GEOG 361 , C. Brewer

Wise Wording

Parse information among titles, subtitles, captions, and
notes.
Hierarchy of detail

Reduce punctuation, reduce wordiness.
Tradeoffs: brevity vs. ambiguity, clarity vs.
impenetrable wordiness.


Example short title:
Population Distribution, 2000

Legend title elaborates:
Number of people by county

Explanatory note offers details:


Recommended title content?
who, where, when, what (numerator and denominator)

BUT Title may not be practical:
“A map showing the distribution of the percent of people indicating one or more races including American Indian and Alaska Native who are under age 18 in 2000 by county in the United States prepared using Census 2000 Redistricting Data”
 

Census atlas solution:
Title:
Percent Under Age 18, 2000
One or More Races Including American Indian and Alaska Native

Legend title:
Percent of people indicating one or more races including American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) who are under age 18 by county

Example map
other notes on example map


Alternative titling; move more detail to notes:
Native American Children, 2000

Legend title:
Percent of Native American population who are under age 18 by county

Explanatory Note:
The Native American population mapped includes both American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) groups. This population includes people indicating their race as AIAN alone and  those indicating AIAN in combination with other races.

Alternative Example



Line logic
Line breaks and line spacing important for clarity

Confusing title breaks:
Energy Consumption Increase and Population
Change by State, 1990 to 2000

Better line breaks:
Energy Consumption Increase
and
Population Change
by State, 1990 to 2000


Confusing line breaks and spacing:


Another example of confusing spacing
Poor:

Good:

AIAN map