Web 2.0: August 2008 Archives

Elizabeth is Tweeting

| | Comments (1)

Believe it or not, Robin Smail (aka Robin2Go) finally talked me into Tweeting. Since I had written a very long blog post against Twitter I thought I should go public with this decision.

I'm also Tweeting in public, although only with my Access ID. I don't have to make the trail that easy to find although I think the community has found me already.

However I still stand by my March 2008 statement that discipline-specific support is a good idea - thankfully it is now part of the strategic plan (a happy coincidence I believe).

Overview of the Penn State Open Source License

| | Comments (0)

The Penn State Multimedia Teaching Objects are a set of objects which can be downloaded under the "Penn State Open Source License". While this license is not Creative Commons, it actually has the same terms as a liberal GNU/Creative Commons license - namely:

This MTO item can be used royalty-free under the following conditions. See the MTO Item Open Source License for complete terms.

  • The item is distributed AS IS with no implied or stated warranties.
  • The item is restricted to educational or personal use only. Commercial use is not permitted.
  • Copies may be distributed, but only for educational or personal use. This item cannot be sold for profit.
  • You have permission to modify the item, but the derivative work must remain open source and cannot be marketed for profit.
  • Copyright of the original item is held by Penn State.
  • If this item is used, attribution to Penn State is requested.

So why not just use Creative Commons? Because when this project was developed several years ago, Creative Commons was not what it is now. At the time we were investigating this, the closest Creative License version I could create was a Canadian one. If, for some reason, someone had borrowed a file and made a billion dollars, it looked like Penn State would have had to file a law suit in Canada.

Looking at the site again, I do think there might be more merit to the actual license...but I don't regret asking qualified attorneys to review the issue. That's why we consult content experts!

Update on Aug 14

I just read in this New Media & Technology Law Blog (found via a Listserv) that a Federal Circuit court says open source licenses are legally enforceable in the U.S. As I interpret it, it means that if you use an open source license, and someone violates it you can sue in court, even if there are no monetary damages per se. I would presume that this is good news for the Creative Commons effort.

LDSC08 - I do like Live Question

| | Comments (1)

I anticipate a quiet Web 2.0 period on this topic, but I did like the Live Question tool from the Harvard Law server. It lets a large class send questions with minimal interruption, and the voting lets other students participate even if the coffee hasn't quite kicked in yet.

This is a good case for letting everyone have their laptops open in class.