734 Rutland Avenue
Sitting Grand Jury
Southern Federal District of Florida
211 W BROWARD BLVD
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33388
Teaneck, NJ 07666
August 28, 2012
Petition for Redress of Grievances to the Grand Jury of the Fort
Lauderdale Federal District
I wish to be included as a complainant in the
petition submitted by Donald Sheldon on August 16, 2012.
President Obama has violated his oath of office to uphold the United
States Constitution. Specifically he has signed three laws and
one executive order, all of which are unconstitutional. These are
identified at the end of this complaint. He and his associates
have been the cause of illegal murders, illegal searches and seizures,
illegal confinements, and other crimes.
My United States residence address is given
above. Currently I am located at 36 Rachel Immenu #2, Jerusalem,
Israel 93228. You can contact me there or, more easily, by E-mail.
I certify that the above is true to the best of
Submitted by Donald Sheldon, August 16,
E-mail copies to:
Donald Sheldon, email@example.com
Tyranny Fighters (over 900 individuals)
S. Senator Chuck Grassley, Government Reform Committee,
U. S. Congressman Darrell Issa, Chairman, House Oversight
Committee, via Facebook
CHARGES AGAINST PRESIDENT OBAMA
2012: Indefinite detention without charges or a trial
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
of 2012, was signed into law by President Obama on January 1, 2012.
The most controversial provisions of the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2012 to receive wide attention were contained in
Title X, Subtitle D, entitled "Counter-Terrorism." In particular,
sub-sections 1021 and 1022, which deal with detention of persons
without charges or a trial that the government suspects of involvement
in terrorism. The controversy was to their legal meaning and potential
implications for abuse of Presidential authority.
The detention without charges or a trial was
declared unconstitutional by Federal District Judge Katherine B.
Forrest on May 16, 2012. However Federal prosecutors on August 6,
2012 appealed the judge's order barring enforcement of part of a law
that permits indefinite military detention for those deemed to have
"substantially supported" al Qaeda, the Taliban or "associated forces."
However, I do not see how the federal courts
could enforce its order if upheld, since the President acts without
free speech in presence of Secret Service
HR 347: President Obama signed bill H.R. 347
(also known as the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds
Improvement Act of 2011) into law on March 9, 2012. This time the
attack is against the First Amendment and free speech. This new law
makes ’No Free Speech" Zones wherever the Secret Service says so.
Bye bye Protests. Bye bye Free Speech. Bye bye Constitution. The
’bill’ was signed into law in secret.
This violates the First Amendment “right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
On Friday, March 16, 2012 President Obama
issued an unconstitutional executive order. The National Defense
Resources Preparedness Executive Order allows the government to
confiscate our property without due process under the direction of
Janet Napolitano and the Department of Homeland Security. This is
a violation of Amendment IV to the U. S. Constitution which states
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
with no warrants
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was signed by
President Obama on August 2, 2012. During the Obama Administration, the
National Security Agency (NSA) has officially continued operating under
the new FISA guidelines. However, in April 2009, officials at the
United States Department of Justice acknowledged that the NSA had
engaged in "overcollection" of domestic communications in excess of the
FISA court's authority, but claimed that the acts were unintentional
and had since been rectified. However the law signed August 2,
2012, returns the unconstitutional surveillance, as stated above in
Amendment IV of the U. S. Constitution.