Applying psychology to my life: A correlational study

| 2 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Recently, the idea of research has been getting more and more interesting to me. I never thought that would happen when I first started taking psychology classes; in fact, research seemed pretty intimidating. However, after conducting my own literature review and small research project, I now see that research doesn't have to be so scary. In the next few paragraphs I am going to discuss the steps in my research project, which are hypothesis, literature review, data collection, and correlational design.


The first step was determining a hypothesis, which stated that impulsive behavior is lower for recovering addicts that have 2 or more years abstinent by participating in Narcotics Anonymous (or NA, a drug addiction 12-step self help group), versus recovering addicts that are new to NA (those with one year or less). This topic is a social psychology issue because addiction, a negative health behavior (Taylor, 2009), is a large social problem in the United States. I am a recovering addict and this topic is also a very personal matter. Many interventions have been carried out to address substance use disorders, and the literature review I conducted helped me to determine the types of studies that have been done with impulsivity and NA.


This literature review was very useful before I conducted my project because I was able to get ideas on a research design and data collection methods. I looked at a lot of primary sources, which are full research reports, as well as secondary sources, such as college textbooks (Bordens and Abbott, 2008), those that paraphrase and summarize information from research articles. Through this review, I was able to find an impulsivity scale that is widely used in psychology. It has high content validity, which means that the scale's questions measure the behavior accurately. The questionnaire I used is called the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) (Patton et al., 2005). I also discovered some research data on topics similar to my hypothesis. For example, researchers had studied impulsivity scores on participants in Alcoholics Anonymous, a related self help group. Using this information, I began my data collection and design.


I chose to do the correlational design so that I could look at the relationship between impulsivity and length of time in NA. My data collection method involved administering the Barratt Scale to a small sample population of NA members. Ten members had one year or less abstinent and ten members had two or more years. After compiling the data and computing the statistical calculations, I found a correlation coefficient of   r = + .36, but a small p-value (p > .1).  A possible explanation for the p-value was that my sample population was too small (N = 20). Because of these findings, I had to conclude that my hypothesis was not correct. However, a future study that included a larger sample size may find a statistically significant p-value (p < .05).


This study was very useful to me because I was able to see from my literature review that much research has been done on 12-step recovery programs and they have been found to be at least as effective as many applied psychology interventions. The self-help groups such as AA and NA were formed by addicts, not necessarily psychologists, although they utilize cognitive behavioral therapy methods such as modeling and self-monitoring. Because of this research project and the higher level psychology courses I've taken recently, research is becoming less intimidating!




Bordens, K. S., Abbott, B. B. (2008). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, 7th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.


Patton, J. M., Stanford, M. S., and Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor Structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768-774.


Taylor, S. E. (2009). Health Psychology, 7th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.


No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:



This was a very nice small scale experiment to perform. In my psych 301W course someone completed a similar experiment with a hypothesis that actually sounded exactly like yours. I also have taken a great interest in research with my descriptive study on how technology effects the delusions of schizophrenic patients. I believed that research was a very intimidating task as my professor emphasized how harshly he would grade our papers because research is a very serious matter in the field of psychology. As i began to design my experiment and read through archival data I became excited because it seemed as if my data would show there was some significance between technology and the delusions of schizophrenics. I soon jumped into the research with much zeal and before I knew it I had written a paper that not only received an "A" grade but my professor also thought I might be able to get my work published. I would really like to pursue my research further in the future to expand it and possibly get better results. As per your experiment what sample size do you think would yield a statistically significant p-value? Do you plan on pursuing this research any further? Also, what kind of evaluations were done to conclude the effectiveness of the 12-step intervention program?

Looking forward to your reply,


Hi Louis, I AM from your 301W class! Hello :-)

Leave a comment

Subscribe to receive notifications of follow up comments via email.
We are processing your request. If you don't see any confirmation within 30 seconds, please reload your page.

Search This Blog

Full Text  Tag

Recent Entries

Attraction/ close-to-me effect
People usually cannot live without making relationships with others. As one is born, he becomes a member of our society.…
Social change and internet
Most of people would feel that temperature in winter gets lower and the weather get colder. In here, South…
VOYCE (Voices Of Youth in Chicago Education), a Participatory Action Research group was founded by high school students in an…