November 2008 Archives

Facebook on the Job

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
I read an interesting article on how bosses should embrace Facebook at work about three weeks ago and haven't had time to comment on it until now. It's really meant to be what I consider an informative warning to upper-level management and the disconnect they sometimes have with the new generation of hires. But it's not just generational...

Social networking, in general, builds relationships and creates a positive feeling of freedom and flexibility. Think of all of the different personalities in your office. Now think of being new to that office. How long does it take to meet everyone? Are some more outgoing while others shy? Chances are you learn a bit more about a couple of key people that you spend most of your time with and have superficial information (at best) about many of the others.

Now enter Facebook. Friend your new colleagues. Take the time to look over their profiles. All of a sudden these people turn human. Better yet, you find people have similar interests you never would have known about (and it probably would have taken you a year or more to stumble across these interests in limited conversation). It ensures the quiet person doesn't get "stepped on" in conversation. Everyone gets an equal voice.

The article goes on to mention that some companies view LinkedIn or in-house social software to be more appropriate for work matters. But it stressed that banning the others (like Facebook) that employees commonly use will only keep people from forming tighter bonds. Banning such services will make employees feel that they aren't being trusted to use their time wisely. Creating an environment where employees feel they are trusted and have freedom will create a better and more productive atmosphere for the company as a whole.

Look at how Twitter has aided in finding a quick answer to problems that you just couldn't figure out. Ever think that your Facebook friends could be used in similar fashion?

I work in a university setting, obviously different than the mainstream corporate world. My department, being Education Technology Services, embraces new technology and has an open mind to how we can use tools in educational settings. I used the Facebook chat feature just the other day to discuss blogs and an upcoming training with a colleague in the libraries. I also use Facebook solely to communicate with the members of the Schreyer blogging project that I manage. What better way to schedule meetings, events, send a quick note, etc. to a group of students than on the platform they check five times (that might be a low assumption) as much as their email.

The benefits that this platform can have on the corporate world are not too different than my scenario. What does it hurt to leave Facebook or other social networking tools open? I've taken to logging into Facebook on many mornings now and just leaving it up on a separate tab for the entire day. Has it cut my productivity in any way? Not as far as I can see. In fact, I'm positive that I've been more productive since I've been leaving it open. Will my bosses be complaining? I think not. Maybe I should send them a message over Facebook to check since I can see they are on too!  

Buffalo Chicken Dip

| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks
As promised, here is the recipe for the Buffalo Chicken Dip that I made for the office Halloween lunch. The recipe below makes the amount I brought (roughly a 9x13 pan worth) but it is easily halved for a more manageable amount to snack on and watch football at the house.

2 large cans of white chicken (the size bigger than a tuna can)
2 cups of shredded cheddar cheese
2 packages of cream cheese (I used light) ... sit out for a bit to soften... much easier
1 cup of ranch dressing
1 cup of hot wing sauce (I use either Franks or Texas Pete) ... if you want it spicier... add more

Mix together by hand and bake at 350 for about 15 minutes just to get everything to melt and then stir together. Can be served hot or cold.

The end of Twitter's usefulness?

| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks
So some may have noticed that over the past three or four weeks my time and contributions to Twitter have been quite limited. It suddenly "clicked" the other day as to why I've done this and I think it has left me even more confused than I was when I didn't know why I was avoiding it.

Disclaimer: This is not a political post so just deal with me while I explain.

I'm not one to discuss politics openly usually and my sphere of Twitter contacts seem to be the opposite. I am just actually mentally drained having to be force-fed all the political information on Twitter. Which way the content is leaning doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is that the benefit of being able to get office/project information during the day has been virtually zero and so I have instead tuned out. Hopefully this will all change in the next few days (regardless of election outcome) and the tool will again become valuable to me each day. Until then, I will likely remain fairly silent.

Now, why did I say that I was confused? Well now I think about what offends me on Twitter or is not useful and wonder if I should change my icon. It is currently the Red Sox symbol. Will people find me offensive to show my hometown team some allegiance (Congrats to you Philly fans... thank you for taking care of the Rays)? Probably not. But you never know. I think maybe I need to think about forming more meaningful 140-character posts before hitting that "enter" button. But isn't the reason for Twitter there just to have some quick updates? What are the standards really for how you should be using it at work vs outside of 8-5? It's a community social mechanism. I just need to reconsider who that community might be and what I should be contributing to it. Obviously not everyone will see this the same way but I'm trying to figure it out as best as possible. Baseball season is over so at least I have a couple of months to work out my thoughts :-)

Search This Blog

Full Text  Tag