"A conceptual understanding provides an opportunity for students to show the relationship between facts and the application of those relationships to a new situation" (p. 119).
Ready, Set, Science, Chapter 8
Chapter 8 summarizes the big ideas and concepts that had been presented in the previous chapters. The text is supported by acclaimed research within science education. Once the objectives, standards, and goals are defined for both students and teachers, then the resources and materials must be made available. Teachers must commit themselves to the latest content, pedagogy, technology, and learning instruction. Science is not a discipline that is set in stone, but instead, it changes with time. The most successful science programs will be built upon the intertwined four strands of proficiency. The chapter focuses on the standards, curricula, instruction, assessments, and professional development, when implementing a meaningful science program. Teachers, like students, are "investigators and learners." They have a responsibility to themselves to focus on inquiry throughout every process. As a teacher I will focus on the content knowledge, the ways in which students best learn science, my pedagogy as to how I will teach science, and the ways that I will educate myself in support of my classroom. Since many schools do not have successful and high-priority science programs in place, it is the responsibility of the entire school-wide community of administrators, curriculum writers, and teachers to take a stand in favor of supporting science learning
"As research has made clear, teachers have not had access to the kinds of professional learning opportunities necessary for effective science teaching" (162).
Connections:
I enjoyed chapter 8 of Questions, Claims, and Evidence, because I was able to relate my latest ideas for my unit plans to the book's ideas. I like the references and examples to the "initial understandings" part of the book. By giving students a Quick, Draw, Write, or by having them write down their "Before" knowledge or feelings about a particular subject, you are later able to see the transformation in their thinking. Additionally, I think it is important to expose students to internal and external sources of expert knowledge. Although this was not mentioned in the text, I would also want my students to be able to differentiate between what is fact and what is opinion. Sometimes students take everything they read for being true, or fact. However, this is certainly not the case, especially when students speak to other peers or read magazines and newspapers. By exposing children to multiple sources, you are helping to think critically and to analyze those sources. They are able to compare and contrast their own ideas or beliefs with others. Especially with science and social studies, I do not want my students to take my word as the only right or wrong answer. I want them to explore the concepts and dig up the facts for themselves. Luckily, this is all a part of inquiry--the big concept when I will be teaching science.
Question:
Given the variability within the ways that students demonstrate their science learning (authentic assessments/written papers/projects etc.) what is the best way to assess those projects? Does there always need to be a summative assessment at the end of a lesson/unit or may a formative assessment be acceptable, if not just as useful?