January 2010 Archives

Overring the Ordered List CSS on MT

| | Comments (0)

As I've noted before, I'm not too crazy about using CSS to control presentation of ordered lists. Normally, my solution is to declare my content XHTML transitional and still use the type="" attribute. When playing with a content managment system (CMS) though, you may not have that option.

I just realized that my template in Movable Type (MT) actually has a setting that makes all OL's the decimal type (i.e. 1,2,3...). That's fine except if you have a nested list, in which case you nave nested lists all being numbered 1,2,3. Even my editor, who is no usability guru, commented that this could be confusing (no kidding).

In the code, I HAD made the nested list type="a" for lower-case alpha, but the CSS in my MT template overrides any type declaration I make. Fortunately, Movable Type allows me to add custom CSS to the template, so I did. You can see the code below, but note that #alpha-inner refers to the DIV for the main content. I don't want to mess with OLs in the navigation or sidebar widgets...yet.

/* Nested OL fix */
#alpha-inner ol {list-style-type: decimal;}
#alpha-inner ol ol {list-style-type: lower-alpha;}
#alpha-inner ol ol ol {list-style-type: lower-roman;}

What this declaration does is make first level OL's decimal (1,2,3), the second level lower-alpha (e.g. a,b,c) and the third level lower-roman (i,ii,iii). If I get to a 4th level, I will probably have to rethink my content.

FYI - You can use this strategy on any CMS so long as you or a developer can access the CSS styles, but I do recommend restricting the domain to whichever DIV is the main content. Navigation is often done with a list with its own CSS which should be left alone until you have a better idea of how you want to hack it....

The Interesting Point in danah boyd's Web 2.0 Expo Speech

| | Comments (0)

As some of you may have learned 2 months ago, danah boyd was rather nastily critiqued on the Twitter screen behind her during her Web 2.0 Expo keynote video.

For those of you "not in the loop", what happened was that she was presenting the keynote address with a trendy Twitter backchannel feed in the background. This can be interesting, but in this case it backfired because the audience decided that her peformance wasn't up to par and decided to tweet about it. danah boyd wrote later that she knew something was wrong (due to laugter) but didn't know what it was until later. In the meantime, she said had problems adjusting to the atmosphere so didn't give her best performance. Oh well.

Actually when I watched the official Web 2.0 video, I really only noticed some slight hesitancy (and only because I was looking for it). In terms of content, I thought was very good, although I will admit there was some jargon (but it was good jargon IMHO).

In fact, my favorite term was probably homophily

or the tendency for networks to self-segregate (or be in the process of self-segregation). In other words, the current media situation is often pushing us into smaller pockets that interact primarily only with each other. Another term for this is echo chamber.

boyd points out that many of us could theoretically receive information from multiple sources, the reality is that people often receive the same information from the same sources their friends and colleagues do. For instance, all of us here at ETS know an amazing array of Web 2.0 tools and continue to learn more, but outside of ETS, it's still a new concept.

To expand the implications - on a political level, NPR listeners often receive different information than Fox News radio listeners do (I know because I've heard hours of both). It's not that either source is lying or enacting a conspiracy, but rather that each live in their own echo chamber. Whenever information does cross the network boundary, the result is often "Wow, I didn't know THAT!"

For the record, I have nothing against getting information interesting to you from people you trust, but homophily is always something to be wary of. Are you getting information from the same sources or more than one? How can you tell? For me, if I hear two divergent points of view, I know I've hit pay dirt. It may be that one of them really is completely kooky, but at least I've had a gut check on my assumptions. More often than not, it's been good for my character.

boyd closes the speech with a plea to stop with visions of utopia or disutopia and think realistically about what this new Internet phenomenon really means. As the Twitterfeed incident shows though, more people seem interested in competing for attention rather than really listening. Too bad because it was a lost opportunity for danah boyd and the audience.

I'm fairly cautious when it comes to predicting the future, especially in terms of technology, but I will go out on a limb here and make one. But first, a little background.

The "Hot" Accessibility Audience Effect

The "accessibility audience" technically includes a wide range of users including visually impaired users, hearing impaired users, mobility impaired users (particularly disabilities involving the hands) and cognitive disabilities.

In reality though, a lot of developers tend to think in terms of just one disability and skimp on the rest. When I first learned about that audience, it was visually impaired users. That made sense because there are so many hurdles for that audience, but it did sometimes results in Web sites that were 100% navigable on a screen reader and was fairly difficult for a visual users (because you don't need to check colors on a screen reader).

But...once podcasting and YouTube became more common, the focus switched to providing captions for the hearing impaired audience. This is good also because finally, more video content received captions...but the price was that we often forgot to ensure that video players worked on a screen reader. Oops.

The Next "Hot" Accessibility Audience?

Will there be a next "hot" audience? I officially predict, that the next audience we will be focusing on are mobility impaired users. These aren't necessarily people in a wheelchair (although this group does need be sure they can get to a computer), but rather people who have hand injuries of some sort and have problems using the mouse or even the keyboard.

One reason I believe this will be an issue is that in the next few years, more veterans will try to use their new GI Bill education benefit.Any veteran with a permanent hand injury may need accommodation, depending on the severity of the injury.

Another reason is the aging population in general. This is when issues such as "essential tremor" come into play as well as other disorders like Parkinson's disease and arthritis. Although you can get these kinds of illnesses at any age, the statistical probability that you are affected increases with age. Among my personal acquaintances, the most common call for accessibility advice has been in reference to not being able to control the mouse or keyboard very well.

A final population I will touch on are those suffering repetitive motion disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome. As my wrist was protesting over the fact that I was playing my action game too much after work, I remembered that it was time to use my keyboard shortcuts (eek). As we become more accustomed to our mobile devices, mice, joysticks and other devices which require a lot of repetitive hand motion, the potential for the onset of repetitive motion disorder continues to increase (Blackberry thumb anyone?)

What the Motion Impaired Audience Needs

Right now not many accessibility discussions focus on this audience, so I will list the common recommendations:

Less mouse, more (large) keyboard

The amount of control needed to aim and hit a reasonably sized key is less than to aim a mouse, joy stick and/or finger swipe. For some people, a standard keyboard is sufficient to assist users, but others may need one with extra large keys.

In any case it's good to plan keyboard equivalents for software functions whenever possible. For instance, most browsers let you tab through form fields and tab through headers (particularly in those which covert headers into an outline). Photoshop lets you switch tools by clicking a certain letter and Microsoft Office and most other commercial products replicates most of its functions with keyboard equivalents such as Control+B for Bold face. This great for avoiding frequent return trips to a tool palette or menu. Similar keyboard equivalents can be built into Flash applications or media players, but aren't necessarily done (or aren't necessarily widely known).

Note: There are issues of keyboard equivalents on the Web interfering with keyboard commands. I think they need to be carefully implemented and announced on the Web site so everyone is aware of them.

Large Mouse Targets

You can't always avoid a mouse, but it's good to make your targets larger than not. Hence "Click to download" as a link is generally preferable to "Here" as a target. Similarly a tiny icon is worse than a medium sized icon with a text label as a target. And an 8x8 pixel X to close a pop up window - are you kidding?

Motion Tolerant Dropdowns

There are times when a Web design calls for a dropdown menu (e.g. a list of all 50 states), but it should definitely have "wiggle room". The worst offenders I have seen are complex drop down menus with multiple levels which call for precise movement to move between levels - lest it disappear altogether (Argh!).

A better design might allow users to click on top levels and would remain on the screen until someone made an actual click (and would provide visible keyboard equivalents...at least for the top levels)/

Consequences

If we really do focus on this audience, I think developers will be pleasantly surprised that the screen reader audience will also benefit greatly. Imagine aiming a mouse when you can't see the screen...The other good news is that some of these accommodations may already be in place, just not visible on visual browsers. For instance, the option to skip the main menu by tabbing does benefit motion impaired users as well screen reader users.

Will we be losing our video captions again if our focus switches to the motion impaired user? That could happen, but I'm betting that this will be moved to the back burner instead. Even though a lot of developers are caption obsessed at the moment, there is an awareness that ALT tags and properly HTML tables should still be in use - all recommendations for the screen reader audience.

I don't know if my prediction will come true, but I do hope it does. I really need to cut back on my mouse for now.

Maxing out the TWT Certificate Experience

| | Comments (0)

For several years now, I have been administering the Teaching with Technology Certificate program for graduate student instructors. It's a great program which allows students to learn how to think about teaching and putting what they have learned into a portfolio. Ironically, the recent economy has been somewhat of a boon for the program since students can use the portfolio (and certification) not only to develop a reflective portfolio, but also to show future employers what they have learned in the classroom

I think most instructional designers would agree that building a teaching portfolio is a good idea for any grad student. It shows not only an instructor's technical skills and teaching philosophy but also provides a mechanism to demonstrate mini-teaches (like the great explanation of the blood-brain barrier I read in one portfolio).

But the great thing about this program is that it is giving ETS some unique outreach opportunities. First, it should hopefully generate business for our tools including Blogs at Penn State, podcasting/video tools supported by Media Commons, Web 2.0 tools like wikis and even (yes) ANGEL and Clickers. As these tools are used thoughtfully, we can only hope that the student experience improves and that students may even see how these tools can be adopted for their own uses.

What may be more valuable though is that these portfolios can give us a reflection of how our instructors teach and the tools they use. For instance, I've found out that many English instructors teaching rhetoric have found YouTube very useful for providing examples of good and bad rhetoric. Similarly, I can see some which tools are important to math instructors (especially the ones for graphs and equations.) As I talk with more graduate students, I learn what their working environment is like. It's amazing how much progress ITS makes in some areas and how little in others.

Finally I learn quite a bit about instructional design from the examples used. As much as I try to be instructional-tech savvy, I usually can't match the nuance of tool usage that an instructor skilled in content, pedagogy and technology brings. The best use of Flickr to group photos came from a classics instructor. I learned of SlideShare (the online way to share PowerPoint) from a comparative literature grad student. These are the kinds of example I can share with instructors and know that they were really used in the classroom

A final benefit to us and the instructors is that we maintain an archive of completed portfolios. Hopefully future TWT candidates are using these as inspiration, just as I am.

Mind Maps Gone Wild

| | Comments (0)

Scott McDonald on the Stuff Blog pointed out a great mind map parody on Flickr and I have to agree - it's really one messy mind map. I'll replicate the effect of this mind map in this history of English concept map (you can see the clean concept maps here).

Tree showing dialects of English in multiple colors and shapes

A few months ago, I claimed that many concept maps were unclear to me because the arrows were labeled. In the parody though, the labels are rarely labeled, yet I still read it as one hot mess. The problem here really is bad design. One, there's very little white space (because the only gap left was filled with a brain or a helmet, depending on the image).

Another is that a large multitude of shapes and color are used but not assigned a meaning. My entry did mention a comment that many maps associate different shapes with different concepts and that it may make sense to use a consistent scheme. Hmmm

Of course, we've all seen lots of happy messy mind maps full of a wild mix of shapes, images, colors and photos - like this mystery mind map from the Burnham Grammar School in the U.K. The original newsletter Web Site asks "Can you unravel the mysteries of the mind map? Clue: Year 7 trip..." My answer is alas "not very quickly."