Naturalism in Painting

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Merleau-Ponty sites Cézanne as saying of the artists relation to nature: "the artist must conform to this perfect work of art. Everything comes to us from nature; we exists through it; nothing else is worth remembering" (Merleau-Ponty Basic Writing, 276). Merleau-Ponty suggests that Cézanne struggled with his attempt to pursue "reality without giving up the sensuous surface, with no other guide than the immediate impression of nature" (ibid.).  

Here are two pictures that show this struggle and the distortions that arise from it:

Cézanne, Still Life with Plate of Cherries (1885-87) Cézanne, Still Life with Apples (1890-94)
Merleau-Ponty points to the distortion in the cup and saucer in a painting like the Still Life with Apples (1890-94), which should be elliptical as a sign of the struggle Cézanne is working through not to give up the sensuous surface of things.

He also points to the portrait of Gustave Geoffroy, suggesting: "The work table in his portrait of Gustave Geoffroy stretches, contrary to the laws of perspective, into the lower part of the picture. In giving up the outline Cézanne was abandoning himself to the chaos of sensations, which would upset the objects and constantly suggest illusions ..." (276). 

Merleau-Ponty insists, however, that the distortion in the table actually captures more effectively the way we ourselves perceive things; that is, to our natural vision of the "object in the act of appearing, organizing itself before our eyes" (278).

Cézanne, Portrait of Gustave Geffroy (1895) Cézanne, Portrait of Mme Cézanne in a Yellow Chair (1888-90)
So, Merleau-Ponty suggests that when we run our eyes over a large surface, the images we see are taken from different points of view and the "whole surface is warped" (278).

To emphasize this phenomenological point about different perspectives, it is helpful to look at the portrait of Mme Cézanne in a Yellow Chair in which the segment of the line behind her on the wall is dislocated, as it would be to natural vision. 

Merleau-Ponty summarizes why he thinks Cézanne is an important painter of the phenomenology of perception this way:

it is Cézanne's genius that when the over-all composition of the picture is seen globally, perspectival distortions are no longer visible in their own right but rather contribute, as they do in natural vision, to the impression of an emerging order, of an object in the act of appearing, organizing itself before our eyes" (278).

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Naturalism in Painting.

TrackBack URL for this entry: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/6123

Leave a comment

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

PHIL204 Blogroll