Recently in Resources Category

Those of you still trying to figure out what Twitter is should watch the new Twitter video from the folks at Common Craft. Those of you hooked into the "TwitterStream" can leave comments here about why you have gotten engaged -- I know some of you are Twitter people, so let's hear from you!




Hi all ... Bart Pursel from the College of Information Sciences and Technology will be in class on Thursday to talk to you a bit about virtual worlds and how they play out in a learning landscape.  Bart maintains a blog that you might want to take a look at it.  He also passed a link along to a PDF he'd like you to skim over.  It should be a fun and interesting discussion, so please try to come ready to participate.
Take a look at this little screencast that shows you how to add Google Analytics to your PSU Blog.

Worth a Look

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
A Flickr set from the 1975 book, And the Changes to Come.  Looks like we made it ...
This week we have a couple of interesting readings for you.  The first is the Cluetrain Manifesto and is much more of a technically driven reading than what we've assigned to this point.  To many people this was the first book to change their minds about how the Internet could be used as a platform.  The Cluetrain focuses on the idea that "it is all about the conversation" and that the web should be used to empower that.  The second reading is from Wenger's Communities of Practice.  You'll find that reading in ANGEL.  The Cluetrain pieces are open and freely available to read online.  I've linked to them below.

Cluetrain Manifesto:


Specifically related to the Cluetrain Manifesto, we would like you to create a blog post that provides an overarching reaction to the assigned pieces of the reading.  In addition, please select the three themes that you feel are most compelling, interesting, or that you feel connected to.  Don't just list the three themes, please tell us why you selected them as they relate to community, design, or identity.  Please try to relate your responses to the readings you've done to this point.
I really enjoyed meeting all of you today and I was thrilled that the attached presentation created enough interest to drive the discussion we had.  It is attached as a PDF ... please feel free to send me any comments or thoughts, or better yet, leave them here once the comments for the course blog are activated.

Download the PDF of the new_class_conv.pdf

After class today I thought I'd share some information on copyright with you.  It seemed as though there was lots of interest around this topic -- especially given the ownership and identity questions we posed.  This isn't an assignment of any sort, but should give you the basics related to copyright.  Much of this adapted from work my tam did at IST several years ago.

The birth of the Internet and other technologies that allow for easily sharing information have opened up challenges to our copyright laws. In recent years landmark cases have filled our court systems and left many experts searching for new answers. The purpose of this Lesson is to help you understand copyright law, fair use of copyrighted works, and how to avoid violation of copyright.  Essentially, after reading this you should be able to:

  • Describe protections afforded to an author under copyright laws.
  • Explain how to obtain permission to use a copyrighted work.
  • Explain conditions of Fair Use under the copyright law.
  • Describe how one can avoid plagiarism.
  • Explain the penalties of plagiarism.
  • Understand emerging trends in open copyright and discuss the “Free Culture” prespective.

Protections Under the Law

Copyright is the protection provided by U.S. law (Title 17, U.S. Code) of “original works of authorship” both published and unpublished. In their brochure, Copyright Basics, the U.S. Copyright Office (2001) outlines eight categories of copyrightable works:

  • Literary works
  • Musical works, including any accompanying words
  • Dramatic works, including any accompanying music
  • Pantomimes and choreographic works
  • Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works
  • Motion pictures and other audiovisual works
  • Sound recordings
  • Architectural works

There are several categories of materials that the U.S. Copyright Office (2001) does not list as eligible for copyright.

  • Works that have not been fixed in a tangible form
  • Titles, names, short phrases, slogans
  • Ideas, procedures, methods, systems, processes, concepts, principles, discoveries, or devices
  • Works consisting entirely of information that is common property and containing no original authorship

Up until 1989 in order to have one’s work protected by copyright, it was required that a Notice of Copyright be provided. According to U.S. Copyright Law, the Notice of Copyright was required to contain three elements: (1) The copyright symbol (©) or the word copyright; (2) the year of the first publication; and (3) the name of the owner of the publication. The birth of new technologies has led to some significant changes in the copyright laws. One such change, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was signed into law in 1998. The DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into commercial software. Additionally, the law seeks to prevent the manufacture, sale, or distribution of code-cracking devices used to copy software. Provisions in the law do permit cracking of copyright protection devices for the purposes of encryption research, assessment of product interoperability, and to test computer systems.

Obtaining Copyright

Once a work is created and fixed in a copy or “phonorecord” (U.S. Copyright Office, 2001, p. 3), copyright is secured. It is not necessary to register a work or publish the work to have copyright privileges. If you use or reproduce a copyrighted work without expressed permission, you are infringing on said copyright. However, Section 107 of Title 17 of U.S. Code provides the use of copyrighted works is free of infringement if being used for any of the following purposes:

  • Criticism
  • Comment
  • News reporting
  • Teaching
  • Scholarship
  • Research

In order to gain permission to use a copyrighted work, simply contact the copyright holder, explain your need for their work, and ask permission. You should be sure to gain a written or recorded copy of their permission for your records.

Fair Use

According to Section 107 of Title 17 of U.S. Code, four factors must be considered in determining whether or not use of a copyrighted work constitutes fair use:

  • What is the purpose and character of the use of the copyrighted work?
  • Is the use of the work commercial in nature or for nonprofit academic use?
  • What is the nature of the copyrighted work?
  • What is the amount of the work and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole?
  • What effect will the use of the copyrighted work have on the potential market for or value of the work?

Avoiding Plagiarism

The use of someone else’s ideas, words, etc. without clearly acknowledging the source of information is considered plagiarism. In order to avoid plagiarism, give credit where credit is due! In other words, if you use someone’s ideas, words, opinions, statistics, graphics, etc. through a quotation or paraphrase, provide a citation for the work. When paraphrasing, be sure to put ideas in your own words. If you use words taken directly for a source, put the passage in quotation marks and provide a page number from the source where you pulled the quote.

Penalties

In an academic setting acts of plagiarism may result in a failing grade or expulsion from the institution. Additionally, such acts may result in legal action in the form of a lawsuit. Here are some additional resources to review: PSU Copyright Bytes: Information about how copyright can affect you. Berkley Digital Library Sunsite: Links and information on Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights. Copyright Clearance Center: How to obtain copyright permissions.

Open Copyright: The Commons

Probably the most interesting development in the copyright space has been the birth of the Creative Commons approach to copyright. This new thinking is allowing people to share and share alike to move their art forward. To me, it is the way of the future — at least I hope. Some people really don’t like it (Bill Gates) and some think it is THE way to go (Lessig). I will let you decide however. I’d like you to take a half hour of you life to listen to Lawrence Lessig’s talk, Free Culture … I’ll be asking you to respond to that, so please take a look.

Wrap-Up

Now that you have completed this Lesson you should have a better understanding of copyright law and your responsibilities to use information in accordance with that law. In this lesson you should have learned to:

  • Describe protections afforded to an author under copyright laws.
  • Explain how to obtain permission to use a copyrighted work.
  • Explain conditions of Fair Use under the copyright law.
  • Describe how one can avoid plagiarism.
  • Explain the penalties of plagiarism.
  • Understand emerging trends in open copyright and discuss the “Free Culture” prespective.
We were able to get all the blog RSS feeds publishing into the Course Pligg site this morning.  You can bounce over there and click through aggregated content from class blogs, this blog, and some del.icio.us links tagged with ci597c.  Please feel free to vote on items to push them to the front page and try out the comments while you are there.

We will be exploring how a site like this can influence what we discuss on a weekly basis.  This is truly a grand experiment, so please find ways to think critically about what it means for a learning community to use a social environment to help move the discussion and focus of a course around.

Level Setting

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
As I was reading through introductions and other early blog posts I started to recognize a slight trend -- the language of the course (on the technical side) is causing a little confusion.  With that in mind I thought I'd add a post defining (in my own words) what a handful of this stuff is.  This should probably be more of a wiki page, but for now I'll just add a few definitions ... comments should be working on the blogs today or tomorrow, so feel free to add thoughts as this grows:

  • RSS -- RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication.  RSS is an XML (extensible markup language) varient that allows content to be redistributed without any style associated with it.  It is pure content that can be pushed around the web and redisplayed in nearly any other location.  It is most commonly used to allow users to subscribe to websites (mainly blogs and news sites) so that fresh content is delivered to them in a single interface.  In the same way you use an email client for reading new messages, an RSS (or news reader) is used to subscribe to sites and read newly updated content -- all without having to visit the original site to find it.  At the simplest level it is an incredible time saver ... imagine having all the new content from 20 online newspapers delivered to one location only when newly published material is available?  No need to surf to 20 sites, it comes to you.  There are lots of other things about RSS that we will discuss in the coming weeks as well.
  • Web 2.0 -- This really isn't one thing, it is more of a philosophy and approach to the way the web is evolving.  We'll discuss this in class today, but think back to when the web started and remember what a one way platform it was -- updates were not regular, the common person did not have a voice online, and creating web sites was hard.  Today the web is an open platform where anyone can not only consume content, but create it with ease.  Look at the way the web has evolved into a platform for open participation -- blogging, photo sharing, social sites (FaceBook and My Space), social bookmarking, and so much more.  Web 2.0 is about people, it is Soylent Green.
  • Pligg/Digg/Social Ratings -- All of these types of sites are built around a very simple premise, that people (especially communities of people) can create a better source of relevant news than a single editor.  This all started with Digg -- mainly a news aggregator site (no original content, just content that is linked in from around the web) that allows the members of the site to vote content up or down.  Content with the greatest number of votes (or diggs) end up on the front page and more easily discoverable.  We've adapted this approach with our course Pligg site. Pligg is simply an open source version of Digg.  Your blog posts are aggregated in (via RSS) to the site and each post can be voted on.
I could go on and on, but those seem to be the ones I read about the most.  We'll dive into a lot of this over the next several weeks and will be looking at how to take these tools and use them for teaching and learning.

Get our Podcasts at Penn State on iTunes U

Sign In