.The coming war would closely
resemble the First World War
2.It would be decided in the lands
between France and Germany
3.Combatants would use biological
and chemical warfare, including against cities and civilian targets
4.Bombers would annihilate cities
on both sides from the air, probably in the opening stages of the conflict
5.Social unrest sparked by the war
would generate revolutions across the world, and probably help spread Communism
6.The war would destroy financial
structures.
7.The war would conceivably cause a
reversion to barbarism, a new Dark Age.
THE FIRST WORLD WAR AND ITS HERITAGE
Comparing The
Wars
MYTH: WW1 was utterly different from WW2. WW1
was a struggle of greedy empires; WW2 was a titanic moral conflict
REALITY: Both
wars had very much the same combination of ideology and self-interest
How The Wars
Started
MYTH: The nations
stumbled into war almost by accident
REALITY:
Long-term plans by particular powers – especially Germany – ensured
war
GermanyÕs Role
MYTH: Germany was
no more guilty of aggression than any other country (All Quiet On the
Western Front)
REALITY:
GermanyÕs war aims in WW1 look very much like those of WW2 – see the
treaty of Brest Litovsk
How The War
Was Fought
MYTH: Trench
warfare and military incompetence (Somme and Verdun)
REALITY:
Incredible innovation at every stage, tactical, strategic and technological:
chemical warfare, tanks, aircraft, artillery, storm warfare, submarines,
long-range bombing
How The War
Ended
MYTH: US
intervention swung the balance between exhausted European Powers
REALITY:
Brilliant and total Allied victory over Germany during the Hundred Days Battle
of 1918
THE WAR IN THE MEDITERRANEAN 1943-45
1943
May Axis
forces surrender in Tunisia
July US
7th Army and British 8th Army invade Sicily, in Operation
"Husky"
July-August Allied
massacre of Axis prisoners at Biscari
September 3 Allies
invade mainland Italy
September 8 Italy
surrenders
September 9 Allied
5th Army lands at Salerno, Operation "Avalanche"
September Germans
murder thousands of Italian soldiers in the Cephalonia Massacre
December German
air raid on Bari
December Canadians
fight Germans at Ortona
1944
January Allies
land 50,000 at Anzio, in Operation "Shingle"
February Allied
bombers destroy monastery of Monte Cassino
May Polish
forces take Monte Cassino;
Allied
offensive breaks the Gustav Line
June 4/5 Allies
occupy Rome
June Fall
of Orvieto
June Germans
retreat to Gothic Line
July-October several
separate massacres by SS of Italian villages,
each claiming
hundreds of victims
August Allies
invade Southern France, Operation "Dragoon"
August Allies
take Florence and Pisa
October British
intervene in Greece and liberate Athens
1945
March Allied
air raid on Venice
April Final
Allied offensive in Northern Italy; Allies capture Genoa, Verona, Brescia, and
Bologna
April Italian
partisans lynch Benito Mussolini
The Mediterranean was "a
venue where the Western allies could warm up against the Axis B team"
(Douglas Porch)
MAJOR WARTIME CONFERENCES
CASABLANCA, Morocco, January
1943
Major themes: Demand for Unconditional Surrender
Western Allies Mediterranean Strategy
TEHRAN, Persia November
1943
Major themes: Promise of Second Front in France, Overlord; Stalin
promises simultaneous attack in East
Reconstruction of Germany
Support for Yugoslav Partisans
Agreement on the United Nations
QUEBEC II, Canada, September
1944
Major themes: Reconstruction of Germany – the Morgenthau Plan
YALTA, USSR February
1945
Major themes: Reconstruction of Germany - occupation zones;
demilitarization and denazification
War crimes trials
Settlement of Poland – Lublin Poles; new borders; issue of elections
Soviets promise to attack Japan 90
days after Germans surrender
Compromise with Soviets in China
POTSDAM, Germany, July
1945
Major themes: Reparations to Soviets
Soviet
demand for Polish borders
Control
of Balkan states
Removal
of German populations in the East
Demand
for JapanÕs unconditional surrender
YALTA
THE
MEMORY OF YALTA
In
May 2005
President George W. Bush
said that the Soviet domination of central and eastern Europe after World War
II was "one of the greatest wrongs of history" and that the United
States played a significant role in the division of the continent and that the
Yalta conference "followed in the unjust tradition of Munich and the Molotov-Ribbentrop
pact. É Once again, when powerful governments negotiated, the
freedom of small nations was somehow expendable."
THE
ATLANTIC CHARTER (1941)
The
President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister, Mr.
Churchill, representing His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom, being
met together, deem it right to make known certain common principles in the
national policies of their respective countries on which they base their hopes
for a better future for the world.
First,
their countries seek no aggrandizement, territorial or other;
Second,
they desire to see no territorial changes that do not accord with the freely
expressed wishes of the peoples concerned;
Third,
they respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under
which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self government
restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them;
Fourth,
they will endeavor, with due respect for their existing obligations, to further
the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access,
on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are
needed for their economic prosperity;
Fifth,
they desire to bring about the fullest collaboration between all nations in the
economic field with the object of securing, for all, improved labor standards,
economic advancement and social security;
Sixth,
after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny, they hope to see established a
peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within
their own boundaries, and which will afford assurance that all the men in all
the lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want;
Seventh,
such a peace should enable all men to traverse the high seas and oceans without
hindrance;
Eighth,
they believe that all of the nations of the world, for realistic as well as
spiritual reasons must come to the abandonment of the use of force. Since no
future peace can be maintained if land, sea or air armaments continue to be
employed by nations which threaten, or may threaten, aggression outside of
their frontiers, they believe, pending the establishment of a wider and
permanent system of general security, that the disarmament of such nations is
essential. They will likewise aid and encourage all other practicable measures
which will lighten for peace-loving peoples the crushing burden of armaments.
WHAT
DID FDR WANT?
In
our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have
accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of
security and prosperity can be established for all -- regardless of station, or
race or creed. Among these are:
The
right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries, or shops or farms or
mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide
adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of (every) farmers to raise
and sell their (his) products at a return which will give them (him) and their
(his) families (family) a decent living;
The right of every business man, large
and small , to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and
domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent
home;
The right to adequate medical care and
the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from
the economic fears of old age, and sickness, and accident and unemployment;
And finally, the right to a good education.
All
of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared
to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human
happiness and well-being.
FDR,
State Of The Union Address, January 1944
THE
FATE OF GERMANY
There
are two schools of thought, those who would be altruistic in regard to the
Germans, hoping by loving kindness to make them Christians again - and those
who would adopt a much 'tougher' attitude. Most decidedly I belong to the
latter school, for though I am not bloodthirsty, I want the Germans to know
that this time at least they have definitely lost the war FDR,
1944
We
have got to be tough with the Germany and I mean the German people not just the
Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have
got to treat them in such a manner so they can't just go on reproducing people
who want to continue the way they have in the past FDR,
1944
At a
conference between the President and Prime Minister upon the best measures to
prevent renewed rearmament by Germany, it was felt that an essential feature
was the future disposition of the Ruhr and the Saar. The ease
with which the metallurgical, chemical, and electric industries in Germany can
be converted from peace to war has already been impressed upon us by bitter
experience. It must also be remembered that the Germans have devastated a large
portion of the industries of Russia and of
other neighboring Allies, and it is only in accordance with justice that these
injured countries should be entitled to remove the machinery they require in
order to repair the losses they have suffered. The industries referred to in
the Ruhr and in the Saar would therefore be necessarily put out of action and
closed down. It was felt that the two districts should be put under some body
under the world organization which would supervise the dismantling of these
industries and make sure that they were not started up again by some
subterfuge.
This
programme for eliminating the war-making industries in the Ruhr and in the Saar
is looking forward to converting Germany into a country primary agricultural and pastoral in
its character.
Morgenthau
Plan, 1944
If
the German people lay down their weapons, the Soviets, according to the
agreement between Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin, would occupy all of East and
Southeast Europe along with the greater part of the Reich. An "iron
curtain" would fall over this enormous territory controlled by the Soviet
Union, behind which nations would be slaughtered. The Jewish press in London
and New York would probably still be applauding. Josef
Goebbels 1945
It is
difficult to say what is going on, but in general the Russians are acting little
better than thugs. They have wiped out all the liquid assets. No food cards are
issued to Germans, who are forced to travel on foot into the Russian zone,
often more dead than alive. An iron curtain has descended over the fate of
these people and very likely conditions are truly terrible. The promises at
Yalta to the contrary, probably 8 to 10 million people are being enslaved. Allen
Dulles December 1945
From Stettin
in the Baltic
to Trieste
in the Adriatic
an "iron curtain" has descended across the Continent. Behind that
line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw,
Berlin,
Prague,
Vienna,
Budapest,
Belgrade,
Bucharest
and Sofia;
all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call
the Soviet sphere, and all are subject, in one form or another, not only to
Soviet influence but to a very high and in some cases increasing measure of
control from Moscow.
Winston
Churchill, March 1946