UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Civil Action, File Number llll

Julian Heicklen
Antonio Musumeci
Plaintiffs

v.
Complaint:
Case #

U. S. Department of Homeland Security
New York City Fire Department
Saint Vincent Hospital
Bellevue Medical Center
New York Downtown Hospital
U. S. Central Violations Bureau
et al.
Defendants
List of Defendants on next pages

GOVERNMENT AND HOSPITAL MISCONDUCT

____________________
Julian Heicklen
Plaintiff
Counsel, pro se
734 Rutland Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
Telephone: 814 880 9308
_____________________
Antonio Musumeci
Plaintiff
Counsel, pro se
809 Fairview Lane
Fort Lee, NJ 07024
Telephone: 201 777 0009
Plaintiffs

ADDRESSES OF DEFENDANTS

Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Janet Napolitano, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, Telephone 800-375-5283

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer C. Barnes #245, Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer Wong #213, Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer Roomnd #234, Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866- DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 1 (11/02/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 2 (11/02/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 1 (11/16/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 2 (11/16/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866--DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 3 (11/016/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 1 (11/23/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866-DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 2 (11/23/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866- DHS-2-ICE

Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officer John Doe 3 (11/023/09), Federal Protective Service, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536, Telephone 1-866- DHS-2-ICE

Alan D. Aviles, President & Chief Executive, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 125 Worth Street, New York, New York 10013, Telephone not listed

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center, Henry J. Amoroso, President and Chief Executive Officer, 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011, Telephone 212-604-7000

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center ambulance driver (10/19/09) 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011, Telephone 212-604-7000

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center ambulance Nurse 1 (10/19/09) 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011, Telephone 212-604-7000

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center ambulance Nurse 2 (10/19/09), 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011, Telephone 212-604-7000

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center admitting nurse (10/19/09) 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011,Telephone 212-604-7000

Saint Vincent's Manhattan Medical Center Psychiatrist (10/19/09), 170 West 12th Street, New York, NY 10011, Telephone 212-504-7000

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Driver (10/26/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Nurse 1 (10/26/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Nurse 2 (10/26/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Admitting Nurse (10/26/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Driver (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Nurse 1 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Ambulance Nurse 2 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Admitting Nurse (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatrist Dr. Lowe, Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatrist Dr. Elizabeth Steicker Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Dr. Megan C. Poe Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Social Worker Kari Wolf LCSW-R Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212 -562 7665

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatric Assistant 1 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatric Assistant 2 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatric Assistant 3 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Psychiatric Assistant 4 (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

Bellevue Hospital Center Nurse who administered injection (11/02/09) Bellevue Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, Unit: CPEP462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4811, Room 19E1, Telephone 212-562-4961

MD Farque, Department of Finance, Bellevue Hospital Center, First Avenue and 27th Street, New York, NY 19916, Telephone 212-562-4141

New York City Fire Department, Nicholas Scoppetta, Fire Commissioner, 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, NY 10005, Telephone: 212-809-4887

New York City Fire Department Medics John Does 1 & 2, 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza,. New York, NY 10005, Telephone: 212-809-4887

New York Downtown Hospital, Jeffrey Menkes, President and Chief Executive Officer, 170 William Street, New York, NY 10038-2649, (212) 346-7981

New York Downtown Hospital, Emergency Services, 170 William Street, New York, NY 10038-2649, (212) 346-7981, Ambulance Driver

New York Downtown Hospital, Emergency Services, 170 William Street, New York, NY 10038-2649, (212) 346-7981, ambulance attendants 1 & 2

New York Downtown Hospital, Emergency Services, 170 William Street, New York, NY 10038-2649, (212) 346-7981, Admitting nurses 1, 2, 3, & 4

U. S. Central Violations Bureau, Michael F. Oakes, Divisional Office Manager, U.S. District Clerk's Office, 655 East Durango Blvd., Room G65, San Antonio, Texas 78206, (210) 472-6550

ABSTRACT

Plaintiff Heicklen was distributing literature in front of the U. S. District Courthouse for the Southern District of New York on six successive Mondays in October and November, 2009. He was arrested and cited by the U. S. Department of Homeland Security police and imprisoned in three different hospitals. Plaintiff Musumeci was cited for photographing the event of November 9, 2009. Plaintiffs are suing the Department of Homeland Security the New York City Fire Department, Saint Vincent Hospital, Bellevue Medical Center, the New York Downtown Hospital, U. S. Central Violations Bureau, and many of their employees for violation of their civil rights under U. S. Constitution Amendments I, IV, V, XIV; kidnapping and unlawful detention; assault; coercion; robbery, larceny, extortion and embezzlement; perjury; fraud; official misconduct; obstructing emergency medical services; and enterprise corruption.

CITATIONS

1. U. S. Constitution
Article I, Section 8
Article IIl, Sections 1 and 2
Amendments I, IV, V, VII, & XIV

2. U. S. Statutes
18 USC #3 Accessory after the fact
18 USC #13 Laws of States adopted for areas within Federal jurisdiction
18 USC #111(A) Impeding/Opposing Federal Officer
18 USC #152(6) Extortion and Bribery
18 USC #241 Conspiracy against rights
18 USC #242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC #286 Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to claims
18 USC #287 False, fictitious or fraudulent claims
18. USC #351(e). Assault
18 USC #371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to
18 USC #645 Court officers generally
18 USC #872 Extortion by officers or employees of the United States
18 USC #1035 False statements relating to health care matters
18 USC #1038 False information and hoaxes
18 USC #1201 Kidnapping
18 USC #1621 Perjury generally
18 USC #2236 Searches without warrant
18 USC #3742. Review of a sentence
28 USC Part IV Ch. 85 #1367. supplemental Jurisdiction
42 USC #1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights

3. U. S. Regulations
41 CFR, subsection C #102-74.415(c) for distributing literature
41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420 for photographing without a permit
41 CFR #102-71.25. Who must comply with GSA's real property policies

4. New York State Statutes
New York Penal Law #105.05 Conspiracy in the fifth degree.
New York Penal Law #110.00 Attempt to commit a crime
New York Penal Law #115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree.
New York Penal Law #120.00 Assault in the third degree
New York Penal Law #120.05 Assault in the second degree.
New York Penal Law #120.14 Menacing in the second degree.
New York Penal Law #135.00 Unlawful imprisonment, kidnapping and custodial interference
New York Penal Law #135.05 Unlawful imprisonment in the second degree.
New York Penal Law #135.20 Kidnapping in the second degree
New York Penal Law #135.25 Kidnapping in the first degree
New York Penal Law #135.60 Coercion in the second degree
New York Penal Law #140.25 Burglary in the second degree
New York Penal Law #145.14 Criminal tampering in the third degree.
New York Penal Law #155.05 Larceny
New York Penal Law #160.00 Robbery
New York Penal Law #160.05 Robbery in the third degree
New York Penal Law #165.40 Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.
New York Penal Law #175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree
New York Penal Law #195.00 Official misconduct
New York Penal Law #195.16 Obstructing emergency medical services.
New York Penal Law #210.05 Perjury in the third degree
New York Penal Law #210.10 Perjury in the second degree
New York Penal Law #210.15 Perjury in the first degree
New York Penal Law #240.50 Falsely reporting an incident in the third degree.
New York Penal Law #250.35 Failing to report criminal communications.
New York Penal Law #460.20 Enterprise corruption.

5. U. S. Court Opinions
Thais Cardoso Almeida v. Amazon.com, Inc. Nos 04-115341 & 04-15561, DC Docket No. 04-20004-CV-MGC July 18, 2006) U. S. Circuit Court for the 11th District, appeal from U. S. district Court for the Southern district of Florida
United States of America v. Juan Carlos Bonilla Velasquez, No. 05-3002 US. Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit submitted April 25, 2006, filed June 1, 2006. appeal from U. S. district Court for the Middle District of PA, Criminal No. 03-cr-00068-01
Guarro v. United States, 237 F.2d 578, 580 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169, 177 (1958)
Watts v. United States, 402 F.2d 676 (D.C. Cir. 1968), rev'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 705 (1969)
United States v. Masel, 563 F.2d 322 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 (1978)
Guerrero, 667 F.2d 862 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 964 (1982).
Ethridge v, Rhodes, DC Ohio 268F Supp 83 (1967)
Whirl v. Kern CA 5 Texas 407 F 2d 781 (1968)

6. Florida Statutes
FL Statute #540.08: Unauthorized publication of name or likeness
FL Statute #772.11: Civil remedy for theft or exploitation

7. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 27. Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal
Form 2. Allegation of Jurisdiction

8. Other
Mirriam-Webster online dictionary defines arrest
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrest

Videos of October 26, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnnwQ2RPMxg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnnwQ2RPMxg
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-26370-Libertarian-News-Examiner~y2009m10d28-Jury-activist-arrested-for-exercising-First-Amendment-rights.

Videos of November 9, 2009
http://blogofbile.com/2009/11/10/julian-heicklens-fija-outreach-2009-11-09-arrest-video/
http://blogofbile.com/tag/julian-heicklen/?order=ASC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3wVobgcQfk

Video of November 16, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crlw5luM5zI

9. Sited in Exhibit U
Olmstead U. S., 277 US 348, 485 S. Ct. 564, 575; LEd 944
28 USCA 2411
Pfizer v. Lord, 456 F 2d 532; cert denied 92 S. Ct. 2411; US Ct App MN, (1972)
Gross v. State of Illinois F 2d 257 (1963)
Firemens Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. Washburn County, 2 Wisc 2d 214 (1957)

CONTENTS
Page
A. JURISDICTION..........................................................................................................................................................................12

B. STANDINGS...............................................................................................................................................................................15

C. LEGAL TERMS..........................................................................................................................................................................16

D. PERTINENT HISTORY.............................................................................................................................................................43

E. CLAIMS......................................................................................................................................................................................62

F. CAUSES OF ACTION...............................................................................................................................................................62

G. DAMAGES................................................................................................................................................................................70

H. REMEDIES SOUGHT...............................................................................................................................................................71

I. MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL.....................................................................................................................................................72

J. SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS...................................................................................................................................................72

K. CHARGE TO THE COURT.....................................................................................................................................................72

L. AFFIDAVIT OF Plaintiff Heicklen............................................................................................................................................73

M. EXHIBITS..................................................................................................................................................................................73

A. JURISDICTION

1. Jurisdiction rules are listed in FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITH FORMS DECEMBER 1, 2006.
2. Rule 27. "Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal (a) BEFORE ACTION. (1) Petition. A person who desires to perpetuate testimony regarding any matter that may be cognizable in any court of the United States may file a verified petition in the United States district court in the district of the residence of any expected adverse party."
3. Form 2. "Allegation of Jurisdiction (a) Jurisdiction founded on diversity of citizenship and amount. Plaintiffs are citizens of the State of New Jersey. All Defendants are government officials of New York City or New York State (b) Jurisdiction founded on the existence of Federal questions. The action arises under the Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power... To Constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;" and Article IIl, Sections 1 and 2.
4. U. S. Constitution Article III, Sec 1 states in part:

"The judicial power of the United states, shall be invested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."

5. U. S. Constitution Article III, Sec 2 and other U. S. statutes, which include 18 U. S. C. Part I, Ch. I # 3, 18 U.S.C. # 242,42 U. S. C #1983, and 28 USC, PART IV, CHAPTER 85 #1367 gives the federal government authority to prosecute offenses against Amendments I, IV, V, & XIV.
6. 18 U. S. C. Part I, Ch. I #3(a) states:

"Whoever within or upon any of the places now existing or hereafter reserved or acquired as provided in section7 of this title, or on, above, or below any portion of the territorial sea of the United States not within the jurisdiction of any State, Commonwealth, territory, possession, or district is guilty of any act or omission which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State, Territory, Possession, or District in which such place is situated, by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment."

7. 18 U.S.C. #242 states:

"Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."

8. 42 U. S. C #1983 states in part:

"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress,..."

9. 28 USC, PART IV, CHAPTER 85 #1367 Supplemental jurisdiction states:

"(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties."

10. The residence of none of the Defendants is known to Plaintiff Heicklen. However, the litigation is not directed against any of the Defendants as private citizens, but in their professional capacities. All Defendants, except Janet Napolitano and Michael F. Oakes, have offices in New York County.
11. The laws of New York state are enforcible by the U. S. Courts under 18 USC #13. Laws of States adopted for areas within Federal jurisdiction:

"(a) Whoever within or upon any of the places now existing or hereafter reserved or acquired as provided in section 7 of this title, or on, above, or below any portion of the territorial sea of the United States not within the jurisdiction of any State, Commonwealth, territory, possession, or district is guilty of any act or omission which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State, Territory, Possession, or District in which such place is situated, by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment."

12. Therefore the laws of New York State become enforceable by the U. S. Courts as shown in United States of America v. Juan Carlos Bonilla Velasquez, U. S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, No 05-3002 (on appeal from the U. S. District Court for the Middle District of PA, D.C. Criminal No. 03-cr-00068-01) (filed June 1, 2006) and Thias Cardoso Almeida v. Amazon.Com, Inc. U. S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, No 04-15341 & 04-15561 (on appeal from the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of FL, D.C. Docket No. 04-20004-CV-MGC) (July 18, 2006).
13. In U.S. v. Velasquez, the Court of Appeals ruled that it had jurisdiction to enforce N. Y. Penal Law #140.25 and #110.00 on Velasquez (a citizen of Honduras) pursuant too 18 U.S.C. #3742(a).
14. In Almeida v. Amazon, the Court of Appeals ruled that it had jurisdiction to enforce FL Statutes #540.08 and #772.11.

B. STANDINGS

15. Plaintiffs are the aggrieved parties who are seeking redress.They are acting as counsels pro se.
16. All of the named Defendants were directly involved in criminal actions against Plaintiff Heicklen. Some Defendants were also involved in criminal actions against Plaintif Musumeci.

C. LEGAL TERMS
1. Arrest
17. Mirriam-Webster online dictionary defines arrest (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrest) as:

"seize, capture; specifically: to take or keep in custody by authority of law."

18. This would be a legal arrest.
19. An illegal arrest would be one in which the arresting officers thought they had authority of law, but were mistaken. Usually, the officers would be immune from prosecutions for this honest mistake.
20. If the officers know, or should know, that they have no legal right to take a person into custody, the legal term used is "false arrest."
21. "False arrest" is an oxymoron used by the legal profession to obfuscate the event it describes. There is no such thing as a false arrest. If one is seized and taken prisoner, there is nothing false about it.
22. A false arrest is really unlawful imprisonment or kidnapping.

2. U. S. Constitution Amendments
23. Several U. S. Constitution issues are involved. These are:
24. U. S. Constitution, Amendment I: "Congress shall make no law ...prohibiting the right of the people peaceably to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
25. U. S. Constitution, Amendment IV: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,..:"
26. U. S. Constitution, Amendment V "No person shall be....deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law"
27. U. S. Constitution, Amendment VII: "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,..."
28. U. S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1: "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without the process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

3. Violation of Constitutional rights
29. TITLE 42 USC #1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights states:

"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia."

30. Title 18 USC #242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

"Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."

4. Kidnapping and unlawful detention
31.Kidnapping is defined as:

"The crime of unlawfully seizing and carrying away a person by force or fraud, or seizing and detaining a person against his or her will with an intent to carry that person away at a later time." (dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Kidnapping)

32. New York State Law penal Code Article #135 states:

#135.00 Unlawful imprisonment, kidnapping and custodial interference.The following definitions are applicable to this article:

1. "Restrain" means to restrict a person`s movements intentionally and unlawfully in such manner as to interfere substantially with his liberty by moving him from one place to another, or by confining him either in the place where the restriction commences or in a place to which he has been moved, without consent and with knowledge that the restriction is unlawful. A person is so moved or confined "without consent" when such is accomplished by
(a) physical force, intimidation or deception
2. "Abduct" means to restrain a person with intent to prevent his liberation by either
(a) secreting or holding him in a place where he is not likely to be found. (I point out that my daughter could not find me until contacted later by the police.)

#135.05 Unlawful imprisonment in the second degree.
A person is guilty of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree when he restrains another person. Unlawful imprisonment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

#135.20 Kidnapping in the second degree
A person is guilty of kidnapping in the second degree when he abducts another person. It is a class B felony.

#135.25 #2(d). Kidnapping in the first degree.
A person is guilty of kidnapping in the first degree when he abducts another person and when:
2. He restrains the person abducted for a period of more than twelve hours with intent to
(d) Interfere with the performance of a governmental or political function

33. The federal law for kidnapping is given in 18 Part I Ch 55 #120

(a) "Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when (2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States."

5. Assault
34. New York Sate law Penal Code #120.00. A person is guilty of assault in the third degree when:

"1. With intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person: or
2. He recklessly causes physical injury to another person; or
3. With criminal negligence, he causes physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument.
Assault in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor."

35. Criminal Resource Manual Ch. 1610 Assault—18 USC #351(e)
The assault provision of 18 U.S.C #351(e) divides assault into two categories: those that result in personal injury, which are punishable by 10 years of imprisonment and a fine; and all others, which are punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine. The applicable fine is determined by the provisions of 18 U.S.C. #3571. The legislative history of the section shows that the lower penalty was intended for situations in which a person strikes with his or her fist at a Member of Congress without landing the blow, or strikes only with an open hand and causes no lasting injury.
36. Absent a statutory definition of assault, the courts have looked to the common law and have concluded that an "assault" is:

"An attempt with force or violence to do a corporal injury to another; may consist of any act tending to such corporal injury, accompanied with such circumstances as denotes at the time an intention, coupled with present ability, of using actual violence against the person."

Guarro v. United States, 237 F.2d 578, 580 (D.C. Cir. 1956).
37. But, of course, an assault can also be committed "merely by putting another in apprehension of harm whether or not the actor actually intends to inflict, or is capable of inflicting that harm." Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169, 177 (1958).
38. Proof of this form of assault requires establishment of a reasonable apprehension of the immediate application of force to the victim.
39. Note also that a condition in an offer of violence may negate the element of apprehension. For an excellent discussion of this concept, see Watts v. United States, 402 F.2d 676 (D.C. Cir. 1968), rev'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 705 (1969).
40. While the conviction of assaulting a Congressman requires proof that the defendant willfully caused an offensive touching, it is not necessary to prove a more severe injury. See also United States v. Masel, 563 F.2d 322 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 (1978) (spitting into the face).
41. Throwing eggs at a Congressman running for President was an assault under the statute and did not constitute protected symbolic political speech. See United States v. Guerrero, 667 F.2d 862 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 964 (1982).
42. As the statute does not provide for aggravated assaults, involving use of deadly or dangerous weapons without inflicting personal injury, application of the attempted homicide provision should be considered in those cases where the penalty for simple assault appears unsuitable.
43. New York Penal Law #120.05 Assault in the second degree.

"A person is guilty of assault in the second degree when:

1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person; or
2. With intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument; or
3. With intent to prevent a peace officer, police officer, a fireman, includinga fireman acting as a paramedic or emergency medical technician administering first aid in the course of performance of duty as such fireman, an emergency medical service paramedic or emergency medical service technician, or medical or related personnel in a hospital emergency department, from performing a lawful duty, by means including releasing or failing to control an animal under circumstances evincing the actor's intent that the animal obstruct the lawful activity of such peace officer, police officer, fireman, paramedic or technician, he causes physical injury to such peace officer, police officer, fireman, paramedic, technician or medical or related personnel in a hospital emergency department; or
4. He recklessly causes serious physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument; or
5. For a purpose other than lawful medical or therapeutic treatment, he intentionally causes stupor, unconsciousness or other physical impairment or injury to another person by administering to him, without his consent, a drug, substance or preparation capable of producing the same; or
6. In the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempted commission of a felony, other than a felony defined in article one hundred thirty which requires corroboration for conviction, or of immediate flight therefrom, he, or another participant if there be any, causes physical injury to a person other than one of the participants; or
7. Having been charged with or convicted of a crime and while confined in a correctional facility, as defined in subdivision three of section forty of the correction law, pursuant to such charge or conviction, with intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person; or
8. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly causes serious physical injury to such person; or
9. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical injury to a person less than seven years old, the defendant causes such injury to such person; or
10. Acting at a place the person knows, or reasonably should know, is on school grounds and with intent to cause physical injury, he or she:
(a) causes such injury to an employee of a school or public school district; or
(b) not being a student of such school or public school district, causes physical injury to another, and such other person is a student of such school who is attending or present for educational purposes. For purposes of this subdivision the term "school grounds" shall have the meaning set forth in subdivision fourteen of section 220.00 of this chapter.
11. With intent to cause physical injury to a train operator, ticket inspector, conductor, bus operator or station agent employed by any transit agency, authority or company, public or private, whose operation is authorized by New York state or any of its political subdivisions, he or she causes physical injury to such train operator, ticket inspector, conductor, bus operator or station agent while such employee is performing an assigned duty on, or directly related to, the operation of a train or bus.
Assault in the second degree is a class D felony."

6. Coercion
44. New York Penal Law #135.60 Coercion in the second degree.

"A person is guilty of coercion in the second degree when he compels or induces a person to engage in conduct which the latter has a legal right to abstain from engaging in, or to abstain from engaging in conduct in which he has a legal right to engage, by means of instilling in him a fear that, if the demand is not complied with, the actor or another will:
1. Cause physical injury to a person; or
2. Cause damage to property; or
3. Engage in other conduct constituting a crime; or
4. Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against him; or
5. Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or
6. Cause a strike, boycott or other collective labor group action injurious to some person's business; except that such a threat shall not be deemed coercive when the act or omission compelled is for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act; or
7. Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another's legal claim or defense; or
8. Use or abuse his position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to his official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely; or
9. Perform any other act which would not in itself materially benefit the actor but which is calculated to harm another person materially with respect to his health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation or personal relationships.
Coercion in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor."

7. Robbery
45. NY Penal Law #160.00: Robbery is forcible stealing. a person forcibly steals property and commits robbery when, in the course of committing a larceny, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the purpose of:

"1. Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking: or
2. Compelling the owner of such property or another person to deliver up the property or to engage in other conduct which aids in the commission of the larceny."

46. New York Penal Law #160.05 Robbery in the third degree.

"A person is guilty of robbery in the third degree when he forcibly steals property. Robbery in the third degree is a class D felony."

47. Federal robbery laws are not applicable as far as Plaintiffs are aware.

8. Larceny
48. New York State Penal Law #155.05: Larceny

"1. A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same or withholds such property from an owner thereof.
2. Larceny includes a wrongful taking, obtaining or withholding another's property, with the intent prescribed in subdivision one of this section, committed in any of the following ways:
(a) By conduct heretofore defined or known as common law larceny by trespassory taking, common law larceny by trick, embezzlement, or obtaining property by false pretenses;
(e) By extortion. A person obtains property by extortion when he compels or induces another person to deliver such property to himself or to a third person by means of instilling him fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or another will:
(viii) Use or abuse his position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to his official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely; or

(ix) Performs any other act which would not in itself materially benefit the actor but which is calculated to harm another person materially with respect to his heath, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation or personal relationships."

49. New York Penal Law #165.40 Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

"A person is guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree when he knowingly possesses stolen property, with intent to benefit himself or a person other than an owner thereof or to impede the recovery by an owner thereof. Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is a class A misdemeanor."

50. Federal larceny laws are not applicable as far as Plaintiffs are aware.

9. Extortion
51. TITLE 18 USC #152(6) Extortion and Bribery states:

"A person who...knowingly and fraudulently gives, offers, receives,
or
attempts to obtain any money or property, remuneration, compensation, reward, advantage, or promise thereof for acting
or
forbearing to act in any case under title 11;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."

"There is no requirement that the act or forbearance from acting be unlawful itself. Acting or not acting with the required criminal intent is sufficient."

52. TITLE 18 USC #872. Extortion by officers or employees of the United States

"Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of office or employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

53. TITLE 18 USC #1035. False statements relating to health care matters

"(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully--
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24 (b) of this title."

10. Embezzlement
54. TITLE 18 USC #645. Court officers generally

"Whoever, being a United States marshal, clerk, receiver, referee, trustee, or other officer of a United States court, or any deputy, assistant, or employee of any such officer, retains or converts to his own use or to the use of another or after demand by the party entitled thereto, unlawfully retains any money coming into his hands by virtue of his official relation, position or employment, is guilty of embezzlement and shall, where the offense is not otherwise punishable by enactment of Congress, be fined under this title or not more than double the value of the money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the amount embezzled does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. It shall not be a defense that the accused person had any interest in such moneys or fund."

11. Perjury
55. New York Penal Law #210.05 Perjury in the third degree.

"A person is guilty of perjury in the third degree when he swears falsely. Perjury in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor."

56. New York Penal Law #210.10 Perjury in the second degree.

"A person is guilty of perjury in the second degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement is
(a) made in a subscribed written instrument for which an oath is required by law, and
(b) made with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official functions, and
(c) material to the action, proceeding or matter involved.
Perjury in the second degree is a class E felony."

57. New York Penal Law #210.15 Perjury in the first degree.

"A person is guilty of perjury in the first degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement

(a) consists of testimony, and
(b) is material to the action, proceeding or matter in which it is made.
Perjury in the first degree is a class D felony."

58. TITLE 18 USC #1621. Perjury generally

"Whoever--
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."

59. TITLE 18 USC #1035. False statements relating to health care matters

"(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully--
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24 (b) of this title."

60. TITLE 18 USC #1038. False information and hoaxes

"(a) Criminal Violation."
(1) In general."Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49, shall"
(A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and (C) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.
(2) Armed forces.-Any person who makes a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged-
(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(C) if death results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any number of years or for life, or both. (b) Civil Action."Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505 (b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49 is liable in a civil action to any party incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(c) Reimbursement."
(1) In general."The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of an offense under subsection (a), shall order the defendant to reimburse any state or local government, or private not-for-profit organization that provides fire or rescue service incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(2) Liability."A person ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses with each other person, if any, who is ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection for the same expenses.
(3) Civil judgment."An order of reimbursement under this subsection shall, for the purposes of enforcement, be treated as a civil judgment.
(d) Activities of Law Enforcement."This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States."

61. Plaintiff Heicklen was charged with 18 U.S.C. #111. Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees

"(a) In General. - Whoever -

1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person's term of service, shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physicalcontact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b) Enhanced Penalty. - Whoever, in the commission of any actsdescribed in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both."

62. However, officer Barnes committed perjury because no such act occurred. A video taken by Derek DeMarco of the incident of October 26, 2009, (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnnwQ2RPMxg) shows Plaintiff Heicklen lying motionless on his back.He was removed on a stretcher by an ambulance crew and transported to Bellevue Medical Center.

12. Fraud
63. TITLE 18 USC #286. Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to claims

"Whoever enters into any agreement, combination, or conspiracy to defraud the United States, or any department or agency thereof, by obtaining or aiding to obtain the payment or allowance of any false, fictitious or fraudulent claim, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

64. TITLE 18 USC #287. False, fictitious or fraudulent claims

"Whoever makes or presents to any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the United States, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be imprisoned not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in this title."

65. TITLE 18 USC #371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

"If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor."

66. TITLE 18 USC #1035. False statements relating to health care matters

"(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully"
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry,
in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24 (b) of this title."

67. TITLE 18 USC #1038. False information and hoaxes

"(a) Criminal Violation."
(1) In general."Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49, shall"
(A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(C) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.
(2) Armed forces."Any person who makes a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged"
(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(C) if death results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any number of years or for life, or both.
(b) Civil Action."Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505 (b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49 is liable in a civil action to any party incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(c) Reimbursement."
(1) In general."The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of an offense under subsection (a), shall order the defendant to reimburse any state or local government, or private not-for-profit organization that provides fire or rescue service incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(2) Liability."A person ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses with each other person, if any, who is ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection for the same expenses.
(3) Civil judgment."An order of reimbursement under this subsection shall, for the purposes of enforcement, be treated as a civil judgment.
(d) Activities of Law Enforcement."This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States."

68. TITLE 18 USC #1035. False statements relating to health care matters

"(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully-
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24 (b) of this title."

69. TITLE 18 USC #1038. False information and hoaxes

"(a) Criminal Violation."
(1) In general.-Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49, shall-
(A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(C) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.
(2) Armed forces."Any person who makes a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged"
(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B) if serious bodily injury results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(C) if death results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any number of years or for life, or both.
(b) Civil Action."Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505 (b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123 (b) of title 49 is liable in a civil action to any party incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(c) Reimbursement.-
(1) In general.-The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of an offense under subsection (a), shall order the defendant to reimburse any state or local government, or private not-for-profit organization that provides fire or rescue service incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.
(2) Liability."A person ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses with each other person, if any, who is ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection for the same expenses.
(3) Civil judgment."An order of reimbursement under this subsection shall, for the purposes of enforcement, be treated as a civil judgment.
(d) Activities of Law Enforcement."This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States."

70. New York Penal Law #240.50 Falsely reporting an incident in the third degree.

"A person is guilty of falsely reporting an incident in the third degree when, knowing the information reported, conveyed or circulated to be false or baseless, he:
1. Initiates or circulates a false report or warning of an alleged occurrence or impending occurrence of a crime, catastrophe or emergency under circumstances in which it is not unlikely that public alarm or inconvenience will result; or
2. Reports, by word or action, to an official or quasi-official agency ororganization having the function of dealing with emergencies involving danger to life or property, an alleged occurrence or impending occurrence of a catastrophe or emergency which did not in fact occur or does not in fact exist; or
3. Gratuitously reports to a law enforcement officer or agency
(a) the alleged occurrence of an offense or incident which did not in fact occur; or
(b) an allegedly impending occurrence of an offense or incident which in fact is not about to occur; or
(c) false information relating to an actual offense or incident or to the alleged implication of some person therein; or
4. Reports, by word or action, to the statewide central register of child abuse and maltreatment, as defined in title six of article six of the social services law, an alleged occurrence or condition of child abuse or maltreatment which did not in fact occur or exist.
Falsely reporting an incident in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor."

71. TITLE 18 USC #1621. Perjury generally

Whoever-
"(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."

13.Conspiracy
72. TITLE 18 USC #241. Conspiracy against rights

"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."

73. New York Penal Law #250.35. Failing to report criminal communications.

"1. It shall be the duty of a telephone or telegraph corporation, or an entity operating an electronic communications service, and of any employee, officer or representative thereof having knowledge that the facilities of such corporation or entity are being used to conduct any criminal business, traffic or transaction, to furnish or attempt to furnish to an appropriate law enforcement officer or agency all pertinent information within his possession relating to such matter, and to cooperate fully with any law enforcement officer or agency investigating such matter.
2. A person is guilty of failing to report criminal communications when he knowingly violates any duty prescribed in subdivision one of this section.

Failing to report criminal communications is a class B misdemeanor."

74.New York Penal Law #115.00. Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree.

"A person is guilty of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree when, believing it probable that he is rendering aid:
1. to a person who intends to commit a crime, he engages in conduct which provides such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aids such person to commit a felony; or
2. to a person under sixteen years of age who intends to engage in conduct which would constitute a crime, he, being over eighteen years of age, engages in conduct which provides such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aids such person to commit a crime.

Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree is a class A misdemeanor."

75. New York Penal Law #145.14 Criminal tampering in the third degree.

"A person is guilty of criminal tampering in the third degree when, having no right to do so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he has such right, he tampers with property of another person with intent to cause substantial inconvenience to such person or to a third person.

Criminal tampering in the third degree is a class B misdemeanor."

14. Misconduct
76. New York Penal Law #195.00 Official misconduct.

"A public servant is guilty of official misconduct when, with intent to obtain a benefit or deprive another person of a benefit:
1. He commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized; or
2. He knowingly refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.

Official misconduct is a class A misdemeanor."

77. TITLE 18 USC #2236. Searches without warrant

"Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, engaged in the enforcement of any law of the United States, searches any private dwelling used and occupied as such dwelling without a warrant directing such search, or maliciously and without reasonable cause searches any other building or property without a search warrant, shall be fined under this title for a first offense; and, for a subsequent offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
This section shall not apply to any person-
(a) serving a warrant of arrest; or
(b) arresting or attempting to arrest a person committing or attempting to commit an offense in his presence, or who has committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having committed a felony; or
(c) making a search at the request or invitation or with the consent of the occupant of the premises."

78. New York Penal Law #195.16 #195.16 Obstructing emergency medical services.

"A person is guilty of obstructing emergency medical services when he or she intentionally and unreasonably obstructs the efforts of any service, technician, personnel, system or unit specified in section three thousand one of the public health law in the performance of their duties.

Obstructing emergency medical services is a class A misdemeanor."

79. New York Penal Law #460.20 Enterprise corruption.

"1. A person is guilty of enterprise corruption when, having knowledge of the existence of a criminal enterprise and the nature of its activities, and being employed by or associated with such enterprise,
he:
(a) intentionally conducts or participates in the affairs of an enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or
(b) intentionally acquires or maintains any interest in or control of an enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or
(c) participates in a pattern of criminal activity and knowingly invests any proceeds derived from that conduct, or any proceeds derived from the investment or use of those proceeds, in an enterprise.
2. For purposes of this section, a person participates in a pattern of criminal activity when, with intent to participate in or advance the affairs of the criminal enterprise, he engages in conduct constituting, or, is criminally liable for pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter, at least three of the criminal acts included in the pattern, provided
that:
(a) Two of his acts are felonies other than conspiracy;
(b) Two of his acts, one of which is a felony, occurred within five years of the commencement of the criminal action; and
(c) Each of his acts occurred within three years of a prior act.
3. For purposes of this section, the enterprise corrupted in violation of subdivision one of this section need not be the criminal enterprise by which the person is employed or with which he is associated, and may be a legitimate enterprise.

Enterprise corruption is a class B felony."

D. PERTINENT HISTORY

1. October 19. 2009
80. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, October 19, 2009.The weather was perfect: about 50*F and sunny.Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse holding a sign which said "JURY INFO" (Exhibit A).
81. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out the Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA) pamphlet entitled "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" (Exhibit B) along with his flyer (Exhibit C).
82. Within a few minutes a Homeland Security police officer approached Plaintiff Heicklen, accepted a pamphlet, informed Plaintiff Heicklen that he cannot distribute literature on federal property without a permit, and asked Plaintiff Heicklen to leave. Plaintiff Heicklen disagreed with him and said that he would not leave. The officer left momentarily, but soon returned with another officer, and the conversation was repeated.
83. Then one officer left the scene, but the other officer stayed and said that the other officer was checking with headquarters. In a few minutes he left also.
84. Plaintiff Heicklen continued distributing literature.
85. At 12:10 pm two federal marshals exited the court house and approached Plaintiff Heicklen. They accepted Plaintiff Heicklen's literature and informed him that he could not distribute literature on federal property without a permit.
86. Plaintiff Heicklen stated that he had a permit, and removed his pocket U. S. Constitution from his pocket. The federal marshals informed Plaintiff Heicklen that they had the same document. Plaintiff Heicklen told them to read Amendment I. They returned to the courthouse.
87. Plaintiff Heicklen continued his activity until all but one of the FIJA pamphlets had been distributed.
88. At 12:18 pm, Plaintiff Heicklen noticed the two Homeland Security officers across the street. Soon they were joined by a third officer, who apparently was in command.
89. They crossed the street at about 12:30 pm and approached Plaintiff Heicklen. The third officer stated that he did not want to arrest Plaintiff Heicklen, but that Plaintiff Heicklen had to move.
90. There followed some discussion. Plaintiff Heicklen was asked for his name, but refused to provide it.
91. One of the other officers said that Plaintiff Heicklen was being confrontational. Plaintiff Heicklen reminded him that they approached Plaintiff Heicklen, and that they were the ones being confrontational.
92. The boss officer asked Plaintiff Heicklen to move over to the side, where we could discuss the issue. Plaintiff Heicklen refused.
93. One of the other officers grabbed Plaintiff Heicklen's arm. Plaintiff Heicklen asked if he was under arrest, and was informed no. Then Plaintiff Heicklen demanded that the officer holding his arm let go, which he did.
94. At this point Plaintiff Heicklen was placed under arrest, fell to the ground and remained limp and silent. He was handcuffed behind his back and searched. All his possessions, including what was in his clothes pockets, but not his clothes, were removed by the police.
95. Plaintiff Heicklen had no identification with him, so they never found out his name or address. They waited a short while, but Plaintiff Heicklen did not move.
96. An ambulance was called. It arrived at about 12:50 pm. Plaintiff Heicklen was transferred to a gurney and put into the ambulance.
97. The police transferred custody of Plaintiff Heicklen to the ambulance crew. Plaintiff Heicklen was taken to Saint Vincent Hospital in Manhattan.
98. The nurse attending Plaintiff Heicklen in the ambulance called a person listed in Plaintiff Heicklen's cell phone to inform her that Plaintiff Heicklen was all right and under medical custody. The nurse asked the person to identify Plaintiff Heicklen, but she refused.
99. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the hospital at 1:15 pm and laid on a bed. Several doctors and nurses examined him and checked his vital signs. Plaintiff Heicklen did not move a muscle or utter a sound from the time of his arrest until 5:00 pm.
100. The nurses pinched Plaintiff Heicklen's nipples in an effort to get him to talk.
101. During much of the afternoon, Plaintiff Heicklen took a nap. At 5:00 pm a psychiatrist approached Plaintiff Heicklen for an interview.
102. At this point, Plaintiff Heicklen responded to most of the psychiatrist's questions. Plaintiff Heicklen did not provide his name or address.
103. The psychiatrist decided that Plaintiff Heicklen was a harmless nut and released him with instructions to attend a psychiatric clinic.
104. Plaintiff Heicklen signed his name as Ayn Rand on the hospital release papers, recovered most of his property, and left the hospital for home at 5:50 pm. However the police had confiscated Plaintiff Heicklen's sign, which read JURY INFO (Exhibit A).
105. There is an interesting legal point here. The federal government presumably has a regulation that no person can exercise his or her First Amendment rights without a permit on federal property. Presumably, state and local governments could pass identical violations. Then the only place left to protest would be on private property. But that is trespassing.
106. In this way the First Amendment would be repealed. We must not let the federal regulation stand!

2. Incident of October 26, 2009
107. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, October 26, 2009. The weather was perfect: about 60*F and sunny. Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse holding a sign which said "JURY INFO" (Exhibit A).
108. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out the FIJA pamphlet entitled "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" (Exhibit B) along with his flyer (Exhibit C). Immediately the three Department of Homeland Security Officers of last week approached him and told him that he could not pass out that material.
109. Plaintiff Heicklen informed them that he could. They said that he could not and that Plaintiff Heicklen had quoted the wrong citation in his e-mail distribution of last week.
110. They had checked the FBI records to find Plaintiff Heicklen's identity and accessed his web page. They said that if Plaintiff Heicklen distributed the FIJA pamphlets, he would be put under arrest.
111. Plaintiff Heicklen asked for the statute that they use. They said 41 CFR Sec 102-74.415(c) (Exhibit D).
112. Plaintiff Heicklen asked them to identify themselves and they did. The officer in charge was C. Barnes #245. The other two were Wong #213 and Roomnd #234. They work for the Federal Protection Service of the Department of Homeland Security.
113. Plaintiff Heicklen started to distribute a pamphlet, but the officers seized it and Plaintiff Heicklen's sign which read JURY INFO (Exhibit A) and placed him under arrest. Plaintiff Heicklen fell to the ground and remained motionless for several minutes.
114. Nothing happened, so Plaintiff Heicklen got up and started to distribute literature again.
115. The police officers had called for an ambulance.They and the ambulance personnel approached Plaintiff Heicklen.
116. Plaintiff Heicklen read to them the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution Plaintiff Heicklen asked them what part of "Congress shall make no law" they did not understand. They said that Plaintiff Heicklen should take it up with the judge. They were arresting Plaintiff Heicklen under the rule that they had stated.
117. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out literature again, but the police seized all of his pamphlets and placed him under arrest again. Plaintiff Heicklen fell to the ground.
118. Officer C. Barnes #245 gave Plaintiff Heicklen two citations, one for Unlawful Distribution of Flyers on Federal Property 410 CFR, sub C Section 102-74.415(c) (Exhibit E) and one for Impeding/Opposing Federal Officer, 18 U.S.C. #111(A) (Exhibit F). Officer C. Barnes also gave Plaintiff Heicklen a property receipt (Exhibit G) for his two signs and the pamphlets that they had seized.
119. Plaintiff Heicklen was placed on a gurney and put in the ambulance.He was taken to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital.
120. Plaintiff Heicklen did not talk to any of the personnel, including the psychiatrist. They left Plaintiff Heicklen alone for awhile. The police left.
121. After awhile the psychiatrist returned and read a copy of Plaintiff Heicklens flyer (Exhibit C). The psychiatrist's comment was that this was a free speech case and he agreed with Plaintiff Heicklen. He ordered that Plaintiff Heicklen be discharged.
122. Plaintiff Heicklen was fed lunch and after some paper work was released at 3:10 pm. He signed the release papers "Ayn Rand."
123. Erek DeMarco, a photographer, was present at the demonstration taking a video of events. His video appears at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnnwQ2RPMxg
124. Mr. DeMarco was approached by the Homeland Security police officerss and told that he was violating a federal regulation and must stop photographing.
125. If he did not stop, he would be given a citation and his equipment seized.
126. After some additional intimidation, he discontinued phographing.
127. Garry Reed of the Libertarian News Examiner published an article on Plaintiff Heicklen's Monday October 19 and 26 trips to Manhattan and subsequent arrest for committing the crime of exercising his rights as a free citizen. The article is titled "Jury activist arrested for exercising First Amendment rights" and is located here:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-26370-Libertarian-News-Examiner~y2009m10d28-Jury-activist-arrested-for-exercising-First-Amendment-rights.
128. You should know that The Federal Protective Service is intercepting Plaintiff Heicklen's e-mails. Another violation of our civil liberties.
129. THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
130. THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

3. Incident of November 2, 2009
131. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, November 2, 2009. The weather was sunny, but a little cooler than the two previous weeks. Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse.
132. Plaintiff Heicklen did not have his JURY INFO sign, because he did not have the time to replace the one that was seized the previous week.
133. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out the FIJA pamphlet entitled "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" (Exhibit A) along with his flyer (Exhibit B). At 12:00 noon, a Homeland Security police officer approached Plaintiff Heicklen and asked for a copy of the pamphlet, which he gave to him.
134. The police officer informed Plaintiff Heicklen that he could not pass out literature on federal property. Plaintiff Heicklen assured him that he could. The police officer left without identifying himself.
135. At 12:21 pm, two other Homeland Security police officers approached Plaintiff Heicklen, who requested them to identify themselves, but they refused.
136. The police officers and Plaintiff Heicklen had a disagreement about Plaintiff Heicklen's right to pass out literature. They ordered Plaintiff Heicklen to stop, but Plaintiff Heicklen continued.
137. Then one of them said that Plaintiff Heicklen was under arrest, get his hands behind his back and handcuff him. Immediately, Plaintiff Heicklen fell to the ground face down.
138. Plaintiff Heicklen remained in that position for over an hour, before he was lifted onto a gurney and strapped securely. Plaintiff Heicklen was never handcuffed nor received a citation or summons. It was an out and out kidnapping.
139. Plaintiff Heicklen was taken to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital and arrived at about 2:00 pm. Again Plaintiff Heicklen gave no response to any questions of either the police or the hospital personnel.
140. The nurses pinched Plaintiff Heicklen's nipples in an effort to get him to talk. All Plaintiff Heicklen's personal belongs including sneakers and a belt were taken from him.
141. At about 3:00 pm, Plaintiff Heicklen received a telephone call from Chris Goldstein, a radio reporter, who said that he would start the publicity rolling.
142. After about 4:00 pm, Plaintiff Heicklen made a fuss to see someone in charge, so that he could either be released or brought in front of a magistrate.
143. Plaintiff Heicklen was told that he was not under arrest, but that the hospital could keep him for 72 hours. Plaintiff Heicklen's requests were ignored, and became more persistent.
144. Against Plaintiff Heicklen's wishes four attendants grabbed him, and a nurse gave Plaintiff Heicklen a shot of thorazine to calm him down. It worked, Plaintiff Heicklen got an excellent night's sleep.
145. Dr. Lowe is the head psychiatrist for the Bellevue unit in charge. He made it a point to see that Plaintiff Heicklen was not interviewed the first day.
146. On Tuesday morning Plaintiff Heicklen was interviewed by psychiatrist Dr. Elizabeth Steicker and social worker Kari Wolf. After a calm discussion with them, Plaintiff Heicklen was released at 11:55 am. A set of follow-up instructions was given to him.
147. During Plaintiff Heicklen's stay, he was treated well by the staff, received three full meals, and extensive medical tests of the usual variety were done. It was a thorough medical exam.
148. On Tuesday morning, Plaintiff Heicklen was given a NOTICE OF STATUS AND RIGHTS C.P.E.P. EMERGENCY ADMISSION (Exhibit H). In principle Plaintiff Heicklen had rights, but it would not be convenient to exercise them.
149. Plaintiff Heicklen signed all documents John Galt. He was released at 11:55 am and voted for Ken Kaplan for Governor of NJ on his way home.
150. Warning:You should know that The Federal Protective Service is intercepting Plaintiff Heicklen's e-mails.Another violation of our civil liberties.
151. THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
152. THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

4. Incident of November 9, 2009
153. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, November 9, 2009. The weather was perfect: warm and sunny. Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse holding a sign which said "JURY INFO" (Exhibit A).
154. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out the FIJA pamphlet entitled "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" (Exhibit B) along with his flyer (Exhibit C). Plaintiff Musumeci, a freelance reporter/producer from Free Talk Live, was present.
155. At 11:48, Plaintiff Heicklen was approached by two federal marshals, who identified themselves as Musumeci (by coincidence the same last name as Plaintiff Musumeci) and Sullivan. They would not give first names and said that they had no badge numbers. They informed Plaintiff Heicklen that he had to leave. Plaintiff Heicklen demurred. They said that they would have to report Plaintiff Heicklen and left.
156. Plaintiff Heicklen passed out about 15 flyers, when three police from the Department of Homeland Security approached him at about 12:20 pm. The leader was Plaintiff Heicklen's acquaintance Officer Barnes from two weeks ago.
157. After an exchange of the usual pleasantries, Officer Barnes placed Plaintiff Heicklen under arrest, and Plaintiff Heicklen fell to the ground. Officer Barnes confiscated Plaintiff Heicklen's remaining five brochures and his JURY INFO sign. He left a property receipt (Exhibit I) and a citation 41 CFR, Sub C Section 102 #74.415(c) (Exhibit J), the same as two weeks earlier.
158. During the exchange with the police, Plaintiff Musumeci, a Free Talk Live reporter/producer, videotaped the event and interviewed Plaintiff Heicklen until he was stopped and cited by the police (Exhibit K) under 41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420 for photographing without a permit. The text of 41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420 is given in Exhibit L.
159. Plaintiff Musumeci was placed under arrest. First his camera was confiscated, and then his memory card cubicle was taken. Plaintiff Musemeci convinced the police to keep the memory card, but return the camera, which they did. However the police seized only a primary video. A second video taken with a smaller camera can be seen at:
http://blogofbile.com/2009/11/10/julian-heicklens-fija-outreach-2009-11-09-arrest-video/
http://blogofbile.com/tag/julian-heicklen/?order=ASC and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3wVobgcQfk
160. At about 12:30 pm, while Plaintiff Heicklen was still on the ground, Joel Kupferman, a lawyer and Executive Director of the New York Environmental & Justice Project appeared and observed.
161. The police left at 12:35 pm. Plaintiff Heicklen stood up and the event was over.
162. Plaintiffs and Joel noticed that an NBC reporter was present, but did not interact with him. Joel Kupferman and Plaintiff Heicklen went to a Chinese soup shop and had hot and sour soup. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived home at about 3:15 pm.
163. Warning: You should know that The Federal Protective Service, and possibly the FBI, is intercepting Plaintiff Heicklen's e-mails. Another violation of our civil liberties. Be prudent if you write to Plaintiff Heicklen.
164. THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
165. THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

5. Incident of November 16, 2009
166. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, November 16, 2009. The weather was perfect: warm and sunny. Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse holding a sign which said "JURY INFO" (Exhibit A)
167. Plaintiff Heicklen started to pass out the FIJA pamphlet entitled "A Primer for Prospective Jurors" (Exhibit B) along with his flyer Exhibit C). Two photographers, whom Plaintiff Heicklen does not know, were present.
168. At 11:48 am, Plaintiff Heicklen was approached by two federal marshals, who informed him that he had to leave. Plaintiff Heicklen demurred. They said that they would have to report Plaintiff Heicklen and left.
169. Plaintiff Heicklen passed out about 8 flyers, when three police officers from the Department of Homeland Security approached him at about 11:58 am. The leader was Plaintiff Heicklen's acquaintance Officer Barnes from previous encounters.
170. After we exchanged the usual pleasantries, Officer Barnes placed Plaintiff Heicklen under arrest, and he fell to the ground. Officer Barnes confiscated Plaintiff Heicklen's remaining brochures and his JURY INFO sign. He left a property receipt (Exhibit M) and a citation 41 CFR, Sub C Section 102 #74.415(c) (Exhibit N), the same as previously. Officer Barnes unarrested Plaintiff Heicklen at 12:05 pm, and the police left the scene.
171. The Homeland Security Police also approached the photographers. Apparently one left, but the other would not. He was taking pictures of Plaintiff Heicklen's arrest. He was placed under arrest.
172. However, he apparently had a permit to photograph a trial, which was the reason he was there. He identified himself as a photographer for the "Post." He was not cited nor any of his property confiscated.
173. Plaintiff Musumeci was standing about 20 feet away observing and filming the events. The police approached him and asked him to convince Plaintiff Heicklen to leave. Plaintiff Musumeci informed the officer that he was there to observe, and that Plaintiff Heicklen was not his responsibility.
174. Plaintiff Musemeci then was threatened to "get one too." Assuming he meant a citation or arrest, Plaintiff Musumeci asked "for what?," in which the officer replied "whatever." Plaintiff Musumeci had two cameras. The footage of the event can be seen at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crlw5luM5zI
175. Warning: You should know that The Federal Protective Service, and possibly the FBI, is intercepting Plaintiff Heicklen's e-mails. Another violation of our civil liberties. Be prudent if you write to me.
176. THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
177. THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

6. Incident of November 23, 2009
178. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at he U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:45 am on Monday, November 23, 2009. The weather was cold and windy. Plaintiff Heicklen stood in the middle of the plaza in front of the courthouse holding a sign which said "JURY INFO" (Exhibit A)
179. Plaintiff Heicklen passed out 10 of the FIJA pamphlet entitled "True or False: Factual Information about Jury Service" (Exhibit O) along with Plaintiff Heicklen's flyer (Exhibit C).
180. At 12:10 pm three Homeland Security police officers approached Plaintiff Heicklen. Plaintiff Heicklen asked them to identify themselves, but they did not. Instead they asked Plaintiff Heicklen who he was. Plaintiff Heicklen responded that he did not have to identify himself, but that they did.
181. Plaintiff Heicklen reached into his bag to obtain his clipboard. One of the police officers grabbed Plaintiff Heicklen's arm and placed him under arrest. Plaintiff Heicklen fell to the ground and lay still on the cold ground for about 1/2 hour and said nothing. Plaintiff Heicklen was not handcuffed.
182. The police confiscated Plaintiff Heicklen's ‘JURY INFO" sign (Exhibit A) and his pen, but not his remaining pamphlets. Plaintiff Heicklen was not issued a property receipt or a citation.
183. While on the ground, some individuals were taking pictures of Plaintiff Heicklen. They were informed by the police that they could not take pictures on federal property, but at least one of them continued.
184. Plaintiff Heicklen does not know what happened to them. Plaintiff Heicklen overheard one of the police officers say that he saw Plaintiff Heicklen's web site and himself on youtube.
185. Medics from the fire department arrived. They asked Plaintiff Heicklen questions, but Plaintiff Heicklen did not respond. They pounded on Plaintiff Heicklen's chest and shoulders to try to get him to respond, but to no avail.
186. Then they searched Plaintiff Heicklen for identification, which he do not carry. While doing this they put a 3-inch rip in Plaintiff Heicklens pants.
187. Soon an ambulance arrived. Plaintiff Heicklen was lifted onto a gurney, and placed in the ambulance. The ambulance attendants also punched Plaintiff Heicklen in the chest and shoulders to get him to talk, which did not work. They also gave Plaintiff Heicklen a medical exam.
188. Plaintiff Heicklen arrived at New York Downtown Hospital and was treated by four nurses, who stripped Plaintiff Heicklen naked down to his undershorts and gave him the most thorough medical exam of his life. This included two intravenous injections, blood withdrawal, an electrocardiogram, stethoscope, blood pressure, pulse, eyes, and temperature.
189. Plaintiff Heicklen was found to be in excellent health. However they did not give Plaintiff Heicklen a colorectal exam. Fortunately, Plaintiff Heicklen's urologist had done that on November 11, 2009.
190. The nurses called two people listed in Plaintiff Heicklen's cell phone to identify him, but they refused to identify Plaintiff Heicklen or themselves, as Plaintiff Heicklen had instructed them.
191. Finally Dr. Cho came to see Plaintiff Heicklen at about 2:15 pm. Plaintiff Heicklen asked her if he still was under arrest. She said no and did not know why Plaintiff Heicklen asked. The hospital was told that the police found a man lying unconscious in the street. Plaintiff Heicklen informed Dr. Cho that the police lied.
192. Plaintiff Heicklen talked to Dr. Cho, which greatly relieved everyone else. She tried to learn Plaintiff Heicklen's identity, but Plaintiff Heicklen would not give it to her. Plaintiff Heicklen asked to be released, and she agreed.
193. The hospital wanted Plaintiff Heicklen's name, address, and medical insurance information. Plaintiff Heicklen refused to give any information. He was released at 2:35 pm and signed the release form "John Galt."
194. Warning: You should know that The Federal Protective Service, and possibly the FBI, is intercepting Plaintiff Heicklen e-mails. Another violation of our civil liberties. Be prudent if you write to Plaintiff Heicklen.
195. THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
196. THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

7. Correspondence with Bellevue Medical Center
197. MD Farque of Bellevue Medical Center sent Plaintiff Heicklen an undated and unsigned letter requesting the following information (Exhibit P)

a. Proof of Identity for all household members
b. Social security Card for all family members
c. Proof of address for all household members
d. Proof of income
e. Other income and resources
f. School letter for children under 21 years old
g. Marriage certificate
h. Support letter, if unemployed and supported by somebody.

198. Plaintiff Heicklen refused to submit any of this information. His response is his letter of November 16, 2009 (Exhibit Q)
8. Correspondence from the Central Violations Bureau
199. Plaintiff Heicklen received three notices from the Central Violations Bureau for the citations of 10/26/2009, 11/09/2009, and11/16/2009, ordering him to pay a $100.00 fine for each one or to appear in front of the U S. Magistrate , U. S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Room 520, New York, NY 10007, at 10:30 am on 01/19/2010 (Exhibits R).
200. Plaintiff Heicklen received a fourth notice from the Central Violations Bureau for the criminal complaint for Impeding/Opposing federal Officer ordering him to appear in front of the U S. Magistrate , U. S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Room 520, New York, NY 10007, at 10:30 am on 01/19/2010 (Exhibit S).
201. Plaintiff Musumeci received a notice from the Central Violations Bureau for the citation of November 9, 2009, ordering him to pay a $100.00 fine or to appear in front of the U S. Magistrate , U. S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Room 520, New York, NY 10007, at 10:30 am on 01/19/2010 (Exhibits T).
202. Plaintiff Heicklen notified the Magistrate that he would ignore all four orders (Exhibit U).
203. Plaintiff Musumeci and some Homeland security police officers apeared in the U. S. Courthouse on January 19, 2010. However neither Plaintiff Heicklen nor Defendant Barnes (the officer issuing Plaintiff Musumeci's citation) appeared, so the hearing was postponed for a month.
9. Correspondence from Highmark Freedom Blue PFFS Blue Shield
204. On December 5, 2009, Plaintiff Heicklen was notified by Highmark Freedom Blue PFFS Blue Shield, Plaintiff Heicklen's health insurance carrier, that it paid $429.97 to the FDNY Emergency Medical Service for tranporting Plaintiff Heicklen on 10/26/2009 (Exhibit V).
205. On December 29, 2009, Plaintiff Heicklen notified Highmark Freedom Blue PFFS Blue Shield at its fraud hotline at 800 438 2478 of the fraudulent claim.

E. CLAIMS

206. The text of Regulation 41 CFR, subsection C #102-74.415(c) for distributing literature is given in Exhibit D.
207. The text of Regulation 41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420 for photographing without a permit is given in Exhibit J.
208. Regulation #102-71.25 Who must comply with GSA's real property policies? Federal agencies operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services (GSA) must comply with these policies.
209. The general public is not subject to the regulations. They are not federal statutes. They are not a violation of law. The GSA cannot make laws. Only Congress can do that.
210. All of the citations for violating the regulations were issued improperly, because private citizens are not subject to them. Furthermore they violate Plaintiffs' rights under Amendments I and XIV of the U. S. Constitution.
211. Statute 18 U.S.C #111(a) (Exhibit K) deals with forcible resistance. It does not apply to Plaintiff Heicklen. Plaintiff Heicklen used no force whatever.
212. Title 41 C.F.R. #102 is not a law. It is a regulation that applies only to employees of the GSA, not to the public. Since the Plaintiffs are not federal employees, it is not incumbent on him to comply. Federal agencies are not given the right to enforce the regulations, only to comply with them. Failure to comply with those regulations is not a violation of law.
213. The GSA cannot make laws. Only Congress can do that.

F. CAUSES OF ACTION

1. U. S. Constitution Rights
214. All named Defendants are charged with denying both Plaintiffs their U. S. Constitutional rights under Amendments I, IV, V, and XIV. This is a violation of 42 USC #1983. Relief is available under 18 USC #242 and by court decisions:

"To maintain an action under 42 USC 1983, it is not necessary to allege or prove that the defendants intended to deprive Plaintiff of his Constitutional rights or that they acted willfully, purposefully, or in a furtherance of a conspiracy. . . it is sufficient to establish that the deprivation. . . was the natural consequences of defendants acting under color of law. . . ." Ethridge v. Rhodos, DC Ohio 268 F Supp 83 (1967), Whirl v. Kern CA 5 Texas 407 F 2d 781 (1968)"
.
2. Kidnapping and unlawful detention
215. All of the Defendants, except MD Farque and Michael F. Oakes are charged with kidnapping under federal statute 18 Part I Ch 55 #1201(a).
216. The Department of Homeland Security, Bellevue Medical Center and all their employees named as Defendants, as well as the ambulance crew, who participated in the event of November 2, 2009, are charged with Kidnapping in the first degree under New York state Penal Code #135.25 #2(d).
217. All of the Defendants, except MD Farque and Michael F. Oakes, are charged with unlawful imprisonment, kidnapping, and custodial interference under New York Penal Code #135.00.
218. All of the Defendants, except MD Farque and Michael F. Oakes, are charged with unlawful imprisonment in the second degree under New York Penal Code #135.05.
219. All of the Defendants, except MD Farque and Michael F. Oakes, are charged with kidnapping in the second degree under New York Penal Code #135.20

3. Assault
220. The ambulance crews of October 26, 2009, and November 2, 2009, and the 4 attendants at Bellevue hospital who forcefully restrained Plaintiff Heicklen and the nurse who administered the thorazine are charged with assault under 18 USC Ch 1610 #351 (e) and New York State Penal Code #120.00.
221. The ambulance crews of October 26, 2009, and November 2, 2009, and the 4 attendants at Bellevue hospital who who forcefully restrained Plaintiff Heicklen and the nurse who administered the thorazine are charged with assault in the second degree under New York State Penal Code #120.05.
222. Bellevue Medical Center, Defendant Lowe, the restraining attendants, and the nurse who injected thorazine into Plaintiff Heicklen on November 2, 2009, are charged with assaul in the third degree under New York State Law Penal Code #120.00.
223. The Department of Homeland security, its police officers involved in the kidnappings of October 16 and 23, 2009; Saint Vincent's Hospital, and its ambulance attendants of October 16, 209: Bellevue Medical Center and its ambulance attendants of October 26 and November 2; New York downtown hospital, its ambulance attendants, and admitting nurses of November 23, 2009: the New York City Fire Department and its medics of November 23, 2009, and other dates unknown to Plaintiff Heicklen are charged with assault under federal statute 18 USC #351(e)

4. Coercion
224. All of the Defendandants are charged with coercion in the second degree nder New York State Penal Law #135.60.
225. The Department of Homeland Security and its police officers, Saint Vincent's Hospital and its employees, Bellevue Medical Center and its employees, New York Downtown Hospital and its employees, the New York City Fire Department and its medics of November 23, 2009, and the U. S. Central Violations Bureau and its employees are charged with coercion under New York Penal Law #135.60 Coercion in the second degree.

5, Robbery
226. The Department of Homeland Security and all of its police officers named as Defendants are charged with robbery as defined in New York Penal Law #160.00 (1 & 2).
227. The Department of Homeland Security, its police officers are charged with robbery in the third degree under New York Penal Law #160.05

6. Larceny
228. The Department of Homeland Security and all of its police officers named as Defendants are charged with larceny under New York State Penal Law #155.05 (1 & 2a) and criminal possession of stolen property under New York State Penal Law #165.40.
229. Bellevue Medical Center and Defendant MD Farque are charged with larceny by extortion under New York State Penal Law #155.05(2e).
230. The U. S. Central Violations Bureau and Michael F. Oakes are charged with Larceny by extortion under New York State Penal Law #155.05(2e)
7. Extortion
231. Bellevue Medical Center and Defendant MD Farque are charged with Extortion under federal law 18 USC #152(6).
232. The U. S. Central Violations Bureau and Michael F. Oakes are charged with extortion under federal law 18 USC #152(6) and 18 USC Ch. 41 #872.

6. Conspiracy
233. All Defendans are charged with conspiracy as defined in 18 USC #241

8. Fraud
234. The New York City Fire Department and Nicholas Scoppetta are charged with conspiracy to defraud the governent with respect to claims under 18 USC Part I, Ch 15 #286.
235. The New York City Fire Department and Nicholas Scoppetta are charged with false, fictitious or fraudulent claims under 18 USC Part I, Ch. 15 #287.
236. The New York City Fire Department and Nicholas Scoppetta are charged with conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States under 18 USC Part I, Ch. 47 #1035.
237. The New York City Fire Department and Nicholas Scoppetta are charged with false information and hoaxes under 18 USC Part I, Ch. 47 #1038.

9. Perjury
238. The Department of Homeland Security and all its police oficers are charged with perjury in the third degree under New York City Penal Law #210.05, perjury in the second degree under New York City Penal Law #210.10, and perjury in the first degree under New York City Penal Law #210.15 for filing a false claim in the statutory violation charge of forcibly resisting arrest 18 U.S.C. #111(A) of October 26, 2009.
239. The Department of Homeland security and Officers of November 23, 2009, are charged with perjury under NY state Penal Law Article 210.05, 210.10, for informing the New York Downtown Hospital that they found Plaintiff Heicklen unconscious in the street.
240. The Department of Homeland security and officers are charged with perjury uder TITLE 18 USC Part I #1621 Perjury generally:

"Whoever -
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."

241. TITLE 28 USC PART V, CHAPTER 115 #1746. Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

"Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form:
(1) If executed without the United States: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)."

10. Official misconduct
242. The Department of Homeland Security and its police officers, Saint Vincent's Hospital and its employees, Bellevue Medical Center and its employees New York Downtown Hospital and its employees, the New York City Fire Department and its medics of November 23, 2009, are charged with official misconduct under New York Penal Law #195.00.
243. The Department of Homeland Security and its police officers, Saint Vincent's Hospital and its employees, Bellevue Medical Center and its employees New York Downtown Hospital and its employees, the New York City Fire Department and its medics of November 23, 2009, are charged with enterprise corruption under New York Penal Laws #460.20.
244. The Department of Homeland Security, Janet Nepolitano, and all police officers named as defendants are charged with searches without a warant under 18 USC Part I, Ch 109 #2236.
245. The Department of Homeland Security, Janet Nepolitano, and all police officers named as defendants are charged with obstructing emergency medical services under New York State Penal Code #195.16.
246. TITLR 18 USC #2236. Searches without warrant

"Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, engaged in the enforcement of any law of the United States, searches any private dwelling used and occupied as such dwelling without a warrant directing such search, or maliciously and without reasonable cause searches any other building or property without a search warrant, shall be fined under this title for a first offense; and, for a subsequent offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
This section shall not apply to any person"
(a) serving a warrant of arrest; or
(b) arresting or attempting to arrest a person committing or attempting to commit an offense in his presence, or who has committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having committed a felony; or
(c) making a search at the request or invitation or with the consent of the occupant of the premises."

G. DAMAGES

247. On six occassions Plaintiff Heicklen and on two occassions Plaintiff Musumeci were illegally prevented from exercising their Constitutional rights:

a. Plaintiff Heicklen was illegally detained on three occasions.
b. Police confiscated Plaintiff Heicklen's property on six occasions and Plaintiff Musumeci's property on one occassion.
c. Medical personal assaulted Plaintiff Heicklen on three occasions.
d. Medical personnel ripped Plaintiff Heicklen's pants on one occasion.
e. Plaintiff Musumeci was subjected to offical misconduct, coercion, and harassment on two occassions.

248. Plaintiffs were born into a free country. They were proud of their country.
249. The thugs have turned the country into a totalitarian police state. It is now the number one prison state in the world. With less than 5% of the world's population, it has 25% of the world's prisoners.
250. All Constitutional rights have been abrogated. Plaintiffs and others are not allowed to proclaim their ideas and beliefs by passing out literature, taking pictures, or standing on a public sidewalk.
251. All civil liberties on federal lands have been abrogated.
252. Property is confiscated by police for no legitimate reason.
253. Hospitals are used as prison holding cells.
254.The fire department manhandles arrestees.
255. This has caused a personality change in Plaintiff Heicklen.
256. Plaintiff Heicklen is ashamed of his country, very ashamed.
257. Plaintiff Heicklen has become an angry man, a very angry man.

H. REMEDIES SOUGHT

258. Plaintiffs move that the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York quash statute violation charges and all citations against Plaintiffs.
259. Plaintiffs move that they be compensated for all stolen property.
260. Plaintiffs move that they be compensated for all court associated costs and out-of-pocket expenses listed above.
261. Plaintiff Heicklen moves that he be compensated for time spent learning New York State and federal law and court procedures and in preparing court documents.
262. Plaintiff Heicklen moves that he be compensated for anxiety, shame, bitterness, and sleepless nights resulting from the arrests, charges of criminal activity, and citations.
263. Plaintiffs move that they be compensated for having their country become a police state which deprives them of rights and privileges of citizenship in a supposedly free country.
264. Plaintiffs move that the Court impose punitive monetary damages on the Defendants in sufficient amount such that the police, fire department, and hospitals will obey the law, stop harassing harmless people, and display common courtesies to people.
265. Specifically, Plaintiffs request the following:

a. One hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) for real damages.
b. Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000.00) for punitive damages.
c. Quash the statutory violations and citations.

I. MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL

266. Plaintiffs move for a jury trial as guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution, Amendment VII, which states, in part: "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,..."

J. SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS

267. Plaintiffs move that the Court grant permission to serve each listed Defendant by certified U. S. mail. Each Defendant will be sent appropriately completed copies of the forms required by rules of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

K. CHARGE TO THE COURT

268. "What is morally necessary must be made politically possible" (Senator Eugene McCarthy).
269. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable" (President John Kennedy).

L. AFFIDAVIT OFPLAINTIFF HEICKLEN

I, Julian Heicklen, Plaintiff Heicklen and Counsel Pro Se in U. S, District Court of the Southern District of New York, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 56 (e)(2), do affirm, under penalty of perjury, that all information and allegations in this document entitled GOVERNMENT AND HOSPITAL MISCONDUCT are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

______________________
Julian Heicklen
Plaintiff
Counsel Pro Se

____________________
Date

M. EXHIBITS

A. JURY INFO sign
B. FIJA pamphlet "A Primer for Prospective Jurors"
C. Plaintiff Heicklen's flyer
D. Text of 41 CFR, Sub C Section 102 #74.415(c)
E. Citation for 18 U.S.C. #111(A) of October 26, 2009
F. Citation 41 CFR Sec 102-74.415(c) of October 26, 2009
G. Property receipt of October 26, 2009
H. Notice of status and rights C.P.E.P. emergency admission
I. Property receipt of November 9, 2009
J. Citation of Regulation 41 CFR Sec 102-74.415(c) of November 9, 2009
K. Text of Regulation 41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420
L. Citation of Regulation 41 CFR, Subsection C, #102-74.420
M. Property receipt of November 16, 2009
N. Citation of 41 CFR Sec 102-74.415(c) of November 16, 2009
O. FIJA Pamphlet "True or False: Factual Information about Jury Service"
P. Letter from MD Farque
Q. Reply letter to MD Farque of Plaintiff Heicklen of November 16, 2009
R. Three notices to pay citations for distributing literature
S. Notice to appear in court for arrrest of October 23, 2009
T. Notice to pay citation for photographing for a news agency
U. Noncompliance letter of January 4, 2010 to District Court magistrate
V. Notice from Highmark Freedom Blue PFFS Blue Shield