RE: The Official Constitution of The Graham-Cooper Cup of College Football Supremacy
Well folks, the results are in. A majority of the ballots were returned and the sentiments included were varied. Upon further review and reflection I have made the following decisions ...
1 - I should APOLOGIZE.
That was not really a ballot ... at least not in the traditional
sense. Blame it on the psychology
training. I came up with a hypothesis [
2 - I do not want to be branded a POOR SPORT. Not that I can't take it ... I have been called much worse. However, as a representative of The University of IOWA, the Hawkeye athletic teams and the fine student-athletes that comprise them I must carefully measure my decisions before they are executed. It is based upon the belief that my actions have a profound effect on the global Hawkeye community that I realize ...
3 - Football is a better game than DIRTY POOL. I think the group consensus is that it is unfair to "change the rules once the game has started". My argument is that it may be even more unfair to play a game with hazy, undefined rules. As such, I attempted to establish the aforementioned parameters for our contest.
Considering the input I have received and the statements above, I now propose that we put The Constitution [including the caveats below] to a second vote.
I.
The document will go into effect AFTER the current
season. The 2008 G-CC Winner will be
decided via the current standings.
II.
Beth Graham will be added to the G-CC voting body. Beth is a member of a G-CC founding nuclear
family and even though she graduated from
PLEASE cast your vote by commenting on this entry.
YES = I approve The Constitution, as amended above.
NO = I do NOT approve The Constitution, even after considering the thoughtful revisions and at the risk of being omitted from BLAKE's holiday card list.
Let's get this thing solidified, move on and begin to focus on The Bowl Season.
