Project 3:
|
| Brief History of Sonar |
The first roots of sonar
can be dated back to 1822. Daniel Colloden used an underwater bell to
calculate the speed of sound underwater in Lake Geneva, Switzerland.
This early research led to the invention of dedicated sonar devices
by numerous other inventors. In 1906, Lewis Nixon invented the very
first sonar type listening device, as a way of detecting icebergs. The
interest in sonar grew during World War I, with a need to be able to
detect submarines. It was not until 1915, when Paul Langevin invented
the first sonar type device for detecting submarines called an "echo
location to detect submarines" using the piezoelectric properties
of the quartz. Although too late to help the war, Lanevin's efforts
heavily influenced future sonar devices. The current sonar devices were
passive listening devices, lacking the ability to transmit signals.
It was not until 1918 that both Britain and the United States had built
avtice systems, enabling the tranmission and the reception of signals
(About Inventors). |
| How Sonar Works |
Sonar, an acronym for SOund Navigation
And Ranging, a method of detecting and/or locating underwater objects,
based on the reflection of underwater sound waves (MSN Encarta). There
are two general classifications of sonar, passive and active. Passive
sonar involves listening for sounds generated by a target. Therefore
passive systems only receive sound waves from outside sources. They
do not send out sound waves themselves. This application is used for
stealth in military operations when silence is of utmost importance
to avoid detection by the enemy. Unlike passive systems, active sonar
systems not only receive sounds but they also transmit. Active sonar
systems emit pulses of sound waves that travel through the water, reflect
off the target and return back to the ship by way of “echo”. By knowing
the speed of sound in water and the time of the received echo, computers
can quickly calculate the distance and orientation of the target (Howstuffworks).
The following portions of this paper will focus on active sonar systems
and applications.
The major components used in echo sounding aboard ships are transducers, which both transmit and receive sound waves, and a computer processor. First, the transducer, acting as a transmitter, sends a cone of sound down to the ocean floor, which will then reflect back to the ship. The returning echo is received by the transducer, now acting as a receiver, amplified electronically, and then recorded on graphic recorders. The time taken for the sound to travel from transmission through reflection and to return to the transducer is then used to calculate water depths. The faster the sound waves return, the shallower the water depths and the higher the elevation of the seafloor. In accordance, the longer the sound waves take to return, the deeper the water depths and the lower the elevation of the seafloor. Commonly, in order to produce a continuous line showing ocean depths directly beneath the ship, Echo sounders repeatedly ping the seafloor as the ship moves across the surface (Dive and Discover). “Echo sounders use different frequencies of sound to find out different
things about the seafloor. Scientists typically use echo sounders that
transmit sound at 12 kiloHertz (kHz) to determine how far down the seafloor
lies. However, they use a lower frequency (3.5 kHz) sound, which penetrates
the seafloor, if they want to “see” accumulated layers of sediments
below it.” (Dive and Discover) |
|
|
| Multibeam Sonar System |
| Multibeam sonar is an advancement on its predecessor, single-beam echo sounding. Multibeam Bathymetry is based on the fact that more beams are better that one. Similar to the Single-Beam system, the multibeam system measures water depth. However, the multibeam system uses multiple 12kHz transducers, sometimes up to 120, sending out many beams of sound, simultaneously, to obtain a series of water depth readings along the path of a moving ship. The transducers are arranged in a precise geometric pattern on the ships' hulls. The swath of sound they send out covers a distance on either side of the ship that is equal to 200% of the water depth. Due to the uneven seafloor, which causes continuously different water depths, the sound bounces off the seafloor at different angles and is received by the ship at slightly different times. All the signals are then brought together and processed by computers aboard the ship and converted into water depths. The water depths are then automatically plotted as a bathymetric map, as pictured below, with an accuracy of ten meters (Dive and Discover).
|
| Sidebar Sonar System |
|
Side scan sonar is a specialized sonar system for searching and detecting objects that rest on the seafloor. Similar to other sonar, a side scan transmits sound energy and analyzes the returning echo which has bounced off the seafloor or other objects. The basic components used in side scan sonar are a towed transducer, which collects the data, and a communication cable, which provides a means to transmit the newly acquired data to the computer processor. “In a side scan the transmitted energy is formed into the shape of a fan that sweeps the seafloor from directly under the towfish to either side, normally to a distance of 100 meters.” (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Certain frequencies work better than others. High frequencies, 500kHz to 1MHz, provide excellent resolutions but the acoustic energy only travels a short distance. Whereas lower frequencies such as 50kHz to 100kHz yield lower resolution but the distance that the energy travels is greatly improved. (Klein Associates Inc) The strength of the return echo is continuously recorded, rather than the time of travel of the echo as in the multibeam system, creating a “picture” of the seafloor, as pictured below, built up one line of data at a time, instead of water depths acquired in multibeam. Hard objects reflect more energy causing lighter signal on the image. Soft objects, that do not reflect energy as well, show up as darker signals. The absence of sound, such as shadows behind objects, show up as very dark areas on a sonar image (Klein Associates Inc).
|
| Side scan sonar systems are one of the most accurate systems for
imaging large areas of the seafloor, capable of detecting an object
on the sea floor that measures 1m x 1m x 1m from shadow length measurements
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). There are several
common uses for side scan sonar systems due to its increased accuracy
over other methods. Surveying, locating pipeline routes and other
features, target search operations for pinpointing smaller objects
such as drowning victims in vehicles, shipwreck locations, downed
aircrafts, and collecting geological information about the composition
of the seafloor are just a few of the uses. |
| Mapping an Undersea Transcontintenal Fiber Optic Cable Route |
Which technology, multibeam or side scan,
would produce data most suitable for mapping an undersea trancontinental
fiber optic cable route?
Effectively mapping an undersea transcontinental fiber optic cable route would require knowledge of not only the depth of the seafloor but also the composition of the seafloor, yielding a more cost effective and accurate placement of the cable. The collaboration of multibeam and side scan sonar systems, in a series, would provide the desired factors. The following describes the optimal aforementioned process. In the very beginning research and planning steps, multibeam sonar would be implemented in a “target” area. The multibeam sonar would essentially eliminate certain areas of the target area that were either too deep or too shallow, uneven, or based on many other factors accurate up to ten meters. Then, if more detail was thought to be needed, the side scan method would be implemented in the same target area and would reveal the composition of the seafloor. This method could also eliminate certain portions of the target area, based on circumstances relating to the contents of the floor, such as a sunken ship, etc. which are accurate to one meter. Then one would simply overlay the results from the two methods and whichever areas are “usable” within both projects would yield the easiest area to lay fiber optic cable. With the best path selected to lay cable, the possibility of unexpected complications is greatly reduced, therefore increasing the probability of keeping costs low. |
| Sources |
| About Inventors (2006). The History of Sonar. Retrieved
December 7, 2006, from http://inventors.about.com/od/sstartinventions/a/sonar_history.htm |
| Dive and Discover (2005). NADCON - Mapping the Ocean Floor with Echo Sounding. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://www.divediscover.whoi.edu/tools/sonar-singlebeam.html |
| Dive and Discover (2005). Multibeam Bathymetry - The
Successor to the Single-Beam Echo Sounding. Retrieved December 5,
2006, from http://www.divediscover.whoi.edu/tools/sonar-multibeam.html |
| Howstuffworks (2006). How Submarines Work. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://science.howstuffworks.com/submarine4.htm |
Klein Associates Inc. (No Date). Side Scan Sonar a
Description. |
| MSN Encarta (2006). Sonar. Retrieved December 5,
2006, from http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761575038/Sonar.html |
| National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2006). Side Scan and Multibeam Sonar. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov/hsd/wrecks.htm |
| National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (No Date). Specifications and Deliverables. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov/hsd/specs/CHAPTER6.pdf |
| This document is published in fulfillment
of an assignment by a student enrolled in an educational offering of
The Pennsylvania State University. The student, named above, retains
all rights to the document and responsibility for its accuracy and originality.
|