How's that for a headline? Well
the article explains it all but the gist is that allowing a worker to Twitter, check news headlines, hope on Facebook, etc. actually increased the productivity of the typical employee by 9%. I'm not sure they're taking Internet addicts into account but those are the outliers anyway. So, is it true? Cole did a little survey of what applications we opened first when we get to the office. Aside from our email the most common answers seemed to be Twitter, Facebook, a news reader, and other social interaction tools. So are we all addicts?
I will admit. I am very guilty of powering up and starting Twitter and Facebook... and while waiting for them to load I'm look at the RSS for CNN's top stories. So why do we do this and what do we do? CNN is easy. I like to know what's going on in the world. And I find stories like this one. I like to be challenged and the news makes me think.
Next, Facebook. For my current obsession I blame Brett for making me (ok not quite making me... but he invited me) to join Mafia Wars. Now I have to log on each hour to bank my money or people beat me to a pulp. I don't like losing. I have over a billion dollars banked on that stupid little game but still take it personally if someone robs me. But for real now. I leave Facebook up on a tab a lot of days. It is great for posting a status message (very Twitter-like these days) and having people be able to keep up with what you're up to. And how else would a coworker (Thanks, Dave) have known that I had locked myself in the ETS Cafe refusing to come out until I saw (dead) evidence of the hornet flying above my desk yesterday? I was MUCH more productive without the bee thank you very much.
Twitter is very much the same. Instant access to a ton of other people. If you have a question, need some help with a work issue, or just want to get the word out about a project you have an instant network of people. If you don't know something, someone else definitely will. These days I've turned into much more of a Twitter "lurker" now that Facebook changed their style. But it's still very useful and I find myself reading up a lot on other's ideas and shared info. Perhaps I use both because the network of people are slightly different? I'm not sure. The line of my networks is becoming blurred and I think that is a result of the advancement in technology itself.
In any case the article brings up some interesting thinking points and hopefully someone else might get something out of it. While it may be deemed by some as distractions, checking in online is probably more productive than taking up smoking at this point :-)
Recent Comments